[Myasthenia gravis: clinical and surgical treatment]

Thymectomy for non-thymomatous myasthenia gravis

BACKGROUND

Treatments currently used for patients with myasthenia gravis (MG) include steroids, non-steroid immune suppressive agents, plasma exchange, intravenous immunoglobulin and thymectomy. Data from randomized controlled trials (RCTs) support the use of some of these therapeutic modalities and the evidence for non-surgical therapies are the subject of other Cochrane reviews. Significant uncertainty and variation persist in clinical practice regarding the potential role of thymectomy in the treatment of people with MG.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the efficacy and safety of thymectomy in the management of people with non-thymomatous MG.

SEARCH METHODS

On 31 March 2013, we searched the Cochrane Neuromuscular Disease Group Specialized Register, CENTRAL (2013, Issue 3), MEDLINE (January 1966 to March 2013), EMBASE (January 1980 to March 2013) and LILACS (January 1992 to March 2013) for RCTs. Two authors (RS and GC) read all retrieved abstracts and reviewed the full texts of potentially relevant articles. These two authors checked references of all manuscripts identified in the review to identify additional articles that were of relevance and contacted experts in the field to identify additional published and unpublished data. Where necessary, authors were contacted for further information.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomized or quasi-randomized controlled trials of thymectomy against no treatment or any medical treatment, and thymectomy plus medical treatment against medical treatment alone, in people with non-thymomatous MG.We did not use measured outcomes as criteria for study selection.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

We planned that two authors would independently extract data onto a specially designed data extraction form and assess risk of bias; however, there were no included studies in the review. We would have identified any adverse effects of thymectomy from the included trials.

MAIN RESULTS

We did not identify any RCTs testing the efficacy of thymectomy in the treatment of MG. In the absence of data from RCTs, we were unable to do any further analysis.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

There is no randomized controlled trial literature that allows meaningful conclusions about the efficacy of thymectomy on MG. Data from several class III observational studies suggest that thymectomy could be beneficial in MG. An RCT is needed to elucidate if thymectomy is useful, and to what extent, in MG.

[Myasthenia gravis. Clinical evaluation of 153 patients]

We have retrospectively analysed the records of patients diagnosed as having myasthenia gravis and followed up in our department from February 1973 to March 1995. The main clinical findings were ptosis, diplopia, dysphagia, dysphonia or dysarthria, mastigatory impairment, dyspnea, asthenia, weakness of the cervical muscles and of the extremities, as well as findings of the physical and neurological examination. Based on the information collected, the patients were classified clinically according the modified Osserman-Gerkins scale, but considering the non-dynamic aspects of that scale, we used the modified functional scale of Niakan and classified the patients clinically as follows: remission, controlled, stable, partially controlled, poorly controlled, no response. We collected 153 patients, 104 (68.0%) females and 49 (32.0%) males producing a female/male ratio of 2.2:1. The duration of the disease varied from seven days to 27 years, mean 6.26 years (+/- 5.44). Age at the first symptoms varied between 24 hours to 80 years, mean of 32.13 years (+/- 19.48). We had 30 patients ranging from 0 to 15 years of age, 91 patients were observed between 15 and 50 years and 32 patients after the age of 50 years. Above the age of 60 years, the disease aflicts males more than females with a ratio of 1.5:1. The acquired autoimmune form with generalized weakness was the most frequent presentation. However, ocular muscle weakness with ptosis and diplopia were the most common clinical presentation in our series.

[Myasthenia gravis. Historical aspects]

We studied historical aspects of myasthenia gravis starting from its first description by the English physician, Sir Thomas Willis, in 1672. We also describe the difficulties in managing treating the first diagnosed patient. Historical facts related to the investigation and the initial treatment of this disorder as well as curiosities seldom mentioned in the literature are part of this paper.