Antibody response following hepatitis B vaccination in peritoneal dialysis patients: does normalized urea clearance matter?

Determinants of protective humoral response to mRNA-1273 and BNT162b2 vaccines in peritoneal dialysis patients: a prospective cohort study

Patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) on dialysis have a higher mortality rate associated with SARS-CoV-2 infection. Although vaccines are now available, the protective response rates and determinants of humoral response to the vaccine are poorly described in patients on peritoneal dialysis. This was a prospective observational study describing the response rates of detectable and standardized protective antibody titers one month after each mRNA vaccine dose in a cohort of 88 patients on peritoneal dialysis. We found that the vast majority of patients produced protective levels of antibodies (73%) one month after the second vaccine dose. In the multivariate analysis, the single determinant for an adequate humoral response was the weekly Kt/V, a surrogate of dialysis dose. The response rate was higher, but not significantly, with the mRNA-1273 than with the BNT162b2 vaccine one month after the second dose (78.7 vs. 46.2%, respectively, p = 0.02). We found that patients on peritoneal dialysis had a satisfactory humoral response rate, which was much higher than in transplant recipients. PD patients with a poor humoral response, particularly those with a low wKT/V, may benefit from an additional dose of vaccine.

Effect of Pneumococcal Conjugate 13 Valent and Polysaccharide 23 Valent Vaccination on Anti-Pneumococcal Antibody Titer of Hemodialysis Patients: A Randomized Clinical Trial

Background

Pneumococcal infections are a life- threatening disease in hemodialysis patients and vaccination against pneumococcus is an effective prevention. The current study aims to evaluate the immune response and maintenance of the anti-pneumococcal antibody titer in hemodialysis patients to the 23 valent pneumococcal polysaccharide vaccine alone and 13 valent conjugated with 23 valent polysaccharide vaccine.

Materials and Methods

This study is a randomized clinical trial that was performed at Loghman Hakim Hospital in Tehran, Iran in 2017. A total of 70 patients undergoing hemodialysis were randomly assigned to intervention (22 patients) and control (23 patients). In the control group, only one dose of the PPSV23 vaccine while patients in the intervention group were injected initially with PCV13, and then after at least 8 weeks PPSV23 vaccine. The outcome of this study is first and sixth-month antibody titer after injection of the PPSV23 vaccine.

Results

The obtained result showed no significant difference between the two groups in the first month and sixth months. The results indicate that both the intervention group (treated with PCV13+PPSV23) and the control group (treated with PPSV23 only) experienced a significant impact from the first to the sixth month. Additionally, there was a noticeable effect on the levels of anti pneumococcal antibodies during the first to sixth month between the intervention and control groups. In addition, the difference between the antibody titer of the first month and the sixth month was not significant in the two groups.

Conclusion

The anti-pneumococcal antibody titer in hemodialysis patients does not show a clear difference after two vaccine injections and one vaccination.

Vaccination practices in dialysis patients: A narrative review

In a period of turmoil concerning vaccination practices, there is a serious conflict between scientifically reasonable, evidence-based guidelines and the far-fetched rumors or misconceptions concerning the vaccination practices in the general population. When a significant portion of the medical and paramedical personnel may be deliberately unvaccinated against common biological agents, achieving effective vaccination rates in the dialysis population may be complicated. Vaccination rates are unacceptably low in dialysis patients and seroconversion rates are even lower; further, serological follow-up is generally poor. The particularly anergic immune system of the advanced chronic kidney disease patients is partly a cause of both high rates of infection and low rates of seroconversions. This narrative review is an effort to summarize current knowledge concerning the vaccination practices in dialysis patients with some specific recommendations based on these facts. Of particular interest is a new vaccine, the Zoster Recombinant, Adjuvanted Vaccine (Shingrix), which we will include in our discussion.

Immunization in end-stage renal disease: opportunity to improve outcomes

Infection is the second most common cause of death in patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD), following cardiovascular causes. Immunization is a fairly simple, but underutilized, strategy for prevention of infectious morbidity and mortality in patients with kidney failure. It is imperative for nephrologists and primary care providers to have an understanding of immunization as an essential component of preventive healthcare measures in this high-risk population. Patients with ESRD represent a unique population due to their immunosuppressed state, dialysis-related exposures and suboptimal response to routine vaccines. While the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) provides guidelines for vaccination of patients with renal disease against Hepatitis B, influenza and pneumococcal disease, the data on immunization against other commonly preventable infectious diseases are lacking. This article reviews the recent evidence on immunization in the ESRD population and synthesizes the related implications for maximizing prevention of infectious diseases in this high-risk population.