Improved double-fuse technique for post-bariatric brachioplasty

Complications in Brachioplasty: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

Brachioplasty procedures have experienced a surge in popularity over the past decade, mirroring the rise in bariatric procedures and growing population of massive weight loss patients. The authors estimated the incidence of associated complications and identify possible patient- or procedure-related predictive factors.

METHODS

A systematic review was performed using the PubMed, Cochrane, and Embase databases; extracted data were synthesized through a random-effects meta-analysis of proportions and a multivariate meta-regression.

RESULTS

Twenty-nine studies were included in the meta-analysis, representing 1578 patients; all studies followed an observational design. The incidence of adverse outcomes assessed included aberrant scarring, 9.9 percent (95 percent CI, 6.1 to 15.6 percent); ptosis or recurrence, 7.79 percent (95 percent CI, 4.8 to 12.35 percent); wound dehiscence, 6.81 percent (95 percent CI, 4.63 to 9.90 percent); seroma, 5.91 percent (95 percent CI, 3.75 to 9.25 percent); infection, 3.64 percent (95 percent CI, 2.38 to 5.53 percent); nerve-related complications, 2.47 percent (95 percent CI, 1.45 to 4.18 percent); lymphedema or lymphocele formation, 2.46 percent (95 percent CI, 1.55 to 3.88 percent); skin necrosis or delayed healing, 2.27 percent (95 percent CI, 1.37 to 3.74 percent); and hematoma, 2.06 percent (95 percent CI, 1.38 to 3.06 percent). The operative reintervention rate for aesthetic purposes was 7.46 percent (95 percent CI, 5.05 to 10.88 percent), and the operative reintervention rate for nonaesthetic purposes was 1.62 percent (95 percent CI, 1.00 to 2.61 percent). Multivariate meta-regression demonstrated that medial incision placement was associated with a higher risk of complications, whereas the incidence of certain complications was lowered with adjunctive liposuction (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

In the absence of large clinical trials, the present meta-analysis can serve to provide plastic surgeons with an evidence-based reference to improve informed consent and guide procedure selection with respect to the complication profile of brachioplasty.

'J' brachioplasty technique in massive weight loss patients

Upper extremity body reshaping is a very frequent surgical procedure in massive weight loss patients. Many surgeons have presented different patterns of brachioplasty skin excision and a variety of adjunctive techniques, each of them claiming improvements in scar aesthetic, arm shape or overall safety of the procedure. In this pape,r we want to illustrate our personal brachioplasty technique for massive weight loss patients. Our incision design named 'J' Brachioplasty is described. Between March 2013 and March 2016, a retrospective study of patients with massive weight loss and clinical diagnosis of brachial ptosis undergoing surgical reconstruction with 'J' brachioplasty was performed. All patients were treated according to a standard surgical procedure described in detail in the paper. The presence of axillary and thoracic skin excess was also recorded for every subject, as well as clinical and surgical postoperative complications. A total number of 73 Caucasian underwent J-shaped brachioplasty. Our technique allowed us to treat both arm and thoracic skin excess with a single skin incision. Among our casuistic we had only two cases of postoperative bleeding and four cases of partial wound dehiscence due to tension. Seroma was reported only in one (female) patient. Despite the recent introduction our technique has proven to reach good results in massive weight loss patients.

Complications associated with brachioplasty: a literature review

Background:

Paralleling the growth of bariatric surgery, the demand for post-bariatric body-contouring surgery is increasing. Weight loss is the main cause, although not the only one, that drives patients to arm lift surgery. Several surgical techniques have been proposed over the years. Our aim was to consider the complications and outcomes according to the performed technique, through a wide review of the literature.

Methods:

A search on PubMed/Medline was performed using “brachioplasty”, “upper arm lifting”, and “techniques” as key words. Embase, Medline (OvidSP), Web of Science, Scopus, PubMed publisher, Cochrane, and Google Scholar were searched as well. As inclusion criteria, we selected the clinical studies describing techniques of brachioplasty. We excluded the papers in which complications related to brachioplasty were not specified. We also excluded literature-review articles.

Results:

We found 27 studies from 1995 to 2015. Overall, 1065 patients were treated. Different techniques were applied. Complications were observed in 308/1065 patients (28.9%). The most frequent complications were hypertrophic scarring, seroma and hematoma. Surgical revision rate ranged from 0 to 21 percent. Nerve damage occurred in a modest percentage of patients (16/1065, 1.5%). No major complications, such as thromboembolism and sepsis, were observed.

Conclusions:

Brachioplasty is a safe surgical procedure. All the brachioplasty techniques showed positive outcomes, in term of patients’ satisfaction and clinical results. Nevertheless, minor complications occurred in a high percentage of patients, regardless the performed surgical procedure. Patients should be informed about the possible formation of hypertrophic scars and nerve injuries. (www.actabiomedica.it)

Liposuction-assisted medial brachioplasty after massive weight loss: an efficient procedure with a high functional benefit

BACKGROUND

Brachioplasty frequently offers functional benefits but results in poor aesthetic scars and a relatively high complication rate. The authors describe the complications and risk factors inherent in liposuction-assisted medial brachioplasty and assess patient satisfaction with the functional and aesthetic benefits.

METHODS

A 5-year retrospective study was performed that included all patients who underwent liposuction-assisted medial brachioplasty. Complications were reviewed and analyzed by aesthetic and nonaesthetic categories, and patient satisfaction was rated.

RESULTS

Sixty-six patients were included (mean age, 44.4 years). The average body mass index was 30.2 kg/m; mean weight reduction was 50.72 kg. Thirty-seven patients (56.1 percent) developed at least one complication, including six (9.1 percent) with a nonaesthetic complication versus 31 (47.0 percent) with an aesthetic complication. Complications were significantly associated with a longer operative time (p = 0.015), 233 minutes in the complication group versus 164 minutes in the no-complication group. Fifty-three patients answered the questionnaire. Forty-six (86.8 percent) stated that they would undergo this intervention again. Overall satisfaction was reported as excellent for 12 patients (22.6 percent) and pleasing for 24 (45.3 percent). All patients rated the functional outcome superior or equal to the aesthetic outcome. Quality of life was estimated to be better after than before the intervention for 41 patients (77.4 percent).

CONCLUSIONS

Liposuction-assisted medial brachioplasty is a safe and efficient technique. It offers a functional benefit with a low nonaesthetic complication rate. Despite the inherent scars, the majority of patients would undergo this intervention again because of an important satisfaction rate and improvement in quality of life.

CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Risk, III.