Right renal vein elongation with the inferior vena cava for cadaveric kidney transplants: an old neglected surgical approach

Deceased donor kidney procurement: Systematic review of the surgical technique

INTRODUCTION

Kidney procurement procedure must be carried out following a standardized technique in order to optimize kidney grafts for their subsequent implantation.

OBJECTIVES

Review of the available literature on kidney procurement procedure.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Narrative review of the available evidence on deceased donor kidney procurement technique after a search of relevant manuscripts indexed in PubMed, EMBASE and Scielo written in English and Spanish.

RESULTS

Deceased donor kidney procurement can be divided into two groups, donation after brain death (DBD) and donation after circulatory death (DCD). Kidney procurement in DBD frequently includes other chest and/or abdominal organs, requiring multidisciplinary surgical coordination. During the harvesting procedure, the renal vascular pedicle must remain intact for subsequent implantation and reduced ischemia time.

CONCLUSIONS

Adequate execution and perfect knowledge of the technique for surgical removal and anatomy reduces the rate of graft losses associated to inadequate harvesting techniques.

Outcomes From Right Versus Left Deceased-Donor Kidney Transplants: A US National Cohort Study

RATIONALE & OBJECTIVE

There may be important transplant-related differences between right and left kidneys, including logistical/surgical considerations about vessel length for the right compared to the left kidney from the same donor. Because US centers choose between the right and left kidney when their recipient is ranked higher on a "match-run," we sought to determine whether deceased-donor right kidneys have had worse posttransplantation outcomes than left kidneys.

STUDY DESIGN

Paired Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network analysis.

SETTING & PARTICIPANTS

Deceased-donor kidney pairs transplanted during 1990 to 2016.

EXPOSURE

Right versus left kidney controlling for other significant factors.

OUTCOMES

Delayed graft function (DGF), all-cause and death-censored graft failure, and mortality.

ANALYTICAL APPROACH

Multivariable conditional logistic regression for DGF; proportional hazards models (conditional on same donor) for failure/mortality with right kidneys (operationalized as 6-month time-varying coefficients) adjusting for DGF and other confounders.

RESULTS

87,112 recipient pairs shared the following donor characteristics: mean age of 41 ± 14 years, 60% males, and 11% with cardiac death. Recipient characteristics were numerically similar by donor kidney side but with some statistical differences given the sample size. Right kidneys had slightly longer cold ischemia time. DGF occurred more often for right kidneys (28% vs 25.8%; P < 0.001; adjusted OR, 1.15 [95% CI, 1.12-1.17]). The adjusted hazard ratio (aHR) for all-cause graft failure with right kidneys within 6 months was 1.07 (95% CI, 1.03-1.11), and was 0.99 (95% CI, 0.97-1.01) thereafter. The aHRs for death-censored graft failure with right kidneys before and after 6 months were 1.11 (95% CI, 1.06-1.16) and 0.96 (95% CI, 0.93-0.99), respectively; the corresonding aHRs for mortality were 0.99 (95% CI, 0.93-1.04) and 1.00 (95% CI, 0.98-1.03), respectively.

LIMITATIONS

Registry data, different transplant eras, reasons for kidney side unavailable.

CONCLUSIONS

There is modest association for transplantation of right kidneys with DGF and graft loss within the first 6 months, which is lost beyond this time point. These findings do not support the use of laterality of deceased-donor kidneys as an important factor in organ acceptance decisions.

Fax Extension of the Right Renal Vein With a Remodeled Receptor Saphenous Vein in a Living-Donor Kidney Transplant: A Case Report

The right kidney may be chosen for donor safety as the donor kidney in a living renal transplant. However, the short length of the right renal vein may increase technical difficulties and affect the implanted graft. We report a method that uses the remodeled receptor saphenous vein to reconstruct and extend the transplanted renal vein.

Right renal vein extension with cryopreserved external iliac artery allografts in living-donor kidney transplantations

INTRODUCTION

A short right renal vein remains a challenge for renal transplant surgery, especially in the living donor. Our objective was to report on a new technique to solve this problem.

TECHNICAL CONSIDERATIONS

We describe our experience with the use of cryopreserved iliac artery grafts for right renal vein extension. Two renal grafts from living donors with a short right renal vein were subjected to an extension with a cryopreserved external iliac artery allograft. There were no perioperative or postoperative complications. There were also no changes in ischemia times. The renal implantation was performed easily and conveniently using our standard technique. For the first and second procedures, at 3 and 3.5 years after surgery, respectively, both vascular grafts maintain good patency, and the renal function of both recipients is optimal.

CONCLUSION

Tissue-banked cryopreserved cadaveric vessels can be a useful tool in renal transplant surgery. The use of a cryopreserved iliac artery for renal vein extension is a simple and effective new technique that can be added to the pool of surgical solutions for a short renal vein in living-donor kidney transplantation. To our knowledge, this is the first time that the use of such grafts for this purpose has been described.

[Elongation of the right renal vein in 120 consecutive transplant patients. A comparative analysis]

OBJECTIVES

Shorter length of the right renal vein (RRV) may represent an additional difficulty for transplant. This paper has aimed to present our experience with RRV elongation in the kidney from a cadaveric donor and to compare the results with the rest of kidneys transplanted in the same period of time.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

We performed 377 kidneys transplants within the last 11 years. Of these, in 120, the RRV was elongated with the vena cava. The surgical technique is described and the results compared with the remaining transplants of the series. Renal function, graft survival and complications were assessed at 1, 3 and 12 months. Data were obtained retrospectively from the database of the Urology Department and Hospital medical records.

RESULTS

In the 377 transplants, there were 4 (1%) venous thrombosis, 2 (1.6%) of which concerned kidneys with elongation of the RRV and 2 (0.7%) in the rest of transplanted kidneys. There was no difference in postoperative bleeding, 11 (9.1%) occurred in kidneys with elongated RRV and 22 (8.5%) in the remaining kidney. In no case was the bleeding related to the elongated segment. Graft survival and renal function were similar for both groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Elongation of the RRV with the vena cava is a feasible, fast, and effective procedure that does not increase morbidity or affect renal function or graft viability. It facilitates vascular anastomosis and places the kidney in a less forced position, shortens the warm ischemia time and avoids the risk of kinking of the renal artery because it is equal to the length of the vein artery.

Renal vein lengthening using gonadal vein reduces surgical difficulty in living-donor kidney transplantation

BACKGROUND

During living-donor kidney transplantation, to maximally decrease donor injury, the right kidney with lower glomerular filtration rate often is selected as the donor kidney. However, the renal vein of the right kidney is relatively short for transplantation. The gonadal vein is essentially useless and is easily accessed during the donor nephrectomy.

METHODS

Seventeen live kidney donors received right kidney nephrectomy for living-donor kidney transplantation. Short renal veins were lengthened by circular anastomosis or spiral anastomosis of longitudinally cut gonadal veins. The renal function of receivers was evaluated using creatinine clearance.

RESULTS

The renal veins were extended by 2.0-2.7 cm with circular anastomosis and 4.1-4.5 cm with spiral anastomosis with an average of 2.5 ± 0.7 cm. Lengthening of renal veins averaged 20.4 ± 4.2 min. All surgeries were successful, significantly reducing difficulty of vascular anastomosis during transplantation. No poor early graft function occurred. No side effects were observed in donors.

CONCLUSIONS

When donor renal veins are too short for effective kidney transplantation and may affect reliability of vascular anastomosis, they can be lengthened by using gonadal veins without increasing injury to the donor. Successful extension of donor kidney renal veins expands the indication for right donor kidneys.

Evaluation of cadaveric renal vein lengths and their extension loss with three types of ligature and section

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

The right kidney has been less frequently used in live donor nephrectomy, because of the shorter length of the right renal vein (RRV) that is associated with technical difficulties and higher rates of venous thrombosis. In live open donor or deceased donor transplant nephrectomy, an additional cuff of the inferior vena cava is usually removed, but this is a more difficult and risky maneuver in laparoscopic nephrectomy. For this reason, laparoscopic right nephrectomy (LRN) for renal transplantation (RT) is not frequently performed in most medical institutions. We evaluate the difference between RRV and left renal vein (LRV) lengths in cadavers, as harvested for RT by three clamping methods. Our objective was to obtain information that could clarify when LRN for RT should be encouraged or avoided with regard to conventional surgery.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Ninety adult fresh unfrozen cadavers were randomly divided into three groups of 30, according to the clamping device used: Satinsky, stapler, and Hem-o-lok clip. The abdominal viscera were removed through a median xyphopubic incision, and the veins were measured on the bench. Two lateral limits were used: The renal hilum and the tangential line of the renal poles. As for medial limits, the inferior vena cava or the laparoscopic clipping device on the RRV were used on the right side, while on the LRV, the medial border of the emergence of the adrenal vein was considered. After section of the renal vein, a slight traction of the extremity was applied for the measurement. All measurements were obtained three times using a metallic millimetric ruler, and the arithmetic mean was considered. The chi-square, one-way analysis of variance, and paired t tests were used for statistical analysis. Statistical significance was accepted at P <or= 0.05.

RESULTS

The groups of cadavers were homogeneous in demographic characteristics. Regardless of the clamping method and considering the useful length of the LRV, the RRV was statistically smaller. The evaluation of the vein length did not depend on the lateral limit considered. Independent of the clamping method, on both sides, the lengths after the vein section were larger than before the section, a fact attributed to traction. Use of a stapler and a single Hem-o-lok presented the same waste of vein length on the right side. On average, the RRV was 13.7% shorter than the LRV.

CONCLUSIONS

With the wide acceptance of laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy, the length difference between the veins of both kidneys is an important issue, and the right kidney is therefore used less than the left, compared with conventional surgery. This article represents the first step to quantify the anatomic length of renal veins in different situations. Certainly, more imagenologic or surgical studies should be carried out before decisions can be made for better selection of patients for LRN.