Aparelho de avanço mandibular aumenta o volume da via aérea superior de pacientes com apneia do sono

Comparison of monoblock and twinblock mandibular advancement devices in patiens with obstructive sleep apnea and temporomandibular disorder: effects on airway volume, polysomnography parameters, and sleepiness scale scores

PURPOSE

This study aimed to compare the effects of two different mandibular advancement devices on the upper airway volume, polysomnographic parameters, and sleepiness scale scores in patients with obstructive sleep apnea and Temporomandibular disorders (TMD).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Monoblock and twinblock mandibular advancement devices were applied to patients with obstructive sleep apnea syndrome for 3 months separated by a wash-out period of 2 weeks. Research Diagnostic Criteria for TMD (RDC/TMD), Polysomnographic parameters and cone-beam computed tomography findings were recorded before and after the use of the mandibular advancement devices. A three-dimensional analysis of the airway was then performed.

RESULTS

The use of the monoblock device significantly increased the upper airway volume compared with the use of the twinblock device (p = 0.032). The polysomnographic parameters similarly improved with the use of the twin-block and monoblock devices. The significant reduction in TMD symptoms was observed.

CONCLUSION

The use of the monoblock device increased the retropalatal airway volume. This volume increase may be attributed to the fact that the design of the monoblock device allows less mandibular movement than does that of the twinblock device. Indicates the potential benefits of MADS treatment in alleviating TMD-related issues.

CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE

Monoblock MADs have improved effects on respiratory parameters and upper airway dimensions in patients with OSA and mild to moderate TMD.

Methodological parameters for upper airway assessment by cone-beam computed tomography in adults with obstructive sleep apnea: a systematic review of the literature and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

A reliable method for analyzing the upper airway (UA) remains a challenge. This study aimed to report the methods for UA assessment using cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) in adults with obstructive sleep apnea (OSA).

METHODS

We performed a systematic review (PROSPERO #CRD42021237490 and PRISMA checklist) that applied a search strategy to seven databases and grey literature.

RESULTS

In 29 studies with moderate-to-high risk of bias, investigators mostly reported the body position during CBCT (upright or supine) and hard tissue references, diverging in UA delimitation and terminologies. The meta-analysis showed two subgroups (upright and supine), and no statistical differences were identified (p = 0.18) considering the UA area. The volume in the OSA group was smaller than that in the control group (p < 0.003 and Cohen's d =  - 0.81) in the upright position. Patients with OSA showed smaller anteroposterior dimensions than the control group and were not affected by the position during image acquisition (p = 0.02; Cohen's d =  - 0.52). The lateral measurements were also lower in the OSA group (supine) (p = 0.002; Cohen's d =  - 0.6).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with OSA showed smaller UA measurements in the upright (volume) and supine (lateral dimension) positions. The anteroposterior dimension was also reduced in patients with OSA compared to the control group, regardless of the position during CBCT acquisition.

Changes in sleep and airway variables in patients with obstructive sleep apnea after mandibular advancement splint treatment

INTRODUCTION

Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is an extensive public health problem that imposes considerable morbidity. Mandibular advancement splint (MAS) therapy is a well tolerated treatment, but success rates are difficult to predict. Our objective was to investigate the relationship of oropharyngeal airway dimensions, sleep characteristics, patient biometrics, and treatment response within an OSA patient sample.

METHODS

Records of 33 adults were assessed retrospectively with the use of Dolphin 3D and Image J to measure the airway on pretreatment supine cone-beam computed tomography images and derived lateral cephalograms. The patients used Somnodent (Somnomed; Crows Nest, Australia) MAS appliances, which were titrated over 6-8 weeks. Appliance titration measurements and pre- and posttreatment polysomnograms were assessed. Respiratory disturbance index (RDI), absolute and percentage changes in RDI, non-rapid eye movement (NREM) RDI, rapid eye movement (REM) RDI, supine and nonsupine NREM and REM RDI, and minimal blood-oxygen saturation variables were evaluated. The associations of measurements from 2D and 3D minimal anterior-posterior linear distance and 3D airway variables with MAS treatment response were estimated.

RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS

Combined effects of baseline total airway volume, body mass index, neck circumference, location of minimal cross sectional area, and OSA severity were associated with treatment response. Patients with higher initial OSA and more superiorly located airway constriction showed enhanced treatment response to MAS therapy. Airway constriction due to maxillofacial disproportions rather than soft tissue obstruction also showed better treatment response. No significant relationships were found in lateral cephalogram measurements.

Correlation of upper airway radiographic measurements with risk status for obstructive sleep apnea syndrome in young dental patients

OBJECTIVE

The aim of the present study is to compare radiographic measurements of the upper airway (UA) in young adult patients with different levels of risk status for obstructive sleep apnea syndrome.

STUDY DESIGN

The study included 50 patients between 18 and 30 years of age who were referred for dental examination and evaluation of impacted third molars. Case record forms, including habit history, along with the Berlin Questionnaire and the Epworth Sleepiness Scale, were completed by the patients and their relatives. According to the answers, 25 low-risk patients and 25 high-risk patients were selected. Cephalometric radiographs and cone beam computed radiography images were obtained for radiographic analysis when the patients were admitted into the study.

RESULTS

There were significant differences in body mass index, neck circumference measurements, Epworth score, and smoking status between risk groups. There were significant differences for UA measurements on radiographic evaluation. Body mass index (BMI) was found to be correlated positively with neck circumference and Epworth scores and negatively with UA measurements for all patients. Velopharyngeal measurements showed the highest correlation with Epworth scores, BMI, and neck circumference.

CONCLUSIONS

The radiographic findings correlated with the survey results. Our data suggest that radiographic measurements of UA may be used as a predictor of risk for obstructive sleep apnea syndrome in a young population.