Meza N, Rojas V, Escobar Liquitay CM, Pérez I, Aguilera Johnson F, Amarales Osorio C, Irarrázaval M, Madrid E, Franco JVA. Non-pharmacological interventions for autism spectrum disorder in children: an overview of systematic reviews.
BMJ Evid Based Med 2022:bmjebm-2021-111811. [PMID:
35217568 DOI:
10.1136/bmjebm-2021-111811]
[Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 01/25/2022] [Indexed: 11/04/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE
To assess the effectiveness of non-pharmacological interventions for the treatment of autism spectrum disorder (ASD) in children.
DESIGN
Overview of systematic reviews (SRs).
PARTICIPANTS
Children aged 12 years and under with ASD.
SEARCH METHODS
In October 2021, we searched Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, MEDLINE, Embase, PsycINFO and Epistemonikos placing no restrictions on language or date of publication.
INTERVENTIONS
17 non-pharmacological interventions compared with placebo, no-treatment (including waiting list) or other interventions (ie, usual care, as defined by the authors of each study).
DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS
We rated the methodological quality of the included SRs using A Measurement Tool to Assess Systematic Reviews (AMSTAR 2). We reported the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) certainty of the evidence (CoE) according to the analysis conducted by the authors of the included SRs.
MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES
A multidisciplinary group of experts agreed on analysing nine critical outcomes evolving core and non-core ASD symptoms.
PUBLIC AND PATIENT INVOLVEMENT STATEMENT
Organisations of parents of children with ASD participated in external revision of the final version of the report.
RESULTS
We identified 52 reports that were within our scope, of which 48 were excluded for various reasons. After excluding less reliable SRs, we included four SRs. Non-pharmacological interventions (ie, Early Intensive Behavioural Intervention, Applied Behaviour Analysis, Picture Exchange Communication System and Naturalistic Developmental Behavioural Interventions) may have favourable effects on some core outcomes including language, social and functioning, play or daily living skills in children with ASD (with either no GRADE assessment, very low or low CoE). In addition, we identified a lack of report for other key outcomes in the included SRs (ie, restricted, repetitive behaviour; play and sensory processing).
CONCLUSIONS
Synthesised evidence regarding the efficacy of non-pharmacological interventions for children with ASD is scarce. High-quality SRs addressing the variety of both non-pharmacological interventions and relevant outcomes are needed.
PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER
CRD42020206535.
Collapse