Avaliação do risco ergonômico em trabalhadores da indústria têxtil por dois instrumentos: quick exposure check e job factors questionnaire

The non-explicit observational method is reproducible and valid in the analysis of occupational biomechanical exposure of workers

BACKGROUND: An analysis of workers’ exposure to biomechanical risk factors in the workplace with a high methodological quality allows for stronger evidence of the relationship between risk factors and musculoskeletal disorders. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the measurement properties of non-explicit observational methods. METHODS: Psychometric study design that included 50 workers in an analysis of occupational tasks (n = 50 video tasks) using a non-explicit observational method, the Rapid Entire Body Assessment (REBA) method, and a workers’ self-report on their perception of their biomechanical occupational exposure. The reliability was tested by a non-explicit method and the REBA method. The validity of the non-explicit method was tested using the REBA method and the workers’ self-report, according to COSMIN guidelines. RESULTS: The intra- and inter-evaluator reliability of the non-explicit observational method ranged from moderate to strong (ICC2.1  = 0.45 to 0.87), and the agreement was acceptable (SEM = 0.60 to 2.79), expect for neck region. The REBA method showed intra-evaluator reliability to be moderate to excellent (ICC2.1  = 0.50 to 1.00), inter-evaluator reliability to be poor to strong (ICC2.1  = –0.17 to 0.83), and intra- and inter-evaluator agreement to be poor to moderate (SEM = 0.00 to 0.74). The concurrent validity between the non-explicit and REBA methods showed a strong positive correlation. CONCLUSION: The non-explicit observational method of biomechanical exposure analysis presented reproducible and valid measurement properties. Methods that present better measurement properties provide professionals with a better basis for analysis and assist in decision-making to reduce or eliminate risk exposure.

Pandemia de COVID-19 e as atividades de ensino remotas: riscos ergonômicos e sintomas musculoesqueléticos dos docentes do Instituto Federal Catarinense

RESUMO O objetivo da pesquisa foi avaliar os sintomas osteomusculares e os riscos ergonômicos dos ambientes de trabalho dos docentes do Instituto Federal Catarinense (IFC). Participaram 140 docentes, que responderam a um questionário online sobre informações sociodemográficas, realização de tarefas, ambiente de trabalho e dor musculoesquelética. Os dados foram analisados por meio de uma regressão logística binária separadamente para cada desfecho, utilizando como variáveis dependentes: dores no pescoço, no ombro direito e na coluna lombar. A prevalência de dor entre os professores foi de 94,7%, e as regiões mais frequentes foram o pescoço, a coluna lombar e o ombro direito. Os principais riscos ergonômicos observados foram: sobrecarga mental (estresse), mesa de trabalho e monitor inadequados. Foi observada associação entre dor no pescoço e docentes que apresentaram maior sobrecarga mental (estresse), não fazem atividade física e usam o computador por mais de 20 horas por semana; dor no ombro direito e docentes que não fazem atividade física, usam o computador por mais de 20 horas por semana, cuja mesa de trabalho não estava ao nível do cotovelo e sem espaço para apoiar os antebraços. Ainda, a dor na coluna lombar foi associada ao grupo de mulheres com carga horária de aula semanal maior que 15 horas e com doença crônica. Os resultados encontrados possibilitam a adaptação dos ambientes de trabalho dos docentes para a prevenção de dor, a melhoria da qualidade de vida e do ensino.

COVID-19 pandemic and remote teaching activities: ergonomic risks and musculoskeletal symptoms of professors at Instituto Federal Catarinense

ABSTRACT This study aimed to evaluate the musculoskeletal symptoms and the ergonomic risks in the workplaces of the professors of the Instituto Federal Catarinense (IFC). 140 professors participated by answering an online questionnaire on sociodemographic information, task performance, work environment, and musculoskeletal pain. Data were analyzed using binary logistic regression for each outcome separately, using neck, right shoulder, and low back pain as dependent variables. The prevalence of pain among professors was 94.7% and the most frequent regions were the neck, lumbar spine, and right shoulder. The main ergonomic risks were mental overload (stress) and inadequate worktable and monitor. An association between neck pain and professors who had greater mental overload (stress), who do not engage in physical activity, and who use the computer for more than 20 hours a week was observed; also, between pain in the right shoulder and the professors who do not engage in physical activity, who use the computer for more than 20 hours a week, who had an inadequate workspace. Low back pain was associated with women, weekly course workload greater than 15 hours, and chronic disease. The results found indicate the need to adapt the workplace of the professors with in order to prevent pain and improve the quality of life and the quality of teaching.

Ergonomic Risk Assessment during an Informal Hand-Made Cookware Operation: Extending an Existing Model

The work conducted in the informal sector is highly variable within and between days. Characterizing ergonomic exposures remains a challenge because of unstructured work settings and schedules. The existing ergonomic risk assessment tools have been widely used in formal work settings with a narrow range of exposure, and for predefined tasks that primarily constitute a daily routine. There is limited information in the literature on how they have been applied in informal workplaces. The aim of this study was to extend an existing risk assessment tool and to evaluate the applicability of the extended tool by assessing ergonomic exposure related to hand-made cookware operations. Eighteen hand-made cookware makers were recruited from six sites. A walkthrough risk assessment questionnaire was used to collect information on workers, tasks, work stations and workplace structures. The Rapid Upper Limb Assessment (RULA) screening tool was extended by including duration and vibration. An action priority matrix was used to guide intervention. According to the RULA action levels, the workers required investigation and changes soon, and immediate investigation and changes. The use of an action priority matrix was appropriate, and indicated that all the workers assessed were within the high to very high exposure domain and required immediate corrective measures. The methodology used proved to be an effective and reliable strategy for identifying ergonomic exposure among hand-made cookware makers.

Electromyographic activity of the erector spinae: The short-effect of one workday for welders with nonspecific chronic low back pain, an observational study

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to evaluate the effect of one workday on pain and perceived exertion, muscular strength, and electromyographic activity of the erector spinae muscles in welders with and without low back pain. This is an observational cohort study.

PARTICIPANTS

Twenty-two welders, metallurgical shipbuilding, were equally divided into 2 groups: low back pain and no low back pain. Pain and perceived exertion. Muscular strength by maximal voluntary contractions and electromyographic activity of right and left erector spinae muscles during maximal voluntary contractions and in the 3 welding positions for 2 periods of the workday (in the morning and at the end of the workday).

RESULTS

At the end of workday, the pain increased significantly for the low back pain group (t(22) = 2.448; P= 0.023). The perceived exertion also increased significantly for both groups at the end of workday groups (F(1,22) = 8.570, P= 0.000) and periods (F(1,22) = 8.142, P= 0.000). There were no significant differences between groups and workday periods for muscular strength and electromyographic activity during maximal voluntary contractions of the erector spinae. There was no significance difference for electromyographic activity between groups and workday period and in the 3 welding positions.

CONCLUSION

Although the pain and perceived exertion increased at the end of the workday, these results did not interfere in muscular strength and electromyographic activity of right and left erector spinae muscles. Thus, we can conclude that welders with chronic low back pain had a good physical capacity (muscular strength) and that muscle performance was maintained.

Observational methods for biomechanical risk assessment in workers: a systematic review

Abstract Introduction: Among the methods of measurement of the biomechanical risk factors available in the literature, the observational methods have greater applicability in occupational practice. Objective: To identify observational methods used in Brazilian workers to identify and to evaluate their translation/cross-cultural adaptation procedures and measuring property tests. Methods: Three search strategies were used in MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, LILACS and SCIELO. After a review of titles and abstracts, potential articles were read in full for inclusion and subsequent extraction of data related to translation, cross-cultural adaptation and measurement properties of the observational methods. Results: 5349 potential studies were found and 29 were eligible for inclusion. The methods used in Brazilian workers were: AET, NIOSH, OCRA, OWAS, QEC, RARME, REBA and RULA. All procedures regarding the translation and cross-cultural adaptation were positive for the QEC and REBA. The translation, synthesis of the translations and review committee procedures were doubtful for the OCRA method. The QEC measuring properties showed negative reliability, doubtful internal consistency, and positive agreement and construct validity. The REBA showed negative reliability and agreement. The RARME presented positive reliability and negative construct validity. Conclusion: For most observational methods used in Brazilian workers, the translation and cross-cultural adaptation procedures were not performed and their measurement properties were not performed, highlighting the need to perform these procedures before using them.

Effectiveness of job rotation for preventing work-related musculoskeletal diseases: a cluster randomised controlled trial

OBJECTIVE

Job rotation is an organisational strategy widely used on assembly lines in manufacturing industries to mitigate workers' exposure so as to prevent musculoskeletal disorders. This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of job rotation for reducing working hours lost due to sick leave resulting from musculoskeletal diseases.

METHODS

The design consisted of a 1-year cluster randomised controlled trial with a blinded assessor. Production sectors of the textile industry were randomised to intervention and control groups. Both groups received ergonomic training. The intervention group performed a job rotation programme. The primary outcome measure was number of working hours lost due to sick leave as a result of musculoskeletal disease (ICD-10). The secondary outcome measures were musculoskeletal symptoms (Yes/No), risk factors for musculoskeletal diseases (0-10), psychosocial factors and fatigue (0-100), general health (0-100), and productivity (0-10). All secondary outcomes were measured at baseline and 12-month follow-up.

RESULTS

At the 12-month follow-up, both groups showed an increase in the number of working hours lost due to sick leave for musculoskeletal disease. There was no significant difference between the job rotation intervention group (mean deviation -5.6 hours, 95% CI -25.0 to 13.8) at the 12-month follow-up and the control group. There were no significant differences between groups for the secondary outcomes (p>0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

The job rotation programme was not effective in reducing the number of working hours lost due to sick leave, decreasing the prevalence of musculoskeletal symptoms, or improving perception of musculoskeletal pain and workplace risk factors, psychosocial risk factors and productivity.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

NCT01979731.