1
|
Nugent D, Apoola A, Coleman H, Gilmour C, Lawton MD, Nori A, D C Ross J, Whitlock G, Yeend-Curd-Trimble H. British association for sexual health and HIV national guideline for the management of anogenital warts in adults (2024). Int J STD AIDS 2024; 35:498-509. [PMID: 38456387 DOI: 10.1177/09564624241233338] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/09/2024]
Abstract
This guideline offers recommendations on the diagnosis, treatment and health promotion principles needed for the effective management of human papillomavirus (HPV)-related warts at anogenital sites including the external genitals, vagina, cervix, urethra, perianus and anal canal. The guideline is aimed primarily at patients aged 16 years or older presenting to healthcare professionals working in level 3 sexual health services in the United Kingdom. However, the principles of the recommendations may be applied in other care settings, including in primary care, using locally adapted care pathways where appropriate. The management of HPV-related anogenital dysplasia or warts at other extragenital sites is outside the scope of this guideline.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Diarmuid Nugent
- Chelsea & Westminster Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Ade Apoola
- Derbyshire Community Health Services NHS Foundation Trust, Derby, UK
| | - Harry Coleman
- Central & North West London NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Cindy Gilmour
- Chelsea & Westminster Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | | | - Achyuta Nori
- Guy's & St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Jonathan D C Ross
- University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK
| | - Gary Whitlock
- Chelsea & Westminster Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | | |
Collapse
|
2
|
Gilson R, Nugent D, Werner RN, Ballesteros J, Ross J. 2019 IUSTI-Europe guideline for the management of anogenital warts. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol 2021; 34:1644-1653. [PMID: 32735077 DOI: 10.1111/jdv.16522] [Citation(s) in RCA: 46] [Impact Index Per Article: 15.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/28/2019] [Accepted: 04/01/2020] [Indexed: 12/31/2022]
Abstract
This guideline is an update of the 2011 European Guideline for the Management of Anogenital Warts. It is intended to support best practice in the care of patients with anogenital warts by including evidence-based recommendations on diagnosis, treatment, follow-up and advice to patients. It is intended for use by healthcare professionals in sexual healthcare or dermato-venereology clinics in Europe but may be adapted for use in other settings where the management of anogenital warts is undertaken. As a European guideline, recommendations should be adapted according to national circumstances and healthcare systems. Despite the availability of vaccine to prevent HPV types 6 and 11, the cause of >95% anogenital warts, they remain an important and frequent health problem. The previous systematic review of randomized controlled trials for anogenital warts was updated. The changes in the present guideline include the following: Updated background information on the prevalence, natural history and transmission of human papillomavirus (HPV) infection and anogenital warts. Key recommendations for diagnosis and treatment have been graded according to the strength of the recommendation and the quality of supporting evidence. 5-fluorouracil, local interferon and photodynamic therapy have been evaluated and included as potential second-line treatment options. Evidence of the impact of HPV vaccination on the incidence of anogenital warts has been updated.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- R Gilson
- Centre for Clinical Research in Infection and Sexual Health, Institute for Global Health, University College London, London, UK.,The Mortimer Market Centre, Central and North West London NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - D Nugent
- Centre for Clinical Research in Infection and Sexual Health, Institute for Global Health, University College London, London, UK.,The Mortimer Market Centre, Central and North West London NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - R N Werner
- Department of Dermatology, Venereology and Allergy, Division of Evidence-Based Medicine (dEBM), Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany
| | | | - J Ross
- University Hospital Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
[Consensus on HPV of the Portuguese Society of Andrology, Sexual Medicine and Reproduction: Treatment]. Rev Int Androl 2020; 19:150-159. [PMID: 32684426 DOI: 10.1016/j.androl.2020.01.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/11/2019] [Accepted: 01/19/2020] [Indexed: 11/22/2022]
Abstract
The treatment of condyloma is generally a challenge in clinical practice. Although the spontaneous resolution rate is high, a significant proportion of patients seek treatment, not because of symptomatology, but mainly for aesthetic issues and concerns related to the transmission or worsening of existing lesions. The available treatments should be applied only for clinically evident macroscopic lesions. Ideally, available therapies should have rapid action onset and clearance, resolve symptoms, reduce recurrence rate and viral load, be effective in treating small lesions, and be well tolerated. However, none of the currently available treatments is clearly more effective than the others and there is no ideal treatment for all patients or for all condyloma. Therefore, the therapeutic decision should be based on the clinician's experience, available resources, lesion morphology, size, number and location, primary or recurrent lesions, disease severity, patient preference and expectations, patient's immune competence, convenience, tolerance, cost of treatment and results of previous therapies. The available treatments are divided into three groups: applied by the patient himself (imiquimod 3.75 or 5%, podophyllotoxin .5%, synecatekines 10% or 15%), applied by the health care provider (bi- and tricloacetic acids 80%-90%, intralesional interferon alpha, cryotherapy, surgical removal, electrofulguration, laser ablation) and experimental or alternative therapies (topical cidofovir, intralesional bleomycin, photodynamic therapy). Treatment methodologies can be further divided into their action - ablative or destructive treatment (cryotherapy, electrofulguration, laser ablation, surgical excision), cytotoxic or proapoptotic treatments (podophyllotoxin .5%, 5-fluoruracil, bleomycin) and immunomodulatory treatments (imiquimod 3.75% or 5%, synecatekines 10% or 15%, intralesional interferon alpha). The overall success rate of the various treatments available ranges from 23% to 94%. Only treatments that include cryotherapy or surgical excision are suitable in condyloma with any anatomical location and that have the highest success rate in monotherapy. Recurrences are common regardless of the treatment received. In contrast, immunomodulatory therapies despite having lower initial clearance rates appear to have higher probabilities of cure in the medium term, with low recurrence rates. Some treatments may be combined with each other and the effectiveness of combined therapies appears to be superior to monotherapy (proactive sequential treatment). The consensuses for the treatment of HPV also consider special situations: immunocompromised patients, meatus and intraurethral lesions and treatment of the partner.
Collapse
|
4
|
Bertolotti A, Ferdynus C, Milpied B, Dupin N, Huiart L, Derancourt C. Local Management of Anogenital Warts in Non-Immunocompromised Adults: A Network Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials. Dermatol Ther (Heidelb) 2020; 10:249-262. [PMID: 32030564 PMCID: PMC7090115 DOI: 10.1007/s13555-020-00357-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/16/2019] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION No hierarchy of first-line treatments for anogenital warts (AGWs) is provided in international guidelines. This study aimed to determine the efficacy of topical treatments and ablative procedures for the management of AGWs. METHODS Twelve electronic databases were systematically searched from inception to August 2018. All randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing immunocompetent adults with AGWs who received at least 1 provider-administered or patient-administered treatment in at least 1 parallel group were included. Risk of bias assessment followed the Cochrane Handbook. The study endpoint was complete lesion response after clearance and recurrence assessment. A network meta-analysis was performed. RESULTS A network geometry was constructed based on 49 of the 70 RCTs included in our systematic review. All but 4 RCTs had a high risk of bias. The most efficacious treatments compared to placebo were surgery (RR 10.54; CI 95% 4.53-24.52), ablative therapy + imiquimod (RR 7.52; CI 95% 4.53-24.52), and electrosurgery (RR 7.10; CI 95% 3.47-14.53). SUCRA values confirmed the superiority of surgery (90.9%), ablative therapy + imiquimod (79.8%), and electrosurgery (77.1%). The most efficacious patient-administered treatments were podophyllotoxin 0.5% solution (63.5%) and podophyllotoxin 0.5% cream (62.2%). CONCLUSIONS With low-level evidence of most included RCTs, surgery and electrosurgery were superior to other treatments after clearance and recurrence assessment. Podophyllotoxin 0.5% was the most efficacious patient-administered treatment. Combined therapies should be evaluated in future RCTs in view of their identified effectiveness. The results of future RCTs should systematically include clinical type, number and location of AGWs, and sex of the patient, to refine therapeutic indications. PROTOCOL REGISTRATION PROSPERO-CRD42015025827.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Antoine Bertolotti
- Department of Infectious Disease, Saint-Pierre Hospital, Reunion Island, France.
- EA 4537, Antilles-Guyane University, Martinique, France.
- INSERM CICEC 1410, Reunion Island, France.
| | | | - Brigitte Milpied
- Department of Dermatology and Pediatric Dermatology, National Center for Rare Skin Disorders, Saint-André and Pellegrin Hospitals, Bordeaux, France
| | - Nicolas Dupin
- Department of Dermatology, Cochin Hospital, Paris Descartes University, Paris, France
| | - Laetitia Huiart
- Department of Population Health, Luxembourg Institute of Health, Luxembourg, Luxembourg
| | - Christian Derancourt
- EA 4537, Antilles-Guyane University, Martinique, France
- Department of Dermatology, Hôpital de Briançon, Briançon, France
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Bertolotti A, Milpied B, Fouéré S, Dupin N, Cabié A, Derancourt C. Local Management of Anogenital Warts in Non-immunocompromised Adults: A Systematic Review and Meta-analyses of Randomized Controlled Trials. Dermatol Ther (Heidelb) 2019; 9:761-774. [PMID: 31606873 PMCID: PMC6828858 DOI: 10.1007/s13555-019-00328-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/29/2019] [Indexed: 12/22/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Several therapeutic options are available to manage anogenital warts (AGWs). However, no hierarchy of treatments is provided in the latest European and American recommendations. This study aimed to determine the efficacy and safety of local treatments for the management of AGWs. METHODS A search was conducted through 12 databases from inception to August 2018. All randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in which at least one parallel treatment group composed of immunocompetent adults with AGWs received at least one provider-administered or patient-administered treatment were included. Risk of bias assessment and meta-analyses of aggregated study data were performed on the basis of the Cochrane Handbook, and quality of evidence evaluation followed the Grading of Recommendation Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach. Primary endpoints were complete clearance and recurrence at 3 months. RESULTS Seventy RCTs (9931 patients) were included. All but four RCTs had a high risk of bias. CO2 laser was slightly more efficacious than cryotherapy [risk ratio (RR) 2.05; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.61-2.62], with fewer recurrences at 3 months (RR 0.28; 95% CI 0.09-0.89). Electrosurgery was slightly more efficacious than cryotherapy. No differences in efficacy or side effects were found between cryotherapy and imiquimod or trichloroacetic acid. Podophyllotoxin gel was slightly more efficacious than podophyllotoxin cream. 5-Fluorouracil (5-FU) was slightly more efficacious and caused less erosion than CO2 laser (RR 1.37; 95% CI 1.11-1.70). CONCLUSION The vast majority of included RCTs had a low level of evidence, thereby preventing the establishment of a hierarchy of treatments. Nevertheless, our results provide an overview of the main AGW treatments available for general practitioners and specialists. While provider-administered treatments are superior, patient-administered treatments (e.g., imiquimod, podophyllotoxin) are useful solutions for compliant patients. PROTOCOL REGISTRATION PROSPERO-CRD42015025827.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Antoine Bertolotti
- EA 4537, Antilles University, Martinique, France.
- Infectious Diseases, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de la Réunion, Saint-Pierre, La Réunion, France.
| | - Brigitte Milpied
- Department of Dermatology and Pediatric Dermatology, National Centre for Rare Skin Disorders, Saint-André and Pellegrin Hospitals, Bordeaux, France
| | - Sébastien Fouéré
- Department of Dermatology, Saint-Louis Hospital, Paris Diderot University, Paris, France
| | - Nicolas Dupin
- Department of Infectious Diseases, CHU Martinique, Fort-de-France, Martinique, France
| | - André Cabié
- EA 4537, Antilles University, Martinique, France
- Department of Dermatology, Cochin Hospital, Paris Descartes University, Paris, France
| | - Christian Derancourt
- EA 4537, Antilles University, Martinique, France
- Department of Dermatology, Briançon Hospital, Briançon, France
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Delmonte S, Benardon S, Cariti C, Ribero S, Ramoni S, Cusini M. Anogenital warts treatment options: a practical approach. GIORN ITAL DERMAT V 2018; 155:261-268. [PMID: 30251804 DOI: 10.23736/s0392-0488.18.06125-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/08/2022]
Abstract
Anogenital warts (AGWs) are an important issue for public health centers dealing with Sexually Transmitted Infections. They are epidemiologically relevant, with significant morbidity and an established effective treatment is lacking. In this article, we examine the epidemiological, diagnostic, and therapeutic aspect of the problem in order to give an up to date picture of the situation and a practical clue for the management of AGWs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sergio Delmonte
- Clinic of Dermatology, Department of Medical Science, University of Turin, Turin, Italy -
| | - Susanna Benardon
- Department of Internal Medicine and Medical Specialties, State University of Milan, Milan, Italy.,Unit of Dermatology, Maggiore Polyclinic Hospital, Ca' Granda IRCCS and Foundation, Milan, Italy
| | - Caterina Cariti
- Clinic of Dermatology, Department of Medical Science, University of Turin, Turin, Italy
| | - Simone Ribero
- Clinic of Dermatology, Department of Medical Science, University of Turin, Turin, Italy
| | - Stefano Ramoni
- Unit of Dermatology, Maggiore Polyclinic Hospital, Ca' Granda IRCCS and Foundation, Milan, Italy
| | - Marco Cusini
- Unit of Dermatology, Maggiore Polyclinic Hospital, Ca' Granda IRCCS and Foundation, Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Bertolotti A, Dupin N, Bouscarat F, Milpied B, Derancourt C. Cryotherapy to treat anogenital warts in nonimmunocompromised adults: Systematic review and meta-analysis. J Am Acad Dermatol 2017; 77:518-526. [PMID: 28651824 DOI: 10.1016/j.jaad.2017.04.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 31] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/27/2016] [Revised: 03/27/2017] [Accepted: 04/10/2017] [Indexed: 01/21/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Cryotherapy is one of the most commonly used therapeutic modalities to treat anogenital warts (AGWs), but this treatment was not clearly established in the recent international recommendations. OBJECTIVE To compare the efficacy and safety of cryotherapy versus other AGW treatments. METHODS Through a systematic search of 12 electronic databases, we identified 11 randomized controlled trials, screened from database inception through October 2016, that met the inclusion criteria (including immunocompetent adults with AGWs receiving cryotherapy in 1 of the comparison groups). Primary endpoint was complete clearance of AGW. Risk-for-bias assessment was based on Cochrane Handbook recommendations. Meta-analyses used Review Manager v5.3 software. RESULTS Cryotherapy efficacy did not appear to differ from that of trichloroacetic acid, podophyllin, or imiquimod. Electrosurgery was weakly associated with better AGW clearance than cryotherapy (risk ratio [RR] 0.80, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.65-0.99). Cryotherapy was associated with more immediate low-level adverse events (erythema, stinging, or irritation; RR 3.02, 95% CI 1.38-6.61) and immediate pain requiring oral analgesics (RR 2.11, 95% CI 1.07-4.17) but fewer erosions (RR 0.57, 95% CI 0.36-0.90). LIMITATIONS All but 1 randomized-controlled trial had a high risk for bias. CONCLUSION With low-level quality of the evidence, cryotherapy is an acceptable first-line therapy to treat AGWs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Antoine Bertolotti
- Centre d'Investigation Clinique Antilles-Guyane, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Martinique, Fort-de-France, Martinique; Antilles-Guyane University, Fort-de-France, Martinique.
| | - Nicolas Dupin
- Department of Dermatology, Cochin Hospital, Paris-Descartes University, Paris, France
| | - Fabrice Bouscarat
- Department of Dermatology, Bichat Hospital, Paris-Diderot University, Paris, France
| | - Brigitte Milpied
- Department of Dermatology and Pediatric Dermatology, National Centre for Rare Skin Disorders, Saint-André and Pellegrin Hospitals, Bordeaux, France
| | - Christian Derancourt
- Antilles-Guyane University, Fort-de-France, Martinique; Délégation à la Recherche Clinique et à l'Innovation, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Martinique, Fort-de-France, Martinique; Department of Dermatology, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Martinique, Fort-de-France, Martinique
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Sharma N, Sharma S, Singhal C. A Comparative Study of Liquid Nitrogen Cryotherapy as Monotherapy versus in Combination with Podophyllin in the Treatment of Condyloma Acuminata. J Clin Diagn Res 2017; 11:WC01-WC05. [PMID: 28511487 DOI: 10.7860/jcdr/2017/23797.9339] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/28/2016] [Accepted: 11/01/2016] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Condyloma Acuminata (CA) is a common viral sexually transmitted disease. Although various treatment modalities are available for treating CA, but none of them can achieve 100% response rate. In a search for better response rate and less recurrence rate, the combination of cytotoxic agent Podophyllin with ablative liquid nitrogen cryotherapy was evaluated over cryotherapy alone. AIM To evaluate the synergistic effect of Podophyllin as a chemotherapeutic adjunct to an ablative therapy of liquid nitrogen cryotherapy versus liquid nitrogen cryotherapy alone in the treatment of CA. MATERIALS AND METHODS Sixty patients with multiple CA were randomly assigned to two groups in the study. Thirty patients in group A received double freeze thaw cycle of 25 seconds of liquid nitrogen cryotherapy. Thirty patients in Group B were subjected to liquid nitrogen cryotherapy in a similar manner followed by application of not more than 0.5 ml of 25% Podophyllin solution. All patients were followed up at 1, 4, 8, 12 and 24 weeks after the treatment to monitor the response to therapy and evaluation for any recurrence. When the number of unresponsive lesions were more than 30% of original lesions at 4 weeks follow-up, then the whole procedure was repeated again. RESULTS The complete response rate and the recurrence rate in the Group B in our study were comparable to Group A as the difference was statistically insignificant. But the differentiating point was that the similar results were obtained in Group B with an average1.2 sessions per patient in comparison to an average of 1.67 sessions per patient in Group A. CONCLUSION Cryotherapy represents a simple, safe and effective regimen for the treatment of multiple CA which in combination with Podophyllin is even more effective as a single session procedure; thereby shortening the treatment regimen.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nidhi Sharma
- Senior Resident, Department of Dermatology, Government Medical College, Amritsar, Punjab. India
| | - Sanjeev Sharma
- Associate Professor, Department of Surgery, Government Medical College, Amritsar, Punjab. India
| | - Chetna Singhal
- Junior Resident, Department of Dermatology, Government Medical College, Amritsar, Punjab. India
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Asadi N, Hemmati E, Namazi G, Jahromi MP, Sarraf Z, Pazyar N, Salehi A. A Comparative Study of Potassium Hydroxide versus CO2 Laser Vaporization in The Treatment of Female Genital Warts: A Controlled Clinical Trial. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COMMUNITY BASED NURSING AND MIDWIFERY 2016; 4:274-82. [PMID: 27382594 PMCID: PMC4926007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Genital warts are the most common viral sexually transmitted disease affecting 1% of the population. A prospective, open-label controlled trial was performed to compare topical 5% potassium hydroxide (KOH) solution with CO2 laser in the treatment of female genital warts. METHODS Seventy patients were enrolled in the study after convenience sampling. Right-sided lesions of the patients were treated by CO2 laser every 3 weeks. The left-sided lesions of the same patients were treated by topical 5% KOH solution twice a day using a toothpick with cotton wrap on the tip. The patients were visited at 3, 6, and 9 weeks after initiation of the treatment and followed up for 6 months after the last visit. RESULTS Out of seventy patients, sixty three completed the study and were analyzed. A total of 56 KOH treated-patients (88.9%) showed complete response. On the other hand, 56 laser-treated patients (88.9%) presented complete clearing of the lesion. There was not any difference in response to both modalities of treatment. Complications of KOH solution and CO2 laser were 24% and 19% respectively (P>0.05), but serious adverse events were not observed. The patients under KOH treatment displayed a recurrence rate of 11.1% (7 cases), while the same patients with CO2 laser therapy demonstrated a recurrence rate of 7.9% (5 cases) (P=0.54). CONCLUSION Topical 5% KOH solution was as effective as CO2 laser in the treatment of female genital warts. There was not any serious complication in the application of KOH solution. This could be used as a new treatment for genital warts. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER IRCT201412207848N1.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nasrin Asadi
- Maternal-fetal Medicine Research Center, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran
| | - Ensie Hemmati
- Department of Gynecology, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran,Corresponding author: Ensie Hemmati, MD; Department of Gynecology, Shahid Faghihi Hospital, Zand Street, Shiraz, Iran Tel/Fax: +98 71 32332365;
| | - Golnaz Namazi
- Department of Gynecology, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran
| | | | - Zahra Sarraf
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran
| | - Nader Pazyar
- Department of Dermatology, Ahvaz Jundishapur University of Medical Sciences, Ahvaz, Iran
| | - Alireza Salehi
- Research Center for Traditional Medicine and History of Medicine, Department of Epidemiology, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Jayaprasad S, Subramaniyan R, Devgan S. Comparative Evaluation of Topical 10% Potassium Hydroxide and 30% Trichloroacetic Acid in the Treatment of Plane Warts. Indian J Dermatol 2016; 61:634-639. [PMID: 27904181 PMCID: PMC5122278 DOI: 10.4103/0019-5154.193670] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/31/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: Warts are benign proliferations of skin and mucosa caused by the human papillomavirus (HPV). Plane warts are caused by HPV types 3, 10, 28, and 41, occurring mostly in children and young adults. Among the treatment modalities, topical application of trichloroacetic acid (TCA) is age old. Potassium hydroxide (KOH) has a keratolytic effect on virus-infected cells. It is less irritating, less painful, less scar forming, and can be safely used in children too. Hence, it could be a better topical agent in the treatment of plane warts. Aims and Objectives: To compare the safety and efficacy of topical 10% KOH with 30% TCA in the treatment of plane warts. Materials and Methods: Sixty consecutive patients with plane warts were randomly assigned into two arms of thirty patients each; arm A received topical 10% KOH and arm B received topical 30% TCA as a once weekly application until the complete clearance of warts or a maximum period of 12 weeks. Results: Statistically no significant difference (P = 0.07) was found between the objective therapeutic response to 10% KOH and 30% TCA at the end of study (12 weeks). However, subjective response to 10% KOH was better and statistically significant (P = 0.03). There was no recurrence of warts seen on follow-up for 3 months of complete responders in both the arms. Conclusion: 10% KOH is found to be equally effective in the treatment of plane warts compared to 30% TCA with the advantage of faster onset of action and tendency of completely clearing warts with fewer side effects.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sandhaya Jayaprasad
- Department of Dermatology, Command Hospital Air Force, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India
| | | | - Shalini Devgan
- Department of Community Medicine, Guru Gobind Singh Medical College and Hospital, Faridkot, Punjab, India
| |
Collapse
|