Does sildenafil enhance the effect of tamsulosin in relieving acute urinary retention?

Immediate or delayed trial without catheter in acute urinary retention in males: A systematic review

Objective

To compare the success of establishing spontaneous micturition following immediate trial without catheter (TWOC) to delayed TWOC in males catheterized for acute urinary retention.

Materials and methods

In this systematic review, we included studies reporting success rates of immediate TWOC or delayed TWOC (≤30 days) among males ≥18 years of age catheterized for acute urinary retention. We excluded studies on suprapubic catheterization, postoperative/perioperative catheterization and urinary retention related to trauma. We searched the following databases: MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Open Grey and Clinicaltrials.gov. The search was concluded on 30 November 2022. There were no restrictions on language or publication date. Risk of bias was assessed using the ROB 2.0 and ROBINS-I tools. We did random-effects restricted maximum likelihood model meta-analyses. Certainty of evidence was assessed using GRADE.

Results

We included 61 studies. In two randomized controlled trials (RCTs), both with some concerns for risk of bias, including in total 174 participants, the relative success rate was 1.22 (95% CI 0.84-1.76) favouring delayed TWOC. In two comparative cohort studies, both with serious risk of bias, including 642 participants, the relative success rate was 1.18 (0.94-1.47) favouring delayed TWOC. One study was excluded from this meta-analysis because of critically low quality. Four studies reporting success rates for cohorts with immediate TWOC, all with serious risk of bias, including 409 participants, had an overall success rate of 47% (29-66). Fifty-two studies reporting success rates for cohorts with delayed TWOC, all with serious risk of bias, including 12 489 participants, had an overall success rate of 53% (49-56). The certainty of the evidence was considered low for the RCTs and very low for the rest.

Conclusion

There was a limited number of appropriately designed studies addressing the research question directly. The evidence favours neither approach.

Best nonsurgical managements of acute urinary retention: what's new?

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

To provide a comprehensive review of the nonsurgical management of acute urinary retention (AUR).

RECENT FINDINGS

A recent meta-analysis confirmed that α-blockers are associated with higher rates of successful trial without catheter (TWOC) compared with placebo, while combination therapies do not significantly reduce the rate of recatheterization. Compared with standard TWOC, bladder perfusion with physiological serum prior to catheter removal is a simple and cost-effective method to increase TWOC success rates (odds ratio 2.41, 95% confidence interval 1.53-3.8), and to reduce time-to-discharge (-89.68 min, 95% confidence interval -160.55, -18.88). Clean intermittent catheterization (CIC) is increasingly used for urinary retention in patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia as existing data suggest that it may decrease the risk of urinary tract infections, accelerate spontaneous voiding recovery and might be more cost-effective compared with indwelling urethral catheterization. Ongoing trials are examining whether office-placed prostate stent may be a promising solution in patients with AUR.

SUMMARY

The recent development of alternative approaches to traditional TWOC may lead to new therapies for treating patients with AUR. Further studies are needed as the level of evidence from published studies remains low.

Efficacy and tolerability of combination therapy with alpha-blockers and phosphodiesterase-5 inhibitors compared with monotherapy for lower urinary tract symptoms: Protocol for a systematic review and network meta-analysis

PURPOSE

This study aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of combination therapy consisting of α-blockers and different phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitors for lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) by performing a network meta-analysis.

METHOD

Relevant articles were retrieved from the Cochrane Library, PubMed, and EMBASE databases. Bayesian network meta-analyses were performed with a random-effect model to compare the efficacy and safety of combination therapy with α-blockers and phosphodiesterase-5 inhibitors for LUTS. The odds ratio (OR), mean difference (MD) and surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA) were calculated with the GeMTC R package.

RESULTS

Twenty randomized trials with 4131 patients were included in this network meta-analysis. Based on the SUCRA values, vardenafil (10 mg) combined with α-blockers ranked first, first and sixth; sildenafil (25 mg) combined with α-blockers ranked second, third and first; and tadalafil (20 mg) combined with α-blockers ranked third, second and fourth in IPSS, post void residual, and maximum flow rate, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Combination therapy with α-blockers and phosphodiesterase-5 inhibitors was effective and well tolerated for LUTS. For men who prioritize high efficacy, vardenafil (10 mg) combined with α-blockers seems to be the treatment of choice. For men wishing to optimize minimally invasive treatment, sildenafil (25 mg) and tadalafil (20 mg) combined with α-blockers appears to have a possible advantage in terms of avoiding adverse effects.

Combination Therapy with Alpha-blocker and Phosphodiesterase-5 Inhibitor for Improving Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms and Erectile Dysfunction in Comparison with Monotherapy: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

CONTEXT

The effects of combination therapy consisted of an α-blocker and a phosphodiesterase-5 inhibitor (PDE5I) for the treatment of lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) and erectile dysfunction (ED).

OBJECTIVE

To systematically investigate the efficacy and safety of combination therapy in comparison with monotherapy.

EVIDENCE ACQUISITION

The study complied with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) statement and the recommendations of the European Association of Urology Guidelines office. The study was registered in the PROSPERO database with ID CRD42018086619. Only comparative prospective studies, randomized or quasirandomized, with at least one control group with monotherapy were selected for the meta-analysis. The primary endpoint was the quality of life related to LUTS and ED, measured with the International Prostate System Score (IPSS), maximum flow rate (Qmax), postvoid residual (PVR), and International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF). Secondary endpoints included the adverse events rate. In the subgroup analysis of the influence of adding a PDE5I to the treatment of LUTS, the use of different PDE5Is was considered.

EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS

After the screening of 6687 publications, 25 randomized controlled trials were considered eligible to be included in the meta-analysis. In the combination group, IPSS was lower and Qmax was higher than in the α-blocker group, with mean differences (MDs) of 1.41 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.42, 2.41; I² = 71%, p =  0.005) and -1.01 ml/s (95% CI: -1.58, -0.43; I² = 58%, p =  0.0006), respectively. The mean change of the IPSS was bigger in the combination group, with an MD of -1.72 (95% CI: -2.55, -0.89; I² = 37%, p <  0.0001). The mean change of Qmax was insignificant, with an MD of -0.61 (95% CI: -1.57, 0.34; I² = 63%, p =  0.21), as well as PVR and the mean change of PVR, with MDs of 0.65 (95% CI: -5.37, 6.66; I² = 76%, p =  0.83) and -20.79 (95% CI: -48.94, 7.37; I² = 75%, p =  0.15), respectively. The IIEF and the mean change of the IIEF had no difference between the combination group and the PDE5I-monotherapy group, with MDs of 1.82 (95% CI: -0.91, 4.54; I² = 40%, p =  0.19) and 0.25 (95% CI: -1.11, 1.62; I² = 47%, p =  0.72), respectively. Regarding the adverse events, the meta-analysis was in favor of monotherapy. None of the studies reported any serious or severe adverse event.

CONCLUSIONS

Treatment with combination therapy is more effective for the improvement of the IPSS. Less significant improvement was shown in Qmax. The beneficial effect of combination therapy regarding ED remains equivocal. The combination therapy seemed to be safe and well tolerated.

PATIENT SUMMARY

In this study, we review the effects of the combination therapy consisting of an α-blocker and a phosphodiesterase-5 inhibitor for the treatment of lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) and erectile dysfunction (ED). We found strong evidence to suggest the combination therapy for the improvement of LUTS. Benefits regarding the treatment of ED are less clear.

Management of Urinary Retention in Patients with Benign Prostatic Obstruction: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

CONTEXT

Practice patterns for the management of urinary retention (UR) secondary to benign prostatic obstruction (BPO; UR/BPO) vary widely and remain unstandardized.

OBJECTIVE

To review the evidence for managing patients with UR/BPO with pharmacological and nonpharmacological treatments included in the European Association of Urology guidelines on non-neurogenic male lower urinary tract symptoms.

EVIDENCE ACQUISITION

Search was conducted up to April 22, 2018, using CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, ClinicalTrials.gov, and World Health Organization International Clinical Trials Registry Platform. This systematic review included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and prospective comparative studies. Methods as detailed in the Cochrane handbook were followed. Certainty of evidence (CoE) was assessed using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) approach.

EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS

Literature search identified 2074 citations. Twenty-one studies were included (qualitative synthesis). The evidence for managing patients with UR/BPO with pharmacological or nonpharmacological treatments is limited. CoE for most outcomes was low/very low. Only α1-blockers (alfuzosin and tamsulosin) have been evaluated in more than one RCT. Pooled results indicated that α1-blockers provided significantly higher rates of successful trial without catheter compared with placebo [alfuzosin: 322/540 (60%) vs 156/400 (39%) (odds ratio {OR} 2.28, 95% confidence interval {CI} 1.55 to 3.36; participants=940; studies=7; I²=41%; low CoE); tamsulosin: 75/158 (47%) vs 40/139 (29%) (OR 2.40, 95% CI 1.29 to 4.45; participants=297; studies=3; I²=30%; low CoE)] with rare adverse events. Similar rates were achieved with tamsulosin or alfuzosin [51/87 (59%) vs 45/84 (54%) (OR 1.28, 95% CI 0.68 to 2.41; participants=171; studies=2; I²=0%; very low CoE)]. Nonpharmacological treatments have been evaluated in RCTs/prospective comparative studies only sporadically.

CONCLUSIONS

There is some evidence that usage of α1-blockers (alfuzosin and tamsulosin) may improve resolution of UR/BPO. As most nonpharmacological treatments have not been evaluated in patients with UR/BPO, the evidence is inconclusive about their benefits and harms.

PATIENT SUMMARY

There is some evidence that alfuzosin and tamsulosin may increase the rates of successful trial without catheter, but little or no evidence on various nonpharmacological treatment options for managing patients with urinary retention secondary to benign prostatic obstruction.

Effectiveness of the addition of tadalafil to tamsulosin in the treatment of acute urinary retention in patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia: A randomized clinical trial

INTRODUCTION

Acute urinary retention is one of the most significant complications of benign prostatic hyperplasia. Until now, standard treatments include catheterization and use of α-blockers. Tadalafil has been recently seen to also play a role in the treatment of urinary symptoms caused by benign prostatic hyperplasia. The aim of this study was to survey the addition of tadalafil to tamsulosin in the treatment of acute urinary retention in patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This is a randomized, double-blind placebo-controlled clinical trial. In all, 80 patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia-related acute urinary retention referred to the emergency department of the hospital were divided into two groups of 40 each and randomly assigned to receive either 0.4 mg tamsulosin plus placebo or 0.4 mg tamsulosin plus 10 mg tadalafil daily for 7 days. At the same first visit, the catheter was removed and the ability to void in 24 h and 1 week later was assessed in each group.

RESULTS

The differences in age, urine retention volume, history of drug use, lower urinary tract symptoms, and previous acute urinary retention were not significant between the two groups ( p = 0.619, 0.149, 0.501, 0.284, and 0.371, respectively). After catheter removal, 23 (57.5%) patients in the placebo group and 26 (65%) in the tadalafil group voided successfully at 24 h ( p = 0.491). After 1 week, 29 (72.5%) patients taking placebo and 26 (65%) taking tadalafil could void, yet indicating no significant difference ( p = 0.469).

CONCLUSION

Addition of tadalafil to α-blockers has no significant advantage in improving benign prostatic hyperplasia-related acute urinary retention versus tamsulosin alone.