Inflammatory pseudotumor of kidney: a challenging diagnostic entity

Child inflammatory myofibroblastic tumor of the kidney misdiagnosed as Wilms' tumor: case report

Inflammatory myofibroblastic tumor (IMT) is a rare mesenchymal tumor with recurrent potential, most commonly occurring in the lung but rarely in the kidney with nonspecific clinical symptoms and radiographic features, thus may be misdiagnosed as primary malignant lesions. We described a 6-year-old boy with renal IMT misdiagnosed as Wilms' tumor and then treated with right nephrectomy. It should be emphasized that in addition to the most common renal tumors in children, IMT should also be taken as a differential diagnosis. It is therefore mandatory to carry out clinical interpretation, careful histologic examination, and immunohistochemical studies collectively to make solid diagnosis.

A Case of Renal Inflammatory Pseudotumor Leading to Nephrectomy

Inflammatory pseudotumor (IPT) of the kidney is a rare benign disorder with unknown etiology. In IPT patients, some nonspecific symptoms might present, such as fever, hematuria, and back pain. As it can appear on computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging as a hypovascular mass with surrounding fat stranding, IPT can be misdiagnosed as a primary tumor. Since the clinical symptoms, radiographic features, and preoperative findings can be inconsistent, it is imperative to confirm IPT based on histopathological assessment. In the present study, we describe a case of renal IPT in a 13-year-old girl. The patient was treated with nephrectomy of the right kidney since the preoperative diagnosis was renal carcinoma. Pathological examination revealed an IPT. This article emphasizes the importance of preoperative definitive diagnosis in avoiding unnecessary nephrectomy.

Inflammatory Pseudotumor of the Renal Pelvis

Background: Inflammatory pseudotumor of the kidney is a rare disease of unknown etiology. There are no specific clinical or radiologic findings. The lesion can mimic renal cell carcinoma or transitional cell carcinoma depending on the site of involvement. These tumors, if diagnosed correctly, may respond to medical management. We present a case in which an inflammatory pseudotumor of the renal pelvis was misdiagnosed as a transitional cell carcinoma and unwarranted surgical intervention was performed. Case Presentation: A 39-year-old man presented with left flank pain and gross hematuria. On MRI, there was a hypointense 2.4 × 1.8 cm lesion involving the left renal pelvis. The urine cytology and biopsy of the lesion were inconclusive. On follow-up cans the lesion increased in size and patient had repeated hematuria. The lesion was clinically presumed to be a transitional cell carcinoma of the left renal pelvis. A laparoscopic left side nephroureterectomy along with bladder cuff excision and para-aortic lymphadenectomy was performed. The histology report revealed the lesion to be inflammatory pseudotumor of the renal pelvis. Conclusion: Inflammatory pseudotumor should always be considered in differential diagnosis of pelvic tumors, especially when image findings and biopsies are inconclusive.

Kidney inflammatory myofibroblastic tumor masquerading as metastatic malignancy: A case report and literature review

BACKGROUND

Inflammatory myofibroblastic tumor (IMT) is a rare mesenchymal tumor that is characterized by spindle cells differentiated from muscle fibroblasts and infiltration of various types of inflammatory cells. IMT can occur at any age and at any anatomic site. The most common location of IMT is the bladder in the genitourinary tract. Only scarce cases of kidney IMT have been reported in the literature.

CASE SUMMARY

A 77-year-old woman, with a history of bilateral renal calculus for 15 years, was admitted to the Department of Urology of our hospital complaining of recurrent painless gross hematuria for one month. The treatment with cephalosporin was ineffective. Computed tomography imaging showed a mixed density and slightly heterogeneously enhanced lesion in the middle pole of the left kidney and ipsilateral adrenal enlargement. The patient underwent surgical treatment by retroperitoneoscopic left radical nephrectomy plus adrenalectomy. A large number of typical spindle cells surrounded by plasma cells and lymphocytes were observed microscopically. Immunohistochemical analyses indicated that these spindle cells were positive for vimentin, cytokeratin (CK), Ki-67, CK7, CD34, and CD31 and were focally positive for CD10 and anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK-1). Thus, a diagnosis of IMT was made definitively. The patient recovered well after operation, and no recurrence or metastasis was noted during the 22-mo follow-up.

CONCLUSION

Since kidney IMT is very rare and lacks characteristic clinical manifestation, it is easily misdiagnosed as a malignant tumor before operation. Surgery remains the best choice for diagnosis and treatment, and such cases must be followed carefully because of the uncertain biological behavior of this tumor. This report suggests that renal calculus may be one of the causes of IMT, but further investigation is necessary to prove it.