Potential interaction between itraconazole and clarithromycin

Simultaneous diagnosis of allergic bronchopulmonary aspergillosis and Mycobacterium avium complex lung disease

Allergic bronchopulmonary aspergillosis (ABPA) and Mycobacterium avium complex lung disease (MAC-LD) often coexist because bronchiectasis, caused by ABPA or MAC, might be an important predisposing factor for both conditions. Here, we describe a man with asthma symptoms who had centrilobular small nodules and mucoid impaction on chest CT. We diagnosed the patient with simultaneous ABPA and MAC-LD on the basis of bronchoscopy findings. Itraconazole monotherapy led to substantial clinical improvement, avoiding the adverse effects of systemic corticosteroids. Sputum culture conversion of MAC was achieved after switching from itraconazole monotherapy to combination therapy comprising clarithromycin, rifampicin and ethambutol. ABPA recurred but was controlled by reinitiation of itraconazole. Overall, corticosteroid management was avoided for 38 months. Itraconazole monotherapy may be selected as initial treatment for ABPA with chronic infection, including MAC.

Oral Candida in Patients with Fixed Orthodontic Appliance: In Vitro Combination Therapy

BACKGROUND

Fixed orthodontic appliance (FOA) increases the cariogenic microorganisms of mouth including candida. The aim was to evaluate the pharmacodynamic effects of some antibacterial drugs in combination with most applicable antifungal agents on candida isolated from patients with FOA.

METHODS

Three antifungal agents (amphotericin B (AMB), ketoconazole (KET), and itraconazole (ITZ)) and three antibacterial drugs (ciprofloxacin (CIP), doxycycline (DOX), and metronidazole (MET)) with serial concentrations have been used and microdilution broth method has been done for single and combination therapy, then fungal growth was assessed spectrophotometrically, and the combinations were evaluated by bliss independent analysis.

RESULTS

According to bliss independent interaction, the synergistic interactions depended on ΔE values that showed the best for CIP was with AMB (ΔE = 55.14) followed with KET (ΔE = 41.23) and lastly ITR (ΔE = 39.67) at CIP = 150 mg/L. DOX was optimal with KET (ΔE = 42.11) followed with AMB (ΔE = 40.77) and the lowest with ITR (ΔE = 9.12) at DOX = 75 mg/L. MET is the best with AMB (ΔE = 40.95) and then with ITR (ΔE = 35.45) and finally KET (ΔE = 15.15) at MET 200 mg/L. Moreover, usage of higher concentrations of antibacterial agents revealed inhibitory effects.

CONCLUSION

This study uncovers the optimum antibiotic combination therapy against cariogenic candida with FOA by usage of low therapeutic concentrations.

Frequent Premature Ventricular Contractions Induced by Itraconazole

Itraconazole is widely used to treat onychomycosis because of its significant therapeutic effects. An otherwise healthy 30-year-old man treated with itraconazole developed frequent premature ventricular contractions (PVC). He presented with a dry cough and palpitation. The results of 12-lead electrocardiography (ECG) were essentially normal, but Holter ECG revealed 17,484 (18%) uniform PVC, including 4 short runs among 96,930 beats/day. Another Holter ECG after withdrawing itraconazole revealed 1,032 premature atrial contractions but no PVC. The corrected QT interval was 0.39 s without itraconazole, 0.41 s with itraconazole, and 0.43 s when multiple PVC were documented. Itraconazole inhibits the fungal cytochrome P450 that is involved in fungal cell membrane formation, interrupts human cytochrome P450A4 in the liver and causes adverse interactions with various drugs such as antiarrythmics, but its cardiac side-effects are obscure. Both patients and physicians should be aware that itraconazole can cause PVC as a side-effect.

Frequency of potential azole drug-drug interactions and consequences of potential fluconazole drug interactions

PURPOSE

To assess the frequency of potential azole-drug interactions and consequences of interactions between fluconazole and other drugs in routine inpatient care.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective cohort study of hospitalized patients treated for systemic fungal infections with an oral or intravenous azole medication between July 1997 and June 2001 in a tertiary care hospital. We recorded the concomitant use of medications known to interact with azole antifungals and measured the frequency of potential azole drug interactions, which we considered to be present when both drugs were given together. We then performed a chart review on a random sample of admissions in which patients were exposed to a potential moderate or major drug interaction with fluconazole. The list of azole-interacting medications and the severity of interaction were derived from the DRUGDEX System and Drug Interaction Facts.

RESULTS

Among the 4,185 admissions in which azole agents (fluconazole, itraconazole or ketoconazole) were given, 2,941 (70.3%) admissions experienced potential azole-drug interactions, which included 2,716 (92.3%) admissions experiencing potential fluconazole interactions. The most frequent interactions with potential moderate to major severity were co-administration of fluconazole with prednisone (25.3%), midazolam (17.5%), warfarin (14.7%), methylprednisolone (14.1%), cyclosporine (10.7%) and nifedipine (10.1%). Charts were reviewed for 199 admissions in which patients were exposed to potential fluconazole drug interactions. While four adverse drug events (ADEs) caused by fluconazole were found, none was felt to be caused by a drug-drug interaction (DDI), although in one instance fluconazole may have contributed.

CONCLUSIONS

Potential fluconazole drug interactions were very frequent among hospitalized patients on systemic azole antifungal therapy, but they had few apparent clinical consequences.

Combinations of antifungal agents in therapy--what value are they?

Concurrent or sequential antifungal treatment for invasive mycoses has been typically considered as an option to improve results of monotherapy. However, data on the efficacy of combination therapy are sparse and consist largely of results from studies in vitro and experimental animal models. These studies have yielded controversial results depending on the criteria used to evaluate the antifungal interaction. Several combinations that showed synergy in vitro failed to do so in animal models. Overall, apart from cryptococcal infections, combined antifungal therapy is not significantly better than monotherapy in terms of clinical efficacy. It is questionable whether combination therapy should be used in most cases as there is a lack of evidence from well-designed clinical trials. However, combination therapy could be an alternative to monotherapy for patients with invasive infections that are difficult to treat, such as those due to multi-resistant species and for those who fail to respond to standard treatment.