1
|
Hefnawy MT, Amer BE, Amer SA, Moghib K, Khlidj Y, Elfakharany B, Mouffokes A, Alazzeh ZJ, Soni NP, Wael M, Elsayed ME. Prevalence and Clinical Characteristics of Sleeping Paralysis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Cureus 2024; 16:e53212. [PMID: 38425633 PMCID: PMC10902800 DOI: 10.7759/cureus.53212] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/08/2024] [Accepted: 01/30/2024] [Indexed: 03/02/2024] Open
Abstract
Sleep paralysis (SP) is a mixed state of consciousness and sleep, combining features of rapid eye movement (REM) sleep with those of wakefulness. The exact cause of SP is unknown, and its prevalence varies among the studies. We aim to identify SP's global prevalence, the affected population's characteristics, and the SP's clinical picture. We searched three databases (PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science (WoS)) using a unique search strategy to identify eligible studies. All observational studies identifying the prevalence or frequency of sleeping paralysis were included. No exclusions are made based on country, race, or questionnaire. The analysis was performed using the latest version of R software (R Core Team, Vienna, Austria). The analysis included 76 studies from 25 countries with 167,133 participants. The global prevalence of SP was 30% (95% CI (22%, 39%)). There were similar frequencies of isolated SP and SP (33%, 95% CI (26%, 42%), I2 = 97%, P <0.01; 31%, 95% CI (21%, 43%), I2 = 100%, P = 0, respectively). A subgroup analysis showed that the majority of those who experienced SP were psychiatric patients (35%, 95% CI (20%, 55%), I2 = 96%, P <0.01). The prevalence among non-psychiatric patients was among students (34%, 95% CI (23%, 47%), I2 = 100%, P = 0). Auditory and visual hallucinations were reported in 24.25% of patients. Around 4% had only visual hallucinations. Meta-regression showed no association between the frequency of SP and sex. Publication bias was detected among the included studies through visual inspection of funnel plot asymmetry. Our findings revealed that 30% of the population suffered from SP, especially psychiatric patients and students. The majority of SP cases lacked associated hallucinations, while a noteworthy proportion experienced combined visual and auditory hallucinations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mahmoud T Hefnawy
- Faculty of Medicine, Zagazig University, Zagazig, EGY
- Medical Research Group of Egypt Branch, Negida Academy, Arlington, USA
| | - Basma E Amer
- Faculty of Medicine, Banha University, Banha, EGY
- Medical Research Group of Egypt Branch, Negida Academy, Arlington, USA
| | - Samar A Amer
- Family Medicine, Royal College of General Practice, London, GBR
- Faculty of Public Health and Community Medicine, Zagazig University, Zagazig, EGY
| | | | - Yehya Khlidj
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Algiers Benyoucef Benkhedda, Algiers, DZA
| | - Bahaa Elfakharany
- Faculty of Allied Medical Sciences, Pharos University, Alexandria, EGY
- Medical Research Group of Egypt Branch, Negida Academy, Arlington, USA
| | - Adel Mouffokes
- Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oran 1 Ahmed Ben Bella, Oran, DZA
| | - Zainab J Alazzeh
- Faculty of Medicine, Jordanian University of Science and Technology, Ar-Ramtha, JOR
| | - Nishant P Soni
- Medicine, Gujarat Medical Education and Research Society Medical College and Hospital, Ahmedabad, IND
| | - Muhannad Wael
- Urology, Saint Joseph Hospital, Jerusalem, PSE
- Faculty of Medicine, An-Najah National University, Nablus, PSE
| | - Mohamed E Elsayed
- Department of Psychiatry, School of Medicine and Health Sciences, Carl von Ossietzky University of Oldenburg, Oldenburg, DEU
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Akhtar MS, Feng T. Detection of Sleep Paralysis by using IoT Based Device and Its Relationship Between Sleep Paralysis And Sleep Quality. EAI ENDORSED TRANSACTIONS ON INTERNET OF THINGS 2022. [DOI: 10.4108/eetiot.v8i30.2688] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/05/2022]
Abstract
When a person wakes up in the middle of the night, they are paralyzed. Despite the fact that most episodes are associated with extreme terror and some might cause clinically significant suffering, little is understood about the experience. This study will analyze existing research on the relationship between sleep paralyses and sleep in general. Many studies have connected poor sleep quality to an increased risk of sleep paralysis. Awake yet unable to act, sleep paralysis occurs. This might happen between awake and sleeping. The problem is approached in three steps: Data collection, data storage, calculation and machine learning prediction of sleep paralysis. The data came from the Smart Device. The dataset has several (independent) and dependent variables (Outcome). This device has been put to the test. Each exam has its own set of features and predicted outcomes. To assess the system's validity, we executed a posture recognition accuracy test. The device was hidden on top of the bed. The controller is in charge of measurement and data collection. Experiments were conducted by collecting pressure data from a patient lying down. The person acted out his sleeping positions on a mat for a while. Machine learning has been used to predict sleep paralysis. By comparing sleep postures to the outcome, we were able to show the link between sleep qualities and sleep paralysis. Machine learning approaches have been used to predict sleep paralysis. Comparing sleeping positions with the results showed the link between sleep quality and sleep paralysis. Sleep paralysis correlates with poor sleep quality. The Random Forest model has the highest accuracy of 91.9 percent in predicting sleep paralysis in the given dataset. SVM with Linear Kernel was 80.49 percent accurate, RBF was 42.68 percent, and Polynomial was 47.56 percent. The accuracy of logistic regression was 76.83 percent. KNN had a dismal performance of 60.98%. Decision Trees and Gradient Boosting both fared well at 85.37 percent.
Collapse
|