1
|
Huang YX, Xu C, Zhang CC, Liu GY, Liu XC, Fan HN, Pan B, Li YC. Vascular reconstruction provides short-term and long-term survival benefits for patients with hilar cholangiocarcinoma: A retrospective, multicenter study. Hepatobiliary Pancreat Dis Int 2024:S1499-3872(24)00070-5. [PMID: 38824095 DOI: 10.1016/j.hbpd.2024.05.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/03/2023] [Accepted: 05/10/2024] [Indexed: 06/03/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND In patients with hilar cholangiocarcinoma (HCCA), radical resection can be achieved by resection and reconstruction of the vasculature. However, whether vascular reconstruction (VR) improves long-term and short-term prognosis has not been demonstrated comprehensively. METHODS This was a retrospective multicenter study of patients who received surgery for HCCA with or without VR. Variables associated with overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS) were identified based on Cox regression. Kaplan-Meier curves were used to explore the impact of VR. Restricted mean survival time (RMST) was used for comparisons of short-term survival between the groups. Patients' intraoperative and postoperative characteristics were compared. RESULTS Totally 447 patients were enrolled. We divided these patients into 3 groups: VR with radical resections (n = 84); non-VR radical resections (n = 309) and non-radical resection (we pooled VR-nonradical and non-VR nonradical together, n = 54). Cox regression revealed that carbohydrate antigen 242 (CA242), vascular invasion, lymph node metastasis and poor differentiation were independent risk factors for OS and RFS. There was no significant difference of RMST between the VR and non-VR radical groups within 12 months after surgery (10.18 vs. 10.76 mon, P = 0.179), although the 5-year OS (P < 0.001) and RFS (P < 0.001) were worse in the VR radical group. The incidences of most complications were not significantly different, but those of bile leakage (P < 0.001) and postoperative infection (P = 0.009) were higher in the VR radical group than in the non-VR radical group. Additionally, the levels of alanine aminotransferase (ALT) and aspartate aminotransferase (AST) up to 7 days after surgery tended to decrease in all groups. There was no significant difference in the incidence of postoperative liver failure between the VR and non-VR radical groups. CONCLUSIONS Radical resection can be achieved with VR to improve the survival rate without worsening short-term survival compared with resection with non-VR. After adequate assessment of the patient's general condition, VR can be considered in the resection.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yi-Xian Huang
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Southwest Hospital, Third Military Medical University (Army Medical University), Chongqing 400038, China
| | - Chao Xu
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Liaocheng People's Hospital, Liaocheng 252000, China
| | - Cheng-Cheng Zhang
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Southwest Hospital, Third Military Medical University (Army Medical University), Chongqing 400038, China
| | - Guang-Yi Liu
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Southwest Hospital, Third Military Medical University (Army Medical University), Chongqing 400038, China
| | - Xing-Chao Liu
- Sichuan Academy of Medical Sciences & Sichuan Provincial People's Hospital, Chengdu 610000, China
| | - Hai-Ning Fan
- Qinghai University Affiliated Hospital, Xining 810016, China
| | - Bi Pan
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Southwest Hospital, Third Military Medical University (Army Medical University), Chongqing 400038, China
| | - Yuan-Cheng Li
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Southwest Hospital, Third Military Medical University (Army Medical University), Chongqing 400038, China.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Pawaskar R, Huang KZ, Pham H, Nagrial A, Wong M, O’Neill S, Pleass H, Yuen L, Lam VWT, Richardson A, Pang T, Nahm CB. Systematic Review of Preoperative Prognostic Biomarkers in Perihilar Cholangiocarcinoma. Cancers (Basel) 2024; 16:698. [PMID: 38398089 PMCID: PMC10886549 DOI: 10.3390/cancers16040698] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/18/2024] [Revised: 02/03/2024] [Accepted: 02/05/2024] [Indexed: 02/25/2024] Open
Abstract
Perihilar cholangiocarcinoma (pCCA) is an uncommon malignancy with generally poor prognosis. Surgery is the primary curative treatment; however, the perioperative mortality and morbidity rates are high, with a low 5-year survival rate. Use of preoperative prognostic biomarkers to predict survival outcomes after surgery for pCCA are not well-established currently. This systematic review aimed to identify and summarise preoperative biomarkers associated with survival in pCCA, thereby potentially improving treatment decision-making. The Embase, Medline, and Cochrane databases were searched, and a systematic review was performed using the PRISMA guidelines. English-language studies examining the association between serum and/or tissue-derived biomarkers in pCCA and overall and/or disease-free survival were included. Our systematic review identified 64 biomarkers across 48 relevant studies. Raised serum CA19-9, bilirubin, CEA, neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR) and tumour MMP9, and low serum albumin were most associated with poorer survival; however, the cutoff values used widely varied. Several promising molecular markers with prognostic significance were also identified, including tumour HMGA2, MUC5AC/6, IDH1, PIWIL2, and DNA index. In conclusion, several biomarkers have been identified in serum and tumour specimens that prognosticate overall and disease-free survival after pCCA resection. These, however, require external validation in large cohort studies and/or in preoperatively obtained specimens, especially tissue biopsy, to recommend their use.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rishaan Pawaskar
- Department of Upper GI Surgery, Westmead Hospital, Sydney, NSW 2145, Australia; (R.P.); (H.P.); (H.P.); (L.Y.); (V.W.T.L.); (A.R.); (T.P.)
| | | | - Helen Pham
- Department of Upper GI Surgery, Westmead Hospital, Sydney, NSW 2145, Australia; (R.P.); (H.P.); (H.P.); (L.Y.); (V.W.T.L.); (A.R.); (T.P.)
- Westmead Hospital, Sydney, NSW 2145, Australia;
- Surgical Innovations Unit, Westmead Hospital, Sydney, NSW 2145, Australia
| | - Adnan Nagrial
- Westmead Clinical School, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia; (A.N.); (M.W.)
- Crown Princess Mary Cancer Centre, Westmead Hospital, Sydney, NSW 2145, Australia;
| | - Mark Wong
- Westmead Clinical School, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia; (A.N.); (M.W.)
- Crown Princess Mary Cancer Centre, Westmead Hospital, Sydney, NSW 2145, Australia;
| | - Siobhan O’Neill
- Crown Princess Mary Cancer Centre, Westmead Hospital, Sydney, NSW 2145, Australia;
| | - Henry Pleass
- Department of Upper GI Surgery, Westmead Hospital, Sydney, NSW 2145, Australia; (R.P.); (H.P.); (H.P.); (L.Y.); (V.W.T.L.); (A.R.); (T.P.)
- Westmead Hospital, Sydney, NSW 2145, Australia;
- Surgical Innovations Unit, Westmead Hospital, Sydney, NSW 2145, Australia
- Westmead Clinical School, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia; (A.N.); (M.W.)
| | - Lawrence Yuen
- Department of Upper GI Surgery, Westmead Hospital, Sydney, NSW 2145, Australia; (R.P.); (H.P.); (H.P.); (L.Y.); (V.W.T.L.); (A.R.); (T.P.)
- Westmead Hospital, Sydney, NSW 2145, Australia;
- Surgical Innovations Unit, Westmead Hospital, Sydney, NSW 2145, Australia
- Westmead Clinical School, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia; (A.N.); (M.W.)
| | - Vincent W. T. Lam
- Department of Upper GI Surgery, Westmead Hospital, Sydney, NSW 2145, Australia; (R.P.); (H.P.); (H.P.); (L.Y.); (V.W.T.L.); (A.R.); (T.P.)
- Westmead Hospital, Sydney, NSW 2145, Australia;
- Surgical Innovations Unit, Westmead Hospital, Sydney, NSW 2145, Australia
- Westmead Clinical School, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia; (A.N.); (M.W.)
- Macquarie University Medical School, Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW 2145, Australia
| | - Arthur Richardson
- Department of Upper GI Surgery, Westmead Hospital, Sydney, NSW 2145, Australia; (R.P.); (H.P.); (H.P.); (L.Y.); (V.W.T.L.); (A.R.); (T.P.)
- Westmead Hospital, Sydney, NSW 2145, Australia;
- Surgical Innovations Unit, Westmead Hospital, Sydney, NSW 2145, Australia
| | - Tony Pang
- Department of Upper GI Surgery, Westmead Hospital, Sydney, NSW 2145, Australia; (R.P.); (H.P.); (H.P.); (L.Y.); (V.W.T.L.); (A.R.); (T.P.)
- Westmead Hospital, Sydney, NSW 2145, Australia;
- Surgical Innovations Unit, Westmead Hospital, Sydney, NSW 2145, Australia
- Westmead Clinical School, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia; (A.N.); (M.W.)
| | - Christopher B. Nahm
- Department of Upper GI Surgery, Westmead Hospital, Sydney, NSW 2145, Australia; (R.P.); (H.P.); (H.P.); (L.Y.); (V.W.T.L.); (A.R.); (T.P.)
- Westmead Hospital, Sydney, NSW 2145, Australia;
- Surgical Innovations Unit, Westmead Hospital, Sydney, NSW 2145, Australia
- Westmead Clinical School, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia; (A.N.); (M.W.)
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Candido S, Tomasello B, Lavoro A, Falzone L, Gattuso G, Russo A, Paratore S, McCubrey JA, Libra M. Bioinformatic analysis of the LCN2–SLC22A17–MMP9 network in cancer: The role of DNA methylation in the modulation of tumor microenvironment. Front Cell Dev Biol 2022; 10:945586. [PMID: 36211450 PMCID: PMC9532607 DOI: 10.3389/fcell.2022.945586] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/16/2022] [Accepted: 08/24/2022] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Several features of cancer cells such as proliferation, invasion, metastatic spreading, and drug resistance are affected by their interaction with several tumor microenvironment (TME) components, including neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin (NGAL), solute carrier family 22 member 17 (SLC22A17), and matrix metallopeptidase 9 (MMP9). These molecules play a key role in tumor growth, invasion, and iron-dependent metabolism of cancer cells. However, the precise epigenetic mechanisms underlying the gene regulation of Lipocalin 2 (LCN2), SLC22A17, and MMP9 in cancer still remain unclear. To this purpose, computational analysis was performed on TCGA and GTEx datasets to evaluate the expression and DNA methylation status of LCN2, SLC22A17, and MMP9 genes in different tumor types. Correlation analysis between gene/isoforms expression and DNA methylation levels of LCN2, SLC22A17, and MMP9 was performed to investigate the role of DNA methylation in the modulation of these genes. Protein network analysis was carried out using reverse phase protein arrays (RPPA) data to identify protein–protein interactions of the LCN2–SLC22A17–MMP9 network. Furthermore, survival analysis was performed according to gene expression and DNA methylation levels. Our results demonstrated that LCN2 and MMP9 were mainly upregulated in most tumor types, whereas SLC22A17 was largely downregulated, representing a specific hallmark signature for all gastrointestinal tumors. Notably, the expression of LCN2, SLC22A17, and MMP9 genes was negatively affected by promoter methylation. Conversely, intragenic hypermethylation was associated with the overexpression of SLC22A17 and MMP9 genes. Protein network analysis highlighted the role of the LCN2–SLC22A17–MMP9 network in TME by the interaction with fibronectin 1 and claudin 7, especially in rectal tumors. Moreover, the impact of expression and methylation status of LCN2, SLC22A17, and MMP9 on overall survival and progression free interval was tumor type–dependent. Overall, our analyses provide a detailed overview of the expression and methylation status of LCN2, SLC22A17, and MMP9 in all TCGA tumors, indicating that the LCN2–SLC22A17–MMP9 network was strictly regulated by DNA methylation within TME. Our findings pave the way for the identification of novel DNA methylation hotspots with diagnostic and prognostic values and suitable for epi-drug targeting.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Saverio Candido
- Department of Biomedical and Biotechnological Sciences, University of Catania, Catania, Italy
- Research Center for Prevention, Diagnosis and Treatment of Cancer, University of Catania, Catania, Italy
- *Correspondence: Saverio Candido,
| | - Barbara Tomasello
- Department of Drug and Health Sciences, University of Catania, Catania, Italy
| | - Alessandro Lavoro
- Department of Biomedical and Biotechnological Sciences, University of Catania, Catania, Italy
| | - Luca Falzone
- Epidemiology Unit, IRCCS Istituto Nazionale Tumori “Fondazione G. Pascale”, Naples, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Gattuso
- Department of Biomedical and Biotechnological Sciences, University of Catania, Catania, Italy
| | - Angela Russo
- Pathological Anatomy Unit, ARNAS Garibaldi Hospital, Catania, Italy
| | - Sabrina Paratore
- Pathological Anatomy Unit, ARNAS Garibaldi Hospital, Catania, Italy
| | - James A. McCubrey
- Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Brody School of Medicine, East Carolina University, Greenville, NC, United States
| | - Massimo Libra
- Department of Biomedical and Biotechnological Sciences, University of Catania, Catania, Italy
- Research Center for Prevention, Diagnosis and Treatment of Cancer, University of Catania, Catania, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Li YM, Bie ZX, Guo RQ, Li B, Wang CE, Yan F. Effect of hepatic artery resection and reconstruction on the prognosis of patients with advanced hilar cholangiocarcinoma. World J Gastrointest Oncol 2022; 14:887-896. [PMID: 35582106 PMCID: PMC9048529 DOI: 10.4251/wjgo.v14.i4.887] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/03/2021] [Revised: 12/16/2021] [Accepted: 03/06/2022] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Hilar cholangiocarcinoma (HC) is a good adaptation certificate of hepatic arterectomy, and hepatic arterectomy is conductive to the radical resection of cholangiocarcinoma, which simplifies the operation and helps with a combined resection of the peripheral portal tissue. With continuous development of surgical techniques, especially microsurgical technique, vascular invasion is no longer a contraindication to surgery in the past 10 years. However, hepatic artery reconstruction after hepatic arterectomy has been performed to treat liver tumor in many centers with better results, but it is rarely applied in advanced HC.
AIM To determine the prognosis of patients with advanced HC after hepatic artery resection and reconstruction.
METHODS A total of 98 patients with HC who underwent radical operation in our hospital were selected for this retrospective analysis. According to whether the patients underwent hepatic artery resection and reconstruction or not, they were divided into reconstruction (n = 40) and control (n = 58) groups. The traumatic indices, surgical resection margin, liver function tests before and after the operation, and surgical complications were compared between the two groups.
RESULTS Operation time, blood loss, hospital stay, and gastrointestinal function recovery time were higher in the reconstruction group than in the control group (P < 0.05); The R0 resection rates were 90.00% and 72.41% in the reconstruction and control groups, respectively (P < 0.05). Serum alanine aminotransferase was lower in the reconstruction group on day one and three postoperatively, whereas serum aspartate aminotransferase was lower on the third day (P < 0.05). Preoperatively, the Karnofsky performance status scores were similar between the groups (P > 0.05), but was higher in the reconstruction group (P < 0.05) two weeks postoperatively. There was no difference in the complication rate between the two groups (27.50% vs 32.67%, P > 0.05). Two-year survival rate (42.50% vs 39.66%) and two-year survival time (22.0 mo vs 23.0 mo) were similar between the groups (P > 0.05).
CONCLUSION Radical surgery combined with reconstruction after hepatic artery resection improves R0 resection rate and reduces postoperative liver injury in advanced HC. However, the operation is difficult and the effect on survival time is not clear.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yuan-Ming Li
- Minimally Invasive Tumor Therapies Center, Beijing Hospital, National Center of Gerontology, Institute of Geriatric Medicine, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing 100730, China
| | - Zhi-Xin Bie
- Minimally Invasive Tumor Therapies Center, Beijing Hospital, National Center of Gerontology, Institute of Geriatric Medicine, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing 100730, China
| | - Run-Qi Guo
- Minimally Invasive Tumor Therapies Center, Beijing Hospital, National Center of Gerontology, Institute of Geriatric Medicine, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing 100730, China
| | - Bin Li
- Minimally Invasive Tumor Therapies Center, Beijing Hospital, National Center of Gerontology, Institute of Geriatric Medicine, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing 100730, China
| | - Cheng-En Wang
- Minimally Invasive Tumor Therapies Center, Beijing Hospital, National Center of Gerontology, Institute of Geriatric Medicine, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing 100730, China
| | - Fei Yan
- Minimally Invasive Tumor Therapies Center, Beijing Hospital, National Center of Gerontology, Institute of Geriatric Medicine, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing 100730, China
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Choi SH, Rim CH, Shin IS, Yoon WS, Koom WS, Seong J. Adjuvant Radiotherapy for Extrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma: A Quality Assessment-Based Meta-Analysis. Liver Cancer 2021; 10:419-432. [PMID: 34721505 PMCID: PMC8527906 DOI: 10.1159/000518298] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/28/2021] [Accepted: 07/05/2021] [Indexed: 02/04/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The benefits of adjuvant radiotherapy (ART) for extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma are uncertain largely because existing publications lack clear comparisons between ART and non-ART arms. METHODS PubMed, Medline, Embase, and the Cochrane library were systematically searched until December 2020. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS). Sensitivity analysis was performed for studies with reliable comparability (i.e., no favorable prognosticators in the ART arm that could skew the data). RESULTS Twenty-three studies involving 1,731 patients with extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma were reviewed. The overall median of all median prescribed doses was 50.4 Gy; brachytherapy or an intraoperative boost of 10-21 Gy was applied in 5 studies. The pooled 1-, 3-, and 5-year OS rates in the non-ART and ART arms were 69.2% versus 81.0%, p = 0.035; 34.3% versus 44.7%, p = 0.025; 25.6% versus 31.7%, p = 0.115, respectively. The corresponding pooled locoregional recurrence rates were 52.1% versus 34.9% (p = 0.014). The pooled rate of grade ≥3 gastrointestinal complications was 9.8%. Sensitivity analysis performed on 14 eligible studies showed that the ART arms had a lower pooled R0 rate (36.8% vs. 63.2%, p = 0.02) and a higher rate of positive lymph nodes (47.4% vs. 34.9%, p = 0.08). The pooled 1-, 3-, and 5-year OS rates in the non-ART versus ART arms of the selected studies were 78.2% versus 84.9%, p = 0.143; 38.5% versus 49.2%, p = 0.026; and 27.8% versus 34.5%, p = 0.11, respectively. CONCLUSIONS ART was shown to improve OS in all studies and in those selected for their reliable comparability.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Seo Hee Choi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Yongin Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Yongin, Republic of Korea
| | - Chai Hong Rim
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Korea University Ansan Hospital, Korea University Medical College, Seoul, Republic of Korea,*Chai Hong Rim,
| | - In-Soo Shin
- Graduate School of Education, AI Convergence Education, Dongguk University, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Won Sup Yoon
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Korea University Ansan Hospital, Korea University Medical College, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Woong Sub Koom
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Yonsei Cancer Center, Yonsei University Medical College, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Jinsil Seong
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Yonsei Cancer Center, Yonsei University Medical College, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Izzo P, Izzo S, DI Cello P, D'Amata G, Cardi M, Polistena A, Messineo D, Izzo L. Role of Leptin in Neoplastic and Biliary Tree Disease. In Vivo 2020; 34:2485-2490. [PMID: 32871776 DOI: 10.21873/invivo.12064] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/19/2020] [Revised: 07/07/2020] [Accepted: 07/08/2020] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND/AIM Leptin is a small hormone of protein nature, it is strongly involved in the regulation of lipid metabolism and its functioning mechanism is not yet well known or whether or not it is actually secreted by cholangiocytes, nor if the biliary tree expresses its receptors. In the past, various studies have tried to correlate leptin levels with certain neoplasms. The aim of this study was to demonstrate that serum leptin values can become a new sensitive and specific serum marker for cholangiocarcinoma. MATERIALS AND METHODS Seventy-two patients with gallbladder stones, hepatolithiasis with benign biliary stenosis, cholangiocarcinoma, and a group of patients without hepato-biliary diseases were enrolled in the study. In all cases blood and bile samples were collected for evaluation of leptin levels and liver biopsies were performed to confirm diagnosis. In all patients, both ultrasound and cholangio-magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) were performed to complete the diagnostic procedure. RESULTS Twenty-two patients were affected by cholangiocarcinoma, 50 by benign biliary disease (35 cholelithiasis and 6 hepatolithiasis and 9 by inflammatory biliary stenosis). The mean values of serum leptin in patients with cholangiocarcinoma were 19.28±8.76 ng/ml, significantly higher than those observed in non-neoplastic biliary diseases. CONCLUSION Serum leptin levels might be a useful marker to differentiate patients with cholangiocarcinoma from those with biliary lithiasis and inflammatory stenosis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Paolo Izzo
- Department of Surgery "Pietro Valdoni", Policlinico Umberto I, Università degli studi "La Sapienza", Rome, Italy
| | - Sara Izzo
- Unit of Colorectal Surgery, Department of Medical, Surgical, Neurologic, Metabolic and Ageing Sciences, University of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli", Naples, Italy
| | | | - Gabriele D'Amata
- ASL Roma 5 UOC Chirurgia Generale Ospedale di Colleferro, Rome, Italy
| | - Maurizio Cardi
- Department of Surgery "Pietro Valdoni", Policlinico Umberto I, Università degli studi "La Sapienza", Rome, Italy
| | - Andrea Polistena
- Department of Surgery "Pietro Valdoni", Policlinico Umberto I, Università degli studi "La Sapienza", Rome, Italy
| | - Daniela Messineo
- Department of Radiological, Oncological and Anatomo-Pathological Sciences, Università degli Studi "La Sapienza", Rome, Italy
| | - Luciano Izzo
- Department of Surgery "Pietro Valdoni", Policlinico Umberto I, Università degli studi "La Sapienza", Rome, Italy
| |
Collapse
|