1
|
Roghani M, Ghaedi G, Iranzadeh S, Golezar MH, Afshinmajd S. Efficacy and safety of venlafaxine versus nortriptyline for the preventive treatment of migraine: A double-blind randomized clinical trial. Clin Neurol Neurosurg 2024; 243:108400. [PMID: 38901375 DOI: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2024.108400] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/27/2024] [Revised: 06/13/2024] [Accepted: 06/15/2024] [Indexed: 06/22/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Migraine, as a primary headache disorder, stands as one of the primary causes of disability worldwide. Consequently, prophylactic treatments are highly recommended for individuals experiencing recurrent migraine episodes. Our study aimed to compare the efficacy and safety profiles of venlafaxine and nortriptyline in the prophylactic management of migraine. METHODS In this single-center, randomized, double-blind clinical trial, 210 migraine patients were allocated into two groups in a 1:1 ratio. One group received venlafaxine (37.5 mg, orally twice daily), while the other group administered nortriptyline (25 mg, orally once daily). A neurologist documented (1) headache intensity using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) and 6-point Behavioral Rating Scale (BRS-6), (2) headache frequency (per month), and (3) headache duration (in hours) of participants on days 0, 45, and 90 of the intervention. RESULTS Following the 90-day intervention, a significant decrease was observed in VAS, BRS-6, frequency, and duration of headaches within both groups (all with p-values <0.001). No difference in VAS, BRS-6, or headache durations was observed between the two groups after 45 and 90 days of treatment (all p-values > 0.05). Although the headache frequency exhibited no difference between the groups after 45 days (p-value = 0.097), a significantly lower frequency in the venlafaxine group was observed at day 90 of the intervention (p-value = 0.011). The reductions in attack parameters in the 0-45- and 0-90-day intervals did not meet statistical significance between the two groups (p-values > 0.05). 77.0 % of the participants in the venlafaxine group and 79.2 % in the nortriptyline group experienced a minimum of 50 % improvement in all attack parameters. Venlafaxine demonstrated a statistically significant lower incidence of adverse reactions in comparison to nortriptyline (p-value = 0.005). A total of 33 adverse drug reactions were documented in the venlafaxine group and 53 in the nortriptyline group, with insomnia observed in the former and xerostomia in the latter as the most prevalent side effects. CONCLUSIONS Venlafaxine and nortriptyline demonstrate clinically significant and comparable therapeutic efficacy for migraine patients in reducing the intensity, frequency, and duration of headache attacks. Venlafaxine may be preferred to nortriptyline in the context of migraine preventive treatment under comparable conditions due to its lower incidence of adverse effects.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mehrdad Roghani
- Neurophysiology Research Center, Shahed University, Tehran, Iran
| | | | | | | | - Siamak Afshinmajd
- Neurophysiology Research Center, Shahed University, Tehran, Iran; Department of Neurology, Faculty of Medicine, Shahed University, Tehran, Iran.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Santos PSF, Melhado EM, Kaup AO, Costa ATNMD, Roesler CADP, Piovesan ÉJ, Sarmento EM, Theotonio GOM, Campos HCD, Fortini I, Souza JAD, Júnior JAM, Segundo JBA, Carvalho JJFD, Speziali JG, Calia LC, Barea LM, Queiroz LP, Souza MNP, Figueiredo MRCF, Costa MENDM, Peres MFP, Jurno ME, Peixoto PM, Kowacs PA, Rocha-Filho PAS, Filho PFM, Silva-Neto RP, Fragoso YD. Consensus of the Brazilian Headache Society (SBCe) for prophylactic treatment of episodic migraine: part II. ARQUIVOS DE NEURO-PSIQUIATRIA 2022; 80:953-969. [PMID: 36257618 PMCID: PMC10658446 DOI: 10.1055/s-0042-1755320] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/11/2021] [Accepted: 04/09/2022] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Migraine affects 1 billion people worldwide and > 30 million Brazilians; besides, it is an underdiagnosed and undertreated disorder. OBJECTIVE The need to disseminate knowledge about the prophylactic treatment of migraine is known, so the Brazilian Headache Society (SBCe, in the Portuguese acronym) appointed a committee of authors with the objective of establishing a consensus with recommendations on the prophylactic treatment of episodic migraine based on articles from the world literature as well as from personal experience. METHODS Meetings were held entirely online, with the participation of 12 groups that reviewed and wrote about the pharmacological categories of drugs and, at the end, met to read and finish the document. The drug classes studied in part II of this Consensus were: antihypertensives, selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors, serotonin and norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors, calcium channel blockers, other drugs, and rational polytherapy. RESULTS From this list of drugs, only candesartan has been established as effective in controlling episodic migraine. Flunarizine, venlafaxine, duloxetine, and pizotifen were defined as likely to be effective, while lisinopril, enalapril, escitalopram, fluvoxamine, quetiapine, atorvastatin, simvastatin, cyproheptadine, and melatonin were possibly effective in prophylaxis of the disease. CONCLUSIONS Despite an effort by the scientific community to find really effective drugs in the treatment of migraine, given the large number of drugs tested for this purpose, we still have few therapeutic options.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Paulo Sergio Faro Santos
- Instituto de Neurologia de Curitiba, Departamento de Neurologia, Setor de
Cefaleia e Dor Orofacial, Curitiba PR, Brazil.
| | - Eliana Meire Melhado
- Centro Universitário Padre Albino, Faculdade de Medicina, Departamento de
Neurologia, Catanduva SP, Brazil.
| | - Alexandre Ottoni Kaup
- Houston Headache Clinic, Houston TX, USA.
- Universidade Federal de São Paulo, São Paulo SP, Brazil.
- Universidade de Santo Amaro, São Paulo SP, Brazil.
| | | | | | - Élcio Juliato Piovesan
- Universidade Federal do Paraná, Departamento de Clínica Médica, Disciplina de
Neurologia, Curitiba PR, Brazil.
| | | | | | | | - Ida Fortini
- Universidade de São Paulo, Faculdade de Medicina, Departamento de Neurologia,
São Paulo SP, Brazil.
| | - Jano Alves de Souza
- Universidade Federal Fluminense, Departamento de Medicina Clínica, Disciplina
de Neurologia, Niterói RJ, Brazil.
| | - Jayme Antunes Maciel Júnior
- Universidade Estadual de Campinas, Faculdade de Ciências Médicas, Departamento
de Neurologia, Campinas SP, Brazil.
| | | | - João José Freitas de Carvalho
- Unichristus, Curso de Medicina, Disciplina de Neurologia, Fortaleza CE,
Brazil.
- Hospital Geral de Fortaleza, Serviço de Neurologia, Núcleo de Cefaleias,
Fortaleza CE, Brazil.
| | - José Geraldo Speziali
- Universidade de São Paulo, Faculdade de Medicina de Ribeirão Preto,
Departamento de Neurologia, Ribeirão Preto SP, Brazil.
| | - Leandro Cortoni Calia
- Universidade Federal de São Paulo, Escola Paulista de Medicina, São Paulo SP,
Brazil.
| | - Liselotte Menke Barea
- Fundação Universidade Federal de Ciências da Saúde de Porto Alegre, Disciplina
de Neurologia, Porto Alegre RS, Brazil.
| | - Luiz Paulo Queiroz
- Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina, Hospital Universitário, Serviço de
Neurologia, Florianópolis SC, Brazil.
| | | | | | | | | | - Mauro Eduardo Jurno
- Fundação José Bonifácio Lafayette de Andrada, Faculdade de Medicina de
Barbacena, Barbacena MG, Brazil.
- Fundação Hospitalar do Estado de Minas Gerais, Hospital Regional de Barbacena
Dr. José Américo, Barbacena MG, Brazil.
| | | | - Pedro André Kowacs
- Instituto de Neurologia de Curitiba, Serviço de Neurologia, Curitiba PR,
Brazil.
- Universidade Federal do Paraná, Complexo Hospital de Clínicas, Serviço de
Neurologia, Curitiba PR, Brazil.
| | - Pedro Augusto Sampaio Rocha-Filho
- Universidade Federal de Pernambuco, Centro de Ciências Médicas, Área de
Neuropsquiatria, Recife PE, Brazil.
- Universidade de Pernambuco, Hospital Universitário Oswaldo Cruz, Ambulatório de
Cefaleias, Recife PR, Brazil.
| | - Pedro Ferreira Moreira Filho
- Universidade Federal Fluminense, Hospital Universitário Antônio Pedro,
Departamento de Medicina Clínica, Niterói RJ, Brazil.
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
3
|
Melhado EM, Santos PSF, Kaup AO, da Costa ATNM, Roesler CADP, Piovesan ÉJ, Sarmento EM, Theotonio GOM, de Campos HC, Fortini I, de Souza JA, Maciel JA, Segundo JBA, de Carvalho JJF, Speziali JG, Calia LC, Barea LM, Queiroz LP, Souza MNP, Figueiredo MRCF, Costa MENDM, Peres MFP, Jurno ME, Peixoto PM, Kowacs PA, Rocha-Filho PAS, Moreira PF, Silva-Neto RP, Fragoso YD. Consensus of the Brazilian Headache Society (SBCe) for the Prophylactic Treatment of Episodic Migraine: part I. ARQUIVOS DE NEURO-PSIQUIATRIA 2022; 80:845-861. [PMID: 36252594 PMCID: PMC9703891 DOI: 10.1055/s-0042-1756441] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/25/2023]
Abstract
The Brazilian Headache Society (Sociedade Brasileira de Cefaleia, SBCe, in Portuguese) nominated a Committee of Authors with the aim of establishing a consensus with recommendations regarding prophylactic treatment for episodic migraine based on articles published in the worldwide literature, as well as personal experience. Migraine affects 1 billion people around the world and more than 30 million Brazilians. In addition, it is an underdiagnosed and undertreated disorder. It is well known within the medical community of neurologists, and especially among headache specialists, that there is a need to disseminate knowledge about prophylactic treatment for migraine. For this purpose, together with the need for drug updates and to expand knowledge of the disease itself (frequency, intensity, duration, impact and perhaps the progression of migraine), this Consensus was developed, following a full online methodology, by 12 groups who reviewed and wrote about the pharmacological categories of the drugs used and, at the end of the process, met to read and establish conclusions for this document. The drug classes studied were: anticonvulsants, tricyclic antidepressants, monoclonal anti-calcitonin gene-related peptide (anti-CGRP) antibodies, beta-blockers, antihypertensives, calcium channel inhibitors, other antidepressants (selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors, SSRIs, and dual-action antidepressants), other drugs, and polytherapy. Hormonal treatment and anti-inflammatories and triptans in minimum prophylaxis schemes (miniprophylaxis) will be covered in a specific chapter. The drug classes studied for part I of the Consensus were: anticonvulsants, tricyclic antidepressants, monoclonal anti-CGRP antibodies, and beta-blockers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eliana Meire Melhado
- Centro Universitário Padre Albino, Faculdade de Medicina, Departamento de Neurologia, Catanduva SP, Brazil
| | - Paulo Sergio Faro Santos
- Instituto de Neurologia de Curitiba, Departamento de Neurologia, Setor de Cefaleia e Dor Orofacial, Curitiba PR, Brazil
| | - Alexandre Ottoni Kaup
- Houston Headache Clinic, Houston TX, United States,Universidade Federal de São Paulo, Departamento de Neurologia, São Paulo SP, Brazil,Universidade de Santo Amaro, São Paulo SP, Brazil
| | | | | | - Élcio Juliato Piovesan
- Universidade Federal do Paraná, Departamento de Clínica Médica, Disciplina de Neurologia, Curitiba PR, Brazil
| | | | | | | | - Ida Fortini
- Universidade de São Paulo, Faculdade de Medicina, Departamento de Neurologia, São Paulo SP, Brazil
| | - Jano Alves de Souza
- Universidade Federal Fluminense, Departamento de Medicina Clínica, Disciplina de Neurologia, Niterói RJ, Brazil
| | - Jayme Antunes Maciel
- Universidade Estadual de Campinas, Faculdade de Ciências Médicas, Departamento de Neurologia, Campinas SP, Brazil
| | | | - João José Freitas de Carvalho
- Unichristus, Curso de Medicina, Disciplina de Neurologia, Fortaleza CE, Brazil,Hospital Geral de Fortaleza, Serviço de Neurologia, Núcleo de Cefaleias, Fortaleza CE, Brazil
| | - José Geraldo Speziali
- Universidade de São Paulo, Faculdade de Medicina de Ribeirão Preto, Departamento de Neurologia, Ribeirão Preto SP, Brazil
| | - Leandro Cortoni Calia
- Universidade Federal de São Paulo, Escola Paulista de Medicina, São Paulo SP, Brazil
| | - Liselotte Menke Barea
- Fundação Universidade Federal de Ciências da Saúde de Porto Alegre, Disciplina de Neurologia, Porto Alegre RS, Brazil
| | - Luiz Paulo Queiroz
- Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina, Hospital Universitário, Serviço de Neurologia, Florianópolis SC, Brazil
| | | | | | | | | | - Mauro Eduardo Jurno
- Fundação José Bonifácio Lafayette de Andrada, Faculdade de Medicina de Barbacena, Barbacena MG, Brazil,Fundação Hospitalar do Estado de Minas Gerais, Hospital Regional de Barbacena Dr. José Américo, Barbacena MG, Brazil
| | | | - Pedro André Kowacs
- Instituto de Neurologia de Curitiba, Serviço de Neurologia, Curitiba PR, Brazil,Universidade Federal do Paraná, Complexo Hospital de Clínicas, Serviço de Neurologia, Curitiba PR, Brazil
| | - Pedro Augusto Sampaio Rocha-Filho
- Universidade Federal de Pernambuco, Centro de Ciências Médicas, Área de Neuropsquiatria, Recife PE, Brazil,Universidade de Pernambuco, Hospital Universitário Oswaldo Cruz, Ambulatório de Cefaleias, Recife PR, Brazil
| | - Pedro Ferreira Moreira
- Universidade Federal Fluminense, Hospital Universitário Antônio Pedro, Departamento de Medicina Clínica, Niterói RJ, Brazil
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
4
|
Chowdhury D, Bansal L, Duggal A, Datta D, Mundra A, Krishnan A, Koul A, Gupta A. TOP-PRO study: A randomized double-blind controlled trial of topiramate versus propranolol for prevention of chronic migraine. Cephalalgia 2022; 42:396-408. [PMID: 34579560 DOI: 10.1177/03331024211047454] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/22/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The aim of the TOP-PRO-study, a double-blind randomized controlled trial, was to assess the efficacy (non-inferiority) and tolerability of propranolol compared to topiramate for the prevention of chronic migraine. BACKGROUND Except for topiramate, oral preventive treatment for chronic migraine lacks credible evidence. METHODS Chronic migraine patients aged above 18 years and less than 65 years of age, not on any preventive treatment were randomly allocated to receive topiramate (100 mg/day) or propranolol (160 mg/day). The primary efficacy outcome was the mean change in migraine days per 28 days at the end of 24 weeks from baseline. A mean difference of 1.5 days per four weeks was chosen as the cut-off delta value. Multiple secondary efficacy outcomes and treatment emergent adverse events were also assessed. RESULTS As against the planned sample size of 244, only 175 patients could be enrolled before the spread of the corona virus disease-2019 pandemic and enforcement of lockdown in India. Of the 175 randomized patients, 95 (topiramate 46 and propranolol 49) completed the trial. The mean change in migraine days was -5.3 ± 1.2 vs -7.3 ± 1.1 days (p = 0.226) for topiramate and propranolol groups respectively. Propranolol was found to be non-inferior and not superior to topiramate (point estimate of -1.99 with a 95% confidence interval of -5.23 to 1.25 days). Multiple secondary outcomes also did not differ between the two groups. Intention to treat analysis of 175 patients and per-protocol analysis of 95 patients yielded concordant results. There was no significant difference in the incidence of adverse events between the two groups. CONCLUSION Propranolol (160mg/day) was non-inferior, non-superior to topiramate (100mg/day) for the preventive treatment of chronic migraine and had a comparable tolerability profile.Trial Registration: Clinical Trials Registry-India CTRI/2019/05/018997).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Debashish Chowdhury
- Govind Ballabh Pant Institute of Post Graduate Medical Education and Research, New Delhi, India
| | - Luv Bansal
- Govind Ballabh Pant Institute of Post Graduate Medical Education and Research, New Delhi, India
| | - Ashish Duggal
- Govind Ballabh Pant Institute of Post Graduate Medical Education and Research, New Delhi, India
| | - Debabrata Datta
- Govind Ballabh Pant Institute of Post Graduate Medical Education and Research, New Delhi, India
| | - Ankit Mundra
- Govind Ballabh Pant Institute of Post Graduate Medical Education and Research, New Delhi, India
| | - Anand Krishnan
- All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India
| | - Arun Koul
- Govind Ballabh Pant Institute of Post Graduate Medical Education and Research, New Delhi, India
| | - Anu Gupta
- All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Chowdhury D, Mundra A, Datta D, Duggal A, Krishnan A, Koul A. Efficacy and tolerability of combination treatment of topiramate and greater occipital nerve block versus topiramate monotherapy for the preventive treatment of chronic migraine: A randomized controlled trial. Cephalalgia 2022; 42:859-871. [PMID: 35259978 DOI: 10.1177/03331024221082077] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/23/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To compare the efficacy and tolerability of combination treatment of topiramate and greater occipital nerve block to topiramate monotherapy in adult chronic migraine patients. BACKGROUND Options for the preventive treatment of chronic migraine are limited and costly. Combination treatments do not have an evidence base yet. METHODS This was a parallel group, 3 arms with 1:1:1 allocation ratio randomized controlled study in consecutive adult chronic migraine patients attending Headache Clinic in a tertiary care hospital. Patients received either topiramate monotherapy 100 mg/day (group A), or topiramate plus greater occipital nerve block with 40 mg lidocaine (2%) and 80mg (2 ml) methylprednisolone as the first injection followed by monthly injections of lidocaine for the next 2 months (group B) or topiramate plus greater occipital nerve block with 40 mg lidocaine (2%) injections monthly for 3 months (group C). The primary endpoint was the mean change in monthly migraine days at Month 3. Multiple secondary endpoints were assessed that included among others, achievement of ≥50% reduction in mean monthly headache days compared to baseline at Month 3 and assessment for any adverse events. RESULTS One hundred and twenty-five patients were randomized; 41 to group A, 44 to group B, and 40 to group C. Efficacy assessments were done for 121 patients. Patients receiving combination treatment of topiramate and greater occipital nerve block with steroids and lidocaine and greater occipital nerve block with only lidocaine compared to topiramate monotherapy showed greater reductions in monthly migraine days at Month 3 (-9.6 vs -7.3 days; p = 0.003) and (-10.1 vs -7.3 days; p < 0.001) respectively. Greater proportion of patients in both the combination treatment groups (added greater occipital nerve block with and without steroid) achieved ≥50% reduction in mean monthly headache days [71.4% vs 39%; OR (95% CI) 3.9(1.6-9.8); p = 0.004] and [62.4% vs 39%; OR (95% CI) 2.7(1.1-6.7); p = 0.034] respectively, compared to those receiving topiramate monotherapy. Adverse effects between the groups were comparable although patients receiving combination treatment with added greater occipital nerve block reported transient adverse effects like post-injection dizziness, local site swelling, and pain. No serious adverse event was reported. CONCLUSION Combination treatments of topiramate with monthly injections of greater occipital nerve block were more effective in reducing monthly migraine days in chronic migraine than topiramate monotherapy at Month 3. Combination treatments were well tolerated.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Debashish Chowdhury
- GB Pant Institute of Post Graduate Medical Education and Research, New Delhi, India
| | - Ankit Mundra
- GB Pant Institute of Post Graduate Medical Education and Research, New Delhi, India
| | - Debabrata Datta
- GB Pant Institute of Post Graduate Medical Education and Research, New Delhi, India
| | - Ashish Duggal
- GB Pant Institute of Post Graduate Medical Education and Research, New Delhi, India
| | - Anand Krishnan
- All India Institute of Medical sciences, New Delhi, India
| | - Arun Koul
- GB Pant Institute of Post Graduate Medical Education and Research, New Delhi, India
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Vélez-Jiménez MK, Chiquete-Anaya E, Orta DSJ, Villarreal-Careaga J, Amaya-Sánchez LE, Collado-Ortiz MÁ, Diaz-García ML, Gudiño-Castelazo M, Hernández-Aguilar J, Juárez-Jiménez H, León-Jiménez C, Loy-Gerala MDC, Marfil-Rivera A, Antonio Martínez-Gurrola M, Martínez-Mayorga AP, Munive-Báez L, Nuñez-Orozo L, Ojeda-Chavarría MH, Partida-Medina LR, Pérez-García JC, Quiñones-Aguilar S, Reyes-Álvarez MT, Rivera-Nava SC, Torres-Oliva B, Vargas-García RD, Vargas-Méndez R, Vega-Boada F, Vega-Gaxiola SB, Villegas-Peña H, Rodriguez-Leyva I. Comprehensive management of adults with chronic migraine: Clinical practice guidelines in Mexico. CEPHALALGIA REPORTS 2021. [DOI: 10.1177/25158163211033969] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction: Migraine is a polygenic multifactorial disorder with a neuronal initiation of a cascade of neurochemical processes leading to incapacitating headaches. Headaches are generally unilateral, throbbing, 4–72 h in duration, and associated with nausea, vomiting, photophobia, and sonophobia. Chronic migraine (CM) is the presence of a headache at least 15 days per month for ≥3 months and has a high global impact on health and economy, and therapeutic guidelines are lacking. Methods: Using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluations system, we conducted a search in MEDLINE and Cochrane to investigate the current evidence and generate recommendations of clinical practice on the identification of risk factors and treatment of CM in adults. Results: We recommend avoiding overmedication of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs); ergotamine; caffeine; opioids; barbiturates; and initiating individualized prophylactic treatment with topiramate eptinezumab, galcanezumab, erenumab, fremanezumab, or botulinum toxin. We highlight the necessity of managing comorbidities initially. In the acute management, we recommend NSAIDs, triptans, lasmiditan, and gepants alone or with metoclopramide if nausea or vomiting. Non-pharmacological measures include neurostimulation. Conclusions: We have identified the risk factors and treatments available for the management of CM based on a grading system, which facilitates selection for individualized management.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Erwin Chiquete-Anaya
- Department of Neurology and Psychiatry, National Institute of Medical Science and Nutrition “Salvador Zubirán”, Mexico City, México
| | - Daniel San Juan Orta
- Department of Clinical Research of the National Institute of Neurology and Neurosurgery “Dr. Manuel Velazco Suárez”, Mexico City, Mexico
| | | | - Luis Enrique Amaya-Sánchez
- Department of Neurology, Hospital de Especialidades del Centro Médico Nacional SXXI Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social, Mexico City, Mexico
| | - Miguel Ángel Collado-Ortiz
- Staff physician of the hospital and the Neurological Center ABC (The American British Cowdray Hospital IAP, Mexico City, Mexico
| | | | | | - Juan Hernández-Aguilar
- Department of Neurology, Hospital Infantil de México. Federico Gómez, Mexico City, Mexico
| | | | - Carolina León-Jiménez
- Department of Neurology, ISSSTE Regional Hospital, “Dr. Valentin Gomez Farías”, Zapopan, Jalisco, Mexico
| | | | - Alejandro Marfil-Rivera
- Headache and Chronic Pain Clinic, Neurology Service, Hospital Univrsitario Autónoma de Nuevo Leon, Mexico City, Mexico
| | | | - Adriana Patricia Martínez-Mayorga
- Department of Neurology, Central Hospital “Dr. Ignacio Morones Prieto”, Faculty of Medicine, Universidad Autónoma de San Luis Potosi, SLP, Mexico City, Mexico
| | | | - Lilia Nuñez-Orozo
- Department of Neurology, National Medical Center 20 de Noviembre, ISSSTE, Mexico City, Mexico
| | | | - Luis Roberto Partida-Medina
- Department of Neurology, Hospital de Especialidades, Centro Medico Nacional de Occidente, IMSS, Guadalajara, Jalisco, Mexico
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Felipe Vega-Boada
- Department of Neurology and Psychiatry, National Institute of Medical Science and Nutrition “Salvador Zubirán”, Mexico City, México
| | | | - Hilda Villegas-Peña
- Department of Pediatric Neurology, Clínica de Guadalajara, Guadalajara, Jalisco, Mexico
| | - Ildefonso Rodriguez-Leyva
- Department of Neurology, Central Hospital “Dr. Ignacio Morones Prieto”, Faculty of Medicine, Universidad Autónoma de San Luis Potosi, SLP, Mexico City, Mexico
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Dakhale GN, Sharma VS, Thakre MN, Kalikar M. Low-dose sodium valproate versus low-dose propranolol in prophylaxis of common migraine headache: A randomized, prospective, parallel, open-label study. Indian J Pharmacol 2019; 51:255-262. [PMID: 31571712 PMCID: PMC6759533 DOI: 10.4103/ijp.ijp_457_18] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022] Open
Abstract
CONTEXT: Migraine is the second most common headache disorder. However, prophylactic therapy remains underutilized. AIMS: The objective of the study was to compare the efficacy and safety of low-dose sodium valproate and low-dose propranolol sustained release (SR) in the prophylaxis of common migraine headache. SETTINGS AND DESIGN: The study was conducted in a tertiary care teaching institute. It was a randomized, prospective, parallel, open-label, clinical study. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: The study included 60 patients with common migraine headaches (≥2 attacks/month) treated for 12 weeks. The patients were randomly divided into two treatment groups treated by sodium valproate 500 mg/day and propranolol SR 40 mg/day, respectively. The primary outcome measures were the percentage of responders (i.e., >50% decrease in mean headache frequency) at the end of 12 weeks and decrease in mean headache frequency (per 4 weeks) at the end of 12 weeks. The patients were assessed at 0, 4, 8, and 12 weeks of the study. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS USED: Intention-to-treat analysis was used for all the statistical analysis. RESULTS: Fifty-five patients completed the study. At the end of the treatment, both sodium valproate and propranolol caused a significant (P < 0.0001) reduction in frequency, severity, and duration of migraine headache. Propranolol caused significantly greater reduction in the severity of headache (P = 0.0410) than sodium valproate. The percentage of responders was 60% in sodium valproate group and 70% in propranolol group. Drowsiness was the most common adverse effect noted in both the groups. CONCLUSION: Both sodium valproate and propranolol significantly reduced frequency, severity, and duration of migraine headache, but propranolol caused significantly greater reduction in the severity of headache compared to sodium valproate. Both the medications were well tolerated and did not result in discontinuation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ganesh N Dakhale
- Department of Pharmacology, Government Medical College, Nagpur, Maharashtra, India
| | - Vikas Sohanlal Sharma
- Department of Pharmacology, Indira Gandhi Government Medical College, Nagpur, Maharashtra, India
| | - Manish N Thakre
- Department of Pharmacology, Government Medical College, Nagpur, Maharashtra, India
| | - Mrunalini Kalikar
- Department of Pharmacology, Government Medical College, Nagpur, Maharashtra, India
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Miller DR, Jangula SJ. Confirmation Bias as a Factor in Pharmacy Student Assessment of Research Study Quality. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PHARMACEUTICAL EDUCATION 2019; 83:6754. [PMID: 31333252 PMCID: PMC6630873 DOI: 10.5688/ajpe6754] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/25/2017] [Accepted: 03/05/2018] [Indexed: 06/10/2023]
Abstract
Objective. To determine whether pharmacy students' prior beliefs and attitudes about drug products and dietary supplements affected their ability to analyze the quality of research study abstracts and use them in making drug recommendations to patients. Methods. Fifty-nine Doctor of Pharmacy (PharmD) students in a drug literature course were randomly assigned to receive one of two forms to evaluate four drug literature abstracts of varying quality and study design. On each form, there were two abstracts that had been taken directly from published research studies and two abstracts in which a different product had been substituted for the actual product studied. Pharmacy students completed a questionnaire about the studies to determine whether their evaluation of quality was affected by their prior opinions about the products. Results. Students correctly recognized the relative quality of the studies. However, after reading abstracts of research articles that were identical except for the product named, students were still more likely to recommend drugs approved by the Food and Drug Administration than dietary supplements. Conclusion. Pharmacy students' evaluation of clinical research studies was mildly influenced by confirmation bias but more so by the quality of the research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Donald R. Miller
- North Dakota State University, College of Health Professions, Fargo, North Dakota
| | | |
Collapse
|
9
|
|
10
|
Jackson JL, Kuriyama A, Kuwatsuka Y, Nickoloff S, Storch D, Jackson W, Zhang ZJ, Hayashino Y. Beta-blockers for the prevention of headache in adults, a systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One 2019; 14:e0212785. [PMID: 30893319 PMCID: PMC6426199 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0212785] [Citation(s) in RCA: 35] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/18/2018] [Accepted: 02/10/2019] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Headaches are a common source of pain and suffering. The study's purpose was to assess beta-blockers efficacy in preventing migraine and tension-type headache. METHODS Cochrane Register of Controlled Trials; MEDLINE; EMBASE; ISI Web of Science, clinical trial registries, CNKI, Wanfang and CQVIP were searched through 21 August 2018, for randomized trials in which at least one comparison was a beta-blocker for the prevention of migraine or tension-type headache in adults. The primary outcome, headache frequency per month, was extracted in duplicate and pooled using random effects models. DATA SYNTHESIS This study included 108 randomized controlled trials, 50 placebo-controlled and 58 comparative effectiveness trials. Compared to placebo, propranolol reduced episodic migraine headaches by 1.5 headaches/month at 8 weeks (95% CI: -2.3 to -0.65) and was more likely to reduce headaches by 50% (RR: 1.4, 95% CI: 1.1-1.7). Trial Sequential Analysis (TSA) found that these outcomes were unlikely to be due to a Type I error. A network analysis suggested that beta-blocker's benefit for episodic migraines may be a class effect. Trials comparing beta-blockers to other interventions were largely single, underpowered trials. Propranolol was comparable to other medications known to be effective including flunarizine, topiramate and valproate. For chronic migraine, propranolol was more likely to reduce headaches by at least 50% (RR: 2.0, 95% CI: 1.0-4.3). There was only one trial of beta-blockers for tension-type headache. CONCLUSIONS There is high quality evidence that propranolol is better than placebo for episodic migraine headache. Other comparisons were underpowered, rated as low-quality based on only including single trials, making definitive conclusions about comparative effectiveness impossible. There were few trials examining beta-blocker effectiveness for chronic migraine or tension-type headache though there was limited evidence of benefit. REGISTRATION Prospero (ID: CRD42017050335).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jeffrey L. Jackson
- Department of Medicine, Zablocki VA Medical Center, Milwaukee, WI, United States of America
| | - Akira Kuriyama
- Department of General Medicine, Kurashiki Central Hospital, Okayama, Japan
| | | | - Sarah Nickoloff
- Department of Medicine, Zablocki VA Medical Center, Milwaukee, WI, United States of America
| | - Derek Storch
- Department of Medicine, Zablocki VA Medical Center, Milwaukee, WI, United States of America
| | - Wilkins Jackson
- Department of Biology, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, Milwaukee, WI, United States of America
| | - Zhi-Jiang Zhang
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Health Sciences, Wuhan University, Wuhan, China
| | | |
Collapse
|
11
|
Hougaard A, Tfelt-Hansen P. General lack of use of placebo in prophylactic, randomised, controlled trials in adult migraine. A systematic review. Cephalalgia 2016; 36:960-9. [DOI: 10.1177/0333102415616880] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/16/2015] [Accepted: 10/04/2015] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Background The Clinical Trials Subcommittee of the International Headache Society (IHS) recommends that a placebo arm is included in comparative randomised clinical trials (RCTs) of multiple prophylactic drugs due to the highly variable placebo response in migraine prophylaxis studies. The use of placebo control in such trials has not been systematically assessed. Methods We performed a systematic review of all comparative RCTs of prophylactic drug treatment of migraine published in English from 2002 to 2014. PubMed was searched using the Cochrane Highly Sensitive Search Strategy for identifying reports of RCTs. Results A placebo arm was used in <10% (three of 31) of prophylactic RCTs in migraine. In only 7.1% (two of 28) of the comparative RCTs without placebo was one drug superior to another drug. Thus in 26 RCTs, including one study requiring more than 75,000 patient days, no difference was identified across treatment arms and conclusions regarding drug superiority could not be drawn. Conclusions The majority of comparative, prophylactic migraine RCTs do not include a placebo arm. Failure to include a placebo arm may result in failure to demonstrate efficacy of potentially effective migraine-prophylactic agents. In order to benefit current and future patients, the current strong tendency to omit placebo-controls in these RCTs should be replaced by adherence to the guidelines of the IHS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anders Hougaard
- Danish Headache Center and Department of Neurology, Rigshospitalet Glostrup, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Peer Tfelt-Hansen
- Department of Neurology, North Zealand Hospital in Hillerød, University of Copenhagen, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Jafarpour M, Yousefi G, Hamedi A, Shariat A, Salehi A, Heydari M. Effect of a traditional syrup from Citrus medica L. fruit juice on migraine headache: A randomized double blind placebo controlled clinical trial. JOURNAL OF ETHNOPHARMACOLOGY 2016; 179:170-176. [PMID: 26721220 DOI: 10.1016/j.jep.2015.12.040] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/27/2015] [Revised: 11/13/2015] [Accepted: 12/21/2015] [Indexed: 06/05/2023]
Abstract
ETHNOPHARMACOLOGICAL RELEVANCE In Persian ethnomedicine several herbal remedies and functional foods have been used to treat migraine headache which are mostly summarized in Qarabadin-e-kabir (Aghili-Shirazi MH, 1773). One of them is Citron syrup (Sharbat-e-Balang) containing edible Citrus medica L. fruit juice and sugar. The present study was designed to assess the efficacy and safety of Citron syrup on patients with migraine headache. MATERIALS AND METHODS Citron syrup was prepared as described in Qarabadin-e-kabir. In this double blind randomized placebo-controlled clinical trial, ninety patients with migraine headache were allocated to three parallel groups (Citron syrup, propranolol or placebo). Patients received 15ml of Citron syrup, placebo syrup or 20mg of propranolol tablet three times daily after a meal for 4 weeks. Primary outcomes were obtained from three measures: the frequency (per month), mean duration (hour) and mean intensity (visual analogue scale "VAS" 0-10 score) of headache attacks evaluated prior to and following 4 weeks of the intervention. RESULTS Citron syrup was superior to placebo in reduction of headache attacks intensity (P<0.01) and duration (p<0.0001) and as effective as propranolol in patients with migraine headache (P>0.05). However, unlike propranolol, Citron syrup could not significantly reduce the frequency of attacks compared to placebo. No indication of any serious side effects from Citron syrup was observed. CONCLUSION According to obtained results, Citron syrup as a traditional Persian remedy can be suggested as an effective treatment for decreasing pain intensity and duration of attacks in migraine headache and the effectiveness is comparable to propranolol. However, the syrup did not show significant effect on frequency of attacks.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mehrnaz Jafarpour
- Department of Phytopharmaceuticals (Traditional Pharmacy), School of Pharmacy, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran
| | - Gholamhossein Yousefi
- Department of Pharmaceutics, School of Pharmacy, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran; Center for Nanotechnology in Drug Delivery, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran.
| | - Azadeh Hamedi
- Department of Pharmacognosy, School of Pharmacy, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran; Medicinal Plants Processing Research Center, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran.
| | - Abdolhamid Shariat
- Department of Neurology, Shiraz Neurosciences Research Center and Clinical Neurology Research Center, Shiraz University, Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran
| | - Alireza Salehi
- Department of Traditional Medicine, Research Center for Traditional Medicine and History of Medicine, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran
| | - Mojtaba Heydari
- Department of Traditional Medicine, Research Center for Traditional Medicine and History of Medicine, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Jackson JL, Cogbill E, Santana-Davila R, Eldredge C, Collier W, Gradall A, Sehgal N, Kuester J. A Comparative Effectiveness Meta-Analysis of Drugs for the Prophylaxis of Migraine Headache. PLoS One 2015; 10:e0130733. [PMID: 26172390 PMCID: PMC4501738 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0130733] [Citation(s) in RCA: 146] [Impact Index Per Article: 16.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/18/2014] [Accepted: 05/24/2015] [Indexed: 01/03/2023] Open
Abstract
Objective To compare the effectiveness and side effects of migraine prophylactic medications. Design We performed a network meta-analysis. Data were extracted independently in duplicate and quality was assessed using both the JADAD and Cochrane Risk of Bias instruments. Data were pooled and network meta-analysis performed using random effects models. Data Sources PUBMED, EMBASE, Cochrane Trial Registry, bibliography of retrieved articles through 18 May 2014. Eligibility Criteria for Selecting Studies We included randomized controlled trials of adults with migraine headaches of at least 4 weeks in duration. Results Placebo controlled trials included alpha blockers (n = 9), angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors (n = 3), angiotensin receptor blockers (n = 3), anticonvulsants (n = 32), beta-blockers (n = 39), calcium channel blockers (n = 12), flunarizine (n = 7), serotonin reuptake inhibitors (n = 6), serotonin norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors (n = 1) serotonin agonists (n = 9) and tricyclic antidepressants (n = 11). In addition there were 53 trials comparing different drugs. Drugs with at least 3 trials that were more effective than placebo for episodic migraines included amitriptyline (SMD: -1.2, 95% CI: -1.7 to -0.82), -flunarizine (-1.1 headaches/month (ha/month), 95% CI: -1.6 to -0.67), fluoxetine (SMD: -0.57, 95% CI: -0.97 to -0.17), metoprolol (-0.94 ha/month, 95% CI: -1.4 to -0.46), pizotifen (-0.43 ha/month, 95% CI: -0.6 to -0.21), propranolol (-1.3 ha/month, 95% CI: -2.0 to -0.62), topiramate (-1.1 ha/month, 95% CI: -1.9 to -0.73) and valproate (-1.5 ha/month, 95% CI: -2.1 to -0.8). Several effective drugs with less than 3 trials included: 3 ace inhibitors (enalapril, lisinopril, captopril), two angiotensin receptor blockers (candesartan, telmisartan), two anticonvulsants (lamotrigine, levetiracetam), and several beta-blockers (atenolol, bisoprolol, timolol). Network meta-analysis found amitriptyline to be better than several other medications including candesartan, fluoxetine, propranolol, topiramate and valproate and no different than atenolol, flunarizine, clomipramine or metoprolol. Conclusion Several drugs good evidence supporting efficacy. There is weak evidence supporting amitriptyline’s superiority over some drugs. Selection of prophylactic medication should be tailored according to patient preferences, characteristics and side effect profiles.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jeffrey L. Jackson
- General Internal Medicine, Zablocki VA Medical Center, Milwaukee, Wisconsin, United States of America
- * E-mail:
| | - Elizabeth Cogbill
- Department of Medicine, Western Michigan School of Medicine, Kalamazoo, Michigan, United States of America
| | - Rafael Santana-Davila
- Division of Hematology and Oncology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, United States of America
| | - Christina Eldredge
- Department of Family and Community Medicine, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin, United States of America
| | - William Collier
- Department of Pharmacology, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin, United States of America
| | - Andrew Gradall
- School of Health Sciences, Gollis University, Hergaisa, Somaliland
| | - Neha Sehgal
- Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin, United States of America
| | - Jessica Kuester
- General Internal Medicine, Zablocki VA Medical Center, Milwaukee, Wisconsin, United States of America
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Abstract
Migraine is a chronic neurological disorder with episodic manifestations, progressive in some individuals. Preventive treatment is recommended for patients with frequent or disabling attacks. A sizeable proportion of migraineurs in need of preventive treatment does not significantly benefit from monotherapy. This short review evaluates the role of pharmacological polytherapy in migraine prevention.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- G Casucci
- Casa di Cura S. Francesco, Viale Europa 21, 82037 Telese Terme, BN, Italy.
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
15
|
Ahmed F, Parthasarathy R, Khalil M. Chronic daily headaches. Ann Indian Acad Neurol 2012; 15:S40-50. [PMID: 23024563 PMCID: PMC3444216 DOI: 10.4103/0972-2327.100002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/16/2012] [Revised: 05/17/2012] [Accepted: 05/19/2012] [Indexed: 11/04/2022] Open
Abstract
Chronic Daily Headache is a descriptive term that includes disorders with headaches on more days than not and affects 4% of the general population. The condition has a debilitating effect on individuals and society through direct cost to healthcare and indirectly to the economy in general. To successfully manage chronic daily headache syndromes it is important to exclude secondary causes with comprehensive history and relevant investigations; identify risk factors that predict its development and recognise its sub-types to appropriately manage the condition. Chronic migraine, chronic tension-type headache, new daily persistent headache and medication overuse headache accounts for the vast majority of chronic daily headaches. The scope of this article is to review the primary headache disorders. Secondary headaches are not discussed except medication overuse headache that often accompanies primary headache disorders. The article critically reviews the literature on the current understanding of daily headache disorders focusing in particular on recent developments in the treatment of frequent headaches.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fayyaz Ahmed
- Department of Neurology, Hull Royal Infirmary, Hull, United Kingdom
| | | | - Modar Khalil
- Department of Neurology, Hull Royal Infirmary, Hull, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
|