1
|
Circ_0003146 upregulates SCARB1 expression by acting as a miR-1272 sponge to promote malignant behaviors of clear cell renal cell carcinoma. Anticancer Drugs 2022; 33:564-574. [PMID: 35276698 DOI: 10.1097/cad.0000000000001286] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
Circular RNAs (circRNAs) exhibit essential regulation in the malignant development of clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC). The aims of this study were to investigate the role and mechanism of circ_0003146 in the biologic behaviors of ccRCC. RNA level analysis was performed through reverse transcription-quantitative PCR assay. Cell proliferation was measured by EdU assay and cell counting kit-8 assay. The protein expression was analyzed using a western blot. Flow cytometry and caspase 3 activity assay were used to assess cell apoptosis. Cell migration and invasion were evaluated via wound healing assay and transwell assay. Circ_0003146 function in vivo was determined by xenograft tumor assay. Dual-luciferase reporter assay was applied for target relation analysis. Circ_0003146 upregulation was detected in ccRCC tissues and cells. Downregulation of circ_0003146 induced inhibition of proliferation, migration, invasion and EMT but the promotion of apoptosis in ccRCC cells. Tumor growth in vivo was inhibited after knockdown of circ_0003146. Circ_0003146 directly interacted with miR-1272, and the miR-1272 sponging effect was responsible for the function of circ_0003146. Scavenger receptor class B type 1 (SCARB1) was a target of miR-1272, and circ_0003146 regulated SCARB1 level by absorbing miR-1272. The regulation of circ_0003146 in ccRCC progression was achieved by upregulating SCARB1 in part. The current findings demonstrated that circ_0003146 contributed to the malignant progression of ccRCC via inducing SCARB1 upregulation by targeting miR-1272.
Collapse
|
2
|
Mondlane ER, Abreu-Mendes P, Martins D, Cruz R, Mendes F. The role of immunotherapy in advanced renal cell carcinoma: Review. Int Braz J Urol 2021; 47:1228-1242. [PMID: 33650838 PMCID: PMC8486460 DOI: 10.1590/s1677-5538.ibju.2020.0681] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/28/2020] [Accepted: 08/05/2020] [Indexed: 01/05/2023] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Ercília Rita Mondlane
- ESTeSCPolitécnico de CoimbraCoimbraPortugalPolitécnico de Coimbra, ESTeSC, DFARM, ESTeSC, SM Bispo, Coimbra, Portugal.
| | - Pedro Abreu-Mendes
- Centro Hospital Universitário de São JoãoServiço de UrologiaPortoPortugalServiço de Urologia, Centro Hospital Universitário de São João, Porto, Portugal.
- Universidade do PortoFaculdade de MedicinaPortoPortugalFaculdade de Medicina Universidade do Porto, Porto, Portugal.
| | - Diana Martins
- ESTeSCPolitécnico de CoimbraCoimbraPortugalPolitécnico de Coimbra, ESTeSC, DCBL, SM Bispo, Coimbra, Portugal.
- Universidade de CoimbraInstituto de Investigação Clínica e Biomédica de Coimbra CoimbraPortugalUniversidade de Coimbra, Instituto de Investigação Clínica e Biomédica de Coimbra Coimbra, Portugal.
- Universidade de CoimbraCentro de Biomedicina e Biotecnologia Inovadoras (CIBB)CoimbraPortugalUniversidade de Coimbra, Centro de Biomedicina e Biotecnologia Inovadoras (CIBB), Coimbra, Portugal.
- Centro Académico Clínico de CoimbraCoimbraPortugalCentro Académico Clínico de Coimbra (CACC), Coimbra, Portugal.
- Universidade do PortoInstituto de Investigação e Inovação em SaúdePortoPortugalInstituto de Investigação e Inovação em Saúde, Universidade do Porto, Porto, Portugal.
| | - Rui Cruz
- ESTeSCPolitécnico de CoimbraCoimbraPortugalPolitécnico de Coimbra, ESTeSC, DFARM, ESTeSC, SM Bispo, Coimbra, Portugal.
| | - Fernando Mendes
- ESTeSCPolitécnico de CoimbraCoimbraPortugalPolitécnico de Coimbra, ESTeSC, DCBL, SM Bispo, Coimbra, Portugal.
- Universidade de CoimbraInstituto de Investigação Clínica e Biomédica de Coimbra CoimbraPortugalUniversidade de Coimbra, Instituto de Investigação Clínica e Biomédica de Coimbra Coimbra, Portugal.
- Universidade de CoimbraCentro de Biomedicina e Biotecnologia Inovadoras (CIBB)CoimbraPortugalUniversidade de Coimbra, Centro de Biomedicina e Biotecnologia Inovadoras (CIBB), Coimbra, Portugal.
- Centro Académico Clínico de CoimbraCoimbraPortugalCentro Académico Clínico de Coimbra (CACC), Coimbra, Portugal.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Leite LDM, Bergerot PG, Dettino ALA, R JA, Zequi SDC, Formiga MNDC. Influence of treatment access on survival of metastatic renal cell carcinoma in brazilian cancer center. Int Braz J Urol 2021; 47:566-573. [PMID: 33621005 PMCID: PMC7993945 DOI: 10.1590/s1677-5538.ibju.2020.0443] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/02/2020] [Accepted: 08/12/2020] [Indexed: 12/30/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI) and immunotherapy improved survival in metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC). Disparities in treatment access are present in healthcare systems globally. The aim of this study was to analyze survival outcomes of mRCC patients treated with first-line TKIs in the public (PHS) and private (PrS) health system in a Brazilian Cancer Center. MATERIALS AND METHODS Records from all mRCC patients treated with first-line TKIs from 2007-2018 were reviewed retrospectively. Categorial variables were compared by Fisher's exact test. Survival was estimated by Kaplan-Maier method and survival curves were compared using the log-rank test. Prognostic factors were adjusted by Cox regression model. RESULTS Of the 171 eligible patients, 37 (21.6%) were PHS patients and 134 (78.4%) were PrS patients. There were no difference in age, gender, or sites of metastasis. PHS patients had worse performance status (ECOG ≥2, 35.1% vs. 13.5%, p=0.007), poorer risk score (IMDC poor risk, 32.4% vs. 16.4%, p=0.09), and less nephrectomies (73% vs. 92.5%, p=0.003) than PrS patients. Median lines of therapy was one for PHS versus two for PrS patients (p=0.03). Median overall survival (OS) was 16.5 versus 26.5 months (p=0.002) and progression-free survival (PFS), 8.4 versus 11 months (p=0.01) for PHS and PrS patients, respectively. After adjusting for known prognostic factors on multivariate analysis, PHS patients still had a higher risk of death (HR: 1.61, 95% CI: 1.01-2.56, p=0.047). CONCLUSION Patients with mRCC treated via the PHS had worse overall survival, possibly due to poorer prognosis at presentation and less drug access.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Luciana de M Leite
- Departamento de Oncologia Médica, AC Camargo Cancer Center, São Paulo, SP, Brasil
| | - Paulo G Bergerot
- Department of Medical Oncology and Experimental Therapeutics, City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center, Duarte, CA, USA
| | - Aldo L A Dettino
- Departamento de Oncologia Médica, AC Camargo Cancer Center, São Paulo, SP, Brasil
| | - José Augusto R
- Departamento de Oncologia Médica, AC Camargo Cancer Center, São Paulo, SP, Brasil
| | - Stenio de C Zequi
- Departamento de Urologia Oncológica, AC Camargo Cancer Center, São Paulo, SP, Brasil.,Instituto Nacional de Ciência e Tecnologia em Oncogenômica e Inovação Terapêutica, AC Camargo Cancer Center, São Paulo, SP, Brasil
| | - Maria Nirvana da C Formiga
- Departamento de Oncologia Médica, AC Camargo Cancer Center, São Paulo, SP, Brasil.,Instituto Nacional de Ciência e Tecnologia em Oncogenômica e Inovação Terapêutica, AC Camargo Cancer Center, São Paulo, SP, Brasil
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Khan M, Zhao Z, Arooj S, Liao G. Impact of Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors (TKIs) Combined With Radiation Therapy for the Management of Brain Metastases From Renal Cell Carcinoma. Front Oncol 2020; 10:1246. [PMID: 32793497 PMCID: PMC7390930 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2020.01246] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/12/2020] [Accepted: 06/17/2020] [Indexed: 12/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: Targeted therapy has transformed the outcome for patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma. Their efficacy and safety have also been demonstrated in brain metastatic RCC. Preclinical evidence suggests synergism of radiation and tyrosine kinase inhibitors. Consequently, several studies have compared their efficacy in the treatment of RCC brain metastases to the era of brain management with surgery/radiation only. Objectives: We seek to systematically review and meta-analyze the results of those studies that involved comparative intervention groups of brain management; TKIs, and never used TKIs. Methods and Materials: Online databases (PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane library, and ClinicalTrials.gov) were searched for comparative studies. Overall survival as the primary outcome of interest, and local brain control, distant control, and adverse events as secondary outcomes of interest were recorded for meta-analysis. Hazard ratios were pooled together using Review Manager 5.3. Fixed effects or random effects model were adopted according to the level of heterogeneity. Subgroup analysis included studies that involved SRS as the local treatment of management. Results: Overall 7 studies (n = 897) were included for meta-analysis. TKI use was associated with better survival (HR 0.60 [0.52, 0.69], p < 0.00001) and local brain control (HR 0.34 [0.11, 0.98], p = 0.05). SRS subgroup also revealed significantly better survival (HR 0.61 [0.44, 0.83], p = 0.002) and local brain control (HR 0.19 [0.08, 0.45], p = 0.0002). Distant brain control (HR 0.95 [0.67, 1.35], p = 0.79) and brain progression free survival were unaffected (HR 0.94 [0.56, 1.56], p = 0.80). Only one study (n = 376) reported significantly greater 12-months cumulative incidence of radiation necrosis with TKI use within 30 days of SRS (10.9 vs. 6.4%, p = 0.04). Conclusions: TKIs use in combination with SRS is safe and effective for treating RCC brain metastases. Larger randomized controlled trials are warranted to validate the results.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Muhammad Khan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Shenzhen People's Hospital, The First Affiliated Hospital of Southern University of Science and Technology, Shenzhen, China.,Department of Oncology, First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Hefei, China
| | - Zhihong Zhao
- Department of Nephrology, Shenzhen People's Hospital, Second Clinical Medicine Centre, Jinan University, Shenzhen, China
| | - Sumbal Arooj
- Department of Biochemistry, University of Sialkot, Sialkot, Pakistan
| | - Guixiang Liao
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Shenzhen People's Hospital, The First Affiliated Hospital of Southern University of Science and Technology, Shenzhen, China
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Zhou L, Li Z, Pan X, Lai Y, Quan J, Zhao L, Xu J, Xu W, Guan X, Li H, Yang S, Gui Y, Lai Y. Identification of miR-18a-5p as an oncogene and prognostic biomarker in RCC. Am J Transl Res 2018; 10:1874-1886. [PMID: 30018727 PMCID: PMC6038077 DOI: pmid/30018727] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/11/2018] [Accepted: 05/07/2018] [Indexed: 02/05/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND RCC is a malignant tumor that originates from renal tubular epithelial cells, accounting for nearly 90% of renal malignancies and 3% of adult malignancies. It was reported that more than 30-40% of patients with early localized RCC still have recurrence and metastasis after receiving radical surgery. miRNAs are an endogenous non-coding small RNAs that play an important role in the regulation of tumor cell proliferation, differentiation and apoptosis. METHODS In our study, RT-qPCR, CCK-8 assay, wound scratch assay, transwell assay and flow cytometry assay were designed to identify the expression and functions of miR-18a-5p in RCC. Moreover, we collected the survival data from The Cancer Genome Atlas to predict and clarify the prognostic functions of miR-18a-5p in RCC. The correlation between miR-18a-5p expression and clinicopathological variables or overall survival was analyzed by 42 formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) renal cancer samples. RESULTS The expression of miR-18a-5p in RCC tissues and cell lines was elevated. Further researches suggested that upregulation of miR-18a-5p had a positive effect on RCC cell proliferation, migration, invasion and inhibition of apoptosis, while down-regulation of miR-18a-5p neutralized the effect. In addition, Data of TCGA and prognostic analysis of FFPE RCC samples revealed that high miR-18a-5p expression patients had significantly poorer survival. CONCLUSIONS These results demonstrated that miR-18a-5p functioned as an oncogene and prognostic biomarker in RCC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Liang Zhou
- Department of Urology, Peking University Shenzhen HospitalShenzhen 518036, Guangdong, China
- Department of Urology, Guangzhou Medical UniversityGuangzhou 511436, Guangdong, China
- The Guangdong and Shenzhen Key Laboratory of Male Reproductive Medicine and Genetics, Peking University Shenzhen Hospital, Institute of Urology of Shenzhen PKU-HKUST Medical CenterShenzhen 518036, Guangdong, China
| | - Zuwei Li
- Department of Urology, Peking University Shenzhen HospitalShenzhen 518036, Guangdong, China
- Department of Urology, Shantou University Medical CollegeShantou 515041, Guangdong, China
- The Guangdong and Shenzhen Key Laboratory of Male Reproductive Medicine and Genetics, Peking University Shenzhen Hospital, Institute of Urology of Shenzhen PKU-HKUST Medical CenterShenzhen 518036, Guangdong, China
| | - Xiang Pan
- Department of Urology, Peking University Shenzhen HospitalShenzhen 518036, Guangdong, China
- The Guangdong and Shenzhen Key Laboratory of Male Reproductive Medicine and Genetics, Peking University Shenzhen Hospital, Institute of Urology of Shenzhen PKU-HKUST Medical CenterShenzhen 518036, Guangdong, China
- Department of Urology, Anhui Medical UniversityHefei 230032, Anhui, China
| | - Yulin Lai
- Department of Urology, Peking University Shenzhen HospitalShenzhen 518036, Guangdong, China
- Department of Urology, Guangzhou Medical UniversityGuangzhou 511436, Guangdong, China
- Department of Urology, Anhui Medical UniversityHefei 230032, Anhui, China
| | - Jing Quan
- Department of Urology, Peking University Shenzhen HospitalShenzhen 518036, Guangdong, China
- The Guangdong and Shenzhen Key Laboratory of Male Reproductive Medicine and Genetics, Peking University Shenzhen Hospital, Institute of Urology of Shenzhen PKU-HKUST Medical CenterShenzhen 518036, Guangdong, China
- Department of Urology, Anhui Medical UniversityHefei 230032, Anhui, China
| | - Liwen Zhao
- Department of Urology, Peking University Shenzhen HospitalShenzhen 518036, Guangdong, China
- The Guangdong and Shenzhen Key Laboratory of Male Reproductive Medicine and Genetics, Peking University Shenzhen Hospital, Institute of Urology of Shenzhen PKU-HKUST Medical CenterShenzhen 518036, Guangdong, China
- Department of Urology, Anhui Medical UniversityHefei 230032, Anhui, China
| | - Jinling Xu
- Department of Urology, Peking University Shenzhen HospitalShenzhen 518036, Guangdong, China
| | - Weijie Xu
- Department of Urology, Peking University Shenzhen HospitalShenzhen 518036, Guangdong, China
| | - Xin Guan
- Department of Urology, Peking University Shenzhen HospitalShenzhen 518036, Guangdong, China
| | - Hang Li
- Department of Urology, Peking University Shenzhen HospitalShenzhen 518036, Guangdong, China
| | - Shangqi Yang
- Department of Urology, Peking University Shenzhen HospitalShenzhen 518036, Guangdong, China
| | - Yaoting Gui
- The Guangdong and Shenzhen Key Laboratory of Male Reproductive Medicine and Genetics, Peking University Shenzhen Hospital, Institute of Urology of Shenzhen PKU-HKUST Medical CenterShenzhen 518036, Guangdong, China
| | - Yongqing Lai
- Department of Urology, Peking University Shenzhen HospitalShenzhen 518036, Guangdong, China
- The Guangdong and Shenzhen Key Laboratory of Male Reproductive Medicine and Genetics, Peking University Shenzhen Hospital, Institute of Urology of Shenzhen PKU-HKUST Medical CenterShenzhen 518036, Guangdong, China
| |
Collapse
|