Relationship of age to outcome and clinicopathologic findings in men submitted to radical prostatectomy

Exploration on Gleason score variation trend of patients with prostate carcinoma from 1996 to 2019: a retrospective single center study

Background

Gleason score (GS) is one of the stronger prognostic factors and is integral to the management of prostate carcinoma. Subsequent modifications, recommended by the International Society of Urological Pathology in 2005 and 2014, enabled accurate prediction of prognosis. The present study investigated GS variation trend of patients with prostate carcinoma from 1996 to 2019 and offered an overview of GS changes with age, specimen type, histopathological type and serum prostate specific antigen (PSA).

Methods

One thousand three hundred and seventy-six patients, admitted to Peking University People's Hospital in 1996 to 2019, were divided into 1996 to 2006, 2007 to 2015 and 2016 to 2019 groups. Data, including demographic characteristics, GS, primary and secondary grade and percentage of primary and secondary grade of each group, were collected and analyzed. The population distribution and average of GS was evaluated, after segmented and stratified by age, type of specimen, histopathological type and PSA.

Results

The average of age and PSA of each cohort had no obvious change. The average of total GS fluctuated among three cohorts with statistically significant differences. The distribution of age and PSA did not differ among cohorts. The distribution of total and primary GS shifted, with more patients detected as total GS higher than 6 (86.1%), and more primary grade higher than 3 (56.7%) in 2016-2019. After segmented and stratified by age, specimen type, histological type and PSA, the population percentage of GS over 6 was significantly higher in 2016-2019 than 1996-2006 and 2007-2015 in patients aged younger than 80 years (age <60, 89.6%, age 60-69, 82.0%, age 70-79, 87.7%). Patients, aged below 80 years in 2016-2019, were detected with higher total GS.

Conclusions

In the present study, GS in patients with prostate carcinoma showed a upward trend. Primary grade, age, serum PSA and specimen type were the main reasons for GS changing while secondary grade, tissue types and diagnostic criteria influenced less.

Management Options for Biochemically Recurrent Prostate Cancer

Prostate cancer is the most common solid tumor malignancy in men worldwide. Treatment with surgery and radiation can be curative in organ-confined disease. Unfortunately, about one third of men develop biochemically recurrent disease based only on rising prostate-specific antigen (PSA) in the absence of visible disease on conventional imaging. For these patients with biochemical recurrent prostate cancer, there is no uniform guideline for subsequent management. Based on available data, it seems prudent that biochemical recurrent prostate cancer should initially be evaluated for salvage radiation or prostatectomy, with curative intent. In selected cases, high-intensity focused ultrasound and cryotherapy may be considered in patients that meet very narrow criteria as defined by non-randomized trials. If salvage options are not practical or unsuccessful, androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) is a standard option for disease control. While some patients prefer ADT to manage the disease immediately, others defer treatment because of the associated toxicity. In the absence of definitive randomized data, patients may be followed using PSA doubling time as a trigger to initiate ADT. Based on retrospective data, a PSA doubling time of less than 3-6 months has been associated with near-term development of metastasis and thus could be used signal to initiate ADT. Once treatment is begun, patients and their providers can choose between an intermittent and continuous ADT strategy. The intermittent approach may limit side effects but in patients with metastatic disease studies could not exclude a 20% greater risk of death. In men with biochemical recurrence, large studies have shown that intermittent therapy is non-inferior to continuous therapy, thus making this a reasonable option. Since biochemically recurrent prostate cancer is defined by technological limitations of radiographic detection, as new imaging (i.e., PSMA) strategies are developed, it may alter how the disease is monitored and perhaps managed. Furthermore, patients have no symptoms related to their disease and thus many prefer options that minimize toxicity. For this reason, herbal agents and immunotherapy are under investigation as potential alternatives to ADT and its accompanying side effects. New therapeutic options combined with improved imaging to evaluate the disease may markedly change how biochemically recurrent prostate cancer is managed in the future.

Young age under 60 years is not a contraindication to treatment with definitive dose escalated radiotherapy for prostate cancer

BACKGROUND

It is widely believed that younger prostate cancer patients are at greater risk of recurrence following radiotherapy (RT).

METHODS

From 1992 to 2007, 2168 (395 age ≤ 60) men received conformal RT alone for prostate cancer at our institution (median dose=76 Gy, range: 72-80). Multivariable analysis (MVA) was used to identify significant predictors for BF and PCSM. Cumulative incidence was estimated using the competing risk method (Fine and Gray) for BF (Phoenix definition) and PCSM to account for the competing risk of death.

RESULTS

With a median follow-up of 72.2 months (range: 24.0-205.1), 8-year BF was 27.1% for age ≤ 60 vs. 23.7% for age >60 (p=0.29). Eight-year PCSM was 3.0% for age ≤ 60 vs. 2.0% for age >60 (p=0.52). MVA for BF identified initial PSA [adjusted HR=1.7 (PSA 10-20), 2.6 (PSA >20), p<0.01], Gleason score [adjusted HR=2.1 (G7), 1.9 (G8-10), p<0.01], T-stage [adjusted HR=1.7 (T2b-c), 2.6 (T3-4), p<0.01], and initial androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) [adjusted HR=0.38 (ADT >12 months), p<0.01] as significant, but not age or ADT <12 months. MVA for PCSM identified Gleason score [adjusted HR=3.0 (G8-10), p=0.01] and T-stage [adjusted HR=8.7 (T3-4), p<0.01] as significant, but not age, PSA, or ADT.

CONCLUSION

This is the largest, most mature study of younger men treated with RT for prostate cancer that confirms young age is not prognostic for BF.

Biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy: is the disease or the surgeon to blame?

PURPOSE

The PSA recurrence develops in 27 to 53% within ten years after radical prostatectomy (RP). We investigated the factors (disease grade and stage or the surgeon's expertise,) more likely to influence biochemical recurrence in men post-radical prostatectomy for organ-confined prostate cancer by different surgeons in the same institution.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 510 patients that underwent radical prostatectomy were investigated retrospectively. Biochemical recurrence was defined as detection of a PSA level of ≥ 0.20 ng/mL by two subsequent measurements. The causes, which are likely to influence the development of PSA recurrence, were separated into two groups as those related to the disease and those related to the surgical technique.

RESULTS

Biochemical recurrence was detected in 23.5% (120 cases) of 510 cases. The parameters most likely to influence biochemical recurrence were: PSA level (p < 0.0001), T stage (p < 0.0001), the presence of extracapsular invasion prostate (p < 0.0001), Gleason scores (p = 0.042, p < 0.0001) and the presence of biopsy with perineural invasion (p = 0.03). The only surgical factor that demonstrated relevance was inadvertent capsular incision during the surgery that influenced the PSA recurrence (p < 0.0001).

CONCLUSION

The PSA recurrence was detected in 21.6% of patients who had been treated with radical prostatectomy within 5 years, which indicates that the parameters related to the disease and the patient have a pivotal role in the PSA recurrence.