Comparative study of actinic keratosis treatment with 3% diclofenac sodium and 5% 5-fluorouracil

International time trends and differences in topical actinic keratosis therapy utilization

Background

Actinic Keratoses (AK) are precancerous lesions that can lead to Squamous Cell Carcinoma. International differences in the utilization of topical medications to treat AK are not well described.

Objectives

To describe international differences in topical AK medication utilization, including associations of countries' economic status with AK medication utilization.

Methods

We used IQVIA MIDAS pharmaceutical sales data for 65 countries (42 high-income, 24 middle-income) from April 2011 to December 2021. We calculated each country's quarterly utilization of medications in grams per 1000 population. We used univariable linear regression to assess the association between country economic status and AK medication utilization.

Results

High-income countries used 15.37 more grams per 1000 population of 5-fluorouracil (95% CI: 9.68, 21.05), 4.64 more grams per 1000 population of imiquimod (95% CI: 3.45, 5.83), and 0.32 more grams per 1000 population of ingenol mebutate (95% CI: 0.05, 0.60).

Limitations

Missing medication utilization data for some countries.

Conclusion

High-income countries use more topical AK therapies than middle-income countries.

Pharmacological Agents Used in the Prevention and Treatment of Actinic Keratosis: A Review

Actinic keratosis (AK) is among the most commonly diagnosed skin diseases with potentially life-threatening repercussions if left untreated. Usage of pharmacologic agents represents one of many therapeutic strategies that can be used to help manage these lesions. Ongoing research into these compounds continues to change our clinical understanding as to which agents most benefit particular patient populations. Indeed, factors such as past personal medical history, lesion location and tolerability of therapy only represent a few considerations that clinicians must account for when prescribing appropriate treatment. This review focuses on specific drugs used in either the prevention or treatment of AKs. Nicotinamide, acitretin and topical 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) continue to be used with fidelity in the chemoprevention of actinic keratosis, although some uncertainty persists in regard to which agents should be used in immunocompetent vs. immunodeficient/immunosuppressed patients. Topical 5-FU, including combination formulations with either calcipotriol or salicylic acid, as well as imiquimod, diclofenac and photodynamic light therapy are all accepted treatment strategies employed to target and eliminate AKs. Five percent of 5-FU is regarded as the most effective therapy in the condition, although the literature has conflictingly shown that lower concentrations of the drug might also be as effective. Topical diclofenac (3%) appears to be less efficacious than 5% 5-FU, 3.75-5% imiquimod and photodynamic light therapy despite its favorable side effect profile. Finally, traditional photodynamic light therapy, while painful, appears to be of higher efficacy in comparison to its more tolerable counterpart, daylight phototherapy.

An insight into photodynamic therapy towards treating major dermatological conditions

Photodynamic therapy (PDT), as the name suggests is a light-based, non-invasive therapeutic treatment method that has garnered immense interest in the recent past for its efficacy in treating several pathological conditions. PDT has prominent use in the treatment of several dermatological conditions, which consequently have cosmetic benefits associated with it as PDT improves the overall appearance of the affected area. PDT is commonly used for repairing sun-damaged skin, providing skin rejuvenation, curbing pre-cancerous cells, treating conditions like acne, keratosis, skin-microbial infections, and cutaneous warts, etc. PDT mediates its action by generating oxygen species that are involved in bringing about immunomodulation, suppression of microbial load, wound-healing, lightening of scarring, etc. Although there are several challenges associated with PDT, the prominent ones being pain, erythema, insufficient delivery of the photosensitizing agent, and poor clinical outcomes, still PDT stands to be a promising approach with continuous efforts towards maximizing clinical efficacy while being cautious of the side effects and working towards lessening them. This article discusses the major skin-related conditions which can be treated or managed by employing PDT as a better or comparable alternative to conventional treatment approaches such that it also brings about aesthetic improvements thereof.

Short-Term Follow-Up of a Randomized Controlled Trial of 0.5% and 5% 5-Fluorouracil After Microneedling for Treatment of Facial Actinic Keratoses

INTRODUCTION

Topical 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) is used to treat actinic keratosis, although side effects limit treatment. Microneedling might be a tool for reducing treatment duration.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate microneedling to promote 5-FU delivery at different concentrations (0.5% and 5%) for actinic keratoses (AKs) treatment.

METHODS

Forty-four patients with facial AKs subjected to 1.0 mm microneedling on 1 side of the face were randomized into 5% 5-FU or 0.5% 5-FU groups. Evaluations of efficacy and safety were conducted on days 21 and 111.

RESULTS

Forty-four patients aged 47 to 85 years were enrolled. Complete clearance of AKs was similar within groups for the side of the face treated with microneedling and 5-FU and the side treated with 5-FU alone in both the 5% and 0.5% 5-FU groups. Microneedling and 5% 5-FU was superior to microneedling and 0.5% 5-FU to reduce AKs (p = .025). Microneedling and 5% 5-FU resulted in fewer adverse effects than 5% 5-FU alone (p = .011).

CONCLUSION

Topical 5% and 0.5% 5-FU delivery for 3 days after microneedling was effective for treating facial AKs and equivalent to 5% and 0.5% 5-FU alone for 15 days after 3 months of follow-up. Microneedling may potentiate 5-FU treatment, reducing treatment time without losing efficacy.

Guidelines of care for the management of actinic keratosis

BACKGROUND

Actinic keratoses (AK) are rough scaly patches that arise on chronically ultraviolet-exposed skin and can progress to keratinocyte carcinoma.

OBJECTIVE

This analysis examined the literature related to the management of AK to provide evidence-based recommendations for treatment. Grading, histologic classification, natural history, risk of progression, and dermatologic surveillance of AKs are also discussed.

METHODS

A multidisciplinary Work Group conducted a systematic review to address 5 clinical questions on the management of AKs and applied the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation approach for assessing the certainty of the evidence and formulating and grading clinical recommendations. Graded recommendations were voted on to achieve consensus.

RESULTS

Analysis of the evidence resulted in 18 recommendations.

LIMITATIONS

This analysis is based on the best available evidence at the time it was conducted. The pragmatic decision to limit the literature review to English language randomized trials may have excluded data published in other languages or limited identification of relevant long-term follow-up data.

CONCLUSIONS

Strong recommendations are made for using ultraviolet protection, topical imiquimod, topical 5-fluorouracil, and cryosurgery. Conditional recommendations are made for the use of photodynamic therapy and diclofenac for the treatment of AK, both individually and as part of combination therapy regimens.

Safety of topical interventions for the treatment of actinic keratosis

Introduction: Actinic keratosis (AK) are proliferations of atypical keratinocytes that may eventually progress to cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma. Therefore, AK requires consequent and early treatment. Areas covered: A variety of effective approaches is currently available for the clearance of AK. These interventions may be applied either in a lesion-directed or field-directed mode as AK can occur as single or multiple lesions. Field-directed approaches typically comprise topical drug-mediated interventions which aim at eliminating all visible lesions and also at clearing subclinical changes of the actinically damaged field. However, most treatment options are associated with local adverse events such as erythema, scaling, pain, and rarely with systemic symptoms. This expert review provides a comprehensive and up-to-date overview of the safety considerations of the commonly prescribed topical treatment agents cyclooxygenase inhibitors, 5-fluorouracil, imiquimod, ingenol mebutate, and photodynamic therapy. All these therapies have been proven efficient, yet they differ considerably regarding their safety profile. Expert opinion: In the future, safety concerns will relate to long-term and irreversible adverse drug events instead of application site reactions. In particular, the rate of treatment-associated non-melanoma skin cancers will increasingly come into focus and warrant investigation in postmarketing surveillance trials with a long-term follow-up.

Patient-reported outcomes of topical therapies in actinic keratosis: A systematic review

Patients' perspectives on actinic keratosis treatments may have an impact on treatment adherence and, therefore, therapeutic outcomes. We performed a systematic review to assess patients' perspectives of topical, field‐directed treatments for actinic keratoses. A literature search was conducted, and 14 studies were identified encompassing 4433 patients. Only four studies were focused on face and/or scalp, which are the locations that typically impact patients' quality of life. Four studies were clinical trials. One study utilized a validated patient‐reported outcomes (PRO) instrument specifically developed for actinic keratosis. In general, treatment adherence and patient satisfaction were better with shorter‐duration treatment regimens such as ingenol mebutate gel. Imiquimod improved quality of life in one study but not in another. No data was available on topical piroxicam. The findings underscore the need for effective and well‐tolerated, short‐duration topical treatment for actinic keratosis.

A review of actinic keratosis, skin field cancerisation and the efficacy of topical therapies

While a wide range of treatments exist for actinic keratosis and skin field cancerisation, the long‐term benefits of the most common topical therapies are poorly defined. This report reviews the efficacy of the most commonly used topical therapies to treat regional or field lesions. Limited clinical and histopathological data are available on clearance rates at 12 months post‐treatment for the most commonly used agents, with varied outcome measures making any comparison difficult. In general, total field clearance rates at 12 months are suboptimal for the most commonly employed agents. Given the increasing incidence of actinic keratosis and skin field cancerisation due to an ageing population, further research into the efficacy of therapies is critical to guide treatment choice.

Reflectance confocal microscopy in actinic keratosis-Comparison of efficacy between cryotherapy protocols

BACKGROUND

Actinic keratosis (AK) incidence is increasing. Due to the risk of progression to squamous cell carcinoma, early detection and treatment are essential. The method stated in the European Consensus is cryotherapy, but there is no standard protocol defined for better results.

OBJECTIVES

To compare two different cryotherapy protocols for AK using reflectance confocal microscopy (RCM) as a noninvasive imaging method for evaluation.

METHODS

A self-controlled clinical trial was proposed to compare the efficacy of cryotherapy in two different application protocols. Grade II AKs in the forearms were submitted to freezing and thawing time of 10 seconds for 1 cycle (group A) or 2 cycles (group B). At baseline and 4 weeks after treatment, the same dermatologists assessed RCM evaluation (thickness of horny layer, parakeratosis, dyskeratosis, atypia in spinous layer, fibrosis, and presence of inflammatory cells in epidermis and dermis).

RESULTS

We examined 24 AK lesions in each group. Statistical evaluation of the results evidenced superior response after 2 cycles of cryotherapy in parakeratosis and number of inflammatory cells in epidermis.

CONCLUSION

Both protocols are effective in clearing clinical AK. Two cycles are not generating more side effects (fibrosis) and could reduce the risk of recurrence (better "clearance" of parakeratosis).

A feasibility study of microwave therapy for precancerous actinic keratosis

BACKGROUND

Actinic keratosis (AK) is a common premalignant skin lesion that can progress to cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (cSCC). Microwave therapy is an established cancer treatment and has been used for plantar viral warts.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the efficacy and feasibility of microwave as a treatment for AK.

METHODS

Stage I was a dose-setting study, in which seven participants had the dielectric properties of 12 thick and 22 thin AKs assessed for optimization of the microwave dose used for treatment in Stage II. Stage II was a randomized, internally controlled trial evaluating 179 AKs in 11 patients (93 treated, 86 untreated controls) on the scalp/forehead or dorsal hand. Participants received one treatment initially and a repeat treatment to unresolved AKs at week 4. The response was assessed at six visits over 4 months. The primary outcome was partial or complete resolution of the treated AKs.

RESULTS

A significantly higher proportion of treated AK areas responded than untreated (90% vs. 15%; P < 0·001). Thin AKs were more responsive than thick AKs. The site did not affect efficacy. Pain was severe, but brief (80% reported pain lasting 'a few seconds only'). Adverse effects were minimal (erythema, n = 6; flaking, n = 3; itch, n = 3). All participants who would chose microwave therapy over their current treatment cited the shorter discomfort period.

CONCLUSIONS

Microwave therapy is a portable, safe and effective treatment for AK. An easy-to-deliver, acceptable therapy for AK is attractive as a prevention strategy. While these results are promising, a larger randomized controlled trial is needed against an effective comparator to confirm clinical efficacy and patient acceptability. What is already known about this topic? Actinic keratoses (AKs) are common precancerous skin lesions. Successful treatment of AK can prevent cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (cSCC). Most topical therapies for AK require repeated application over weeks and drive local skin inflammation, leading to poor compliance. An easy-to-deliver and effective treatment for AK, suitable for use in primary care, could reduce cSCC. What does this study add? Microwave therapy is a feasible, effective treatment for AK. Ninety per cent of treated AKs showed full or partial resolution at 120 days post-treatment. Microwave therapy was painful, but the pain was short-lived (seconds) and this short discomfort period was cited as the main reason that microwave was preferred to their current treatment.

Actinic keratoses: review of clinical, dermoscopic, and therapeutic aspects

Actinic keratoses are dysplastic proliferations of keratinocytes with potential for malignant transformation. Clinically, actinic keratoses present as macules, papules, or hyperkeratotic plaques with an erythematous background that occur on photoexposed areas. At initial stages, they may be better identified by palpation rather than by visual inspection. They may also be pigmented and show variable degrees of infiltration; when multiple they then constitute the so-called field cancerization. Their prevalence ranges from 11% to 60% in Caucasian individuals above 40 years. Ultraviolet radiation is the main factor involved in pathogenesis, but individual factors also play a role in the predisposing to lesions appearance. Diagnosis of lesions is based on clinical and dermoscopic examination, but in some situations histopathological analysis may be necessary. The risk of transformation into squamous cell carcinoma is the major concern regarding actinic keratoses. Therapeutic modalities for actinic keratoses include topical medications, and ablative and surgical methods; the best treatment option should always be individualized according to the patient.

Prise en charge thérapeutique des kératoses actiniques

Dermatologists have many therapeutic options for the management of actinic keratoses (AK), in order to treat individual lesions or wider areas. Field cancerization is an area of sun-damaged skin, where visible and subclinical lesions co-exist, and is prone to the development of further AK lesions and sun-related skin cancers (SC). Treatments available are instrumental or medical. Resistance to treatment or atypical symptoms must lead to a biopsy for histological exam. Cryotherapy is the most frequently used method to destroy small or isolated AK, whereas photodynamic therapy (PDT), 5-fluoro-uracil (5-FU), imiquimod, ingenol mebutate and diclofenac are required for large, multiple lesions, and for the treatment of field cancerization. Side-effects of these therapies are essentially local, including pain, irritation, erythema, edema and scars. There is no randomized comparative study reviewing all these treatments, therefore physicians must also consider clinical characteristics, patient's compliance, side-effects and cost when treating AK. Medicoeconomic data of these treatments have been analyzed in several countries, and annual costs are estimated between 250 € and 2 000 €, with an uncertain cost-effective relation. Finally, beyond treatment of AK lesions, patients with AK are at high risk of developing SC, and must therefore have regular full-body examination, in order to be detected and treated precociously. © 2019 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved. Cet article fait partie du numéro supplément Kératoses actiniques : comprendre et traiter réalisé avec le soutien institutionnel de Galderma International.

Treatment of actinic keratosis through inhibition of cyclooxygenase-2: Potential mechanism of action of diclofenac sodium 3% in hyaluronic acid 2.5

Cyclooxygenase‐2 (COX‐2) and its metabolic product prostaglandin E₂ (PGE₂) are induced in response to growth factors, inflammatory cytokines, tumor promoters, activated oncogenes, and, in the skin, ultraviolet (UV) radiation. Accumulating evidence suggests a role for the COX‐2/PGE₂ pathway in tumorigenesis in various tissue types including cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma. There is also strong evidence for a role in the development of actinic keratoses (AKs) — common dysplastic lesions of the skin associated with UV radiation overexposure — considered as part of a continuum with skin cancer. Non‐steroidal anti‐inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) exert their anti‐inflammatory, analgesic, and antipyretic effects by reversibly or irreversibly acetylating COX isoforms, inhibiting downstream prostaglandins, and may have a chemopreventive role in malignancies, including skin cancer. Topical treatment of AK lesions with the NSAID diclofenac sodium 3% in combination with hyaluronic acid 2.5% has been shown to be effective and well tolerated, although the mechanism of action remains to be elucidated.

Reducing unpleasant side effects of topical 5-Fluorouracil treatment for actinic keratosis: a randomized controlled trial

Introduction: 5-Fluorouracil (5-FU) for prophylactic treatment of diffuse actinic keratosis results in an exuberant inflammatory reaction, contributing to patient noncompliance and dissatisfaction.Design: This 5-week split-faced, double-blind, randomized controlled trial involved 30 subjects with diffuse facial AK who received twice daily 5-FU treatment for 2 weeks. This was followed by pre-randomized twice daily use of one of three topical interventions on one half of the face. TEWL, pH, and hydration were assessed on each quadrant of the face at all visits. Additionally, photographs were subjectively graded by three blinded trained observers.Results: Thirty subjects were enrolled, and had an average 27.1 (SD 11.8, range: 13-62) palpable AKs at baseline. Average resolution of baseline AK count was 98.1% by week 4. Clobetasol propionate is best at decreasing TEWL (p = .034), while petrolatum jelly most significantly improves hydration (p = .019) and erythema (p = .014). Though controlled release skin barrier emulsion trended towards improvement in TEWL (p = .17) and hydration (p = .19), there was no significant decrease in erythema (p = .257). Patient free-text response identified erythema as the most bothersome symptom.Conclusions: Given the low cost, wide availability, and ability to significantly reduce erythema, petrolatum should be used for post-5-FU treatment for diffuse AK.

Relative efficacy of 5-fluorouracil compared with other treatments among patients with actinic keratosis: A network meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to compare the efficacy of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) with that of other treatments of actinic keratosis (AK).

METHODS

A systematic literature review of five databases (including Medline and EMBASE) was first performed to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs). A network meta-analysis (NMA) based on a random-effects Bayesian model was then performed on the outcomes for patients with total clearance and lesions reduced from baseline. Five treatments (viz., 0.5% 5-FU with 10% salicylic acid [5-FU/SA], 5% 5-FU cream, 3% diclofenac sodium, cryosurgery, and vehicle) were evaluated.

RESULTS

A total of 11 studies involving 2,256 patients with AK were included in this NMA. The overall risk of bias among the included studies was low. All treatments were significantly better than the vehicle both for patients with total clearance and for lesions reduced from baseline. Among patients with total clearance, 5% 5-FU cream (56.8%) and 5-FU/SA (35.7%) were likely to be more effective than the other treatments, whereas 5% 5-FU cream (98.6%) was likely the most effective in the group of lesions reduced from baseline.

CONCLUSION

5-FU, diclofenac sodium, and cryosurgery are all useful for AK treatment, with 5-FU being the most effective.

Actinic keratosis - review for clinical practice

Actinic keratosis (AK) is a lesion that arises as a result of excessive exposure to solar radiation and appearing predominantly on Fitzpatrick phototype I and II skin. Given that some AKs evolve into squamous cell carcinoma, these lesions are considered premalignant in nature, occurring mostly in elderly men and immunosuppressed individuals chronically exposed to ultraviolet (UV) radiation. There are several mechanisms for the formation of AKs; among them are oxidative stress, immunosuppression, inflammation, altered proliferation and dysregulation of cell growth, impaired apoptosis, mutagenesis, and human papillomavirus (HPV). Through the understanding of these mechanisms, several treatments have emerged. Among the options for AK treatment, the most commonly used include 5-fluorouracil (5-FU), cryotherapy, diclofenac, photodynamic therapy (PDT), imiquimod (IQ), retinoids, and ingenol mebutate (IM). There have been recent advances in the treatment options that have seen the emergent use of newer agents such as resiquimod, betulinic acid, piroxicam, and dobesilate. The combination between therapies has presented relevant results with intention to reduce duration of therapy and side effects. All AK cases must be treated because of their propensity to transform into malignancy and further complicate treatment. In addition to medical or surgical care, education about sun exposure prevention remains the best and most cost-effective method for AK prevention. The objective of this article is to conduct a literature review of the clinical presentation of AK including advances in treatment options available.

Patient satisfaction and reported outcomes on the management of actinic keratosis

Actinic keratosis (AK) is a common dermatologic condition in which hyperplastic epidermal lesions develop in response to excessive and chronic exposure to ultraviolet (UV) radiation. If left untreated, AK can progress to squamous cell carcinomas of the skin. Incidence is rising worldwide as a result of the progressive aging of populations and an increase in lifetime cumulative exposure to UV radiation. Currently, various treatment options exist, which range from topical medications to light-based therapies and procedural modalities. In this article, we will review the treatment options for AK with a focus on assessments of patient satisfaction with treatment.