Advanced Heart Failure and End-Stage Heart Failure: Does a Difference Exist

Advanced heart failure (AdHF) represents a challenging aspect of heart failure patients. Because of worsening clinical symptoms, high rates of re-hospitalization and mortality, AdHF represents an unstable condition where standard treatments are inadequate and additional interventions must be applied. A heart transplant is considered the optimal therapy for AdHF, but the great problem linked to the scarcity of organs and long waiting lists have led to the use of mechanical circulatory support with ventricular-assist device (VAD) as a destination therapy. VAD placement improves the prognosis, functional status, and quality of life of AdHF patients, with high rates of survival at 1 year, similar to transplant. However, the key element is to select the right patient at the right moment. The complete assessment must include a careful clinical evaluation, but also take into account psychosocial factors that are of crucial importance in the out-of-hospital management. It is important to distinguish between AdHF and end-stage HF, for which advanced therapy interventions would be unreasonable due to severe and irreversible organ damage and, instead, palliative care should be preferred to improve quality of life and relief of suffering. The correct selection of patients represents a great issue to solve, both ethically and economically.

Proteomic analysis of metabolic, cytoskeletal and stress response proteins in human heart failure

Human heart failure is a complex syndrome and a primary cause of morbidity and mortality in the world. However, the molecular pathways involved in the remodelling process are poorly understood. In this study, we performed exhaustive global proteomic surveys of cardiac ventricle isolated from failing and non-failing human hearts, and determined the regulatory pathway to uncover the mechanism underlying heart failure. Two-dimensional gel electrophoresis (2-DE) coupled with tandem mass spectrometry was used to identify differentially expressed proteins in specimens from failing (n = 9) and non-failing (n = 6) human hearts. A total of 25 proteins with at least 1.5-fold change in the failing heart were identified; 15 proteins were up-regulated and 10 proteins were down-regulated. The altered proteins belong to three broad functional categories: (i) metabolic [e.g. NADH dehydrogenase (ubiquinone), dihydrolipoamide dehydrogenase, and the cytochrome c oxidase subunit]; (ii) cytoskeletal (e.g. myosin light chain proteins, troponin I type 3 and transthyretin) and (iii) stress response (e.g. αB-crystallin, HSP27 and HSP20). The marked differences in the expression of selected proteins, including HSP27 and HSP20, were further confirmed by Western blot. Thus, we carried out full-scale screening of the protein changes in human heart failure and profiled proteins that may be critical in cardiac dysfunction for future mapping.

Survival among patients with left ventricular systolic dysfunction treated with atenolol

Metoprolol succinate, carvedilol, and bisoprolol are approved for use in heart failure. Other beta-blockers have been found to be inferior (metoprolol tartrate) or have not been studied (atenolol). The authors compared all-cause mortality following treatment with either atenolol, carvedilol, or metoprolol tartrate for 974 patients with left ventricular function < or =40%. The unadjusted mortality at 6 months was lower with atenolol (3.2%) and carvedilol (4.2%) when compared with metoprolol tartrate (7.5%, P< or =.039). However, patients with atenolol were older but had less prior heart failure. After adjustment for the propensity to be treated with atenolol, patients actually treated with atenolol had a significantly lower risk of death compared with treatment with metoprolol tartrate and comparable outcome to those treated with carvedilol. These results suggest that atenolol may be useful for patients with heart failure treatment and highlight the need for a randomized trial comparing atenolol with established beta-blockers.

Beta-1 selective adrenergic antagonist landiolol and esmolol can be safely used in patients with airway hyperreactivity

This study was undertaken to clarify the effects of esmolol and landiolol, beta-1 selective adrenergic antagonists, on hyperreactive airways in both ovalbumin-sensitized guinea pigs and asthmatic patients. In the animal study, asthma was induced by ovalbumin. After control acetylcholine responses for total pulmonary resistance (Raw) and dynamic lung compliance (Cdyn) were obtained, the animals received propranolol, esmolol, or landiolol, and the same protocol was again performed. Sixty inpatients with coronary risk factors and asthma were enrolled in the human study. Under propofol anesthesia, the patients received saline, esmolol, or landiolol. To assess intubation-induced bronchoconstriction, the presence of wheezing was determined. The dose-response curves of Raw and Cdyn to acetylcholine were significantly elevated and declined in the ovalbumin-sensitized model compared with those in the control group. Neither esmolol nor landiolol had any effect on the acetylcholine-induced response curve in these sensitized animals. However, propranolol significantly enhanced Raw and reduced Cdyn in this model. Tracheal intubation increased the incidence of wheezing in asthmatic patients. However, there was no significant difference in the incidence of wheezing among these groups. The ultra-short-acting beta-1 selective adrenergic antagonists esmolol and landiolol can be safely used perioperatively in patients with airway hyperreactivity.

The Effects of β-Adrenergic Blockers in African Americans with Chronic Heart Failure

Objective:

To review the available literature regarding the use of β-adrenergic blockers in African Americans with heart failure.

Data Sources:

Primary literature was located via MEDLINE (1966–January 2004). Key search terms were β-adrenergic blockers; heart failure, congestive; carvedilol; metoprolol; bisoprolol; and bucindolol.

Data Synthesis:

In African Americans, the prevalence of chronic heart failure (CHF) is nearly twice that of white people. African Americans exhibit symptoms of CHF at an earlier age, develop more marked functional decline after hospitalization for CHF, and have almost a twofold higher mortality rate compared with white patients. Sympathetic nervous system activation is a key pathophysiologic response in CHF; by attenuating this system, β-blockers have been shown to decrease mortality. Unfortunately, minority populations have been underrepresented in many of the trials evaluating β-blockers. Of the 4 β-blockers assessed in CHF, bucindolol has shown detrimental effects when used in African Americans. Metoprolol and bisoprolol have not been sufficiently evaluated to determine if response varies by race. Carvedilol has the best documented benefit in this population.

Conclusions:

Response to β-adrenergic blockers in CHF varies by race. Bucindolol has shown detrimental effects when used in African Americans. Further investigation is warranted to determine if metoprolol and bisoprolol are equally efficacious to carvedilol in African American patients with CHF.

Management of chronic congestive heart failure in children

The medical management of congestive heart failure involves manipulating myocardial contractility and loading conditions to achieve optimal performance. Medication may be used to counteract potentially deleterious neurohumoral changes that are associated with congestive heart failure. When appropriate, the correction of the underlying cardiac defect by surgery or catheter intervention is usually the most effective treatment for congestive heart failure in children.

Update on therapy for heart failure

The success of angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors in reducing morbidity and mortality in patients with heart failure has led to investigations of other inhibitors of the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system. Although ACE inhibitors remain first-line drugs in the treatment of heart failure and left ventricular dysfunction, clinical evidence suggests that a newer class of agents--angiotensin II receptor blockers--may provide additional benefit by blocking the adverse effects of angiotensin II more completely. An improved adverse-effect profile also makes angiotensin II receptor blockers appropriate in patients who cannot tolerate ACE inhibitors. Clinical trials have demonstrated the beneficial effects of angiotensin II receptor blockers on the combined endpoints of morbidity and mortality in patients with heart failure. Aldosterone antagonism with spironolactone has additive benefits in patients receiving an ACE inhibitor. The most recent treatment guidelines for heart failure recommend the use of angiotensin II receptor blockers and spironolactone in selected patients.

Heart failure and treatment: part 1

Diagnosis of heart failure is increasingly prevalent. Each year, 550,000 new cases are anticipated. To provide quality outcomes, nurses and physicians must understand the etiology and pathophysiology of heart failure. Research into heart failure provides information about treatment and drug therapies that reduce heart failure symptoms and improve quality of life. PACU nurses care for heart failure patients in various stages of this syndrome. Determining the plan of care for this high acuity population requires nurses with skills to manage complex patients in the perianesthesia period.

Titration of beta-blockers in heart failure. How to maximize benefit while minimizing adverse events

Data from large clinical trials indicate that beta-blocker therapy can be successfully initiated and adjusted upward in most patients with stable chronic heart failure who already take standard heart failure therapy. Such therapy typically includes ACE inhibitors, diuretics, and digoxin. With optimal titration and maintenance strategies, beta-blockers are effective and well tolerated in these patients. It is recommened that all patients with clinically stable mild to moderate chronic heart failure (NYHA class II or III), no contraindications to beta-blocker use, and an LVEF less than 40% should be treated with beta-blockers. Based on the results of recent clinical trials on heart failure, beta-blocker therapy should be initiated at a low dose and slowly tirtrated upward as tolerated. A patient's heart failure should be stable for at least 2 weeks before the dose is adjusted upward. Slow titration facilitates maximal tolerability. In primary care practice, physicians should apply titration strategies and target dosed that have been demonstrated to reduce morbidity and mortality in clinical trials. Although worsening heart failure or other adverse events occur in a minority of patients who take beta-blockers, these effects can be managed by adjusting the dose of ACE inhibitor or diuretic, or both, or by temporarily withholding the beta-clocker. Currently, professional treatment guidelines recommend beta-blocker therapy in combination with ACE inhibitors an diuretics as the standard of care in the treatment of heart failure.

Angiotensin II receptor blockers in heart failure

Heart failure remains a significant cause of morbidity and mortality, despite major advances in therapy. Angiotensin II, the principal mediator of the renin-angiotensin system, exerts both short-term (e.g., hemodynamic, renal) and long-term (e.g., inflammation, cardiac remodeling) effects in the pathophysiology of cardiovascular disease. The effects of angiotensin II appear to be more completely inhibited by angiotensin II receptor blockers (ARBs), which act at the subtype 1 receptor level, than by angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors because pathways other than that of ACE contribute to the generation of angiotensin II. Evidence demonstrates that ARBs, when added to conventional treatment for patients with heart failure, are associated with a reduction in morbidity and mortality as well as an improvement in quality of life. Clinical trials of ARB therapy indicate that these agents are generally well tolerated, both alone and in combination with other neurohormonal inhibitors. The current role of ARBs in heart failure is as an alternative for patients who cannot tolerate therapy with an ACE inhibitor. A number of ongoing clinical studies are likely to further define or expand the role of ARBs in the treatment of cardiovascular disease.

Beta-blockers in chronic heart failure: considerations for selecting an agent

Patients with chronic heart failure have increased sympathetic nervous system activity that contributes to deterioration of cardiovascular function over time. Long-term beta-blocker therapy prevents such deterioration through inhibition of this neurohormonal pathway. The impressive survival data collected from several large studies have made beta-blockers a component of standard therapy for New York Heart Association class II to III heart failure. Although there are differences in the pharmacological properties of the beta-blockers shown to improve morbidity and mortality in heart failure, there is little evidence to suggest that such properties constitute any major advantages in clinical outcome. Carvedilol and extended-release metoprolol succinate are 2 beta-blockers currently approved in the United States for the treatment of patients with heart failure. Both agents have shown similar risk reductions in overall and cause-specific mortality; however, no outcome data from a comparative trial are available to support the use of one agent over the other. Regardless of the agent chosen, appropriate dosing and titration of beta-blockers are essential for successful therapy.

Trastuzumab-associated cardiotoxicity

Trastuzumab is a monoclonal antibody used for the treatment of metastatic breast carcinoma in women whose tumors overexpress the HER2 protein. Cardiotoxicity has been reported to occur with trastuzumab when administered alone and in combination with antineoplastic agents, particularly anthracyclines. The risk of cardiotoxicity with trastuzumab has been reported to be 4% with monotherapy and 27% when administered in combination with an anthracycline and cyclophosphamide, but to the author's knowledge severe outcomes, such as death or permanent disability, are uncommon. The majority of reported cardiac effects are mild to moderate, nonspecific, and medically manageable. Signs and symptoms are similar to those observed in patients who develop anthracycline-induced cardiomyopathy and include tachycardia, palpitations, and exertional dyspnea, which may progress to congestive heart failure. The pathogenesis and histologic changes responsible for trastuzumab-associated cardiotoxicity currently are under investigation. Unlike anthracycline-induced toxicity, trastuzumab-associated toxicity usually responds to standard treatment or the discontinuation of trastuzumab, and there is no evidence that the toxicity is dose related. Current methods for the early detection of cardiotoxicity in trastuzumab-treated patients are similar to those used in anthracycline-treated patients. Cardiac function is established at baseline and monitored regularly during treatment by physical examination and measurement of left ventricular ejection fraction. The majority of patients improve with proper treatment, and some are able to continue to receive trastuzumab.

Lower serum digoxin concentrations in heart failure and reassessment of laboratory report forms

Serum digoxin concentrations (SDC) have been used clinically since the early 1970s. Whereas the therapeutic range for SDC is frequently cited as either 0.8 to 2.0 ng/mL or 0.5 to 2.0 ng/mL, studies over the past decade suggest an upper limit of 1.0 ng/mL for treating heart failure. The same upper limit for SDC is suggested for patients with heart failure and atrial fibrillation with rapid ventricular response. Reducing the upper limit of the therapeutic range to 1.0 ng/mL on computerized and paper laboratory report forms may guide clinicians to avoid unnecessarily high SDC, thus minimizing risk of digoxin toxicity without sacrificing therapeutic benefit for heart failure.

Evaluation of the use of evidence-based angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor criteria for the treatment of congestive heart failure: opportunities for pharmacists to improve patient outcomes

BACKGROUND

The under-utilization and under-dosing of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs) in patients with congestive heart failure (CHF) continues to be a problem observed in clinical practice.

OBJECTIVE

To develop and implement drug use evaluation (DUE) criteria for the use of ACEIs in patients with CHF which could be used by pharmacists to ensure that all eligible patients receive an ACEI at an appropriate dose.

METHODS

A retrospective chart review of all patients discharged from the study institution with a diagnosis of CHF during the period of March 1 to July 31, 1998 was conducted using the DUE criteria developed.

RESULTS

Of the 138 patients evaluated, only 68.6% were discharged on ACEI therapy. Additionally, only 40% of those discharged on an ACEI achieved target dose. Multiple regression analysis revealed that males were 2.43 times more likely to be discharged on an ACEI than females, while those on concomitant diuretics or digoxin were less likely to be discharged on an ACEI (25% and 18%, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

The application of these DUE criteria by pharmacists in hospital and community practice has the potential to improve utilization and dosing of this important class of medications for the management of the symptoms and progression of CHF.

Mediators of chronic heart failure: how drugs work

OBJECTIVE

To critically review the pathophysiology of chronic heart failure at the neurohormonal level, and discuss the effect of present and future therapeutic options on these neurohormones.

DATA SOURCES

A MEDLINE search (1986-November 2000) was used to identify important primary literature and reviews. Additional references were obtained from these articles.

DATA SYNTHESIS

Chronic heart failure is a common, progressive disorder with high morbidity and mortality. Progression is due in large part to several redundant neurohormonal responses. The neurohormones include angiotensin II, norepinephrine, aldosterone, endothelin-1, arginine vasopressin, and tumor necrosis factor. These responses are initially adaptive, but become maladaptive in the long term, impairing the function of the heart, vasculature, and kidneys. Counter-regulatory hormones, such as bradykinin and natriuretic peptides, are insufficient to offset the adverse effects of the other neurohormones. Most drugs used to treat chronic heart failure, such as angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, beta-adrenergic antagonists, and spironolactone, achieve their benefits through altering the neurohormonal pathways. New agents that affect more or different neurohormones may soon be available.

CONCLUSIONS

Multiple agents are required for treatment of chronic heart failure, as no single agent can counteract all of the various adverse pathways. The appropriate prescription and use of such inherently complex regimens require significant physician and patient education.

The Year in Review: Cardiology

Overall, the evolution of the management of a broad spectrum of cardiovascular disease states has occurred primarily as a result of randomized, controlled clinical trials that have been conducted and published over time. During the past two years, the results of numerous clinical trials have certainly had a significant impact on the ways in which practitioners have treated conditions such as chronic heart failure, cardiac arrhythmias, ischemic heart disease, dyslipidemias, and hypertension. This review article summarizes the results of several key clinical trials that evaluated various treatment strategies for these five cardiovascular disease states and attempts to provide insight as to how these findings can be incorporated into clinical practice.