Effects of aluminum-copper alloy filtration on photon spectra, air kerma rate and image contrast

Alternative X-ray filters for an intra-oral digital radiographic system

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of the modulation of the radiation spectrum with the use of alternative X-ray filters in the quality of intra-oral digital images from storage phosphor plates.

METHODS

The radiographic exposures were performed in a GE 1000 X-ray machine (General Electric Co., Milwaukee, WI), operating at 65 kVp, 10 mA, 40 cm focus receptor distance using three different exposure times: 0.05 s, 0.16 s and 0.35 s. The control filter (GC) was 100% aluminium (Al) with a thickness of 1.5 mm. The tested filters were: G1, 97% Al and 3% copper (Cu) with 1.47 mm thickness; G2, 96% Al and 4% Cu with 1.53 mm thickness; G3, 95% Al and 5% zinc (Zn) with 1.56 mm thickness; G4, 98% Al and 2% Zn with 1.5 mm thickness; and G5, 95% Cu and 5% Zn with 1.6 mm thickness. For formation of the image, a 12-step Al wedge (each step with increments of 1 mm in thickness) was radiographed 10 times. Pixel values measured in digital images were converted into optical density (OD).

RESULTS

All replicates showed OD with high reproducibility (r > 0.95) for all exposure times and tested filters. In comparison between filters, statistically significant differences in density (p < 0.05) were observed. The OD curve of the G5 filter in all exposure times and G3 filter in an exposure time of 0.05 s showed changes in shape (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Excluding the G5 filter, all others tested filters can be used as a substitute for GC without losses in image quality.

Image quality produced by different cone-beam computed tomography settings

INTRODUCTION

The aim of this study was to evaluate image quality at different cone-beam computed tomography settings and 3 fields of view.

METHODS

A Hitachi CB MercuRay (Hitachi Medical Systems, Tokyo, Japan) was modified to allow different setting combinations. The variables consisted of 4 milliampere settings (2, 5, 10, and 15 mA), 2 kilovolt (peak) settings (100 and 120 kV[p]), presence or absence of a copper filter, and 3 fields of view (6, 9, and 12 in). Thirty-two scans were taken on a cadaver head and 16 scans on a dry skull. The groups were divided by field of view, and the images were ranked by at least 30 judges. Diagnostic quality was addressed in a questionnaire. Descriptive statistics and rankings were calculated with Excel 2003 (Microsoft, Redmond, Wash) and the Friedman and Wilcoxon signed rank tests with SPSS software (version 14.0.1; SPSS, Chicago, Ill).

RESULTS

The presence or absence of a filter showed significant differences (P <.006) in 2 pairs of the 9-in field of view. Variation in kilovolt (peak) settings showed significant differences (P <.006) in the 6-in 5-mA images with a filter. Altering the milliampere settings showed significant differences (P <.008) in the 6- and 12-in groups. The 9-in group showed significant differences between 2 mA and 10 and 15 mA. Overall, the 6-, 9-, and 12-in images had diagnostic quality 56%, 99%, and 99% of the time, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Presence or absence of a filter and the kilovolt (peak) setting did not affect overall image quality. Images taken at lower milliampere settings showed good diagnostic quality.