Prevalence of dyspeptic symptoms and heartburn of adults in Belo Horizonte, Brazil

Global prevalence of functional dyspepsia according to Rome criteria, 1990-2020: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Although functional dyspepsia (FD) is a common functional gastroduodenal disorder with a high socioeconomic burden, little is known about its global prevalence. Thus, we performed a comprehensive study to estimate long-term trends in the prevalence of FD. We searched PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase, and Google Scholar from 1990 to 2022 for population-based studies that reported the prevalence of FD in adults (≥ 18 years old) according to Rome I, II, III, or IV criteria. The prevalence of FD was extracted from included studies to obtain pooled prevalence with 95% confidence intervals (CI) and 95% prediction intervals. Subgroup analysis was performed according to certain characteristics, including geographic region. A total of 44 studies met the eligibility criteria, including 256,915 participants from 40 countries across six continents. The overall global pooled prevalence of FD was 8.4% (95% CI 7.4-.9.5). The prevalence was the highest in Rome I (11.9%; 95% CI 5.1-25.4) and lowest in Rome IV (6.8%; 95% CI 5.8-7.9). Developing countries showed a higher prevalence than developed countries (9.1% versus 8.0%), and prevalence was higher in women, irrespective of the definition used (9.0% versus 7.0%). The pooled prevalence gradually decreased from 1990 to 2020 (12.4% [8.2-18.3] in 1990-2002 versus 7.3% [6.1-8.7] in 2013-2020). The prevalence of FD differs by country, economic status, geographical region, and sex, and the global prevalence has been gradually declining. Despite the heterogeneity of sample population, our study estimates the current global burden of FD and provides information to heath care policy decisions.

Neuropsychological assessment after long-term omeprazole treatment

Recent studies suggest that Omeprazole, a widely used treatment for gastric acid-related disorders, may have a significant effect on human cognition. However, there is no consensus on the matter. Though some studies suggest the drug is associated with an increased risk of cognitive decline, memory impairment, and dementia, this issue has not been sufficiently studied. Therefore, the goal of this study was to investigate the cognitive impairments associated with long-term Omeprazole treatment, with a focus on memory, attention, and executive functions. Additionally, we sought to verify whether the duration of treatment was associated with the magnitude of the associated cognitive impairments. The sample consisted of 30 participants of both genders treated with Omeprazole (experimental group) and 30 participants who did not use the drug (control group). The cognitive assessment battery: Verbal Fluency, Rey Auditory-Verbal Learning, Attention Assessment Battery, Five Digit Test, Hayling Test, and NEUPSILIN Subtest. The groups were compared using Student's T-tests, and the association between treatment duration and cognitive performance was examined using Pearson's coefficients. The results showed significant group differences in verbal fluency, short-term episodic memory, selective attention, and executive functions. The duration of Omeprazole treatment was also positively associated with the magnitude of cognitive impairment.

Correlation between the symptoms of upper gastrointestinal disease and endoscopy findings: Implications for clinical practice

Objective

Digestive symptoms are the most common complaints among patients who seek primary healthcare services. This study aims to identify digestive symptoms and determine their association with upper gastrointestinal endoscopy findings in patients treated at a public endoscopy centre in Northeast Brazil.

Methods

We conducted a cross-sectional study using data from 751 patients with digestive symptoms who had an indication for upper gastrointestinal endoscopy. We identified the association between these variables through Fisher's exact test or Chi-square test and calculated the odds ratio.

Results

Epigastric pain occurred in 83%, post-prandial plenitude in 72.6%, and heartburn in 72.3% of the patients. Women were more likely to present with epigastric pain (p = 0.001; odds ratio [OR] = 1.25; confidence interval [CI] = 1.07-1.47), post-prandial plenitude (p = 0.001; OR = 1.21; CI = 1.06-1.37), retrosternal pain or burning (p = 0.03; OR = 1.11; CI = 1.004-1.24), heartburn (p = 0.04; OR = 1.10; CI = 0.98-1.24), unintentional weight loss (p = 0.01; OR = 1.12; CI = 1.02-1.24), and dysphagia (p = 0.01; OR = 1.14; CI = 1.03-1.25). There was no statistically significant association between digestive symptoms and endoscopic findings of the upper gastrointestinal tract. Additionally, there was no significant association between digestive symptoms and abnormalities detected by endoscopy.

Conclusion

Dyspeptic symptoms of epigastric pain, post-prandial fullness, and heartburn were the most common symptoms in patients referred for endoscopy. Dyspepsia, heartburn, and dysphagia were more common in women than in men. Digestive symptoms were not associated with positive endoscopy findings or abnormalities detected by endoscopy.

Systematic review with meta-analysis: global prevalence of uninvestigated dyspepsia according to the Rome criteria

BACKGROUND

Prevalence of uninvestigated dyspepsia varies across cross-sectional surveys. This may be due to differences in definitions used or study methodology, rather than global variability.

AIM

To determine the global prevalence of uninvestigated dyspepsia according to Rome criteria.

METHODS

MEDLINE and EMBASE were searched to identify population-based studies reporting prevalence of uninvestigated dyspepsia in adults (≥18 years old) according to Rome I, II, III or IV criteria. Prevalence of uninvestigated dyspepsia was extracted, according to criteria used to define it. Pooled prevalence, according to study location and certain other characteristics, odds ratios (OR), and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated.

RESULTS

Of 2133 citations evaluated, 67 studies fulfilled eligibility criteria, representing 98 separate populations, comprising 338 383 subjects. Pooled prevalence ranged from 17.6% (95% CI 9.8%-27.1%) in studies defining uninvestigated dyspepsia according to Rome I criteria, to 6.9% (95% CI 5.7%-8.2%) in those using Rome IV criteria. Postprandial distress syndrome was the commonest subtype, occurring in 46.2% of participants using Rome III criteria, and 62.8% with Rome IV. Prevalence of uninvestigated dyspepsia was up to 1.5-fold higher in women, irrespective of the definition used. There was significant heterogeneity between studies in all our analyses, which persisted even when the same criteria were applied and similar methodology was used.

CONCLUSIONS

Even when uniform symptom-based criteria are used to define the presence of uninvestigated dyspepsia, prevalence varies between countries. This suggests that there are environmental, cultural, ethnic, dietary or genetic influences determining symptoms.