Comparison of shear bond strength of orthodontics brackets on composite resin restorations with different surface treatments

Assessment of shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets bonded by trans-illumination method

Objective: To assess the clinical effectiveness of trans-illumination technique in bonding orthodontic brackets. Materials and method:  Forty premolars were arbitrarily divided into 4 groups. Bonding of brackets was done with 40- and 80-s light curing from the buccal or lingual aspect with different intensities. Shear bond strengths of brackets were measured using a universal testing machine. Collected data were analyzed statistically. Result: The highest shear bond was observed in group 2 (high intensity, 40 s, buccal) and the lowest found in group 3 (low intensity, 40 s, lingual). Conclusion:  In all experimental groups except group 2, shear bond strength was below the clinically accepted values. Doubling the curing time and increasing the light intensity during trans-illumination are recommended for achieving acceptable bond strengths.

Evaluation of bond strength of molar orthodontic tubes subjected to reinforcement with flowable and bonding resins

OBJECTIVE

The goal was to evaluate the adhesive shear bond strength (SBS) of orthodontic tubes bonded to molar teeth and reinforced with Transbond XT (3M Science, St. Paul, MN, USA) and flowable resin.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In all, 120 molar teeth, previously extracted from patients with a mean age of 30 were included. Orthodontic molar tubes were bonded on the vestibular surface of these teeth with one of two types of adhesive (Transbond XT [3M Science, St. Paul, MN, USA] or Orthobond [Morelli, Sorocaba, Brazil]). Each of these groups was subsequently divided into four further groups: control and those subjected to the use of resin reinforcement on the occlusal surface of the bonded tubes with one of three materials (Transbond XT, Tetric N Flow [Ivoclar Vivadent, Ellwangen, Germany], Z 350 Flow [3M Science, St. Paul, MN, USA]). SBS and adhesive remnant index tests were performed to evaluate bond strength and type of fracture of the tubes bonded with the different methods.

RESULTS

The use of resin reinforcement with Transbond XT significantly increased the SBS of tubes bonded with both materials. Flowable composites did not increase the SBS when used as a reinforcement. Less than 50% of the adhesive remained on the vestibular surface after the SBS test in most samples of all groups.

CONCLUSION

Transbond XT orthodontic adhesive and Orthobond adhesive had appropriate bonding strengths for clinical use. Furthermore, the use of a resinous reinforcement with Transbond XT significantly increased the SBS of tubes bonded. However this technique with flowable adhesives (Tetric N Flow and Z350 Flow) did not significantly increase SBS when orthodontic tubes were bonded with Transbond XT or Orthobond.

Shear Bond Strength of Three Orthodontic Bonding Systems on Enamel and Restorative Materials

Objective. The aim of this in vitro study was to determine the shear bond strength (SBS) and adhesive remnant index (ARI) score of two self-etching no-mix adhesives (iBond™ and Scotchbond™) on different prosthetic surfaces and enamel, in comparison with the commonly used total etch system Transbond XT™. Materials and Methods. A total of 270 surfaces (1 enamel and 8 restorative surfaces, n = 30) were randomly divided into three adhesive groups. In group 1 (control) brackets were bonded with Transbond XT primer. In the experimental groups iBond adhesive (group 2) and Scotchbond Universal adhesive (group 3) were used. The SBS was measured using a Zwicki 1120™ testing machine. The ARI and SBS were compared statistically using the Kruskal–Wallis test (P ≤ 0.05). Results. Significant differences in SBS and ARI were found between the control group and experimental groups. Conclusions. Transbond XT showed the highest SBS on human enamel. Scotchbond Universal on average provides the best bonding on all other types of surface (metal, composite, and porcelain), with no need for additional primers. It might therefore be helpful for simplifying bonding in orthodontic procedures on restorative materials in patients. If metal brackets have to be bonded to a metal surface, the use of a dual-curing resin is recommended.

Effect of Ti:sapphire laser on shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets to ceramic surfaces

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

With increasing demand for orthodontic treatments in adults, orthodontists continue to debate the optimal way to prepare ceramic surfaces for bonding. This study evaluated the effects of a Ti:sapphire laser on the shear bond strength (SBS) of orthodontic brackets bonded to two ceramic surfaces (feldspathic and IPS Empress e-Max) and the results were compared with those using two other lasers (Er:YAG and Nd:YAG) and 'conventional' techniques, i.e., sandblasting (50 µm) and hydrofluoric (HF) acid.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In total, 150 ceramic discs were prepared and divided into two groups. In each group, the following five subgroups were prepared: Ti:sapphire laser, Nd:YAG laser, Er:YAG laser, sandblasting, and HF acid. Mandibular incisor brackets were bonded using a light-cured adhesive. The samples were stored in distilled water for 24 hours at 37°C and then thermocycled. Extra samples were prepared and examined using scanning electron microscopy (SEM). SBS testing was performed and failure modes were classified. ANOVA and Tukey's HSD tests were used to compare SBS among the five subgroups (P < 0.05).

RESULTS

Feldspathic and IPS Empress e-Max ceramics had similar SBS values. The Ti:sapphire femtosecond laser (16.76 ± 1.37 MPa) produced the highest mean bond strength, followed by sandblasting (12.79 ± 1.42 MPa) and HF acid (11.28 ± 1.26 MPa). The Er:YAG (5.43 ± 1.21 MPa) and Nd:YAG laser (5.36 ± 1.04 MPa) groups were similar and had the lowest SBS values. More homogeneous and regular surfaces were observed in the ablation pattern with the Ti:sapphire laser than with the other treatments by SEM analysis.

CONCLUSIONS

Within the limitations of this in vitro study, Ti:sapphire laser- treated surfaces had the highest SBS values. Therefore, this technique may be useful for the pretreatment of ceramic surfaces as an alternative to 'conventional' techniques.