Borges MDEC, Gouvea AB, Marcacini SFB, Oliveira PFDE, Silva AADA, Crema E. Pulmonary function in women: comparative analysis of conventional versus single-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy.
Rev Col Bras Cir 2018;
45:e1652. [PMID:
29846465 DOI:
10.1590/0100-6991e-20181652]
[Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/07/2017] [Accepted: 01/16/2018] [Indexed: 11/21/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE
to evaluate the pulmonary function of women submitted to conventional and single-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy.
METHODS
forty women with symptomatic cholelithiasis, aged 18 to 70 years, participated in the study. We divided the patients into two groups: 21 patients underwent conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy, and 19, single-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy. We assessed pulmonary function through forced vital capacity (FVC), forced expiratory volume in the first second (FEV1), and the FEV1/FVC ratio, measured before and 24 hours after the procedure.
RESULTS
in both groups, FVC and FEV1 were lower in the postoperative period than those obtained in the preoperative period, with a greater reduction in the group undergoing conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Regarding the FEV1/FVC (%) values, there was no statistically significant difference in any of the groups or times analyzed.
CONCLUSION
there was a greater decline in FVC and FEV1 in the postoperative group of patients submitted to conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy.
Collapse