Assessment of inhaler techniques employed by patients with respiratory diseases in southern Brazil: a population-based study

Challenges and Opportunities in COPD Management in Latin America: A Review of Inhalation Therapies and Advanced Drug Delivery Systems

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is a leading cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide, particularly in low- and middle-income countries, where it poses a significant burden. In Latin America, the estimated prevalence of COPD is notably high, but the management and treatment of the disease have progressed slowly. This review examines the current status of inhalation therapy for COPD in Latin America, focusing on pharmacological therapies, inhalation devices, and the potential of advanced drug delivery systems. Pharmacological management predominantly relies on inhaled bronchodilators and corticosteroids, though access to these therapies varies considerably across the region. Inhalation devices, such as metered-dose inhalers (MDIs) and dry powder inhalers (DPIs), play a critical role in effective treatment delivery. However, their usage is often compromised by incorrect technique, low adherence, and limited availability, especially for DPIs. Emerging technologies, including nanoformulations, represent a promising frontier for the treatment of COPD by improving drug delivery and reducing side effects. However, significant barriers, such as high development costs and inadequate infrastructure, hinder their widespread adoption in the region. This review highlights the need for a multifaceted approach to enhance COPD management in Latin America, including optimizing access to existing inhalation therapies, strengthening healthcare infrastructure, improving provider training, and engaging patients in treatment decisions. Overcoming these challenges is crucial to improving COPD outcomes across the region.

The emerging role of digital health in the management of asthma

The most common reasons seen for lack of asthma control include misconceptions about disease control, low controller treatment adherence, poor inhaler technique, and the resulting underuse of controllers and overuse of short-acting beta2 agonists (SABAs). Narrowing these care gaps may be achieved through well-designed patient education that considers the patient's motivation, beliefs, and capabilities regarding their asthma and its management and empowers the patient to become an active participant in treatment decisions. Digital health technologies (DHTs) and digital therapeutic (DT) devices provide new opportunities to monitor treatment behaviors, improve communication between healthcare providers and patients, and generate data that inform educational interactions. DHT and DT have been proven effective in enhancing patient self-management in other chronic conditions, particularly diabetes. Accelerated integration of DHT and DT into the management of asthma patients is facilitated by the use of digital inhalers that employ sensor technology ("smart" inhalers). These devices efficiently provide real-time feedback on controller adherence, SABA use, and inhaler technique that have the strong potential to optimize asthma control.

Characteristics of Inhaler Technique in COPD Patients in a Specialized Center in Armenia, Colombia: A Cross-Sectional Study

Purpose

The aim of this research was to evaluate the technique of using inhaled drugs in patients with a confirmed history of COPD and describe errors in inhaler technique.

Patients and Methods

Descriptive cross-sectional study was conducted in patients with a history of COPD using inhalation therapy, attending pulmonology consultation between August 2020 and April 2021 in Armenia, Colombia. A non-probabilistic sample of 80 adult participants was calculated, and the inhalation technique was evaluated (depending on the device used) using a scale validated for Colombia. Descriptive analysis of the qualitative variables was performed using frequencies and percentages. The Chi-Square test and Fisher's exact test (in corresponding cases) were used to look for association relationships between categorical variables.

Results

A total of 80 participants were evaluated, of which 66.3% (n = 53) were male, and 32.5% were older than 80 years. Clinically, 30.0% (n = 24) were classified as Modified Medical Research Council Dyspnea Scale (mMRC) grade 3, and 51.2% (n = 41) had at least one exacerbation per year. The main comorbidity was hypertension (40.3%). Pressurized metered-dose inhalers with spacer were the most used device at 22.7% (n = 39). Incorrect technique (at least one error in the steps of the inhalation technique used) was found in 48.7%. The most frequent error among all the techniques was the failure to perform pre-inspiratory exhalation. No significant differences were observed between the development of the technique and the characteristics of the participants.

Conclusion

Nearly half of the patients who use inhalation devices make errors in the technique. Patient education and training of healthcare personnel represent a fundamental pillar in mitigating the incorrect use of these devices.

Impact of training on use of inhalational techniques of different inhaler devices: A single institutional cross sectional observation study

OBJECTIVE

To assess the impact of training on use of inhalational techniques of different inhaler devices in spirometry proved cases of COPD and Bronchial Asthma in a tertiary care centre.

METHODS

A total of 128 spirometry proved cases of Asthma and COPD were enrolled. They were equally distributed in four groups comprising of 32 patients each according to their inhalation devices namely pMDI, Rotahaler, Accuhaler and Turbohaler. Patients were asked to demonstrate their inhalation technique and errors were noted according to their inhaler specific checklist. Patients were also interviewed regarding their knowledge about inhalation devices. Training about proper inhalation techniques was given to every participant. Rechecking of inhalation technique was again done at the second visit after 2 wks in the similar manner. Correct and incorrect steps of inhalation technique again evaluated by filling the checklist of the individual device to see post training improvement.

RESULT

In our study, out of total cases more than one third of the patients were >60 yrs of age (41.4%) and most of the patients were males (62.5%). During the interview at first visit, almost 92% patients claimed to know how to use the inhalation device correctly but in reality most of the patients (around 96.1%) had committed at least one mistakes in their inhalation technique among all the inhalation steps. Errors were noted in different steps of inhalation including the essential steps among all the four devices. Statistically significant improvement in inhalation techniques including the essential steps were found among all the four devices after educational intervention and demonstration of sequential steps involved in particular inhaler.

CONCLUSION

Our study confirmed a significant increase in the percentage of improvement in inhalation technique after proper demonstration and training about the inhalation devices. Inhalation technique including essential steps of inhalation significantly improved in all the four devices used.

Factors associated with improper metered-dose inhaler technique among adults with asthma in a primary care clinic in Malaysia

INTRODUCTION

Metered-dose inhalers (MDI) are the most used inhalers worldwide. However, improper MDI techniques remain a significant problem and cause uncontrolled asthma. Studies worldwide have reported that the causes of inefficient inhaler technique are multifactorial. However, this topic has been less well studied in the Asian population. This study aimed to evaluate the MDI technique and associated factors among adults with asthma in a primary care setting in Malaysia.

METHOD

This was a cross-sectional study with universal sampling conducted between July and October 2017. A total of 146 patients with asthma aged 18 years and older in a primary care clinic in Putrajaya, Malaysia were recruited. Logistic regressions were used for statistical analysis to examine the association between improper MDI techniques and their related factors.

RESULTS

The majority (83%) of respondents were female with a median age of 37 (IQR = 30.75-49.25) years, and the median duration of asthma of 20 (IQR = 10-30) years. An improper MDI technique was observed in 100 (71.9%) patients. The most frequently missed step was exhaling gently and fully before inhalation (51.4%). Respondents who were not on an MDI preventer (adjusted OR: 2.487, 95% CI: 1.121-5.519, p = 0 .025) or had used an MDI 5 years or fewer (adjusted OR: 3.369, 95% CI: 1.425-7.964, p = 0.006) were more likely to employ an improper MDI technique.

CONCLUSION

There was a high proportion of improper MDI techniques among patients with asthma. Patients not using an MDI preventer or who had used an MDI less than 5 years were at higher risk of improper MDI technique.

A quantitative evaluation of adherence and inhalation technique among respiratory patients: An observational study using an electronic inhaler assessment device

BACKGROUND

Problems related to poor adherence and inhaler technique (IT) are historically reported in the literature. Most common methods used for adherence and IT assessment are reported to be either inaccurate or subjective. Few electronic monitoring devices (EMDs) that provide an objective measure of both adherence and IT while patients use inhalers at home now exist. Therefore, this study aimed to examine adherence level and IT among respiratory patients in community care using such an EMD for the first time in England.

METHODS

A prospective, multicentre, observational cohort study was conducted. Patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) or asthma were recruited from independent community pharmacies within West and South London. Patients were provided with a dry-powder inhaler (DPI) mounted with an EMD to use for 1 month. Adherence was also assessed using pharmacy dispensing data, inhaler dose counter and self-reporting.

RESULTS

Data were available for 48 patients. Only eight patients used their inhaler in the correct manner at the correct interval as identified by the chosen EMD. The median actual adherence rate, as measured by the EMD, was 42.7%. This was significantly different from the median dose counter adherence (100%), medication refill adherence (MRA) (100%), proportions of days covered (PDC) (97.8%) and self-reported adherence (P < .001, each). Within a 1-month period, there were 2188 files showing attempted use of the DPI, of which 840 had IT errors. The median technique error rate (TER) was 30.1%. Most common errors recorded were as follows: multiple inhalations, drug priming without inhalation and failure to prime the device correctly.

CONCLUSION

The current study demonstrates that measures such as dose counter, prescription refill and self-reporting showed a high level of adherence among the observed patients. However, the objective data provided by the EMD showed a significantly lower actual adherence rate, reflecting how adherence remains variable and problematic among patients in the community.

Lay Health Coaching to Increase Appropriate Inhaler Use in COPD: A Randomized Controlled Trial

PURPOSE

Poor adherence to medications is more prevalent for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) than for other chronic conditions and is associated with unfavorable health outcomes. Few interventions have successfully improved adherence for COPD medications; none of these use unlicensed health care personnel. We explored the efficacy of lay health coaches to improve inhaler adherence and technique.

METHODS

Within a randomized controlled trial, we recruited English- and Spanish-speaking patients with moderate to severe COPD from urban, public primary care clinics serving a low-income, predominantly African American population. Participants were randomized to receive 9 months of health coaching or usual care. Outcome measures included self-reported adherence to inhaled controller medications in the past 7 days and observed technique for all inhalers. We used generalized linear models, controlling for baseline values and clustering by site.

RESULTS

Baseline adherence and inhaler technique were uniformly poor and did not differ by study arm. At 9 months, health-coached patients reported a greater number of days of adherence compared with usual care patients (6.4 vs 5.5 days; adjusted P = .02) and were more likely to have used their controller inhalers as prescribed for 5 of the last 7 days (90% vs 69%; adjusted P = .008). They were more than 3 times as likely to demonstrate perfect technique for all inhaler devices (24% vs 7%; adjusted P = .01) and mastery of essential steps (40% vs 11%; adjusted P <.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Health coaching may provide a scalable model that can improve care for people living with COPD.

Most frequent errors in inhalation technique of patients with asthma treated at a tertiary care hospital

OBJECTIVE

To demonstrate the most frequent errors in inhalation technique in patients with asthma undergoing treatment at a tertiary care hospital.

METHODS

A cross-sectional study with a convenience sample of asthma patients aged 18 years or over, treated at a pulmonology outpatient clinic of a tertiary care hospital. The assessment of inhalation technique of users of the dry powder inhalers Aerolizer®, Aerocaps and Diskus®, or metered-dose inhalers was based on the manufacturer's instructions for use of each inhaler device. Patients demonstrated the inhalation technique with empty inhaler devices, and it was considered correct when all stages were performed properly, or when errors probably did not interfere with the treatment outcome.

RESULTS

Among 71 participants, 43 (60.5%) performed inhalation technique incorrectly. Among metered-dose inhalers and dry powder inhalers users, inhalation technique errors were found in 84.2% and 51.9%, respectively (p=0.013). Errors were more frequent at the exhalation stage (67.4%), followed by breathing in (58.1%) and apnea (51.2%). In the group using dry powder inhalers, the most common errors occurred during exhalation and, for those using metered-dose inhalers, the most compromised stage was aspiration.

CONCLUSION

Errors were more frequent among those using metered-dose inhalers compared with dry powder inhalers. Misconceptions are more common at the expiration stage among users of dry powder inhalers and in aspiration among those on metered-dose inhalers.

What to consider before prescribing inhaled medications: a pragmatic approach for evaluating the current inhaler landscape

Inhaled therapies are the cornerstone of treatment in asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and there are a multitude of devices available. There is, however, a distinct lack of evidence-based guidance for healthcare providers on how to choose an appropriate inhaler. This review aims to summarise recent updates on topics related to inhaler choice, and to offer practical considerations for healthcare providers regarding currently marketed devices. The importance of choosing the right inhaler for the right patient is discussed, and the relative merits of dry powder inhalers, pressurised metered dose inhalers, breath-actuated pressurised metered dose inhalers, spacers and soft mist inhalers are considered. Compiling the latest studies in the devices therapy area, this review focuses on the most common types of handling errors, as well as the comparative rates of incorrect inhalation technique between devices. The impact of device-specific handling errors on inhaler performance is also discussed, and the characteristics that can impair optimal drug delivery, such as inhalation flow rate, inhalation volume and particle size, are compared between devices. The impact of patient perceptions, behaviours and problems with inhalation technique is analysed, and the need for appropriate patient education is also highlighted. The continued development of technology in inhaler design and the need to standardise study assessment, endpoints and patient populations are identified as future research needs. The reviews of this paper are available via the supplemental material section.

Evaluation of the preference, satisfaction and correct use of Breezhaler® and Respimat® inhalers in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease - INHALATOR study

The INHALATOR study was a randomized, multicentre, open label, two-period of 7 days each, crossover study, with 7 days of washout in-between, aiming to evaluate the correct use, satisfaction and preference between Breezhaler^® and Respimat^® devices in patients under daily use of open Spiriva^® or open Onbrize^®, as monotherapy for treatment of mild or moderate COPD. Patients aged ≥40 years with a smoking history of at least 10 pack-year were included in the study. Primary endpoint was the rate of correct use of each device at the first day of treatment after reading the drug leaflet information and was evaluated under the supervision of a trained evaluator. At the end of each treatment phase, the inhaler use was re-evaluated and a satisfaction questionnaire was completed. The patients' preference for the inhaler devices was assessed at the end of the study. After exclusions due to screening failures, 140 patients were randomized: 136 received at least one dose of Breezhaler^® and 135 of Respimat^®. At treatment start, the rate of correct inhaler use was 40.4% (95%CI: 32.2%-48.7%) for Breezhaler^® and 36.3% (95%CI: 28.2%-44.4%) for Respimat^® (p = 0.451). After 7 days, the rates were 68.9% (95%CI: 61.1%-76.7%) and 60.4% (95%CI: 52.2%-68.7%), respectively (p = 0.077). According to the Feeling of Satisfaction with Inhaler Questionnaire - FSI 10 patients were more satisfied using Breezhaler^® than Respimat^® and 57.1% preferred using Breezhaler^® (p = 0.001) while 30.1% preferred Respimat^® (p < 0.001).

Incorrect use of inhalation devices among patients with bronchial asthma. A hospital-based cross-sectional study in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil

CONTEXT AND OBJECTIVE

Treatment of asthma implies inhalation of specific drugs to reach high concentrations in the respiratory tree and ensure low drug bioavailability and few adverse effects. This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of the inhalation technique among outpatients with asthma.

DESIGN AND SETTING

Tertiary-care hospital-based cross-sectional study in Rio de Janeiro.

METHODS

We evaluated inhalation practices in a convenience sample. A questionnaire was used to investigate sociodemographic data and assess disease control level, duration of use of the inhalation device, length of treatment and previous instructions provided by the prescribing physician. Patients demonstrated their inhalation technique using empty devices, and their technique was considered correct when all steps were appropriately performed or when errors did not interfere with the treatment outcome.

RESULTS

Among the 71 participants, 53 (74.7%) had been using the same inhaler device for at least two years and 41 (57.8%) had been under treatment for two years or more. Twelve (17.1%) said that they had been taught once and 57 (81.4%) at least twice, while one (1.4%) reported not having received any guidance regarding use of inhaler devices. Eighteen patients (25.3%) presented controlled asthma and 28 (39.5%) performed the inhalation technique correctly. Incorrect technique was associated with fewer evaluations of the inhalation technique (P =0.04) and uncontrolled asthma (P = 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

Less than half of the sample performed the inhalation technique correctly. Incorrect inhalation technique was related to lower number of evaluations of the use of the inhalation device and uncontrolled asthma.

The Need for a Well-Organized, Video-Assisted Asthma Education Program at Korean Primary Care Clinics

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this study was to assess the effect of our new video-assisted asthma education program on patients' knowledge regarding asthma and asthma control.

METHODS

Adult asthmatics who were diagnosed by primary care physicians and followed for at least 1 year were educated via smart devices and pamphlets. The education sessions were carried out three times at 2-week intervals. Each education period lasted at most 5 minutes. The effectiveness was then evaluated using questionnaires and an asthma control test (ACT).

RESULTS

The study enrolled 144 patients (mean age, 56.7±16.7 years). Half of the patients had not been taught how to use their inhalers. After participating in the education program, the participants' understanding of asthma improved significantly across all six items of a questionnaire assessing their general knowledge of asthma. The proportion of patients who made errors while manipulating their inhalers was reduced to less than 10%. The ACT score increased from 16.6±4.6 to 20.0±3.9 (p<0.001). The number of asthmatics whose ACT score was at least 20 increased from 45 (33.3%) to 93 (65.3%) (p<0.001). The magnitude of improvement in the ACT score did not differ between patients who received an education session at least three times within 1 year and those who had not. The majority of patients agreed to the need for an education program (95.8%) and showed a willingness to pay an additional cost for the education (81.9%).

CONCLUSION

This study indicated that our newly developed education program would become an effective component of asthma management in primary care clinics.

Patient characteristics associated with poor inhaler technique among a cohort of patients with COPD

BACKGROUND

Inhaled therapies are the cornerstone of pharmacologic management for COPD. Each device requires a unique series of steps to be most effective, making appropriate instruction in inhaler technique a key part of the management of COPD.

OBJECTIVES

Examine characteristics of patients and devices associated with poor technique among patients with COPD.

METHODS

Cross-sectional study of subjects with COPD using at least one of: metered dose inhaler, Advair Diskus, Spiriva Handihaler, identified from the COPD Outcomes-based Network for Clinical Effectiveness and Research Translation (CONCERT) registry. Technique was assessed face-to-face using manufacturer-provided dummy inhalers, with standardized checklists for each device. We used logistic regression to model associations with poor inhaler technique, defined as an error in ≥20% of the steps, as a function of patient characteristics, with educational attainment the primary predictor.

RESULTS

688 individuals meet eligibility criteria, 65.5% had poor technique for at least one device. In adjusted analyses, Black race was associated with poor technique (OR 3.25, 95%CI 1.86-5.67) while greater than high school education was associated with decreased odds of poor technique (OR 0.35, 95%CI 0.17-0.70 for trade school/some college, OR 0.25, 95%CI 0.11-0.61 for college or more, p ≤ 0.001 for test of linear trend). The percentage of errors varied between devices, with subjects making proportionally the most errors for MDIs.

CONCLUSIONS

Poor inhaler technique is common among individuals with COPD, varies between devices, and is associated with race and educational attainment. Tailored educational interventions to teach inhaler technique should be part of the process of initiating and monitoring inhaled therapies.

Parameters affecting inhalation therapy adherence in elderly patients with chronic obstructive lung disease and asthma

AIM

One of the most significant problems in the treatment of elderly patients is incorrect use of inhaler devices. The purpose of the present study was to assess the parameters affecting treatment adherence among elderly patients.

METHODS

Spirometry, the Mini-Mental State Examination for cognitive impairment and the Morisky Medication Adherence Scale-4 were carried out in 121 (88 chronic obstructive lung disease patients according to the Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease, 33 asthma patients according to The Global Initiative for Asthma (GINA) criteria) participants aged over 65 years.

RESULTS

The patients with cognitive impairment, low socioeconomic status, a high number of admissions to an emergency service in past year and the presence of dyspnea or sputum had significantly lower inhalation device use scores (P = 0.017, 0.03, 0.025, 0.03 and 0.02). The patients with high Mini-Mental State Examination scores and forced expiratory volume in 1 s (as liter and percentage) were found to be more successful in using inhaler devices (P = 0.005, 0.007 and 0.022). There was a negative correlation between number of hospitalizations and inhalation device score (P = 0.021).The participants without education/training by a doctor about the inhaler device had a significantly poorer treatment adherence (P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Older chronic obstructive lung disease and asthmatic patients have more difficulty with the correct use of inhaler devices. Cognitive impairment might be an important parameter that can affect inhalation device technique. Socioeconomic status, smoking, pulmonary symptoms and admissions to hospital were also thought to have effects on the adherence to inhalation therapy. The type of chronic respiratory disease (chronic obstructive lung disease/asthma) is not a major factor influencing therapy adherence. Assessment of cognitive functions, choosing suitable inhalation devices and educational programs for inhaler use could improve the success of inhaler technique in elderly patients. Geriatr Gerontol Int 2017; 17: 999-1005.

Validation of scores of use of inhalation devices: valoration of errors

Objective:

To validate two scores quantifying the ability of patients to use metered dose inhalers (MDIs) or dry powder inhalers (DPIs); to identify the most common errors made during their use; and to identify the patients in need of an educational program for the use of these devices.

Methods:

This study was conducted in three phases: validation of the reliability of the inhaler technique scores; validation of the contents of the two scores using a convenience sample; and testing for criterion validation and discriminant validation of these instruments in patients who met the inclusion criteria.

Results:

The convenience sample comprised 16 patients. Interobserver disagreement was found in 19% and 25% of the DPI and MDI scores, respectively. After expert analysis on the subject, the scores were modified and were applied in 72 patients. The most relevant difficulty encountered during the use of both types of devices was the maintenance of total lung capacity after a deep inhalation. The degree of correlation of the scores by observer was 0.97 (p &lt; 0.0001). There was good interobserver agreement in the classification of patients as able/not able to use a DPI (50%/50% and 52%/58%; p &lt; 0.01) and an MDI (49%/51% and 54%/46%; p &lt; 0.05).

Conclusions:

The validated scores allow the identification and correction of inhaler technique errors during consultations and, as a result, improvement in the management of inhalation devices.