Tratamento do tromboembolismo pulmonar maciço por fragmentação percutânea do trombo

Percutaneous thrombectomy in patients with intermediate- and high-risk pulmonary embolism and contraindications to thrombolytics: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Catheter-directed interventions have slowly been gaining ground in the treatment of pulmonary embolism (PE), especially in patients with increased risk of bleeding. The goal of this study is to summarize the evidence for the efficacy and safety of percutaneous thrombectomy (PT) in patients with contraindications to systemic and local thrombolysis. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis using MEDLINE, Cochrane, Scopus and the Web of Science databases for studies from inception to March 2022. We included patients with intermediate- and high-risk PE with contraindications to thrombolysis; patients who received systematic or local thrombolysis were excluded. Primary endpoint was in-hospital and 30-day mortality, with secondary outcomes based on hemodynamic and radiographic changes. Major bleeding events were assessed as a safety endpoint. Seventeen studies enrolled 455 patients, with a mean age of 58.6 years and encompassing 50.4% females. In-hospital and 30-day mortality rates were 4% (95% CI 3-6%) and 5% (95% CI 3-9%) for all-comers, respectively. We found a post-procedural reduction in systolic and mean pulmonary arterial pressures by 15.4 mmHg (95% CI 7-23.7) and 10.3 mmHg (95% CI 3.1-17.5) respectively. The RV/LV ratio and Miller Index were reduced by 0.42 (95% CI 0.38-46) and 7.8 (95% CI 5.2-10.5). Major bleeding events occurred in 4% (95% CI 3-6%). This is the first meta-analysis to report pooled outcomes on PT in intermediate- and high-risk PE patients without the use of systemic or local thrombolytics. The overall mortality rate is comparable to other contemporary treatments, and is an important modality particularly in those with contraindications for adjunctive thrombolytic therapy. Further studies are needed to understand the interplay of anticoagulation with PT and catheter-directed thrombolysis.

Systemic Thrombolytic Therapy and Catheter-Directed Fragmentation with Local Thrombolytic Therapy in Patients with Pulmonary Embolism

BACKGROUND

The objective was to compare immediate and long-term results of systemic thrombolytic therapy (STT) and catheter-directed fragmentation (CDF) with local thrombolytic therapy (LTT) in patients with massive pulmonary embolism (PE).

METHODS

About 209 patients with massive PE (the high risk of early death) were included in our study. From 2008 till 2010 in the first group (n = 102), STT was performed. From 2011 till 2013 in the second group (n = 107), CDF with LTT was carried out. Echocardiography and pulmonary arteriography were performed in all patients on admission to hospital and in 5 days after treatment. The patients of both groups were re-examined in 6 months, 1, 2, and 3 years after the operation.

RESULTS

In the first group, there were 5 (4.9%) cases of in-hospital 30-day mortality. In the second group, there was 1 (0.9%) case of in-hospital 30-day mortality (P = 0.08). In the first group, a clinically significant bleeding was noted in 4 (3.9%) cases, but it caused mortality only in 1 case. In the second group, the clinically significant bleeding was not found (P = 0.038). Persistent postembolic pulmonary hypertension (PPPH) in 9.8% cases of patients in the first group and 2.9% cases of patients in the second group was determined (P = 0.048).

CONCLUSIONS

CDF combined with LTT is an effective minimal invasive treatment (helped us to reduce significantly the number of bleeding and PPPH cases), at least in the midterm, in patients with massive PE.

Rheolytic Thrombectomy with or without Adjunctive Indwelling Pharmacolysis in Patients Presenting with Acute Pulmonary Embolism Presenting with Right Heart Strain and/or Pulseless Electrical Activity

Purpose. To evaluate the safety and efficacy of the Possis rheolytic thrombectomy with or without indwelling catheter-directed pharmacolysis for the treatment of massive pulmonary embolus in patients presenting with right heart strain and/or a pulseless electrical activity (PEA). Materials and Methods. Retrospective review of patients undergoing pulmonary pharmacolysis was performed (07/2004-06/2009). Pre- and posttreatment Miller index scoring weres calculated and compared. Patients were evaluated for tPA doses, ICU stay, hospital stay, and survival by Kaplan-Meier analysis. Results. 11 patients with massive PE were found, with 10/11 presenting with a Miller score of >17 (range: 16-27, mean: 23.2). CTPA and/or echocardiographic evidence of right heart strain was found in 10/11 patients. 3 (27%) patients presented with a PEA event. Two (18%) patients had a contraindication to pharmacolysis and were treated with mechanical thrombectomy alone. The intraprocedural mortality was 9% (n = 1/11). Of the 10 patients who survived the initial treatment, 7 patients underwent standard mechanical thrombectomy initially, while 5 received power pulse spray mechanical thrombectomy. Eight of these 10 patients underwent adjunctive indwelling catheter-directed thrombolysis. The mean catheter-directed infusion duration was 18 hours (range of 12-26 hours). The average intraprocedural, infusion, and total doses of tPA were 7 mg, 19.7 mg, and 26.7 mg, respectively. There was a 91% (10/11) technical success rate. The failure was the single mortality. Average reduction in Miller score was 9.5 or 41% (P = 0.009), obstructive index of 6.4 or 47% (P = 0.03), and perfusion index of 2.7 or 28% (P = 0.05). Average ICU and hospital stay were 7.4 days (range 2-27 days) and 21.3 days (range 6-60 days), respectively. Intent to treat survival was 90% at 6, 12, and 18 months. Conclusion. Rheolytic thrombectomy with or without adjunctive catheter-directed thrombolysis provides a safe and effective method for treatment of acute PE in patients who present with right heart strain and/or a PEA event.

Endovascular therapy for acute pulmonary embolism

Acute pulmonary embolism (PE) is the third most common cause of death among hospitalized patients. Treatment escalation beyond anticoagulation therapy is necessary in patients with massive PE (defined by hemodynamic shock) as well as in many patients with submassive PE (defined by right ventricular strain). The best current evidence suggests that modern catheter-directed therapy to achieve rapid central clot debulking should be considered as an early or first-line treatment option for patients with acute massive PE; and emerging evidence suggests a catheter-directed thrombolytic infusion should be considered as adjunctive therapy for many patients with acute submassive PE. This article reviews the current approach to endovascular therapy for acute PE in the context of appropriate diagnosis, risk stratification, and management of acute massive and acute submassive PE.

Tratamento de tromboembolismo pulmonar por aspiração percutânea do trombo: relato de caso

O tromboembolismo pulmonar (TEP) maciço é uma importante causa de mortalidade. A principal causa de óbito é a disfunção do ventrículo direito, provocada pela alta resistência ao seu fluxo de ejeção, e a sobrevida do paciente, nessas situações, depende da pronta desobstrução das artérias pulmonares. A anticoagulação, o uso de trombolíticos e a embolectomia pulmonar representam opções terapêuticas consolidadas para diferentes cenários clínicos de TEP. A Radiologia Intervencionista representa hoje uma alternativa terapêutica para pacientes com TEP maciço e contraindicação ao uso de trombolíticos, sendo uma escolha menos invasiva do que a embolectomia. Os autores relataram um caso de paciente com TEP maciço e contraindicação à trombólise, a qual foi submetida a aspiração percutânea dos trombos das artérias pulmonares, e discutiram os principais mecanismos de técnicas endovasculares para tratamento de TEP.

Catheter-directed therapy for the treatment of massive pulmonary embolism: systematic review and meta-analysis of modern techniques

PURPOSE

Systemic thrombolysis for the treatment of acute pulmonary embolism (PE) carries an estimated 20% risk of major hemorrhage, including a 3%-5% risk of hemorrhagic stroke. The authors used evidence-based methods to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of modern catheter-directed therapy (CDT) as an alternative treatment for massive PE.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The systematic review was initiated by electronic literature searches (MEDLINE, EMBASE) for studies published from January 1990 through September 2008. Inclusion criteria were applied to select patients with acute massive PE treated with modern CDT. Modern techniques were defined as the use of low-profile devices (< or =10 F), mechanical fragmentation and/or aspiration of emboli including rheolytic thrombectomy, and intraclot thrombolytic injection if a local drug was infused. Relevant non-English language articles were translated into English. Paired reviewers assessed study quality and abstracted data. Meta-analysis was performed by using random effects models to calculate pooled estimates for complications and clinical success rates across studies. Clinical success was defined as stabilization of hemodynamics, resolution of hypoxia, and survival to hospital discharge.

RESULTS

Five hundred ninety-four patients from 35 studies (six prospective, 29 retrospective) met the criteria for inclusion. The pooled clinical success rate from CDT was 86.5% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 82.1%, 90.2%). Pooled risks of minor and major procedural complications were 7.9% (95% CI: 5.0%, 11.3%) and 2.4% (95% CI: 1.9%, 4.3%), respectively. Data on the use of systemic thrombolysis before CDT were available in 571 patients; 546 of those patients (95%) were treated with CDT as the first adjunct to heparin without previous intravenous thrombolysis.

CONCLUSIONS

Modern CDT is a relatively safe and effective treatment for acute massive PE. At experienced centers, CDT should be considered as a first-line treatment for patients with massive PE.