Acute cerebral infarction in watershed distribution in a patient with hypereosinophilic syndrome

Idiopathic hypereosinophilic syndrome presenting as capsular warning syndrome: A case report and literature review

RATIONALE

Few reports of idiopathic hypereosinophilic syndrome exist presenting as ischemic cerebrovascular disease, and the majority are watershed infarction. We report the first case of idiopathic hypereosinophilic syndrome that has clinical features of capsular warning syndrome lasting 6 weeks.

PATIENT CONCERNS

A 26-year-old man complained of recurrent right limb weakness, accompanying slurred speech, and right facial paresthesia.

DIAGNOSES

The patient was diagnosed with idiopathic hypereosinophilic syndrome (IHES).

INTERVENTIONS

Adequate glucocorticoid and anticoagulant treatments were given.

OUTCOMES

The patient's motor ability improved, and he was discharged 2 weeks later. Muscle strength in the right-side extremities had fully recovered at a 3-month follow-up after discharge.

LESSONS

This case suggests that idiopathic hypereosinophilic syndrome should be considered as a cause of capsular warning syndrome, and the dose of glucocorticoid and the efficacy evaluation index needs to be reevaluated for the treatment of ischemic cerebrovascular disease associated with idiopathic hypereosinophilic syndrome.

An unusual neurological presentation in a patient with primary hypereosinophilic syndrome

Hypereosinophilic syndromes are characterized by an increased number of blood eosinophils (usually more than 1.5 × 10⁹) infiltrating tissues and causing organ damage through over-production of pro-inflammatory cytokines with heterogeneous clinical presentation. Here we present a case of a 47 years old male, with an unremarkable previous medical history, with a sudden onset of subungual hemorrhage and low back pain. Admitted for right arm weakness and vomiting, was raised the suspicion of acute cerebrovascular syndrome, but a brain CT scan with angiogram and perfusion sequences did not show any signs of early ischaemic lesions; conversely, lab tests revealed an increased peripheral eosinophil blood count. Clinical conditions rapidly worsened and a brain MRI showed multiple sub-acute ischaemic lesions compatible with vasculitis while EEG was in favor of widespread cortical distress. Diagnosis of the hypereosinophilic syndrome was made through peripheral blood smear and osteo-medullar biopsy, which showed a rich prevalence of eosinophils. The molecular biology testing showed FIP1L1-PDGRA gene mutation. Despite the prompt therapy beginning with intravenous corticosteroids and tyrosine-kinase inhibitors with normalization of cell blood count in a few days, the patient remained in minimal consciousness. When facing unusual symptoms onset (low back pain with weakness in one limb) and a highly impaired WBC not consistent with other courses (such as infections, vasculitis, allergies, and other diseases involving the immune system) clinicians should take into account the possibility of a hematological disorder and treat it as soon as possible to avoid a poor prognosis.

Literature reviews of stroke with hypereosinophilic syndrome

Hypereosinophilic syndrome (HES) is defined by persistently elevated blood eosinophil levels and is associated with evidence of organ damage. Cardiovascular involvement in HES is most commonly associated with Loffler endocarditis (cardiac HES). Cardiac HES is typically characterized by progressive subendocardial fibrosis with overlying mural thrombus formation, leading to restrictive dysfunction of the left ventricle. The thrombus from cardiac HES could result in cardiogenic stroke; however, most of the stroke cases with HES were not associated with huge thromboembolism rather multiple infarcts in the watershed area. The major clinical features of 97 previously reported cases of stroke with HES are as follows: the median age was 52 years, of which 61 (63%) were men; the initial presenting symptoms were neurological (73%), followed by headache (16%), respiratory symptoms (9%), and visual symptoms (9%). Almost half of the cases were diagnosed with cardiac HES. The characteristics of cardiac findings were mural thrombi, endomyocardial fibrosis, and a restrictive pattern of heart failure. Cerebral findings revealed 78 cases (80%) were described as multiple infarctions and 55 cases (57 %) were involved with watershed areas, whereas 11 cases (11％) were described as embolic stroke for one proximal large-vessel occlusion. Regarding treatment, 71 (73%), 28 (29%), and 16 (16%) patients were treated with steroids, anticoagulants, and antiplatelets, respectively. The overall mortality and recovery rates were 11% and 89%, respectively. Physicians should know most cases of stroke with HES are characterized by multiple infarctions in the watershed area, and cardiac HES is not always associated with stroke.

[Multiple cerebral infarctions in a patient with hypereosinophilic syndrome with Löffler endocarditis: a case report]

An 82-year-old woman with a history of asthma was admitted to our hospital because of dyspnea. On admission, laboratory testing showed a white blood cell count of 17,700/μl with hypereosinophilia of 9,204/μl (52% of all white blood cells). Various examinations, including a bone marrow biopsy for the cause of eosinophilia, were unremarkable. The patient was diagnosed with hypereosinophilic syndrome (HES). Treatment with intravenous methylprednisolone was initiated. The patient's eosinophil count normalized within 1 day. On the 6th day, she developed left-sided hemiparesis. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the brain showed acute multiple infarcts in arterial border zones of bilateral cerebral and cerebellar hemispheres, and in bilateral basal ganglia and the thalamus. Magnetic resonance angiography was normal. Coagulation factors were normal, except for an elevated D-dimer level (12.9 μg/ml). A transthoracic echocardiogram showed thickening of the left ventricular endocardium with immobile thrombus, compatible with Löffler endocarditis. Treatment with oral prednisolone was started at 30 mg/day and then tapered to a maintenance dose of 5 mg/day. Anticoagulation was concurrently started for prevention of stroke. Ten months later, an echocardiogram showed that the thrombus had decreased in size, and MRI revealed no new cerebral infarctions. The cause of cerebral infarction in patients with hypereosinophilia is thought to be thromboembolism or cerebrovascular endothelial toxicity of eosinophils. In this patient, the cerebral infarcts may have been the result of embolism from the left ventricular thrombus. Because HES with Löffler endocarditis is frequently associated with a poor prognosis, cardiovascular problems should be evaluated and treatment started as soon as possible.

Etiologic Subtypes of Watershed Infarcts

BACKGROUND

Two types of watershed infarcts (WI) are recognized. Internal WI are usually attributed to either severe stenosis in large arteries or acute hypotensive events, whereas external WI are thought to be caused by embolism. The aim of this study was to determine the etiologic background and prognosis of external and internal WI in our patients.

METHODS

We reviewed the medical records and diffusion-weighted images of the patients who were admitted to our stroke unit with acute ischemic stroke between January 2012 and November 2014. The demographics, clinical features, radiologic investigations, and other etiologic tests of the patients with internal or external WI were recorded. We determined etiologic stroke subtypes according to the automated Causative Classification System.

RESULTS

Fifty-three patients with WI were detected in our registry. Twenty-two (41.5%) of them were women. The mean age was 69 ± 12.8 (33-98) years. Twenty-one (39.6%) patients had external WI: 7 (33.3%) of them had large-artery atherosclerosis (LAA), 8 (38.1%) patients had cardioembolism, 3 (14.3%) patients had stroke due to other causes (vasculitis; n = 3), and etiologic subtype was undetermined in 3 patients (14.3%). Thirty-two (60.4%) patients had internal WI: 21 (65.6.%) of them had LAA, 5 (15.6%) patients had cardioembolism, 3 (9.4%) patients had stroke due to other causes (aneurysm; n = 1, hypercoagulability due to chronic myeloid leukemia; n = 1, vasculitis; n = 1), and etiologic subtype of 3 (9.4%) patients remained cryptogenic. LAA was significantly associated with internal WI (P = .024). Hypertension was more common in patients with internal WI (P = .035).

CONCLUSIONS

In this series, cardioembolism was the most common etiologic subtype in the patients with external WI, whereas internal WI were significantly associated with LAA. Uncommon causes should also be investigated in cryptogenic patients.