Morbidity and mortality associated with arterial surgery site infections by resistant microorganisms

A Description of Outcomes Experienced by Patients Whose Orders for Peripheral Artery Revascularization Were Reviewed by a Nondenial Prior Authorization Program

Objective

After a nondenial prior authorization program evaluates orders for peripheral artery revascularization (PAR), ordering physicians sometimes withdraw their orders based upon program recommendations. Some patients with withdrawn orders receive PAR if claudication does not resolve. To characterize patient outcomes under this program, we evaluated whether associations existed between the withdrawal of patients’ initial PAR orders and the presence of claims for PAR and claims mentioning intermittent claudication (IC) in the following 16 weeks.

Methods

Orders for PAR placed from 1/1/19 to 9/30/19 for patients with Medicare Advantage health plans were extracted from a national healthcare organization’s database. Claims data from 0 to 16 weeks following the order were reviewed to determine if patients had downstream PAR claims, or if they had emergency department or hospital claims mentioning IC. Chi-square tests were used to assess the association between order withdrawal and downstream PAR, as well as claims mentioning IC. Multivariate logistic regressions were run to assess the same, controlling for patient age, sex, urbanicity, local median income, state obesity rate, type of PAR, ordering physician specialty, and whether PAR was ordered in a hospital setting.

Results

Of 1588 orders meeting inclusion criteria, 71.9% (1038/1444) of authorized orders and 61.1% (88/144) of withdrawn orders were followed by PAR within 16 weeks, a significant difference ( P < .01). Relatedly, 69.8% (1008/1444) of authorized orders and 70.8% (102/144) of withdrawn orders were followed by IC claims, an insignificant difference. Multivariate logistic regressions showed patients with withdrawn PAR orders had significantly lower adjusted odds of PAR (OR: 0.63; 95% CI: 0.44–0.91), but an insignificant difference in their adjusted odds of IC (OR: 1.10; CI: 0.76–1.64).

Conclusions

Although patients with withdrawn PAR orders were significantly less likely to receive PAR in the subsequent 16 weeks, no association was found between withdrawn PAR orders and subsequent claims mentioning IC.

Tratamento híbrido para revascularização de membro inferior em paciente com infecção de prótese vascular: relato de caso

Patients with severe arterial obstructive disease and critical limb ischemia associated with vascular graft infection have elevated morbidity and mortality rates and are at high risk of limb loss. We present the case of a 76-year-old male patient with left lower limb critical ischemia and a femoropopliteal vascular graft infection. We used a hybrid treatment approach with an open surgical approach to the inguinal and popliteal regions and used the vascular prosthesis as endovascular access for direct recanalization of the superficial femoral artery, because the long occlusion and extensive calcification had frustrated initial attempts at endovascular treatment. After endovascular recanalization, the infected graft was removed. Used in conjunction with open surgery, advances in endovascular techniques and materials offer new solutions for patients when usual procedures fail.

Hybrid treatment for lower limb revascularization in a patient with vascular graft infection: a case report

Abstract Patients with severe arterial obstructive disease and critical limb ischemia associated with vascular graft infection have elevated morbidity and mortality rates and are at high risk of limb loss. We present the case of a 76-year-old male patient with left lower limb critical ischemia and a femoropopliteal vascular graft infection. We used a hybrid treatment approach with an open surgical approach to the inguinal and popliteal regions and used the vascular prosthesis as endovascular access for direct recanalization of the superficial femoral artery, because the long occlusion and extensive calcification had frustrated initial attempts at endovascular treatment. After endovascular recanalization, the infected graft was removed. Used in conjunction with open surgery, advances in endovascular techniques and materials offer new solutions for patients when usual procedures fail.

Topical Oxygen Jet Therapy (TOJT) for treating infected chronic surgical wounds

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the effectiveness of Topical Oxygen Jet Therapy (TOJT) in the treatment of surgical wounds in adult patients who has clinical signs of infection for over 30 days; and to identify the pathogens causing complicated skin and soft tissue infections.

METHOD

Parallel, randomized clinical trials randomly divided into "Control Group" (CG) and "Treatment Group" (TG), which were followed up for 10 consecutive days. Venous antibiotics and dressings were used in both groups. In addition, TOJT were used on the wounds in the TG. The outcome criteria were based on clinical indicators: Pressure Ulcer Scale for Healing (PUSH) and Visual Analog Scale Pain (VAS). The paired t-test or Wilcoxon, chi-squared or Fisher's exact test, and Student's t-test or Mann-Whitney tests were used with a significance level of 5%.

RESULTS

73 inpatients were included and followed up: 39 in TG and 34, CG. There were no significant differences in socio-demographic variables or of initial laboratory tests, except for blood glucose that was higher in TG than in CG (p = 0.044). Ten days into treatment, both the area of PUSH wounds (p < 0.001) and the pain scale (p = 0.029) were significantly reduced in TG. Staphylococcus aureus was the most prevalent pathogen (40%) with no significant difference between the two groups.

DISCUSSION

Although the follow-up time was of only ten days, a significant improvement was observed in TG. As a limitation of the study, the small sample size precluded the comparison of S. aureus infections between the two groups.

CONCLUSION

TOJT accelerated the healing process, reduced pain and contributed to an improvement in the clinical status of the wounds when compared to CG. These findings demonstrate the effectiveness and relevance of the employed technique. It can be easily incorporated as a routine procedure in hospitals without extra investment.