Al-Ghazo MA, Ghalayini IF, Al-Azab RS, Bani-Hani I, Barham A, Haddad Y. Do all patients with newly diagnosed prostate cancer need staging radionuclide bone scan? A retrospective study.
Int Braz J Urol 2011;
36:685-91; discussion 691-2. [PMID:
21176275 DOI:
10.1590/s1677-55382010000600006]
[Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 06/07/2010] [Indexed: 11/22/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE
Define a group of patients with newly diagnosed prostate cancer, whose risk of bone metastasis is low enough to omit a bone scan staging study.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
From 2003 to 2009, the medical records of patients who were newly diagnosed with prostate cancer were retrospectively reviewed. The data collected included: age, digital rectal examination, serum prostate specific antigen (PSA), Gleason score, clinical T stage, and bone isotope scan. Patients were divided into two groups according to the results of bone isotope scan; positive group and negative group. A univariate and multivariate binary logistic regression was used to analyze the results.
RESULTS
Of the 106 patients, 98 had a complete data collection and were entered into the study. The median age of the patients was 70.5 years and patients with a positive bone scan was 74 years, significantly higher than for patients with negative scans (69 years) (p=0.02). Bone metastasis was detected in 39 cases (39.7%). In all patients with clinical T1-2 stage, a Gleason score of <8 and PSA≤20 ng/mL, the bone isotope scans were negative. In univariate analysis, PSA (>20 ng/mL) and Gleason score (>7) were independently predictive of positive bone scan, while clinical stage was not.
CONCLUSION
Staging bone scans can be omitted in patients with a PSA level of ≤20 ng/mL, and Gleason score<8. Our results suggest that by considering the Gleason score and PSA, a larger proportion of patients with prostate cancer could avoid a staging bone scan.
Collapse