Human immunodeficiency virus type 1 neutralization by plasma from B or F genotype infected individuals

Short communication: neutralizing antibodies in HIV-1-infected Brazilian individuals

Tests for the detection of the humoral immune response to HIV-1 have to be standardized and established, demanding regional efforts. For this purpose the neutralizing antibody (NAb) assay for HIV-1 in TZM-bl cells was introduced in Brazil. Twenty plasma samples from HIV-1-infected individuals were assayed: 10 progressors and 10 long-term nonprogressors. These were tested against eight env-pseudotyped viruses (psVs) in the TZM-bl NAb assay and against HIV-1 strain HTLV/IIIB (HIV-1 IIIB) in primary lymphocytes. Forty-four percent of the samples showed neutralizing titers for psVs and 55% for HIV-1 IIIB. Plasma from progressors showed a broader neutralization and a higher potency. The introduction of these reference reagents encourages the participation of Brazil in future comparative assessments of anti-HIV-1 antibodies.

Higher cross-subtype IFN-γ ELISpot responses to Gag and Nef peptides in Brazilian HIV-1 subtype B- and F1- than in C-infected subjects

HIV-1 diversity has been considered a huge challenge for the HIV-1 vaccine development. To overcome it, immunogens based on centralized sequences, as consensus, have been tested. In Brazil, the co-circulation of three subtypes offers a suitable scenario to test T cell cross-subtype responses to consensus sequences. Furthermore, we included peptides based on closest viral isolates (CVI) from each subtype analyzed to compare with T cell responses detected against the consensus sequences. The study included 32 subjects infected with HIV-1 subtype B (n=13),C (n=11), and F1 (n=8). Gag and Nef-specific T cell responses were evaluated by IFN-γ-ELISpot assay. Peptides based on CVI sequences were similar to consensus in both reducing genetic distance and detecting T cell responses. A high cross-subtype response between B and F1 in both regions was observed in HIV-1 subtype B and F1-infected subjects. We also found no significant difference in responses to subtype B and C consensus peptides among subtype B-infected subjects. In contrast, the magnitude of T cell responses to consensus C peptides in the Gag region was higher than to consensus B peptides among HIV-1 subtype C-infected subjects. Regarding Nef, subtype C-infected subjects showed higher values to consensus C than to consensus F1 peptides. Moreover, subtype F1-infected subjects presented lower responses to subtype C peptides than to subtype F1 and B. A similar level of responses was detected with group M based peptides in subtype B and F1 infected subjects. However, among subtype C infected subjects, this set of peptides detected lower levels of response than consensus C. Overall, the level of cross-subtype response between subtypes B and F1 was higher than between subtype C and B or C and F1. Our data suggests that the barrier of genetic diversity in HIV-1 group M for vaccine design may be dependent on the subtypes involved.