Analysis of maxillary sinus septa by cone-beam computed tomography

Evaluation of Maxillary Sinus Septa Using Cone Beam Computed Tomography (CBCT): A Retrospective Study

BACKGROUND

Maxillary sinus septa, which are bony structures dividing the sinus cavity, can pose challenges during sinus lift or implant surgeries by potentially causing perforation of the Schneiderian membrane. This study aimed to estimate the prevalence, height, location, orientation, and risk of perforation of the maxillary sinus septa using cone beam computed tomography (CBCT).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This retrospective, cross-sectional study utilized CBCT (NewTom CBCT machine, of which the scan parameters were 90 KvP, 8 mAs, and 14 s exposure with a field of view (FOV) of 8×8 cm and a 0.2 mm3 voxel size) images of 300 maxillary sinuses from patients aged >18 years, obtained from Swami Devi Dyal Hospital and Dental College in Panchkula, India. Scans were analyzed for the presence, height, location, orientation, and risk of septal perforation. The data were categorized based on age, sex, and dentition status. Statistical analyses were performed to assess the prevalence, configuration, and risk factors.

RESULTS

The prevalence of maxillary sinus septa was 21.33%, with the majority showing a single septum (90.63%). Septa were predominantly found in the middle region (48.44%), with bucco-palatal orientation (93.75%) being more common than anteroposterior. The mean septa height was 6.16 mm. The perforation was classified as moderate (48.4%), low (46.8%), or high (4.6%). Class III septa were associated with the highest risk of perforation.

CONCLUSION

This study highlights a significant prevalence of maxillary sinus septa with variations in height, orientation, and location. The risk of perforation varies with the septa configuration and orientation. CBCT is essential for identifying these anatomical features to minimize surgical complications and to guide preoperative planning.

Research trends on maxillary sinus septa in 2019-2021: a scoping review with scientometric analysis

PURPOSE

This study aimed to conduct a bibliometric analysis of trends in the description items within the literature published from 2019 to 2021 with "maxillary sinus septum" in the title or subtitle.

METHODS

Electronic data from PubMed (MEDLINE), Google Scholar, and ScienceDirect were searched from 2019 to 2021. We used the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) to select 21 of 243 articles and examined their studies. Statistical calculations from data recorded by the authors were performed using the Chi-square, Mann-Whitney, and independent tests. Significance was set at P < 0.05.

RESULTS

The number of articles decreased annually. The highest number of publications was from Asia (64.3%), accounting for 71.4% of publications. The features of the septum were described for eight items, with one septum (70.14%) mentioned significantly more frequently, followed by on one side (65.89%) or the right side (62.22%). Location was mentioned significantly more frequently in the middle (55.22%) and for those aged 45 years and older (50.38%). No significant differences were observed in prevalence, age, height, or width between sexes; the patients' ages ranged from 18 to 90 years. Septa were significantly more prevalent in dentulous (45.38%) and partially edentulous (48.58%) patients, with significantly more patients exhibiting buccopalatal orientation (82.39%).

CONCLUSIONS

This study focused primarily on anatomical features using CBCT examination, and analyses of male-female differences and the origin of the sinus septum are necessary for the future.

Retrospective analysis of maxillary sinus septa - A cone beam computed tomography study

Background

Sinus lift procedures have become a routine and reliable way to gain bone volume in the posterior maxilla for implant placement. The presence of an antral septum in the maxillary sinus increases the risk of complications and subsequent implant failure. This study was designed to estimate the prevalence of maxillary sinus septa and its correlation with age, sex, dentition status and the risk of perforating the Schneiderian membrane using cone beam computed tomography (CBCT).

Methods

This retrospective, cross-sectional study consisted of a total of 178 CBCT images (100 male, 78 female), 63.0% were dentate, 36.0% partially dentate and 1.1% edentate subjects with a mean age of 35 ± 45 years was analyzed to determine the prevalence, height, location, and orientation of maxillary sinus septa. The septa were classified according to the modified Al-Faraje's classification into VII septal patterns, and the risk of perforation of the Schneiderian membrane was estimated. The chi-square test was used to compare categorical variables, and Student's t-test and the Kruskal-Wallis test were used to compare continuous variables.

Results

Septa were present in 25.6% of the sinus segments (37.64% of the subjects). The mean septum height was 5.22 mm ± 2.06 in males and 6.27 mm ± 3.55 in females. The majority of septa were located in the middle 76.92%, while 4.40% were anterior, and 18.68% were posterior; 76.92% were in a buccopalatal direction, whereas 23.08% were in an anteroposterior direction. Class III was the most prevalent type. Overall, 60.4% had a moderate risk of membrane perforation, 30.8% had a low risk, and only 8.8% had a high risk.

Conclusion

Three-dimensional CBCT image analyses can be used as a diagnostic tool to provide accurate information that can help avoid unnecessary intra- and postoperative complications during sinus augmentation procedures by identifying the anatomic structures inherent to the maxillary sinus.

Prevalence of maxillary sinus septa: systematic review and meta-analysis

The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to determine the prevalence and characteristics of maxillary sinus septa using cone beam computed tomography and computed tomography data. Publications were searched until October 5, 2020 in three electronic databases. Additionally, article bibliographies were searched, and authors were contacted if required. This review has been registered in PROSPERO (CRD42019124933). Two independent evaluators assessed methodological quality using the Joanna Briggs Institute levels of evidence; inter-rater reliability tests were performed (Cohen's κ). The prevalence of maxillary sinus septa was expressed as a proportion; differences according to sex were reported in terms of the odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence interval (95% CI). Heterogeneity and sources of heterogeneity were evaluated by meta-regression. Publication bias was assessed by visual analysis of the funnel plot. Statistical significance was set at P < 0.05. The 62 studies identified and included in the review involved 13,701 patients (22,460 sinuses). The meta-analysis of 35 studies (14,664 sinuses) revealed an overall mean sinus septa prevalence per sinus of 33.2% (95% CI 27.8-38.5%; I² = 98.32%). The meta-analysis of 42 studies (9631 patients) found an overall mean sinus septa prevalence per patient of 41.0% (95% CI 36.0-46.0%, I² = 96.45%). The OR for the difference in septa prevalence between sexes was 0.785 (95% CI 0.590-1.046; P = 0.098, I² = 73.24%). Septa were most frequent in the middle area of the sinus and with a transverse orientation (86.0%). Within the limitations, the results suggest a high proportion of septa in the sinus, commonly in the middle area, which can interfere with the success of sinus floor elevation required for implant rehabilitation.