Effects of a structured education program on glycemic control in type 1 diabetes

Process Evaluations of Diabetes Self-Management Programs: A Systematic Review of the Literature

OBJECTIVE

To conduct a systematic review of process evaluations (PEs) of diabetes self-management programs (DSMPs).

DATA SOURCE

An electronic search using Medline (Ovid), Embase (Ovid), CINAHL (Ensco), Academic Search (Ebsco), and APA PsycInfo (Ebsco).

STUDY INCLUSION AND EXCLUSION CRITERIA

Peer-reviewed, empirical quantitative, qualitative, or mixed-method studies were included if they (1) were a traditional, group-based DSMP, (2) involved adults at least 18 years with T1DM or T2DM, (3) were a stand-alone or embedded PE, and (4) published in English.

DATA EXTRACTION

The following process evaluation outcomes were extracted: fidelity, dose delivered, dose received, reach, recruitment, retention, and context. Additional items were extracted, (eg, process evaluation type, data collection methods; theories; frameworks or conceptual models used to guide the process evaluation, and etc).

DATA SYNTHESIS

Due to heterogeneity across studies, studies were synthesized qualitatively (narratively).

RESULTS

Sixty-eight studies (k) in 78 articles (n) (k = 68; n = 78) were included. Most were mixed methods of low quality. Studies were typically integrated into outcome evaluations vs being stand-alone, lacked theoretical approaches to guide them, and incorporated limited outcomes such as dose received, reach, and retention.

CONCLUSION

Future research should 1) implement stand-alone theoretically grounded PE studies and 2) provide a shared understanding of standardized guidelines to conduct PEs. This will allow public health practitioners and researchers to assess and compare the quality of different programs to be implemented.

Cuidados de enfermería para la persona adulta, diabética con hipoglucemia: revisión integrativa

Introducción: La hipoglucemia es la complicación más frecuente del tratamiento con insulina en adultos. Los eventos de hipoglucemia severa se asocian con complicaciones a corto, mediano y largo plazo en  pacientes con diabetes ellmitus. Una de las estrategias para reducir  la frecuencia de hipoglucemia son las intervenciones de enfermería y  aunque hay pocos estudios que las enuncian de manera explícita, se ha publicado respecto a las necesidades de dichos pacientes, que permiten determinar características definitorias de  diagnósticos enfermeros y a partir de ellos establecer metas e intervenciones enfermeras, para el cuidado de dichos pacientes.  Objetivo: identificar los cuidados de enfermería para prevenir y controlar los eventos de hipoglucemia en pacientes adultos diagnosticados con diabetes mellitus. Metodología: revisión integrativa, se realizó en seis fases: planteamiento de la pregunta PICO; búsqueda en bases de datos y metabuscadores; lectura crítica; análisis, clasificación, validación por nivel de evidencia y grado de recomendación, y presentación de la información. Resultados: la revisión reportó cinco categorías: factores de riesgo y protectores, miedo a la hipoglucemia, atención brindada al paciente, disminución de la hipoglucemia y descripción del impacto de la hipoglucemia en los pacientes. Conclusiones: a partir de las necesidades reportadas en las 5 categorías de los resultados se determinaron características definitorias y factores relacionados que permitieron formular diagnósticos de enfermería y determinar como principales intervenciones: enseñanza del proceso de enfermedad, medicamentos prescritos, entrenamiento de asertividad, manejo de la hipoglicemia, nutricional y de la medicación, mejorar el afrontamiento, enseñanza individual, facilitar el aprendizaje y potenciación de la disposición de aprendizaje.

[Insulin therapy is a personalized approach to glycemic management in diabetes]

Type 2 diabetes is characterized by chronic hyperglycemia and varying degrees of insulin resistance and insulinopenia. Achieving targeted glycemic control in diabetic patients is important to reduce the risk of late complications, and many patients with type 2 diabetes ultimately require insulin therapy to maintain adequate glycemic control. Timely administration of insulin can prevent the progression of diabetes, reduce the development of complications, and have fewer side effects. Basal insulin is the preferred option in most cases when glycemic control is not achieved. However, there is considerable therapeutic inertia in clinical practice, both with respect to initiation of insulin therapy and titration of the basal insulin dose. The longer duration of action, reduced glucose variability and a lower risk of hypoglycemia seen with the latest generation of basal insulin analogs compared to the previous generation simplify titration and may increase patient compliance.

Comparison of the effect of a compact vs a conventional, long-term education program on metabolic control in children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes: A pilot, randomized clinical trial

BACKGROUND

Effective education is considered essential for people with type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM) to adhere to a complex and long-term medical regimen and to delay or prevent the onset of diabetes-related complications.

OBJECTIVE

We compared the effect of a compact, cost-effective, education program (CEPT1) vs a long-term program on the metabolic control of children and adolescents with T1DM.

METHODS

Young people aged 8 to 21 years with T1DM were randomized to a short-term (experimental) or an extensive education program (control). The experimental group participated in three sessions of 90 minutes, with one session per week, containing five short videos. The control group attended an extended program delivered through 45-minute PowerPoint lectures, with one class every 3 months. The primary outcome was change in glycated hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) levels from baseline to endpoint (baseline, 3, 6, 9, and 12 months).

RESULTS

In total, 62 patients were randomized to the experimental (CEPT1) (n = 32) or control (n = 30) groups. Both groups showed comparable improvement in HbA1c levels at the end of 12 months (P = .183). In a per-protocol analysis, the mean HbA1c level reduction was -2.3% (-2.6, -2.0) in the experimental group and - 1.8% (-2.0, -1.5) in the control group (P = .008).

CONCLUSION

CEPT1 was comparable with an extensive education program in reducing HbA1c levels. In a per-protocol analysis, the CEPT1 was more effective than the control program in reducing HbA1c levels. CEPT1 is a simple and cost-effective tool that can equally be used in settings with limited resources and specialized centers.