Systematic review with meta-analysis: lubiprostone efficacy on the treatment of patients with constipation

Comparative profiles of lubiprostone, linaclotide, and elobixibat for chronic constipation: a systematic literature review with meta-analysis and number needed to treat/harm

OBJECTIVE

To comprehensively evaluate the efficacy, safety, patient symptoms, and quality-of-life (QoL) of lubiprostone, linaclotide, and elobixibat as treatment for chronic constipation (CC).

DESIGN

Systematic literature review (SLR) and meta-analysis (MA). Literature searches were conducted on PubMed and Embase using the Ovid platform.

METHODS

SLR including randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and observational studies was conducted to identify the overall efficacy and safety of lubiprostone, linaclotide, and elobixibat. Thereafter, MA was performed using only RCTs. The number needed to treat (NNT) and number needed to harm (NNH) analyses were additionally conducted.

PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES

The primary outcome was efficacy regarding change in spontaneous bowel movements. Secondary outcomes included safety, constipation-related symptoms, and QoL.

RESULTS

Twenty-four studies met the inclusion criteria for the SLR: 17 RCTs, 4 observational studies, and 3 single-arm trials. Feasibility assessment for the MA resulted in 14 studies available for safety data analysis, and 8 available for efficacy analysis, respectively. Three drugs showed similar efficacy in the MA and NNT analysis. However, the NNH analysis revealed distinct safety profiles: lubiprostone, linaclotide, and elobixibat were linked to the highest risk of nausea, diarrhea, and abdominal pain, respectively.

CONCLUSION

The current study provides an updated overview of the efficacy, safety, patient symptoms, and QoL of the three drugs with different mechanisms of action for CC treatment.The findings could help physicians adopt an individualized approach for treating patients with CC in clinical practice.

Current Management of Chronic Constipation in Japan

Constipation is a complicated condition. Chronic constipation is diagnosed when constipation occurs for more than 3 months. Chronic constipation is classified using patient symptoms and the pathophysiology. New therapeutic agents to treat chronic constipation have recently been approved in Japan. However, treatments for constipation that is refractory to traditional laxatives have been approved, an algorithm for the treatment of chronic constipation has not yet been developed. The accumulation of knowledge and data is necessary to develop a new algorithm.

Application of metabolomics in irritable bowel syndrome in recent 5 years

Irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) is one of the most common functional gastrointestinal disorders worldwide, characterized by chronic abdominal pain or discomfort and altered bowel habits. To date, the exact pathogenesis of IBS remains elusive, but is clearly multifactorial, including environmental and host factors. However, the management of patients with IBS is challenging and the current diagnostic and therapeutic modalities have unsatisfactory outcomes. Therefore, it is important to develop more effective methods to diagnose IBS early. Metabolomics studies the metabolites most closely related to patient characteristics, which can provide useful clinical biomarkers that can be applied to IBS and may open up new diagnostic approaches. Traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) can play a role in improving symptoms and protecting target organs, but its mechanism needs to be studied in depth. In this review, based on PubMed/MEDLINE and other databases, we searched metabolomics studies related to IBS in the past 5 years, including those related to clinical studies and animal studies, as well as literatures on TCM interventions in IBS, to provide an updated overview of the application of metabolomics to the diagnosis and treatment of IBS and the improvement of IBS by TCM.

Update on treatment of abdominal pain in irritable bowel syndrome: A narrative review

The objectives of this narrative review are to update readers on the current state-of-the-art regarding diverse approaches for the treatment of pain, global symptoms, or adequate relief in irritable bowel syndrome (IBS). The article appraises medications, dietary interventions including low fermentable oligosaccharides, disaccharides, and monosaccharides and polyols (FODMAP) diet, fecal microbial transplantation (FMT), electrical approaches, and behavioral therapies including cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT), gut-directed hypnotherapy (GDH), mindfulness, and open-label placebo. Current evidence demonstrates only modest benefit in global IBS symptoms and pain relief. A future approach that identifies pathophysiological mechanisms of IBS through validated biomarkers has the potential to individualize treatment of patients rather than sequential therapeutic trial and error approaches.

Efficacy and safety of Shouhui Tongbian Capsules in the treatment of constipation: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Constipation is a common gastrointestinal disorder, which has seriously affected the quality of people's daily life. Traditional Chinese Medicine (TCM) therapy takes syndrome differentiation and treatment as the theoretical guidance with certain advantages in treating constipation with the holistic approach. However, there are few studies on the treatment of constipation with Shouhui Tongbian Capsules (SHTB).

PURPOSE

This study was aimed to evaluate the clinical effect and safety of SHTB in the treatment of constipation and provide evidence-based references for clinical application.

STUDY DESIGN

A systematic review and meta-analysis of existing literature on SHTB for treating constipation.

METHODS

Chinese databases (China Network Knowledge Infrastructure, Wan Fang Database and Chinese Scientific Journal Database) and English databases (PubMed, EmBase and the Cochrane Library) were thoroughly investigated through screening randomized controlled trials on SHTB for constipation from the establishment of all databases to September 26, 2022. Data extraction and quality evaluation were performed on the literature that met the inclusion criteria and a meta-analysis was performed for selected data using Review Manager 5.4, ROB 2.0 and Stata 17.0.

RESULTS

A total of 14 RCTs (randomized controlled trial) including 1310 participants were included in the analysis. The results showed that the test group was superior to the control group in improving the total effective rate and curative effect, clinical symptom score, gastrointestinal peptide index and reducing adverse reactions and recurrence rate. The specific results were as follows: ① The total effective rate increased significantly (RR = 1.24, 95% CI [1.18, 1.30], Z = 8.25, p< 0.00001); ② The clinical symptom indexs, including the difficulty of defecation [SMD = -1.28, 95% CI (-1.44, -1.12), Z = 15.65, p< 0.00001], the frequency of spontaneous defecation [SMD = 1.28, 95% CI (1.01, 1.54), Z = 9.52, p< 0.00001], defecation interval [SMD = -1.47, 95% CI (-1.68, -1.26), Z = 13.79, p < 0.00001], incomplete defecation [SMD = -1.34, 95% CI (-1.57, -1.11), Z = 11.42, p < 0.00001], duration of defecation [SMD = -2.02, 95% CI (-2.39, -1.65), Z = 10.73, p < 0.00001], stool characteristics [SMD = -2.30, 95% CI (-2.60, -1.99), Z = 14.72, p< 0.00001] and TCM main syndrome scores [SMD = -1.25, 95% CI (-1.46, -1.05), Z = 11.79, p< 0.00001] increased observably; ③ The gastrointestinal peptide hormone indexs, including MTL Level [SMD = 0.43, 95% CI (0.24, 0.62), Z = 4.44, p < 0.00001] and SP Level [RR =0.57, 95% CI (0.37, 0.87), Z = 2.61, p = 0.009] were improved obviously; ④ The incidence of adverse reactions (RR = 0.57, 95% CI [0.37, 0.87], Z = 2.61, p = 0.009) and recurrence rate (RR = 0.31, 95% CI [0.18, 0.54], Z = 4.28, P <0.001) reduced significantly. Sensitivity analysis showed that there was no significant change in all outcome indicators, which suggested that the results of meta-analysis were relatively stable. Funnel plot and Egger test results showed that the literature included in the study might have publication bias.

CONCLUSION

SHTB can be used to treat functional constipation, especially elderly functional constipation, constipation caused by tumor chemotherapy and disease concomitant constipation. The optimal dosage of SHTB was 0.70 g (2 capsules) each time, 3 times a day, for 28 days. Combined with basic treatment, lactose oral solution, mosaic or castor oil could improve the total effective rate, clinical symptom indicators, gastrointestinal peptide hormone indicators and reduce adverse reaction rate of patients. However, due to the limitations of the included clinical trials, high-quality clinical trials with long follow ups are needed to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of SHTB in treating different types of constipation.