Knowledge produced from the outcomes of the "Nursing Outcomes Classification - NOC": integrative review

Urinary incontinence in women: assessment with the aid of standardized nursing terminologies NANDA-I and NOC

OBJECTIVES

to assess urinary impairment in incontinent women with the aid of standardized nursing terminologies NANDA-I and NOC.

METHODS

a cross-sectional study, carried out with 97 women attending the gynecology outpatient clinic of a university hospital. Data collection took place using a form that contained information about NANDA-I diagnoses related to urinary incontinence and NOC Urinary Continence indicators. Statistical analysis was performed to assess the impairment of NOC indicators in the presence of NANDA-I nursing diagnoses.

RESULTS

diagnosis Mixed Urinary Incontinence was the most prevalent (43.3%), and, in its presence, the most compromised indicators were voids in appropriate receptacle, gets to toilet between urge and passage of urine and empties bladder completely.

CONCLUSIONS

urinary impairment was worse in women with elements of stress and urge urinary incontinence.

Removing the roadblocks to promoting health equity: finding the social determinants of health addressed in standardized nursing classifications

Providing 80% of healthcare worldwide, nurses focus on physiologic and psychosocial aspects of health, which incorporate social determinants of health (SDOH). Recognizing their important role in SDOH, nurse informatics scholars included standardized measurable terms that identify and treat issues with SDOH in their classification systems, which have been readily available for over 5 decades. In this Perspective, we assert these currently underutilized nursing classifications would add value to health outcomes and healthcare, and to the goal of decreasing disparities. To illustrate this, we mapped 3 rigorously developed and linked classifications: NANDA International (NANDA-I), Nursing Interventions Classification (NIC), and Nursing Outcomes Classification (NOC) called NNN (NANDA-I, NIC, NOC), to 5 Healthy People 2030 SDOH domains/objectives, revealing the comprehensiveness, usefulness, and value of these classifications. We found that all domains/objectives were addressed and NNN terms often mapped to multiple domains/objectives. Since SDOH, corresponding interventions and measurable outcomes are easily found in standardized nursing classifications (SNCs), more incorporation of SNCs into electronic health records should be occurring, and projects addressing SDOHs should integrate SNCs like NNN into their ongoing work.

Creating the nursing care map in the evaluation of kidney transplant candidates: A scoping review and narrative synthesis

AIMS

To analyse the aspects involved in the care of individuals assessed as kidney transplant candidates and to identify the role of nurses in providing specialised care for this population.

DESIGN

Scoping review. The results were summarised using a narrative synthesis technique.

DATA SOURCES

A review of the literature published between 2001 and 2021 was conducted between October and November 2021 using PubMed, CINAHL and SciELO.

REVIEW METHODS

The research team agreed on a search strategy based on clinical practice guidelines for assessing kidney transplantation candidates. Quantitative, qualitative and mixed methods studies published in peer-reviewed journals in English, Spanish, French and Portuguese were included.

RESULTS

A total of 377 studies were identified, and 49 articles were included after the inclusion and exclusion criteria were applied. The narrative synthesis was structured into four themes: Physical needs; Psychological and quality of life needs; Education and adherence needs; and Nurses' role.

CONCLUSION

Nursing assessment of kidney transplantation candidates should encompass physical, psychosocial and adherence aspects. A variety of methodologies and resources are available for this assessment. Nurses contribute to coordinating access to kidney transplantation, aiming to improve adherence to an appropriate lifestyle to prevent patients from being excluded from kidney transplantation or suffering from kidney transplantation-related complications.

IMPACT

Based on our findings, we managed to design a nursing care map for kidney transplantation candidates combining the main elements of nursing care that should be incorporated into this process. Advanced practice nursing professionals play a crucial role in accessing renal transplant care.

Assessment of Neurological Status in Patients with Cerebrovascular Diseases through the Nursing Outcome Classification: A Methodological Study

Nurses play an important role in healthcare, and the Nursing Outcomes Classification is a key tool for the standardization of care. This study aims to validate the nursing outcome “Neurological Status” for patients with cerebrovascular diseases. A methodological study was performed in four phases. In Phase 1, the relevance of the indicators was evaluated by seven specialists and the modified kappa coefficient and content validity index were calculated. In Phase 2, conceptual and operational definitions were formulated. In addition, their content was validated with a focus group in Phase 3. In Phase 4, the results were applied in clinical practice and convergence with the National Institute of Health Stroke Scale was verified. The reliability was measured by Cronbach’s alpha. Of the 22 initial indicators, 6 were excluded. The focus group suggested changes in the definitions and the exclusion of two indicators. In Phase 4, only 13 indicators were validated due to the impossibility of measuring intracranial pressure. A strong correlation between the two scales and agreement among all the indicators were observed. Following the specialists’ review, the nursing outcome was reliable and clinically validated with 13 indicators: consciousness, orientation, language, central motor control, cranial sensory and motor function, spinal sensory and motor function, body temperature, blood pressure, heart rate, eye movement pattern, pupil size, pupil reactivity, and breathing pattern.

Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of instrument to measure nursing care dependency

ABSTRACT Objective: To cross-culturally adapt and validate the INICIARE instrument for use in Brazil. Method: methodological study divided into two phases: cross-cultural adaptation and validation. The first phase took place in six stages: translation, synthesis, back-translation, expert review, pre-test and submission to the author. The second, carried out with 130 patients, took place at a private hospital in Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil, between May and July 2019. The study was approved by the Research Ethics Committee. Data were analyzed for stability, equivalence and internal consistency. Results: In the cross-cultural adaptation, the expert committee adjusted the translated version, validating the content. At validation, most patients were women (64.6%) with a mean age of 59 ± 15.3. The reliability index was 0.744. Conclusion: The version of the instrument adapted for Brazil proved to be adequate and reflects the reality of daily nursing practice.

Content validation of the symptom control outcome for heart failure patients in palliative care

OBJECTIVES

To estimate the content validity of the Symptom Control nursing outcome for heart failure patients in palliative care and to analyze the influence of experts' experience in the judgment of the relevance of indicators.

METHODS

A methodological study conducted in São Paulo in 2018, with an adaptation of Fehring's validation model. The relevance of the 11 outcome indicators was assessed by 19 experts by means of an electronically submitted survey. The influence of the experts' experience on judgment was analyzed by the Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney test and by Kendall's Tau correlation.

RESULTS

The indicators were considered pertinent; with 54.5% classified as critical. There was no association between the weighted means of the indicators and the experts' experience.

CONCLUSIONS

The indicators analyzed are relevant for the evaluation of the Symptom Control outcome in this group of patients. The experts' judgment was not influenced by their area of clinical experience or by their experience with the Nursing Outcomes Classification (NOC).

Nursing outcome "airway permeability" in postoperative patients

OBJECTIVES

to evaluate the evolution of clinical indicators that characterize airway permeability in patients in the postoperative period of thoracoabdominal surgeries and to analyze their relationship with the occurrence of the diagnosis "ineffective airway clearance".

METHODS

descriptive, quantitative, longitudinal research with 60 patients who were followed for five consecutive days. Eleven indicators of the nursing outcome "respiratory status: airway permeability" were used.

RESULTS

on the first day of evaluation, the most compromised indicators were: respiratory rate, cough, depth of breath and use of accessory muscles. During follow-up, most of the indicators presented a slight deviation from normal variation and, in the last evaluation, there was a predominance of indicators with some degree of impairment.

CONCLUSIONS

with the aid of the Nursing Outcomes Classification, it was observed that patients submitted to thoracoabdominal surgeries may present compromised airway permeability even days after surgery.

Correspondence of nurses' and physiotherapists' records for orthopedic patients with the Nursing Outcomes Classification

ABSTRACT Objective: To evaluate the correspondence of the terms found in nurses' and physiotherapists' records for orthopedic patients with the Nursing Outcomes Classification (NOC). Method: A descriptive study carried out in a university hospital in southern Brazil. The sample consisted of 392 records of 49 patients submitted to Total Hip Arthroplasty (THA). Data collection was retrospective in the electronic health record. Data was analyzed and compared with the NOC outcomes using the cross-mapping method. Result: The most prevalent outcomes were the following: Pain Level, Falls Occurrence and Mobility. There was sharing of outcomes between the two categories, except for Falls Occurrence and Respiratory Status. Conclusion: Standardizing nurses' and Physiotherapists' records according to the NOC can improve the quality of the clinical documentation of the outcomes of patients undergoing THA.

Clinical Validation of the Nursing Outcome "Pain: Disruptive Effects" in People With Chronic Pain in Spain

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

The measurement of the effects of chronic pain on the patients is a challenge for nurses. The purpose was to translate into Spanish and to assess the psychometrics of the indicators of the nursing outcome "Pain: disruptive effects."

METHODS

A three-stage study: (a) translation and cultural adaptation, (b) content validation, (c) clinical validation in 10 healthcare centers.

RESULTS

The Spanish version of the outcome "Pain: disruptive effects" has high content validity (CVI = .90) with 17 indicators organized into three factors. The Inter-observer agreement was good (kappa = .66) and the internal consistency high (alpha = .90).

CONCLUSIONS

The 17 indicators of the outcome "Pain: disruptive effects" has evidence of reliability and validity for assessing the harmful effects of chronic pain.

Psychometric Evaluation of the Nursing Outcome Knowledge: Pain Management in People with Chronic Pain

Pain has a major impact on health and quality of life. Since the level of knowledge of painful conditions can influence how these are addressed and managed, assessing this knowledge in patients becomes crucial. As a result, it is necessary to have culturally adapted and validated instruments that specifically measure patients' knowledge of chronic pain management. The objective of this study was to carry out the Spanish cultural adaptation and the validation of the outcome Knowledge: Pain Management of the Nursing Outcomes Classification (NOC) in patients with chronic pain, defined as extent of understanding conveyed about causes, symptoms, and treatment of pain. A three-stage study was designed: 1) translation and cultural adaptation through an expert panel, 2) content validation, 3) clinical validation. This study provides nurses with a Spanish version of this scale adapted to their context, as well as a set of structured indicators to measure patients' knowledge about chronic pain. The results indicated that the culturally adapted Spanish version of the outcome Knowledge: Pain Management had a high level of content validity (CVI = 0.92), with 27 indicators being distributed between two factors. This version has been shown to be reliable in terms of inter-observer agreement (κ = 0.79) and internal consistency (α = 0.95). In conclusion, Knowledge: Pain Management has been shown to be reliable and valid to measure knowledge of chronic pain.

Ansiedade relacionada à morte em cuidados paliativos: validação do diagnóstico de enfermagem

Resumo Objetivo: Identificar a prevalência do diagnóstico de enfermagem ansiedade relacionada à morte da NANDA-I em cuidadores familiares de doentes paliativos; e validar as características definidoras associadas. Métodos: Estudo transversal, exploratório e descritivo utilizando o Modelo de Validação Clínica de Fehring, em uma amostra de 111 cuidadores familiares de doentes paliativos. Foi calculada a sensibilidade, especificidade e valor preditivo das características definidoras. As questões formuladas para operacionalizar as características definidoras foram validadas por um painel de peritos. Resultados: A prevalência do diagnóstico foi de 38,7% na amostra estudada. Foram alvo de validação clínica 17 características definidoras, oito delas emergiram de uma prévia revisão da literatura. Nove características foram classificadas como principais e oito secundárias. Conclusão: O diagnóstico foi validado em cuidadores familiares de doentes paliativos. A validação clínica de novas características definidoras confirmou a necessidade da sua revisão de modo a estar adequado à clínica. A prevalência do diagnóstico na amostra estudada, indica que este é um fenômeno relevante a que os profissionais devem estar particularmente atentos, de modo a implementar intervenções específicas para minimizar a ansiedade relacionada à morte dos cuidadores familiares de doentes paliativos.

Psychometric Assessment of the Nursing Outcome Swallowing Status: Rasch Model Approach

PURPOSE

To apply the Rasch model to test the psychometric assessment of the nursing outcome Swallowing status among poststroke patients.

METHODS

Cross-sectional study was conducted with 227 poststroke patients, which were evaluated by a nurse. The Rasch model was used to examine psychometric properties.

FINDINGS

Indicators fit the Rasch model and presented good reliability and good ability for separation index. The 5-point Likert scale did not present adequate discrimination and classification levels were compiled into three.

CONCLUSIONS

Data evidenced the use of a robust method to perform a clinical validity of the Swallowing status, complementing previous validation studies.

RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE

Using Rasch analysis serve as reference points to assess Swallowing status on a single scale.

OBJETIVO

Aplicar o modelo Rasch para testar as medidas psicométricas do resultado de enfermagem Estado da deglutição em pacientes acometidos por acidente vascular cerebral. MÉTODOS: Estudo transversal, realizado com 227 pacientes após AVC avaliados por um único enfermeiro. O modelo Rasch foi usado para examinar propriedades psicométricas.

RESULTADOS

Os indicadores se ajustaram ao modelo Rasch e apresentam boa confiabilidade e boa capacidade de separação. A escala Likert de 5 pontos não apresentou discriminação adequada e os níveis de classificação foram compilados em três pontos. CONCLUSÃO: Os dados evidenciaram o uso de um método robusto para a validade clínica do Estado da deglutição, complementando os estudos de validação anteriores. RELEVÂNCIA PARA A PRÁTICA CLÍNICA: O uso do modelo Rasch serve como ponto de referência para avaliar o Estado da deglutição em uma única escala.

Clinical Indicators for Evaluation of Outcomes of Impaired Tissue Integrity in Orthopedic Patients: Consensus Study

PURPOSE

To select outcomes from the Nursing Outcomes Classification (NOC) to evaluate impaired tissue integrity in patients undergoing orthopedic surgeries, and develop conceptual and operational definitions for their indicators.

METHODS

A consensus study involving 10 nurses from clinical practice. A 100% consensus was established in the outcomes selection.

FINDINGS

Wound Healing: Primary intention (1102) with two indicators: (110214) Scar formation, and (110201) Skin approximation were selected. Four indicators were grouped to evaluate inflammatory signs together with foul wound odor and six for drainage.

CONCLUSIONS

These indicators direct the outcomes evaluation for wound healing.

IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING PRACTICE

Support to the definition the priority interventions in nursing process documentation.