Surgical safety checklist: benefits, facilitators, and barriers in the nurses' perspective

Utilization and Completeness of Surgical Safety Checklist with Associated Factors in Surgical Units of Jimma University Medical Center, Ethiopia

Introduction

Surgical safety checklist is used for every patient undergoing a surgical procedure and is now employed by a majority of surgical providers around the world, but the utilization and completion of surgical safety checklists were low in lower- and middle-income countries.

Objective

The objective of this study was to evaluate the utilization and completeness of the surgical safety checklist in surgical units of Jimma University Medical Center, Ethiopia.

Methods

Hospital-based prospective cross-sectional study was conducted from October 1 to 30, 2020. A total of 384 surgical cases were included in the study. Checklists were kept as part of each patient's medical record, and consecutive post-operative patient charts were included in the study. The data were collected using the modified version of the WHO checklist constituted of 27 items. The collected data were cleaned, coded, and entered into EpiData version 3.1 and exported to SPSS version 20 for analysis. Binary and multiple logistic regression analyses were computed, and the level of statistical significance was determined at p < 0.05.

Results

The use of a surgical safety checklist was 93.5%. The checklist was completed 17.3% of the time, with sign-in, time-out, and sign-out being completed 83%, 25%, and 35% of the time, respectively. Utilization of the surgical safety checklist was 87.4%, which is lower in elective surgeries (AOR = 0.126 95% CI (0.039-0.414)) compared with the emergency procedure. Once more, the completeness of the safety checklist was 63.3%, which is lower in elective surgery (AOR = 0.367 95% CI (0.208-0.65)) than in emergency procedures.

Conclusion

The use of a surgical safety checklist was promising, while the completeness of the checklist was poor that demands further improvement. Time-out was the least completed section of the checklist. Completion of the checklist was high in the first case on the positions of the theatre list.

The surgical safety checklist: a quantitative study on attitudes and barriers among gynecological surgery teams

Background

Implementation of the surgical safety checklist (SSC) plays a significant role in improving surgical patient safety, but levels of compliance to a SSC implementation by surgical team members vary significantly. We aimed to investigate the factors affecting satisfaction levels of gynecologists, anesthesiologists, and operating room registered nurses (OR-RNs) with SSC implementation.

Methods

We conducted a survey based on 267 questionnaires completed by 85 gynecologists from 14 gynecological surgery teams, 86 anesthesiologists, and 96 OR-RNs at a hospital in China from March 3 to March 16, 2020. The self-reported questionnaire was used to collect respondent’s demographic information, levels of satisfaction with overall implementation of the SSC and its implementation in each of the three phases of a surgery, namely sign-in, time-out, and sign-out, and reasons for not giving a satisfaction score of 10 to its implementation in all phases.

Results

The subjective ratings regarding the overall implementation of the SSC between the surgical team members were different significantly. “Too many operations to check” was the primary factor causing gynecologists and anesthesiologists not to assign a score of 10 to sign-in implementation. The OR-RNs gave the lowest score to time-out implementation and 82 (85.42%) did not assign a score of 10 to it. “Surgeon is eager to start for surgery” was recognized as a major factor ranking first by OR-RNs and ranking second by anesthesiologists, and 57 (69.51%) OR-RNs chose “Too many operations to check” as the reason for not giving a score of 10 to time-out implementation. “No one initiates” and “Surgeon is not present for ‘sign out’” were commonly cited as the reasons for not assigning a score of 10 to sign-out implementation.

Conclusion

Factors affecting satisfaction with SSC implementation were various. These factors might be essentially related to heavy workloads and lack of ability about SSC implementation. It is advisable to reduce surgical team members’ excessive workloads and enhance their understanding of importance of SSC implementation, thereby improving surgical team members’ satisfaction with SSC implementation and facilitating compliance of SSC completion.