Effects of the lower energy and pulse stacking in carbon dioxide laser skin treatment: an objective analysis using second harmonic generation

Clinical efficacy of the fractional ablative CO2 laser stacking method for depressed scars

Depressed scars, which are unsightly outcomes of trauma or skin lesions, can lead to significant physical and mental stress. Various treatments have been developed to alleviate these burdens, among which the laser stacking method has proven effective. In this study, we compared the outcomes of laser stacking treatments with those of single-pulse ablative laser treatments for depressed scars. Eighty patients with depressed scars were divided into two therapeutic groups: the ablative laser stacking therapy group (Group 1, n = 40) and the single pulse ablative laser therapy group (Group 2, n = 40). The scars were evaluated using the modified Vancouver Scar Scale (mVSS) before and after treatment. Patient-completed questionnaires were also utilized. Comparative analyses were conducted both before and after treatment, as well as between the two groups. Eighty scars from each patient underwent the complete laser treatment protocols. Group 1 showed significantly greater improvement in the mVSS indices for pigmentation, vascularity, pliability, and height than group 2 (P < 0.05). In terms of patient-reported outcomes, group 1 rated better than group 2 across three indices: appearance, alleviation of concavity, and overall improvement (P < 0.05). Ablative laser stacking therapy effectively alleviated depressed scars, demonstrating significant improvement in both observer- and patient-reported outcomes. An energy level of 20-30 mJ was employed, resulting in more favorable outcomes compared to a single pulse laser application of 10-15 mJ. Our findings highlight the benefits of the stacking method, which shows notable improvements while minimizing complications. Further research involving various protocols may optimize clinical outcomes and patient satisfaction.

Ultrapulse Fractional CO2 Laser With Different Fluences and Densities in the Prevention of Periorbital Laceration Scars: A Split-Scar, Evaluator-Blinded Study

BACKGROUND

Periorbital laceration can result in complex, permanent scars, and even lead to serious complications such as cicatricial ectropion. Early intervention with laser devices has been suggested as a novel modality to reduce scar formation. However, no consensus exists regarding the optimal treatment parameters for scar management. This study evaluated the efficacy and safety of ultrapulse fractional CO2 laser (UFCL) with different fluences and densities in preventing periorbital surgical scars.

OBJECTIVE

To assess the efficacy and safety of UFCL with different fluences and densities in the prevention of periorbital laceration scars.

METHODS

A prospective, randomized, blinded study was conducted on 90 patients with periorbital laceration scars of 2 weeks old. Four treatment sessions of UFCL were administered to each half of the scar at 4-week intervals, with halves treated with high fluences with low density versus low fluences with low-density treatment. Vancouver Scar Scale was used to assess the 2 portions of each individual scar at baseline, final treatment, and 6 months. The patient's 4-point satisfaction scale was used to evaluate the patient's satisfaction at baseline and 6 months. Safety was evaluated by registration of adverse events.

RESULTS

Eighty-two of 90 patients completed the clinical trial and follow-up. There was no significant difference in Vancouver Scar Scale and satisfaction score between different laser settings between the two groups (P > 0.05). Adverse events were minor and no long-term side effects were noted.

CONCLUSIONS

Early application of UFCL is a safe, strategy to significantly improve the final traumatic periorbital scar appearance. Objective evaluation of scars did not identify differences in scar appearance between high fluences with low density versus low fluences with low density of UFCL treatment.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III.