Effect of surface treatments on the bond strength of a resin cement to commercially pure titanium

The effect of ultrafast fiber laser application on the bond strength of resin cement to titanium

The purpose of this study was to investigate the effect of ultrafast fiber laser treatment on the bond strength between titanium and resin cement. A total of 60 pure titanium discs (15 mm × 2 mm) were divided into six test groups (n = 10) according to the surface treatment used: group (1) control, machining; group (2) grinding with a diamond bur; group (3) ultrafast fiber laser application; group (4) resorbable blast media (RBM) application; group (5) electro-erosion with copper; and group (6) sandblasting. After surface treatments, resin cements were applied to the treated titanium surfaces. Shear bond strength testing of the samples was performed with a universal testing machine after storing in distilled water at 37 °C for 24 h. One-way ANOVA and Tukey's HSD post hoc test were used to analyse the data (P < 0.05). The highest bond strength values were observed in the laser application group, while the lowest values were observed in the grinding group. Sandblasting and laser application resulted in significantly higher bond strengths than control treatment (P < 0.05). Ultrafast fiber laser treatment and sandblasting may improve the bond strength between resin cement and titanium.

Effect of different airborne-particle abrasion/bonding agent combinations on the bond strength of a resin cement to a base metal alloy

STATEMENT OF PROBLEM

Investigation of surface treatments to improve the bond of resin cements to metals may contribute to the longevity of metal ceramic restorations.

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of surface treatments on the shear bond strength (SBS) of a resin cement to nickel-chromium (NiCr) alloy.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Eighty cast NiCr alloy disks (9 × 3 mm) were divided into 8 groups (n=10), which received 1 of the following surface treatments: 1) 50 µm Al(2)O(3) particles + silane; 2) 120 µm Al(2)O(3) + silane; 3) 30 µm silica-modified Al(2)O(3) (Cojet Sand) + silane; 4) 120 µm Al(2)O(3) followed by 110 µm silica-modified Al(2)O(3) (Rocatec) + silane; 5) 50 µm Al(2)O(3) + metal primer; 6) 120 µm Al(2)O(3) + metal primer; 7) 30 µm silica-modified Al(2)O(3) (Cojet Sand) + metal primer; and 8) 120 µm Al(2)O(3) followed by 110 µm silica-modified Al(2)O(3) (Rocatec) + metal primer. The silane was RelyX Ceramic Primer and the metal primer Alloy Primer. RelyX ARC resin cement was bonded to NiCr alloy surfaces. Specimens were thermally cycled before shear mode testing. Data (MPa) were analyzed by 1-way ANOVA and the Tukey test (α=.05). Failure mode was determined with a stereomicroscope (×20).

RESULTS

The results revealed that surface treatment was significant (P<.001). There was no significant difference between 50 µm and 120 µm Al(2)O(3) particles, regardless of the bonding agent used (silane or metal primer). Cojet Sand provided lower SBS than Rocatec, both in the groups treated with silane (P<.001) and metal primer (P<.01). No significant difference was observed between silane and metal primer in the groups abraded with 50 µm and 120 µm Al(2)O(3) particles. Metal primer decreased the SBS of both Cojet Sand and Rocatec groups (P<.001). Rocatec + silane had the highest SBS and Cojet Sand + metal primer the lowest. All groups presented 100% adhesive failure.

CONCLUSIONS

Particle size influenced SBS only in the groups abraded with silica-modified Al(2)O(3). The bonding agent did not affect SBS in the groups abraded with Al(2)O(3). Alloy Primer was not chemically compatible with silica-modified Al(2)O(3). Both mechanical (particle size) and chemical (silica/silane interaction) factors contributed to the high SBS of Rocatec + silane.

The effect of surface treatment on bond strength of layering porcelain and hybrid composite bonded to zirconium dioxide ceramics

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to investigate the differences between Rocatec (as surface treatment) and #600 polishing (as control) on shear bond strength of layering porcelain and hybrid composite to zirconium dioxide ceramics.

METHODS

Manufactured zirconia blocks used in this study were yttrium partially stabilized zirconia (YTZ(®)), and veneering materials were NobelRondo Zirconia Dentin A2 High Value (NZR) and Estenia C&B (ES). Total 48 zirconia blocks were fabricated (10 mm × 10 mm × 20 mm). The blocks of 24 each were treated by Rocatec and #600 paper, respectively. Surface treated zirconia blocks were divided into two groups, according to veneering materials of NZR and ES. NZR was fired and ES was polymerized to zirconia. The fabricated specimen was fixed to mounting jig and applied shear force using the universal testing machine at a crosshead speed of 0.5 mm/min. All results were statistically analyzed by two-way ANOVA and Tukey's test. EPMA analysis and SPM analysis of specimen interface were carried out.

RESULTS

Mean shear bond strength of each condition was: NZR/#600; 23.3 (S.D. ±7.0) MPa, NZR/Rocatec; 26.9 (S.D. ±7.0) MPa, ES/#600; 10.7 (S.D.±2.4) MPa, ES/Rocatec; 12.5 (S.D.±0.8) MPa.

CONCLUSIONS

From the results of this study, shear bond strength of layering porcelain to zirconia was higher than that of restorative hybrid resin. However the more study will be needed, the appropriate choice of materials became the gides to the expansion of the applied cases of metal-free prothesis.