Does smoking habit affect dendritic cell expression in oral squamous cell carcinoma?

[Oral cavity cancer: A distinct entity]

Oral Squamous cell carcinoma represent the 17th most frequent cancer in the world. The main risk factors are alcohol and tobacco consumption but dietary, familial, genetic, or oral diseases may be involved in oral carcinogenesis. Diagnosis is made on biopsy, but detection remains late, leading to a poor prognosis. New technologies could reduce these delays, notably Artificial Intelligence and the quantitative evaluation of salivary biological markers. Currently, management of oral cancer consists in surgery, which can be mutilating despite possible reconstructions. In the future, immunotherapies could become a therapeutic alternative and the immune microenvironment could constitute a source of prognostic markers.

Defining biomarkers in oral cancer according to smoking and drinking status

Introduction

Oral Squamous Cell Carcinomas (OSCC) are mostly related to tobacco consumption eventually associated to alcohol (Smoker/Drinker patients: SD), but 25-30% of the patients have no identified risk factors (Non-Smoker/Non-Drinker patients: NSND). We hypothesized that these patients have distinguishable immune profiles that could be useful for prognosis.

Materials and Methods

Cells present in immune tumor microenvironment (TME) and blood from 87 OSCC HPV-negative patients were analyzed using a multiparameter flow cytometry assay, in a prospective case-control study. Cytokine levels in tumor supernatants and blood were determined by a cytometric bead array (CBA) assay.

Results

Normal gingiva and blood from healthy donors (HD) were used as controls. A significant increase of granulocytes (p<0.05 for blood), of monocytes-macrophages (p<0.01 for blood) and of CD4⁺ T cells expressing CD45RO and CCR6 (p<0.001 for blood; p<0.0001 for TME) as well as higher levels of IL-6 (p<0.01 for sera, p<0.05 for tumor supernatant) were observed in SD patients as compared to NSND OSCC patients and HD. High percentages of CD4⁺ T cells expressing CD45RO and CCR6 cells in tumor tissue (p=0.05) and blood (p=0.05) of SD OSCC patients were also associated with a poorer prognosis while a high percentage of regulatory T cells (Treg) in tumor tissue was associated with a more favorable prognostic factor (p=0.05). Also, a higher percentage of blood CD8⁺ T lymphocytes among CD45⁺ cells in NSND patients was associated with a better disease-free survival (p=0.004).

Conclusion

Granulocytes, monocytes-macrophages, and CD4⁺ T cells expressing CD45RO and CCR6 in blood and TME as well as serum IL-6 can therefore distinguish OSCC SD and NSND patients. Quantifying the proportion of CD4⁺ T cells expressing CD45RO and CCR6 and of Treg in SD patients and CD8⁺ T cells in NSND patients could help defining the prognostic of OSCC patients.