Direct intraperitoneal resuscitation with lidocaine, methylene blue and pentoxiphylline combination does not decreases inflammation after intestinal ischemia-reperfusion injury in rats

The role of direct peritoneal resuscitation in the treatment of hemorrhagic shock after trauma and in emergency acute care surgery: a systematic review

PURPOSE

Direct peritoneal resuscitation (DPR) has been used to help preserve microcirculation by reversing vasoconstriction and hypoperfusion associated with the pathophysiological process of shock, which can occur despite appropriate intravenous resuscitation. This approach depends on infusing a hyperosmolar solution intraperitoneally via a percutaneous catheter with the tip ending near the pelvis or the root of the mesentery. The abdomen is usually left open with a negative pressure abdominal dressing to continuously evacuate the infused dialysate. Hypertonicity of the solution triggers visceral vasodilation to help maintain blood flow, even during shock, and is also associated with reduced local inflammatory cytokines and other mediators, preservation of endothelial cell function, and mitigation of organ edema and necrosis. It also has a direct effect on liver perfusion and edema, more rapidly corrects electrolyte abnormalities compared to intravenous resuscitation alone, and may requireless intravenous fluid to stabilize blood pressure, all of which shortens the time required to close patients' abdomen.

METHODS

An online query using the search term "direct peritoneal resuscitation" was carried out in PubMed, MEDLINE and SciELO, limited to publications indexed from January 2014 to June 2020. Of the 20 articles returned, full text was able to be obtained for 19. A manual review of included articles' references was resulted in the addition of 1 article, for a total of 20 included articles.

RESULTS

The 20 articles were comprised of 15 animal studies, 4 clinical studies,and 1 expert opinion. The benefits include both local and possibly systemic effects on perfusion, hypoxia, acidosis, and inflammation, and are associated with improved outcomes and reduced complications.

CONCLUSION

DPR shows promise in patients with hemorrhagic shock, septic shock, and other conditions resulting in an open abdomen after damage control laparotomy.

Regionally infused lidocaine can dose-dependently protect the ischemic spinal cord in rabbits and may be associated with the EAA changes

OBJECTIVE

In our previous study, we found that lidocaine, infused through the abdominal aorta, could protect the spinal cord against the ischemia-reperfusion (I/R) injury caused by aortic occlusion. However, whether lidocaine protective effects have dose-dependent properties and its underlying mechanisms still remain unclear. This study was designed to investigate whether regionally infused lidocaine could dose-dependently protect spinal cord against I/R injury in rabbits and its underlying mechanism.

METHODS

46 New Zealand white rabbits were randomized into six groups: Group NS (normal saline control); Group L10 (lidocaine 10 mg/kg); Group L20 (lidocaine 20 mg/kg); Group L40 (lidocaine 40 mg/kg); Group L80 (lidocaine 80 mg/kg) and Group Sham. In Group NS, Group L10, Group L20, Group L40 and Group L80, spinal cord ischemia was induced by infrarenal aortic occlusion for 30 min. The sham group did not receive spinal cord ischemia. During the occlusion, normal saline or lidocaine at different doses was infused continuously through a catheter into the clamped abdominal aorta respectively. Neurologic behavior functions were assessed according to the Tarlov scale system at the moments of 0, 6, 24 and 48 h after reperfusion. The neural injuries were evaluated by the histological examination and the count of normal α-motor neurons in the ventral horn. The levels of excitatory amino acids (EAAs) in the spinal cord, including glutamate (Glu) and aspartic acid (Asp), were analyzed by high performance liquid chromatography with fluorescence detection.

RESULTS

The Tarlov scales in the Group L20 and the Group L40 were significantly higher than those in the Group NS at 24 and 48 h after reperfusion (P < 0.05). 12.5 % animals in Group L40 and 25 % animals in Group L20 were paraplegic versus 75 % animals in Group NS at 48 h after reperfusion (P < 0.05). The median of normal α-motor neurons in the L20, L40 and L80 groups was 7.5, 9 and 5 respectively which was significantly higher than in the NS group (count 0, P < 0.05). The levels of L-ASP and L-Glu remarkably decreased in the Group L10 and the Group L40 compared to Group NS (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

These data revealed that regional administration of lidocaine through the abdominal aorta can provide dose-dependent protection on spinal cord I/R in rabbits. Inhibition of EAA release may be one of the underlying mechanisms.

Assessment of effects of methylene blue on intestinal ischemia and reperfusion in a rabbit model: hemodynamic, histological and immunohistochemical study

BACKGROUND

Intestinal ischemia-reperfusion (IR) is an important clinical occurrence seen in common diseases, such as gastric dilatation-volvulus in dogs or colic in horses. Limited data is available on the use of methylene blue in veterinary medicine for intestinal ischemia-reperfusion. The present study aimed to compare the hemodynamic, histopathological, and immunohistochemical effects of two doses of methylene blue in two rabbit model groups In one group, 5 mg/kg IV was administered, and in another, 20 mg/kg IV was administered following a constant rate infusion (CRI) of 2 mg/kg/h that lasted 6 h. All the groups, including a control group had intestinal ischemia-reperfusion. Immunohistochemical analysis was performed using caspase-3.

RESULTS

During ischemia, hemodynamic depression with reduced perfusion and elevated lactate were observed. During reperfusion, methylene blue (MB) infusion generated an increase in cardiac output due to a positive chronotropic effect, an elevation of preload, and an intense positive inotropic effect. The changes in heart rate and blood pressure were significantly greater in the group in which methylene blue 5 mg/kg IV was administered (MB5) than in the group in which methylene blue 20 mg/kg IV dose was administered (MB20). In addition, lactate and stroke volume variations were significantly reduced, and vascular resistance was significantly elevated in the MB5 group compared with the control group and MB20 group. The MB5 group showed a significant decrease in the intensity of histopathological lesion scores in the intestines and a decrease in caspase-3 areas, in comparison with other groups.

CONCLUSIONS

MB infusion produced improvements in hemodynamic parameters in rabbits subjected to intestinal IR, with increased cardiac output and blood pressure. An MB dosage of 5 mg/kg IV administered at a CRI of 2 mg/kg/h exhibited the most protective effect against histopathological damage caused by intestinal ischemia-reperfusion. Further studies with MB in clinical veterinary pathologies are recommended to fully evaluate these findings.