Could gastric histology be a useful marker for making decision on Helicobacter pylori eradication therapy in patients with dyspepsia?

Histopathological Assessment of Dyspepsia in the Absence of Endoscopic Mucosal Lesions

Introduction

Dyspepsia is a common symptom with an extensive differential diagnosis. Endoscopy alone may miss serious mucosal lesions in about 15 to 30% of cases. The aim was to determine histopathological features of gastric and duodenal mucosal biopsies in patients with dyspepsia and normal looking upper gastrointestinal (GI) endoscopy.

Materials and methods

One hundred and five adult patients presenting with dyspepsia with no endoscopic mucosal lesions in the upper GI tract were included. Gastric biopsy specimens according to Sydney-Houston system for grading gastritis and biopsy from duodenum were taken. The histopathological features were graded according to the Sydney-Houston system classification for grading gastritis.

Results

The histological lesions were found in 65.7% (69 out of 105 endoscopy free dyspeptic patients). Chronic inflammation was the commonest finding. Neutrophilic activity, glandular atrophy, and mild degree of intestinal metaplasia were present in 27, 45, and 6 patients (22.8, 42.8, and 5.7% respectively). Helicobacter pylori was present in 54 patients with histopathological lesions and in 6 patients without histopathological lesions, and the difference was significant (p = 0.045).

Conclusion

The endoscopic diagnosis of dyspepsia correlated poorly with histopathological findings. The histopathological examination allowed detection and grading of gastric pathology in dyspepsia with normal endoscopy and the commonest finding was the moderate chronic gastritis.

How to cite this article

Dawod HM, Emara MW. Histopathological Assessment of Dyspepsia in the Absence of Endoscopic Mucosal Lesions. Euroasian J Hepato-Gastroenterol 2016;6(2):97-102.

Diagnosis of Helicobacter pylori infection

If we had to give a general view of the articles published in the year 2010, we should conclude that the evidence in the year 2010 suggests that, also in Helicobacter pylori diagnosis, "the devil is in the details". In this sense, different studies suggested that skipping citric acid pretreatment or local validation or reducing the (13) C-urea dose markedly decreases the accuracy of the urea breath test. The studies also implied that, even between monoclonal stool tests, there are large differences between the marketed tests. Finally, even histology does not work adequately in patients with gastric cancer or extensive areas of intestinal metaplasia. In these cases, specific gastric sites should be biopsied to improve the reliability of histology.