Potenciais evocados auditivos por frequência específica em lactentes com audição normal

Auditory Electrophysiological Thresholds With Different Chirps and Their Correlation With Behavioral Thresholds in Hearing-Impaired Children

OBJECTIVES

Research focusing on changes in the clinical practice of audiological diagnosis has become increasingly necessary, particularly in pediatric audiology. The pursuit of accurate and reliable examinations has intensified given the importance of early detection and intervention in cases of childhood hearing loss. Thus, this study aims to investigate the correlation between electrophysiological auditory thresholds, as obtained through frequency-specific auditory brainstem responses with two distinct chirp stimuli (narrow-band CE-Chirp Level Specific and narrow-band iChirp), in children with hearing impairments. In addition, this research set out to correlate these thresholds with behavioral responses while simultaneously comparing the examination durations relative to the type of stimuli and the degree of hearing loss.

DESIGN

A cohort of 20 children (aged 6 months to 12 years) with varying degrees of hearing impairment (ranging from mild to profound) were recruited. The participants underwent bilateral measurement of their electrophysiological thresholds via auditory brainstem responses across different frequencies (500, 1000, 2000, and 4000 Hz), and the timeframe for determining these thresholds was carefully recorded. Subsequently, behavioral thresholds were ascertained using pure-tone audiometry or visual reinforcement audiometry based on the child's age. The data collected was subsequently analyzed using Pearson and Spearman correlation coefficients. To compare examination times, the Student t test and the Kruskal-Wallis test were used.

RESULTS

There was a pronounced correlation between the thresholds obtained through both narrow-band chirp stimuli. Moreover, a substantial correlation was found between electrophysiological and behavioral thresholds at 1000, 2000, and 4000 Hz, especially when compared with pure-tone audiometry. The mean differences between the electrophysiological and behavioral thresholds were below 6 dB nHL, and the exam duration was relatively consistent across both devices, averaging 47.63 (±19.41) min for the narrow-band CE-Chirp Level Specific and 52.42 (±26) min for the narrow-band iChirp. Notably, variations in exam duration did not relate to varying degrees of hearing loss when using the narrow-band CE-Chirp Level Specific. Nevertheless, the narrow-band iChirp indicated significantly shorter durations in instances of profound degree measurements, demonstrating a statistically significant difference.

CONCLUSIONS

The narrow-band CE-Chirp Level Specific and narrow-band iChirp stimuli provided similar estimates of electrophysiological auditory thresholds in children with hearing impairments, giving accurate estimations of behavioral thresholds. The time it took to complete the assessment is comparable between both stimuli. For the narrow-band iChirp, the degree of hearing loss was shown to impact the testing time, and children with profound hearing loss underwent faster exams. Ultimately, this study exhibits significant clinical implications as it reveals that the narrow-band CE-Chirp Level Specific and narrow-band iChirp stimuli could be remarkably promising for clinically exploring electrophysiological thresholds in children with hearing impairments.

Auditory Brainstem response electrophysiological thresholds with narrow band chirps stimuli in hearing infants

OBJECTIVES

to describe reference values for the electrophysiological thresholds obtained in the frequency-specific Auditory Brainstem Response (fsABR) with the NB CE-Chirp® LS and NB iChirp stimuli in hearing infants and to compare the variables: Minimum Levels of Response (MLR), latency, amplitude and examination time.

METHODS

the sample consisted of 74 full-term infants, with a mean age of 23.11 days, 29 females and 45 males. The participants underwent fsABR at the frequencies of 500 Hz, 1000 Hz, 2000 Hz and 4000 Hz, to measure the MLR with the NB CE-Chirp® LS stimulus in the Eclipse equipment, and with the NB iChirp stimulus in the SmartEP, all in natural sleep and performed in the same session. The waveforms were evaluated by judges and later, for the comparison of thresholds and examination time, analyzed with the Wilcoxon test. To compare latency and amplitude, the Student's T Test and ANOVA were used for the same variables, but with the same stimulus. The Kruskal-Wallis test was used to compare the examination time at the different frequencies.

RESULTS

The MLR and latency at 500 Hz and 1000 Hz showed a statistically significant difference between the stimuli, with lower thresholds and higher latencies for the NB iChirp. Higher amplitudes were obtained with the NB iChirp stimulus. The average examination time for the threshold investigation in the four frequencies was 40 min for each ear.

CONCLUSION

it was possible to present reference values for the MLR and latencies for the NB CE-Chirp® LS and NB iChirp stimuli for hearing infants. In addition, with the NB iChirp, the latency of the responses was influenced by the frequency, but it was the stimulus that provided greater amplitudes. With the NB CE-Chirp® LS, the frequency did not influence latency, except at 500 Hz, and the stimulus provided recordings that facilitated the visualization of wave V. There was no difference in the examination time between the stimuli, nor between the test frequencies.

Potencial evocado auditivo de tronco encefálico por frequência específica por via aérea e via óssea em neonatos ouvintes normais

Objetivo determinar os níveis mínimos de resposta (NMR) e a latência da onda V do Potencial Evocado Auditivo de Tronco encefálico por Frequência específica (PEATE-FE) em neonatos ouvintes normais nas frequências de 0.5, 1, 2 e 4 kHz por via aérea e via óssea e determinar valores normativos. Métodos foram avaliados neonatos com audição normal, sendo realizado o PEATE-FE nas frequências de 0.5, 1, 2 e 4 kHz, tanto por via aérea (VA) quanto por via óssea (VO). Para cada frequência, foram avaliadas 12 orelhas em um total de 18 neonatos. A análise dos resultados avaliou o tempo de latência e a presença da onda V até a intensidade de 20 dBnNA para quatro intensidades e para os dois tipos de condução (aérea e óssea). Resultados observou-se aumento da latência da onda V com a diminuição da intensidade e maiores latências nas frequências mais baixas, tanto na VA quanto na VO. Porém, em fortes intensidades, em ambas condições, não houve diferença entre as latências de 0.5 e 1 kHz, contrariando os achados da literatura. Para VA, na frequência de 500 Hz, houve presença da onda V até 30 dBnNA em todas as orelhas, e em 1000 Hz, 11 orelhas (91,66 %) apresentaram resposta em 20 dBnNA; nas demais frequências, 100% das orelhas avaliadas apresentaram resposta em 20 dBnNA. Na VO, a presença da onda V em 20 dBnNA foi observada em todas as frequências estudadas. Conclusão os valores descritos podem ser considerados normativos e utilizados na clinica como padrão de normalidade, auxiliando no diagnóstico diferencial da perda auditiva ao nascimento.

Comparing auditory brainstem responses (ABRs) to toneburst and narrow band CE-chirp in young infants

OBJECTIVE

The difference of characteristics (latency and amplitude) between toneburst and narrow CE-chirp stimuli on ABR recording was analyzed in normal hearing infants.

METHODS

500, 1000, 2000 and 4000 Hz toneburst and narrow band CE-chirp auditory brainstem responses (ABRs) were recorded in 40 normal-hearing infants. The amplitude and latency parameters of the ABR were collected for each of the four stimulus levels: 80, 60, 40, and 20 dB nHL. Both stimuli started from 80 dB nHL using alternating polarity and the rates were both 27.1/s.

RESULTS

The toneburst latencies are greater than narrow band CE-chirp latencies for all intensities at 500, 1000 and 2000 Hz (p < 0.001). However, at 4000 Hz this difference was not significant. At 500 Hz, wave V amplitude is larger for toneburst than narrow CE-chirp (p < 0.001) in 80 dB nHL. The difference between the two stimuli in 60 dB nHL was not significant (p = 0.495) and at 40 and 20 dB nHL the wave V narrow band CE-chirp amplitude is greater than toneburst amplitude (p < 0.001). At 1000, 2000 and 4000 Hz there is no difference between the wave V toneburst and narrow band CE-chirp amplitudes at 80 dB nHL (p = 0.940; p = 0.776 and p = 0.217 respectively). On the other hand, in the levels to 60, 40 and 20 dB nHL, narrow band CE-chirp amplitudes are larger than toneburst amplitude (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Narrow band CE-chirp ABRs generates shorter latencies than the toneburst ABRs, especially to low frequencies. Higher amplitudes were found with narrow band CE-chirp stimuli for all frequencies tested, except to high levels.