Atenção ao aborto no Sistema Único de Saúde no Nordeste Brasileiro: a estrutura dos serviços

Delays in obtaining hospital care and abortion-related complications within a context of illegality

Abortion, particularly when illegal, highlights inequities in different populations. Although abortion-related mortality is lower compared to other obstetric causes, abortion complications tend to be more lethal. Delays in seeking and obtaining care are determinants of negative outcomes. This study, nested within the GravSus-NE, analyzed healthcare delays and their association with abortion-related complications in three cities of northeastern Brazil (Salvador, Recife and São Luís). Nineteen public maternity hospitals were involved. All eligible women ≥18 years old hospitalized between August and December 2010 were evaluated. Descriptive, stratified and multivariate analyses were performed. Youden's index was used to determine delay. One model was created with all the women and another with those admitted in good clinical conditions, thus determining complications that occurred during hospitalization and their associated factors. Of 2,371 women, most (62.3%) were ≤30 years old (median 27 years) and 89.6% reported being black or brown-skinned. Most (90.5%) were admitted in good condition, 4.0% in fair condition and 5.5% in poor/very poor condition. Median time between admission and uterine evacuation was 7.9 hours. After a cut-off time of 10 hours, the development of complications increased considerably. Black women and those admitted during nightshifts were more likely to experience a wait time ≥10 hours. Delays were associated with severe complications (OR 1.97; 95%CI: 1.55-2.51), including in the women admitted in good condition (OR 2,56; 95%CI: 1.85-3.55), and even following adjustment for gestational age and reported abortion type (spontaneous/induced). These findings corroborate the literature, highlighting the social vulnerability of women hospitalized within Brazil's public healthcare system in a situation of abortion. The study strongpoints include having objectively measured the time between admission and uterine evacuation and having established a cut-off time defining delay based on conceptual and epidemiological criteria. Further studies should evaluate other settings and new measurement tools for effectively preventing life-threatening complications.

[Treatment itineraries of women with severe maternal morbidity]

This study aimed to identify the treatment itineraries of Brazilian women with severe maternal morbidity. This was a qualitative, descriptive, exploratory study in a university referral hospital for high-risk pregnancy in the interior of São Paulo State, Brazil. The sample included 16 women with severe complications during pregnancy, childbirth, or postpartum. Data were collected with semi-structured, taped, transcribed interviews subsequently submitted to Content Analysis. The results showed that at the onset of illness, the women take various paths to reach low and high-complexity services, while also relying on neighbor women, pharmacies, and self-medication. They encounter obstacles in the services' receptiveness, continuity of care, case-resolution capacity, and referrals within the healthcare network. Critical points were observed in obstetric care: women are frequently subjected to trekking from one health service to another to obtain care, delays in referrals, and institutional violence. The tertiary hospital was described as receptive and effective. The study identified problems in the entire chain of obstetric care, helping explain how the healthcare system is organized to deal with severe maternal complications.

Delays in access to care for abortion-related complications: the experience of women in Northeast Brazil

Around 18 million unsafe abortions occur in low and middle-income countries and are associated with numerous adverse consequences to women's health. The time taken by women with complications to reach facilities where they can receive appropriate post-abortion care can influence the risk of death and the extent of further complications. All women aged 18+ admitted for abortion complications to public-sector hospitals in three capital cities in the Northeastern Brazil between August-December 2010 were interviewed; medical records were extracted (N = 2,804). Nearly all women (94%) went straight to a health facility, mainly to a hospital (76.6%); the rest had various care-seeking paths, with a quarter visiting 3+ hospitals. Women waited 10 hours on average before deciding to seek care. 29% reported difficulties in starting to seek care, including facing challenges in organizing childcare, a companion or transport (17%) and fear/stigma (11%); a few did not initially recognize they needed care (0.4%). The median time taken to arrive at the ultimate facility was 36 hours. Over a quarter of women reported experiencing difficulties being admitted to a hospital, including long waits (15%), only being attended after pregnant women (8.9%) and waiting for a bed (7.4%). Almost all women (90%) arrived in good condition, but those with longer delays were more likely to have (mild or severe) complications. In Brazil, where access to induced abortion is restricted, women face numerous difficulties receiving post-abortion care, which contribute to delay and influence the severity of post-abortion complications.

[Quality of care for labor and childbirth in a public hospital network in a Brazilian state capital: patient satisfaction]

The study assessed the quality of care for labor and childbirth in the public hospital system in the city of Recife, Pernambuco State, Brazil, according to the mothers' satisfaction, using a cross-sectional exploratory study in all the public hospitals in the network, grouped according to type of hospital management and interviews with 1,000 mothers. Quality of care was measured according to management strata and the following dimensions of quality: reception; respect for individual rights; prenatal and childbirth care; and ambience. The results' significance was analyzed with the Pearson and Friedman chi-square test. There was high prenatal coverage, not linked to childbirth care, and intense migration of deliveries. Waiting time for care by the healthcare team was long, the proportion of vaginal deliveries in the municipal maternity services was 80%, and only 16% of the deliveries included skin-to-skin contact with the newborn; breastfeeding occurred in the birthing room in 11% of the deliveries. Among the various management modalities, the charitable hospital rated highest. The target dimension showed significant differences, with higher satisfaction rates for the following: respect (88.2%), kindness (86.7%), physicians' work (85.2%), and trust in the healthcare staff (84.3%). The highest rates of dissatisfaction were for: temperature on the ward (62.2%), possibility of lodging complaints (48.1%), quantity and quality of hospital clothing and bedding (49.2%), and privacy (43%). Despite positive strides, the findings show the need for reorganization of obstetric care policy, with regionalization, regulation, consolidation of networks of care, and interventions in the healthcare setting, aimed at consolidating the humanization of care.