1
|
Farah GJ, Rogers JL, Lopez AM, Brown NJ, Pennington Z, Kuo C, Gold J, Bui NE, Koester SW, Gendreau JL, Diaz-Aguilar LD, Oh MY, Pham MH. Resident Training in Spine Surgery: A Systematic Review of Simulation-Based Educational Models. World Neurosurg 2023; 174:81-115. [PMID: 36921712 DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2023.03.032] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/19/2022] [Revised: 03/06/2023] [Accepted: 03/07/2023] [Indexed: 03/14/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE With the increasing prevalence of spine surgery, ensuring effective resident training is becoming of increasing importance. Training safe, competent surgeons relies heavily on effective teaching of surgical indications and adequate practice to achieve a minimum level of technical proficiency before independent practice. American Council of Graduate Medical Education work-hour restrictions have complicated the latter, forcing programs to identify novel methods of surgical resident training. Simulation-based training is one such method that can be used to complement traditional training. The present review aims to evaluate the educational success of simulation-based models in the spine surgical training of residents. METHODS Using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines, the PubMed, Web of Science, and Google Scholar databases were systematically screened for English full-text studies examining simulation-based spine training curricula. Studies were categorized based on simulation model class, including animal-cadaveric, human-cadaveric, physical/3-dimensional, and computer-based/virtual reality. Outcomes studied included participant feedback regarding the simulator and competency metrics used to evaluate participant performance. RESULTS Seventy-two studies were identified. Simulators displayed high face validity and were useful for spine surgery training. Objective measures used to evaluate procedural performance included implant placement evaluation, procedural time, and technical skill assessment, with numerous simulators demonstrating a learning effect. CONCLUSIONS While simulation-based educational models are one potential means of training residents to perform spine surgery, traditional in-person operating room training remains pivotal. To establish the efficacy of simulators, future research should focus on improving study quality by leveraging longitudinal study designs and correlating simulation-based training with clinical outcome measures.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ghassan J Farah
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of California San Diego School of Medicine, San Diego, California, USA
| | - James L Rogers
- Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
| | - Alexander M Lopez
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of California, Irvine, Orange, California, USA
| | - Nolan J Brown
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of California, Irvine, Orange, California, USA
| | - Zach Pennington
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - Cathleen Kuo
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University at Buffalo Jacobs SOM, Buffalo, New York, USA
| | - Justin Gold
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Cooper Medical of Rowan University, Camden, New Jersey, USA
| | - Nicholas E Bui
- Department of Neurosurgery, Loma Linda University Medical Center, Loma Linda, California, USA
| | - Stefan W Koester
- Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
| | - Julian L Gendreau
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Johns Hopkins Whiting School of Engineering, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Luis Daniel Diaz-Aguilar
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of California San Diego School of Medicine, San Diego, California, USA
| | - Michael Y Oh
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of California, Irvine, Orange, California, USA
| | - Martin H Pham
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of California San Diego School of Medicine, San Diego, California, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Kulcheski ÁL, Stieven-Filho E, Nunes CP, Milcent PAA, Dau L, I-Graells XS. Validation of an endoscopic flavectomy training model. Rev Col Bras Cir 2021; 48:e202027910. [PMID: 33978123 PMCID: PMC10683459 DOI: 10.1590/0100-6991e-20202901] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/20/2020] [Accepted: 03/04/2021] [Indexed: 11/21/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE to validate a lumbar spine endoscopic flavectomy simulator using the construct method and to assess the acceptability of the simulator in medical education. METHODS thirty medical students and ten video-assisted surgery experienced orthopedists performed an endoscopic flavectomy procedure in the simulator. Time, look-downs, lost instruments, respect for the stipulated edge of the ligamentum flavum, regularity of the incision, GOALS checklist (Global Operative Assessment of Laparoscopic Skills), and responses to the Likert Scale adapted for this study were analyzed. RESULTS all variables differed between groups. Procedure time was shorter in the physician group (p < 0.001). Look-downs and instrument losses were seven times greater among students than physicians. Half of the students respected the designated incision limits, compared to 80% of the physicians. In the student group, about 30% of the incisions were regular, compared to 100% in the physician group (p < 0.001). The physicians performed better in all GOALS checklist domains. All the physicians and more than 96% of the students considered the activity enjoyable, and approximately 90% believed that the model was realistic and could contribute to medical education. CONCLUSIONS the simulator could differentiate the groups' experience level, indicating construct validity, and both groups reported high acceptability.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Álynson Larocca Kulcheski
- - Universidade Federal do Paraná (UFPR), Departamento de Cirurgia - Ortopedia e Traumatologia - Curitiba - PR - Brasil
| | - Edmar Stieven-Filho
- - Universidade Federal do Paraná (UFPR), Departamento de Cirurgia - Ortopedia e Traumatologia - Curitiba - PR - Brasil
| | - Carolline Popovicz Nunes
- - Universidade Federal do Paraná (UFPR), Departamento de Cirurgia - Ortopedia e Traumatologia - Curitiba - PR - Brasil
| | - Paul André Alain Milcent
- - Universidade Federal do Paraná (UFPR), Departamento de Cirurgia - Ortopedia e Traumatologia - Curitiba - PR - Brasil
| | - Leonardo Dau
- - Universidade Federal do Paraná (UFPR), Departamento de Cirurgia - Ortopedia e Traumatologia - Curitiba - PR - Brasil
| | - Xavier Soler I-Graells
- - Universidade Federal do Paraná (UFPR), Departamento de Cirurgia - Ortopedia e Traumatologia - Curitiba - PR - Brasil
| |
Collapse
|