Photoselective vaporization of the prostate in men with a history of chronic oral anti-coagulation

Meta-analysis of the effect of antithrombotic drugs on perioperative bleeding in BPH surgery

Effects of antithrombotic agents on the bleeding risk after transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) were assessed in patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH). Controlled clinical trials on the effects of perioperative anticoagulant therapy on postoperative bleeding in BPH patients published during January 1990 and February 2019 were searched in PubMed, Embase and the Cochrane Library. Two independent reviewers screened the studies according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria, extracted the data, evaluated the quality, and conducted a meta-analysis using the RevMan 5.3 software. A total of 20 studies were included. Analysis of these studies found that compared with interrupted use of antithrombotic agents, continuous use of antithrombotic drugs led to more frequent post-TURP bleeding (OR=4.34, 95% CI=2.29-8.23), and higher transfusion rate (2.96, 1.19-7.36). Compared with patients who never used antithrombotic agents, those who used antithrombotic agents continuously had higher bleeding risk (5.52, 1.64-18.66). Those who continued using antithrombotic agents during laser treatment had higher transfusion rate than those who stopped using them before the operation (5.39, 1.49-19.53), but it had no significant difference in clot retention, blood transfusion rate, intraoperative hemoglobin decrease and postoperative catheter-indwelling time compared with those who never used antithrombotic agents (P>0.05). Those who continued using antithrombotic agents during TURP showed less intraoperative hemoglobin decrease (-0.46, -0.58-0.35) than the patients who underwent low molecular weight heparin substitution. Interruption of antithrombotic agents during TURP can prevent the risk of postoperative bleeding; continuous use of antithrombotic agents is safe and feasible during laser treatment of BPH; whether low molecular weight heparin substitution is necessary during the discontinuation of antithrombotic agents is controversial.

Photoselective vaporization has comparative efficacy and safety among high-risk benign prostate hyperplasia patients on or off systematic anticoagulation: a meta-analysis

PURPOSE

The necessity to cease anticoagulation before photoselective vaporization (PVP) surgery remains nonconsensual. We aimed at assessing the efficacy and safety of PVP among high-risk benign prostate hyperplasia (BPH) patients on or off anticoagulation.

METHODS

We systematically searched Pubmed, Embase, and Cochrane Library Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL). 2299 patients from 11 studies were eventually included. Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) was employed to assess the quality and risk of bias of each study. All statistical analyses were conducted with Review Manager v.5.3 software.

RESULTS

Ten parameters (operation time, laser time, blood transfusion, urethral stricture, urinary tract infection, reoperation, dysuria, capsule perforation, catheterization time, and re-catheterization) from patients on or off anticoagulant therapy were collected. The patients without anticoagulants performed better at catheterization time [MD - 0.54, 95% CI (- 0.82, - 0.26), P = 0.96, I² = 0] with a reduction of 0.54 day than those on anticoagulants. Significant statistical difference was not observed from other parameters. Subgroup analysis, grouped by the power output of PVP systems (80 W, 120 W and 180 W), consistently showed no statistical significant difference except at catheterization time in the 180-W PVP subgroup.

CONCLUSION

PVP, a safe and effective option for high-risk BPH patients, work comparably regardless of anticoagulant therapy, despite non-anticoagulant patients have shorter catheterization time. It is implied that the use of anticoagulants might be unnecessary to stop for high-risk BPH patients undergoing PVP for the sake of safety, which certainly requires further investigations to confirm.

The significance of histological analysis following laser transurethral resection of the prostate

PURPOSE

Monopolar transurethral resection of the prostate is the gold standard for the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia. However, due to the associated risks of bleeding and TUR syndrome, laser prostate surgery is gaining popularity. We perform thulium-laser vaporesection of the prostate (TmLRP), where histological samples are generated in every case. We determined postoperative incidence and significance of prostate cancer detection, by retrospective histological examination of our cases.

METHODOLOGY

Between October 2006 and August 2012, 223 patients underwent TmLRP by a single surgeon in our institution. With a background of a benign DRE, and no suspicion of CaP, histological results were studied.

RESULTS

Mean age was 71 years (range 46-91), mean PSA was 4.1 ng/mL (range 0.1-20). 4.9% (11/223) had cancer prostate (CaP) diagnosed, with mean PSA of 6.9 ng/mL (range 0.7-14). Of these: 91% (10/11) had pT1b disease while 9% (1/11) had pT1a disease. Gleason score was 6 in 28% (3/11); 7 in 36% (4/11); 8 in 18% (2/11); 9 in and 18% (2/11).

CONCLUSION

4.9% of patients had unexpected CaP, with significant disease in 4.4% (pT1b) and 3.6% (Gleason score ≥7). Hence, patients should be advised of the small risk of missing significant unsuspected CaP after laser prostatectomy.

[Prostate laser photovaporisation in patients at high risk of bleeding]

Introduction

Les patients sous traitement anticoagulant sont à risque élevé de saignement lors de la résection transurétrale de la prostate ou de l'adénomectomie par taille vésicale et ils se voient souvent récuser pour la chirurgie de l'hyperplasie bénigne de la prostate symptomatique. En Utilisant la photovaporisation de la prostate, les patients à haut risque peuvent subir en toute sécurité la chirurgie. Nous avons évalué l'innocuité et l'efficacité de la photovaporisation de la prostate (PVP) chez les patients sous anticoagulants en cours avec les dérivés de la coumarine, l'aspirine ou le clopidogrel, se plaignant de symptômes d'hypertrophie bénigne de la prostate.

Méthodes

Entre janvier 2009 et mai 2010, 47 hommes sous anticoagulation systémique ont subi une photovaporisation de la prostate. Les données ont été recueillies sur les caractéristiques démographiques, les comorbidités, les complications, la natrémie, l'hémoglobine, le débit urinaire maximal, le résidu post-mictionnel, l'IPSS et les complications.

Résultats

L'âge moyen était de 78 ans, le volume prostatique moyen était de 44g et le PSA était de 3.4ng/ml. Parmi les 10 patients (21.2%) étaient sous AVK, 27 (57.4%) étaient sous aspirine, 2 (4.2%) étaient sous clopidogrel, un sous fondaparinux et 6 (12.7%) étaient sous 2 anticoagulants ou plus. Le score ASA moyen était de 3. La durée moyenne de fonctionnement de l'appareil était de 38 minutes, l'énergie moyenne utilisée était de 200kJ. La durée moyenne d'hospitalisation était de 2 jours. Les complications survenant dans les 30 jours comprenaient une infection urinaire chez 5 patients (10.6%), une dysurie chez 4 patients et une hémorragie retardée chez 4 autres (8.5%). Un seul de ces patients a nécessité une transfusion sanguine et aucun patient n'a nécessité une réintervention. En 3 mois de suivi un seul patient a nécessité une incision du col vésical pour sclérose du col. Aucune incontinence ou sténose urétrale n'a été rapportée. Des améliorations significatives ont été notées dans l'IPSS, le débit urinaire maximal et le résidu post-mictionnel.

Conclusion

La PVP est caractérisé par d'excellentes propriétés hémostatiques et taux très faible de complications peropératoires même chez les patients sous 2 ou plusieurs agents anticoagulants. Sur la base de nos résultats péri-opératoires, nous recommandons la PVP comme traitement chirurgical de première intention chez les patients à haut risque de hémorragique souffrant de symptômes d'hypertrophie bénigne de la prostate.

Management of large prostatic adenoma: Lasers versus bipolar transurethral resection of prostate

Transurethral resection of prostate (TURP) has long been the most commonly performed surgical procedure for the management of benign prostate enlargement (BPE), but has several associated limitations. Over the years, laser techniques have developed as major contenders as alternative therapies for BPE. However, simultaneously, TURP has also flourished and with relatively recent development of resection in saline (bipolar TURP), the tussle between laser techniques and TURP has further gained momentum. A systematic search was performed on Medline using the various Medical subject headings related to the surgical management of BPE including TURP, bipolar, lasers, holmium laser enucleation of prostate (HoLEP), photo-selective vaporization of prostate (PVP), etc., All articles types including meta-analysis randomized controlled trials, review articles, guidelines from various urological associations, single center studies from 2002 onward were considered for review. Bipolar TURP, HoLEP, and PVP provide equivalent outcomes for large prostate adenoma (<60 g). For extremely large glands (<150 g), HoLEP is a very efficacious endoscopic alternative to open prostatectomy and has proven long-term results over more than a decade. Bipolar TURP and PVP are attractive with a minimal learning curves and equivalent short term durability. Surgical management of large prostate should be individualized based upon patient's comorbidities and surgeon's expertise.

Bloodless management of benign prostatic hyperplasia: medical and minimally invasive treatment options

Benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) is a medical condition affecting a wide range of the aging male population resulting in various degrees of lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS). Today, a variety of medical therapies and minimally invasive BPH treatment modalities are available. Medical therapy includes α(1) blockers, 5()α reductase inhibitors and combination therapy. When these options fail, surgery is indicated. Transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) is still considered the gold standard surgical treatment for BPH. Nevertheless, numerous minimally invasive treatment alternatives are available that are comparable in effectiveness to TURP, with significantly less morbidity. In this article, current treatment options for BPH are reviewed with respect to their indications, long-term safety and efficacy in relieving BPH related LUTS. The selection of the type of BPH treatment should be based on the physician's experience, patient's co-morbidities as well as the prostate size and clinical disease progression.