Acute prostatitis after prostate biopsy under ciprofloxacin prophylaxis with or without ornidazole and pre-biopsy enema: analysis of 3.479 prostate biopsy cases

Comparative Retrospective Assessment of the Effectiveness and Risk Factors of Fluoroquinolones, Cephalosporines, and Selective Antibiotic Prophylaxis for Transrectal Prostate Biopsy

INTRODUCTION

Despite increasing resistance of enterobacteria against fluoroquinolones (FLU), they are still widely used during transrectal prostate biopsy (TRPB). This study was designed to analyse infectious complications and risk factors between FLU, cephalosporines (CEPH) and selective other antibiotics (O-AB) used during TRPB.

METHODS

664 patients were included retrospectively (152 FLU, 452 CEPH and 60 O-AB). Infectious complications were defined as fever >38.0°C, the in-house definition of complicated urinary tract infection (cUTI) (if all applied: fever >38.0°C, leucocytosis >11.000/µL and positive urine dipstick) or postinterventional bacteriuria. Hospitalisation rate, duration and comorbidities were also assessed. χ2 and Fisher's exact test were used for group comparison. Multivariate regression analysis assessed the association of comorbidities with infectious complications.

RESULTS

FLU and CEPH were indifferent regarding infectious complications, however in the O-AB group significantly more common compared to FLU and CEPH (11.6, 13.3, 25%, p < 0.05). Duration of hospital stay in CEPH was significantly shorter compared to FLU and O-AB (4.1 vs. 6.3 vs. 8.2 days, p < 0.05). Arterial hypertension showed increased association with fever (OR 6.002 (1.178; 30.597) p = 0.031) and cUTI (OR 6.006 (1.207; 29.891) p = 0.029).

CONCLUSION

Infectious complications were low and indifferent between FLU and CEPH but significantly more frequent in O-AB. Arterial hypertension was significantly associated with postinterventional fever and cUTI.

Pharmacotherapeutic interventions for the treatment of bacterial prostatitis

INTRODUCTION

Bacterial prostatitis, acute or chronic, is one of the most prevalent urogenital infections in men. Its diagnosis requires the application of a careful methodology. Gram-negative bacilli are the most frequent causative agents, and in recent years, an increase in the frequency of multiresistant bacteria has been detected. The choice of the optimal antimicrobial treatment requires the selection of drugs with proven in vitro activity associated with good penetration into the prostatic tissue, especially in chronic forms of infection.

AREAS COVERED

The aim of this article is to summarize the current evidence regarding the pathogenesis, etiology, empirical and definitive antimicrobial therapy, and new pharmacotherapeutic interventions to improve the prognosis of bacterial acute or chronic prostatitis.

EXPERT OPINION

Bacterial prostatitis requires the application of an accurate diagnostic protocol to identify the causative agent and establish the optimal antimicrobial treatment. The structural and biochemical characteristics of prostatic tissue result in poor penetration of antimicrobials; therefore, in the choice of treatment, it is essential to select agents with proven antimicrobial activity and pharmacokinetic characteristics that ensure good and sustained concentrations in this area. Patients with chronic forms of infection require prolonged treatment, and relapses of the infectious process are frequent.