BARIATRIC SURGERY IN THE ELDERLY: RESULTS OF A MEAN FOLLOW-UP OF FIVE YEARS

Outcomes of Endoscopic Sleeve Gastroplasty in the Elder Population

Purpose

With the aging of the population and the epidemic spread of obesity, the frequency of older individuals with obesity is steadily growing. To date, no data evaluating the use of endoscopic sleeve gastroplasty (ESG) in the elderly have been published. In this case series, we evaluate the short- and medium-term outcomes of ESG in patients with obesity aged 65 years and older.

Materials and Methods

A retrospective analysis was done on a prospective database; patients aged 65 years and older were included in our analysis. EWL%, TBWL%, the Bariatric Analysis and Reporting Outcome System (BAROS) questionnaire, and the presence of comorbidities were assessed.

Results

Eighteen patients aged 65 years and older underwent ESG between November 2017 and July 2021. The median age was 67 years and the mean baseline BMI was 41.2 kg/m². After ESG, the median TBWL% was 15.1%, 15.5%, and 15.5% at 6, 12, and 24 months, while the median %EWL was 39%, 37%, and 41% at 6, 12, and 24 months, respectively. The median BAROS score was 3.0, 3.4, and 2.5 at 6, 12, and 24 months, respectively. Six out of twelve patients with hypertension and 3/4 diabetic patients reduced or removed their medications within 12 months following ESG. Two out of six patients with OSA stopped therapy with CPAP. No adverse events were recorded.

Conclusion

According to our experience, ESG is a promising therapeutic option for elder individuals with obesity who fail non-invasive methods, and who refuse or are deemed not suitable for bariatric surgery because of age and comorbidities.

Graphical abstract

How safe is adolescent bariatric surgery? An analysis of short-term outcomes

BACKGROUND

The prevalence of childhood obesity in the U.S. has tripled over the last three decades. However, fewer than 1% of children with severe obesity undergo surgical weight loss interventions each year.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

All patients age 10 to 19 years old who underwent laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) or sleeve gastrectomy (SG) from 2015 through 2018 in the Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery Accreditation and Quality Improvement Program database were included in this retrospective cohort analysis. The primary outcomes were mortality and overall complications. Procedural trends, readmission and reoperation rates were also examined using a multivariate regression model.

RESULTS

Patients had a mean BMI of 47.3 kg/m² and 80.0% were either 18 or 19 years old (n = 4,051). There were two reported deaths. Reoperation within 30 days occurred in 1.1% of patients, readmission in 3.5%, and complications in 1.2%. Among all readmissions, primary reasons included nausea/vomiting or nutritional depletion (41.3%) and abdominal pain (16.3%). RYGB was associated with higher odds for readmission (p = 0.006) and complications (p = 0.005). Higher BMI and younger age were not associated with an increased likelihood to experience poorer outcomes. The proportion of patients undergoing SG increased yearly over RYGB from 73.9% in 2015 to 84.3% in 2018.

CONCLUSIONS

Bariatric surgery appears to be low risk for adolescents and SG has become the operation of choice. More research on early consideration of surgical therapy in adolescents with severe obesity is needed given the safety profile.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III.

Postoperative 4-Year Outcomes in Septuagenarians Following Bariatric Surgery

BACKGROUND

Bariatric surgery is the most effective treatment for obesity; however, its utilization in older patients remains low. There is a dearth of literature on long-term effectiveness and safety of bariatric surgery in septuagenarian patients. The aim of this study was to compare the short- and long-term outcomes of bariatric surgery in this population.

METHODS

Patients who underwent primary laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGB) or laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) at our institution between 2011 and 2015 were included. Patients were divided into two age groups: < 70 and ≥ 70 years. Outcomes included postoperative hospital length of stay (LOS), 30-day complications, up to 4-year complications, 90-day mortality, comorbidity resolution, and 4-year weight loss (BMI change-ΔΒΜΙ). The groups were also compared using multivariable analyses adjusting for potential confounders (gender, preoperative BMI, and type of procedure).

RESULTS

Twenty-nine septuagenarians who underwent 21 LRYGB (72.4%) and 8 LSG (27.6%) were compared to 1016 patients aged < 70 years operated on during the same time period. Additionally, following the multivariable analyses, the septuagenarians had higher LOS (3 vs 2.3 days, p = 0.01), 4-year complications (38% vs 23%, p = 0.012), and less comorbidities' resolution but similar 4-year ΔBMI (- 8.6 vs - 10, p = 0.421), and 30-day complications (10% vs 6%, p = 0.316).

CONCLUSION

Bariatric surgery in carefully selected septuagenarians can be accomplished with acceptable safety and comparable postoperative weight loss at 4 years. Surgeons may consider broadening their selection criteria to include this patient subgroup but may allow the patients to reap its benefits if offered earlier in life.

Approach to Obesity in the Older Population

Until recently, weight loss in older obese people was feared because of ensuing muscle loss and frailty. Facing overall increasing longevity, high rates of obesity in older individuals (age ≥ 65 years) and a growing recognition of the health and functional cost of the number of obesity years, abetted by evidence that intentional weight loss in older obese people is safe, this approach is gradually, but not unanimously, being replaced by more active principles. Lifestyle interventions that include reduced but sufficient energy intake, age-adequate protein and micronutrient intake, coupled with aerobic and resistance exercise tailored to personal limitations, can induce weight loss with improvement in frailty indices. Sustained weight loss at this age can prevent or ameliorate diabetes. More active steps are controversial. The use of weight loss medications, particularly glucagon-like peptide-1 analogs (liraglutide as the first example), provides an additional treatment tier. Its safety and cardiovascular health benefits have been convincingly shown in older obese patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. In our opinion, this option should not be denied to obese individuals with prediabetes or other obesity-related comorbidities based on age. Finally, many reports now provide evidence that bariatric surgery can be safely performed in older people as the last treatment tier. Risk-benefit issues should be considered with extreme care and disclosed to candidates. The selection process requires good presurgical functional status, individualized consideration of the sequels of obesity, and reliance on centers that are highly experienced in the surgical procedure as well as short-term and long-term subsequent comprehensive care and support.

Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy Versus Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass in Elderly Bariatric Patients: Safety and Efficacy-a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

INTRODUCTION

Obesity is a chronic disease due to excess fat storage, a genetic predisposition, and environmental contribution where surgery offers a viable treatment option. The surgical treatment of obesity in the elderly population (> 55 years) remains controversial.

PURPOSE

To evaluate the safety and efficacy of laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) and laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGB) in elderly bariatric patients.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Data was sourced from MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, PubMed, and Cochrane databases for peer-reviewed, randomized controlled trials, and observational studies in the English language were searched from the year 1991 until 2019. From the extracted data, early and late procedural complications and mortality were used as safety outcomes. Weight loss was the primary outcome for effectiveness while the resolution of obesity-related comorbidities was included as secondary outcomes. The Review Manager (Rev Man 5.3)^™ software was used for statistical analysis.

RESULTS

Of the forty-one screened studies, nine studies were included in the final analysis. There was no difference between LSG and LRYGB regarding early complications and mortality 3.6% versus 5.8% (p = 0.15) and 0.1% versus 0.8% (p = 0.27). Patients who underwent LRYGB had more late complications compared with those who underwent LSG (0.07% and 0.03%, p = 0.001). There was no difference in terms of weight loss at the end of 1 year. Patients who underwent LRYGB had a better resolution of obesity-related comorbidities, not statistically significant.

CONCLUSION

LRYGB has better efficacy when compared with LSG. However, high-risk elderly patients should be considered for LSG given the lesser morbidity and comparable efficacy with LRYGB.

Efficacy and safety of bariatric revisions in patients older than 65 years old

BACKGROUND

Bariatric surgery in advanced age patients (>65-years-old) has been proven safe and effective. Revisional bariatric surgery is infrequently required for cases of refractory obesity. However, there is a paucity of data regarding revisional surgery for the elderly. We hypothesize that revisional bariatric surgery is viable and safe in elderly patients.

METHODS

Retrospective chart review of all bariatric revisions performed at two high-volume bariatric centers of excellence between 2011 and 2018. Perioperative and long-term outcomes were compared between patients >65 and those <65-years-old.

RESULTS

145 bariatric revisions were performed for weight loss. 10% (N = 15) were >65 years old. There were no differences in mortality between the two groups There was a longer median length of stay in the younger cohort (2 vs 1 day, p = 0.001). Percent excess weight loss was similar at 12-months, as was resolution of comorbidities.

CONCLUSIONS

Bariatric revisions in elderly patients appears to be safe and effective. Revisional surgery in this population was not shown to have increased morbidity or mortality with similar excess body weight loss when compared to a younger cohort.

Sleeve Gastrectomy Versus Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass in the Elderly: 1-Year Preliminary Outcomes in a Randomized Trial (BASE Trial)

PURPOSE

Despite the increasing prevalence of elderly obese patients, bariatric surgery remains controversial in this population. Recent publications have focused on perioperative safety, but few studies have addressed clinical outcomes.

OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to evaluate 1-year outcomes of laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) compared to laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGB) in patients 65 years or older.

METHODS

Thirty-six elderly obese patients were recruited for an open-label randomized trial from September 2017 to May 2019, comparing LSG to LRYGB. One-year outcomes were evaluated based on weight loss, functionality, and control of clinical conditions.

RESULTS

The median age (67 × 67 years; p=0.67) and initial body mass index (BMI) (46.3 × 51.3 kg/m²; p=0.28) were similar between groups. Preoperative BMI (after weight loss pre-operative treatment) was higher in LRYGB group (41.9 × 47.6 kg/m²; p= 0.03). After 12 months, EWL and TWL were higher in LRYGB group (60 × 68%; p=0.04; 24.9 × 31.4%; p<0.01). HbA1c reduction was higher after LRYGB (-1.1 × -0.5%; p<0.01) as well as LDL control (-27.5 × +11.5 mg/dL p= 0.02). No difference was noted between LRYGB and LSG concerning hypertension control, triglycerides, HDL, and functionality.

CONCLUSION

Weight loss, diabetes, and LDL control were better achieved with LRYGB after 12 months.

Bariatric surgery in the elderly: a randomized prospective study comparing safety of sleeve gastrectomy and Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (BASE Trial)

BACKGROUND

The aging population along with the obesity epidemic has increased the number of older patients undergoing bariatric surgery. Nevertheless, there is still conflicting data regarding surgical safety in this population.

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to compare the surgical morbidity of laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) and laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGB) for older patients.

SETTING

University hospital, São Paulo, Brazil.

METHODS

We performed a prospective randomized clinical trial from September 2017 to May 2019. Obese patients aged ≥65 years were randomized to LSG or LRYGB. Data collection included demographic information, body mass index (BMI), and co-morbidities. We assessed readmission, postoperative complications, and mortality. Complications were scored according to Clavien-Dindo classification.

RESULTS

A total of 36 patients, with a BMI between 35.5 and 52.8 kg/m² were randomized to either LSG (18 patients) or LRYGB (18 patients). The overall complication rate was similar between LSG and LRYGB (3 versus 7, P = .13). Severe complication was more prevalent in LRYGB patients but had no statistically significant difference (0 versus 3, P = .07). Each group had 1 readmission and there was no mortality in 90-day follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

Morbidity and mortality rates of bariatric surgery are low in elderly obese patients. Despite not statistically significant, LSG had a lower rate of severe complications compared with LRYGB in this population setting.

Roux-en-Y gastric bypass in the elderly: is age a determining factor in our outcomes?

BACKGROUND

While patients are becoming older and the prevalence of obesity increases worldwide, literature on the impact of age on outcomes after laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGB) is scarce. The balance between surgical risks and clinical benefits of LRYGB are unclear in relation to age.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the impact of age on the risk of postoperative complications, postoperative weight loss, and remission of co-morbidities for patients who underwent LRYGB.

SETTING

A high-volume center for bariatric surgery.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis of 582 patients who underwent LRYGB was performed. Linear logistic regression analyses were performed to evaluate the potential impact of age on the postoperative percentage of total weight loss (%TWL). Multivariable binary logistic regression analyses were performed to evaluate whether age was independently associated with the risk of postoperative complications and likelihood of remission of co-morbidities (hypertension, diabetes, and dyslipidemia). In addition, these outcomes were descriptively analyzed for the following 3 age groups: the young (18-39 yr), the middle aged (40-59 yr), and the elderly (≥60 yr).

RESULTS

Patients with hypertension were more prone to developing postoperative complications (odds ratio 2.435, 95% confidence interval: 1.241-4.777) and no other factors were found to be associated with the risk of postoperative complications. Older age was significantly associated with lower %TWL at a postoperative follow-up of 6 (ß = -.117, P = .004), 12 (ß = -.177, P < .001), and 36 months (ß = -.169, P = .001), but not at 60 months (ß = -.097, P = .161). Nonetheless, a %TWL of 30% was observed in patients who were >60 years at the time of surgery. Age was not associated with the likelihood of co-morbidity resolution after LRYGB. The remission of hypertension was less likely in patients with co-existence of diabetes (odds ratio .334, 95% confidence interval: .136-.821) and in patients with a longer length of postoperative follow-up (odds ratio .982, 95% confidence interval: .966-.998).

CONCLUSIONS

Although older age seems to be associated with lower postoperative %TWL, elderly patients can still achieve a %TWL of 30% after LRYGB. In this study, age was not found to be an independent predictor of postoperative complications nor the likelihood of co-morbidity resolution. Therefore, older age alone should not be an absolute contraindication for LRYGB.

Safety and effectiveness of laparoscopic Y-en-Roux gastric bypass surgery in obese elderly patients

Purpose

To analyze, in aged obese patients, the weight loss, comorbidity control, and safety postoperative complications of bariatric surgery by Roux-en-Y gastric bypass technique.

Methods

Twenty-seven patients who underwent laparoscopic weight-reducing gastroplasty with Roux-en-Y gastric bypass to treat obesity were included. All patients were ≥ 60 years old at the time of surgery. The Wilcoxon test was used for statistical analysis, and a p-value ≤0.05it was considered significant.

Results

Ten (90.9%) patients with dyslipidemia were cured (p < 0.001). Nine (81.8%) patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus had total improvement and 2 (18.2%) had partial improvement (p = 0.003). In 23 patients with systemic arterial hypertension, 9 (39.1%) achieved total improvement and 14 (60.9%) partial improvement (p = 0.140). Five (71.4%) patients with obstructive sleep apnea syndrome were cured (p = <0.001). For other comorbidities, no partial improvement or cure was shown.

Conclusions

Roux-en-Y gastric bypass surgery in obese elderly patients can be performed safely and with low morbidity and mortality rates. The benefits of weight loss and reduced comorbidities are promising and like those of the younger population.

Changes in Body Composition, Comorbidities, and Nutritional Status Associated with Lower Weight Loss After Bariatric Surgery in Older Subjects

BACKGROUND

To provide greater insight into bariatric surgery outcomes in aging patients, we compared changes in body weight, body composition, obesity-related comorbidities, and nutritional status between older and younger subjects.

METHODS

We analyzed data collected between January 2004 and December 2014 from our prospective bariatric cohort. Older patients (OP, ≥ 60 years at the time of surgery, n = 93; 66% Roux-en-Y gastric bypass, 34% sleeve gastrectomy) were compared with younger patients (YP, < 60 years, n = 186), matched 1:2 on sex, body mass index, diabetes, and surgical procedure. Body composition was assessed by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry.

RESULTS

Weight loss and excess weight loss at 12 months were lower in OP vs. YP (mean ± SD, 30.1 ± 10.1 vs. 34.1 ± 11.9 kg, 60.6 ± 21.2 vs. 66.8 ± 23.4%, respectively, p < 0.05 for both). Both lean body mass and fat mass loss were lower in OP vs. YP (8.4 ± 3.4 vs. 9.2 ± 9.0 kg, 19.4 ± 8.7 vs. 21.9 ± 9.1 kg, respectively, p < 0.05). The remission rate for type 2 diabetes was significantly lower in OP vs. YP (24 vs. 45%), as well as improvement in hypertension (14 vs. 46%), dyslipidemia (27 vs. 47%), and knee pain. There was no difference in micronutrient deficiencies between groups.

CONCLUSIONS

These data indicate that although bariatric surgery is not as effective for weight loss in older as in younger subjects, it is a safe option regarding a comprehensive set of nutritional variables which enables significant improvement in obesity-related outcomes.

Clinical and Metabolic Improvement after Bariatric Surgery in Older Adults: A 6-Year Follow-Up

AIM

Our aim in this study was to assess the clinical and metabolic impact of bariatric surgery in older adults.

METHODS

This analytical, observational, longitudinal study was carried out with individuals aged 60 years and older who underwent bariatric surgery after 55 years of age at a specialist center for obesity management located in the Federal District of Brazil. Post-surgery changes in the following parameters from baseline: total body weight, excess weight lost, body mass index (BMI), number of medications, number of comorbidities, and weight regain. Mean values of the variables of interest before and after surgery were compared using the nonparametric Wilcoxon test, Poisson regression and multiple linear regression to test the effect of different variables.

RESULTS

Overall, 74 subjects were assessed (78.3% female, mean age 65.8 ± 3.9 years). The mean time from bariatric surgery to assessment was 75.7 months. The mean weight and BMI in the overall sample at baseline was 101.9 ± 17.1 kg and 39.8 ± 4.9 kg/m², respectively. After the procedure, mean weight and BMI were reduced to 75.9 ± 12.9 kg and 29.4 ± 4.1 kg/m², respectively. Reductions were also achieved in mean number of medications used (P<0.001), number of comorbidities (P<0.001), triglyceride levels (P=0.007), and glycated hemoglobin (P=0.02). The mean HDL level increased significantly (P=0.008).

CONCLUSION

In this sample, bariatric surgery was not only useful to manage obesity, but also reduced the number of comorbidities and medications used, and was associated with improvement in clinical and laboratory parameters.

Bariatric surgery as a safe and effective intervention for the control of comorbidities in older adults

INTRODUCTION: In addition to being associated with worsening of diseases related to metabolic syndrome and musculoskeletal disorders, obesity in older adults increases the risk of falls, frailty syndrome, depression, and dementia, with consequent functional loss. Among all treatments available, bariatric surgery is an option for eligible patients. OBJECTIVES: To discuss aspects related to the safety and benefits of bariatric surgery for the control or remission of comorbidities in older adults. METHODS: This literature review was carried out in databases, using the following keywords: bariatric surgery and elderly or aged or older adult and comorbidities or safety. We included clinical trials, observational studies, comparative studies, and reviews that evaluated the effect of bariatric surgery on the control or remission of comorbidities in older adults. RESULTS: In recent years, several studies have evidenced not only control or remission of comorbidities, such as diabetes, hypertension, and sleep apnea syndrome, but also a low rate of complications, similar to those observed in young people. CONCLUSIONS: Based on the results of these studies, bariatric surgical procedures can be indicated for eligible older adults, without age restriction, taking into account functional and life expectancy aspects.

Impact of age on postoperative complications following bariatric surgery

Background: The impact of age on complications following bariatric surgery remains unclear. Research is therefore warranted among previously unstudied populations of bariatric surgery patients. The aim of the current study was to assess the impact of age on postoperative complications following bariatric surgery in Saudi Arabia. Methods: This retrospective study included 301 patients who underwent bariatric surgery between January 2011 and July 2016. Patients were classified into three groups according to age: < 25 years; 25–36 years; and >36 years. Primary outcomes were determined by identifying the number of complications reported during a period of 180 days. The negative binomial model was used to assess the relationship between age and the high rate of postoperative complications following adjustment for confounding variables. Results: The incidence of overall complications was 10.1% in the < 25-year age group, 15% in the 25–36-year age group, and 24.2% in the >36-year age group. After adjusting for confounding variables, it was discovered that the risk of postoperative complications increases with age. The risk was higher in the >36-year age group than in the >25-year age group [adjusted relative rate (aRR) = 2.35; 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.046–5.290; p = 0.039]. Diabetes (aRR = 3.27), adjustable gastric bands (aRR = 3.40), and a more lengthy hospital stay (aRR = 1.23) were associated with increased rates of postoperative complications. Conclusion: Age is independently associated with a high rate of postoperative complications following bariatric surgery. The results showed that patients with diabetes, those using adjustable gastric bands, and those with longer length of hospital stay had significantly higher incidence of postoperative complications. These findings indicate the need for risk stratification tools to evaluate patients as candidates for bariatric surgery and to use as a guide for identifying optimal preoperative factors.

Bariatric Surgery in the Elderly Is Associated with Similar Surgical Risks and Significant Long-Term Health Benefits

PURPOSE

Older age (> 60) has been considered a relative contraindication for bariatric surgery due to increased complication risk. This study examined the risks and benefits of bariatric surgery for patients older than 60 years in Canadian population.

METHODS

This was a retrospective cohort study of the Ontario Bariatric Registry: a database recording peri-operative and post-operative outcomes of publicly funded bariatric surgeries across the province. Patients who completed 1 year follow-up, who underwent laparoscopic gastric bypass (LRYGB) or laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) between January 2010 and May 2013, were divided into older (> 60) and younger (> 60) cohorts, and outcomes were compared.

RESULTS

Between January 2010 and May 2013, 3166 registry patients underwent LRYGB or LSG and completed 1-year follow-up. Of these, 204 (6.5%) were older than 60 years, with 175 (85.8%) undergoing LRYGB and 29 (14.2%) LSG. Demographics were similar, except for a higher number of males in the older group (59 (28.9%) versus 452 (15.3%) (p < 0.001)). No significant difference in complication rate was noted (15% for younger cohort versus 13.8% (p = 0.889)). The average percentage of excess weight loss was significantly higher in the younger population (60.72% versus 56.25% (p < 0.05)) overall, however not significantly in the LSG group. Reduction in medication use post-surgery for management of co-morbidities was significantly higher in the older patients (- 0.91 versus - 2.03 (p < 0.001)).

CONCLUSION

The older cohort who underwent LRYGB or LSG was at no greater risk for intra-operative and post-operative complications and showed greater reduction in medication use post-surgery when compared to the younger cohort.

Perioperative and 1-year outcomes of bariatric surgery in septuagenarians: implications for patient selection

BACKGROUND

Although bariatric surgery is an effective treatment for obesity, utilization of bariatric procedures in older adults remains low. Previous work reported higher morbidity in older patients undergoing bariatric surgery. However, the generalizability of these data to contemporary septuagenarians is unclear.

OBJECTIVES

We sought to evaluate differences in 30-day outcomes, 1-year weight loss, and co-morbidity remission after bariatric surgery among 3 age groups as follows: <45 years, 45-69 years, and ≥70 years.

SETTING

Statewide quality improvement collaborative.

METHODS

Using a large quality improvement collaborative, we identified patients undergoing sleeve gastrectomy (SG) or Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) between 2006 and 2018. We used multivariable logistic regression models to evaluate the association between age cohorts and 30-day outcomes, 1-year weight loss, and co-morbidity remission.

RESULTS

We identified 641 septuagenarians who underwent SG (68.5%) or RYGB (31.5%). Compared with 45-69 year olds, septuagenarians had higher rates of hemorrhage (5.1% versus 3.1%; P = .045) after RYGB and higher rates of leak/perforation (.9% versus .3%; P = .044) after SG. Compared with younger patients, septuagenarians lost less of their excess weight, losing 64.8% after RYGB and 53.8% after SG. Remission rates for diabetes and obstructive sleep were similar for patients aged ≥70 years and 45-69 years.

CONCLUSIONS

Bariatric surgery in septuagenarians results in substantial weight loss and co-morbidity remission with an acceptable safety profile. Surgeons with self-imposed age limits should consider broadening their selection criteria to include patients ≥70 years old.

Safety of bariatric surgery in patients older than 65 years

BACKGROUND

The increase in life expectancy along with the obesity epidemic has led to an increase in the number of older patients undergoing bariatric surgery. There is conflicting evidence regarding the safety of performing bariatric procedures on older patients.

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to compare the safety of laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (SG) and Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) for older patients (>65 yr).

SETTING

Nationwide analysis of accredited centers.

METHODS

The Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery Accreditation and Quality Improvement Program 2015 to 2017 database was used to identify nonrevisional laparoscopic RYGB and SG procedures. Comparisons were made based on patient age. Clinical outcomes included postoperative events and mortality.

RESULTS

There was a total 13,422 and 5395 matched pairs for SG and RYGB in comparing patients aged 18 years to those aged 65 and >65 years, respectively, and 5395 matched RYGB and SG procedures performed in patients >65 years. The complication rate was higher in older patients undergoing RYGB compared with SG (risk difference = 2.39%, 95% confidence interval: 1.57%-3.21%, P < .0001). When comparing older to younger patients, the older group had a higher complication rate for SG but not for RYGB (SG: risk difference = 1.01%, 95% confidence interval: .59%-1.43%, P < .0001, RYGB: risk difference = .59%, 95% confidence interval: -.29% to 1.47%, P = .2003).

CONCLUSIONS

Overall complication rates of bariatric surgery are low in patients >65 years. SG appears to have a favorable safety profile in this patient population compared with RYGB. The overall complication rate for RYGB is not significantly different between the older and younger groups.

Treatment of obesity in older persons-A systematic review

The study aims to systematically review the available evidence regarding weight loss interventions (lifestyle, surgical, and pharmacological) for obesity in adults aged over 60 years. A search of prospective, randomized studies took place in January 2018, on Medline (Web of Science) and PubMed databases. Search terms included the following: elderly, obese, hypocaloric, pharmacotherapy, and bariatric surgery. Abstracts were screened for eligibility. A total of 256 publications regarding lifestyle interventions were identified; of these, 69 studies were eligible. As no eligible studies were identified for pharmacotherapy or bariatric surgery, the search was broadened to include non- randomized studies. Four pharmacotherapy and 66 surgery studies were included. Lifestyle intervention had similar weight loss efficacy in older compared with younger people, with positive effects on a number of relevant outcomes, including physical function and cardiovascular parameters. There was little data regarding obesity pharmacotherapy in older persons. The available data for bariatric surgery indicate comparable weight loss and resolution of type 2 diabetes, with similar or slightly higher complication rates in older compared with younger people. Older age alone should not be considered a contraindication to intensive lifestyle or surgical intervention for obesity. There are insufficient data to guide clinical decisions regarding obesity pharmacotherapy in older people.

Bariatric Surgery in the Elderly Patient: Safety and Short-time Outcome. A Case Match Analysis

BACKGROUND

Indications and outcomes of bariatric surgery in the elderly remain controversial. We aimed to evaluate and compare safety and early outcomes of bariatric procedures in this age group.

STUDY DESIGN

We performed a retrospective case-control study of Mayo Clinic bariatric surgery patients from January 1, 2016, to January 31, 2018. Data collection included surgery type, sex, age, body mass index (BMI), and comorbidities (hypertension, diabetes mellitus, hyperlipidemia, and obstructive sleep apnea (OSA)). Patients aged 65 years old or older were matched with controls younger than 65 years by body mass index (BMI). We assessed length of stay (LOS), perioperative and early postoperative outcomes, short-term weight loss, and complications.

RESULTS

We included 150 bariatric patients, with a case-to-control ratio of 1:2. After laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy, no significant difference was found in LOS between groups (2.4 vs 2.6 days; P = 0.52), 1-month BMI difference (3.35 vs 3.88; P = 0.17), mean nadir excess BMI loss (%EBL) (22.14 vs 23.2; P = 0.75), or complication rate (0% vs 3.3%; P > 0.99). Similarly, the laparoscopic or robotic-assisted Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) cohort showed no difference in LOS (2.65 vs 2.54 days; P = 0.68), 1-month BMI difference (4.72 vs 4.53; P = 0.68), %EBL (31.7 vs 26.6; P = 0.13), or complication rate (11.7% vs 5.71%; P = 0.43).

CONCLUSION

Although the sample size is small to draw definitive conclusions, bariatric surgery in patients 65 years or older seems to be safe, with similar outcomes and complication rates as in younger patients, regardless of procedure performed.

Weight Loss Medications in Older Adults After Bariatric Surgery for Weight Regain or Inadequate Weight Loss: A Multicenter Study

Weight loss medications are effective to confer additional weight loss after bariatric surgery in the general population, but they have not been evaluated in adults 60 years of age and older. We performed a retrospective study identifying 35 patients who were ≥60 years old and had undergone Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) or sleeve gastrectomy (SG) from 2000 to 2014, and were subsequently prescribed weight loss medications. Linear regression analyses were performed to determine beta coefficients of certain predictor variables being associated with weight loss. Patients lost weight on medications with an average body mass index (BMI) change of -2.74 kg/m², standard deviation = 2.6 kg/m². RYGB patients lost a greater percentage of BMI on medication than SG (SG; -1.38 ± 1.49 kg/m² and RYGB; -3.37 ± 2.83 kg/m², p = 0.0372). Patients with hypertension were less likely to lose weight on medications (β = 16.76, p = 0.004, and 95% confidence interval = 5.85-27.67). Weight loss medications are a useful treatment to confer additional weight loss in adults 60 years of age and older after RYGB and SG.

Outcome of bariatric surgery in older patients

BACKGROUND

People are living longer than they were expected to 2 decades ago. Increased life expectancy and reduced mortality encompasses a simultaneous increase in the number of older adults with obesity that entails an increase of co-morbidities, such as diabetes, hypertension, cancer, and many other diseases. The aim of our study was to compare the outcomes of bariatric surgery in patients age ≥65 in comparison with younger patients.

METHODS

This retrospective study compares bariatric surgeries performed in a private institution between the years 2013 and 2015. The study included 9044 patients divided into an older group (451 patients) and the younger group (8593 patients).

RESULTS

In the younger group, bariatric surgery is distributed as follows: 77.68% sleeve gastrectomy, 12.72% gastric banding, 9.27% gastric bypass, and .33% duodenal switch or biliopancreatic diversion; in the older group: 70.51% sleeve gastrectomy, 15.08% gastric bypass, 13.97% gastric band, and .44% biliopancreatic diversion. In the control group 550 cases (6.4%) underwent revisional surgery; 64 cases (14.10%) underwent revision in the older group. Older patients lost less excess weight than younger patients (72.44% versus 86.11%, respectively). Older patients presented higher rates of complications (8.42% versus 5.59%), co-morbidities (77.60% versus 55.45%), and revisions (1.33% versus .77%). There was no statistical difference in hospital stay between older group and control group (2.27 versus 2.23, respectively). When performing a Clavien-Dindo classification, we demonstrated significant differences in class 3B and 4A and no differences in other classes. Two deaths occurred in the control group. Diabetes, fatty liver, and sleep apnea have been improved or remitted in >90% of patients in both groups, hypertension and hyperlipidemia by >80%, and hyperuricemia and ischemic heart disease were improved or resolved in >70% of the patients CONCLUSIONS: Bariatric surgery in the elderly has more complications, but it can still be considered safe.

Bariatric surgery in the elderly: A narrative review

INTRODUCTION

Due to population ageing, the elderly obese population is increasing. Bariatric surgery is the standard treatment option for morbid obesity nowadays, but there is some controversy regarding its routine indication in the elderly population. Objetive: To review the current evidence about bariatric surgery in the elderly.

METHOD

On-line search in the electronic databases Medline and Lilacs and compilation of the most significant data. The most relevant studies in the area over the past 16 years have been considered for this review.

RESULTS

There was significant methodological heterogeneity in the studies found in the literature. Historically, old age was associated with poorer outcomes after bariatric surgery, both in regards to early postoperative complications and less weight loss, and resolution of comorbidities. More recent studies have shown better results, with morbidity and mortality comparable to those observed in younger populations. More cautious patient selection and the evolution of the surgical technique appear to be the cause of such improvement. An extended multidisciplinary team including a geriatrician and a social worker may also help to improve the preoperative approach.

CONCLUSION

Bariatric surgery is a safe and effective therapeutic option in the elderly population, but careful patient selection and specific preoperative assessment are mandatory.

EARLY POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS IN ROUX-EN-Y GASTRIC BYPASS

Background

Roux-en-Y gastric bypass is one of the most common bariatric surgery and leads to considerable weight loss in the first months.

Aim

To quantify the main early postoperative complications in patients submitted to the gastric bypass.

Method

Observational retrospective cohort. Data of 1051 patients with class II obesity associated with comorbidities or class III obesity submitted to the gastric bypass with 30 days of follow-up starting from the date of the surgery.

Results

The age average was 36 years with a predominance of females (81.1%). The mean preoperative body mass index was 43 kg/m². The major complication was fistula (2.3%), followed by intestinal obstruction (0.5%) and pulmonary embolism (0.5%). Death occurred in 0.6% of the cases.

Conclusion

In the period of 30 days after surgery the overall complication rate was 3.8%; reoperation was necessary in 2.6% and death occurred in 0.6%. Fistula was the main complication and the leading cause of hospitalization in intensive care unit, reoperation and death.

EFFECTS OF LONG-TERM ROUX-EN-Y GASTRIC BYPASS ON BODY WEIGHT AND CLINICAL METABOLIC COMORBIDITIES IN BARIATRIC SURGERY SERVICE OF A UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL

Background

Due to the high failure rate observed in the clinical treatment of morbid obesity an increase in bariatric surgery indications, as an alternative for the control of obesity and comorbidities, is noticeable.

Aim

To evaluate the performance of type 2 diabetes mellitus, high blood pressure and dyslipidemia in patients submitted to Roux-en-Y gastric bypass in late follow-up.

Methods

Retrospective analysis of 59 patients included in the bariatric surgery program. Anthropometric (height and body weight) and laboratory (LDLc, HDLc, VLDLc, triglyceride -TG - and glucose) data were collected on pre- and postoperative stages, through medical records.

Results

Among the patients, 86% were female aged 43±11, of whom 52% had attended high school. The average postoperative time was 7±3 years. During the postoperative period, there were decreases of weight and body mass index, respectively (133±06 kg vs 91±04 kg p<0.05 e 49±74 kg/m2 vs 33±79 kg/m2, p<0.05). In comparison to the preoperative stage, lower concentrations of glucose (101.00±26.99 vs 89,11±15.19, p=0.014), total cholesterol rates (179.00±37,95 vs 167.48±28,50, p=0.016), LDLc (104.30±33.12 vs 91.46±24.58, p=0.016), VLDLc (25.40±11,12 vs 15.68±7.40, p<0.01), and TG (143.35±86.35 vs 82.45±37.39, p<0.01) and higher concentrations of HDLc (43.53±8.23 vs 57.90±15.60, p<0.01) were identified in the postoperative stage. 40% of hypertensive patients were still undergoing high blood pressure treatment during the postoperative stage. There was remission of type 2 diabetes mellitus and dyslipidemia on 81% and 94% of the cases, respectively.

Conclusion

Roux-en-Y gastric bypass has proven itself to be an effective long term procedure, promoting weight loss, remission of DM2 and dyslipidemia.