beta-Blocker therapy in veterans with asthma or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

Beta-blocker use in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: A systematic review: A systematic review of βB in COPD

Beta-blockers (βB) are a frequently used class of medications. Although βB have many indications, those related to cardiovascular disease are among the most common and important. However, in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), βB are used less often due to concerns about an unfavorable impact on respiratory morbidity and mortality. We performed a systematic review to assess the safety of βB in patients with COPD. We included a total of 2 randomized controlled trials and 28 observational studies. The majority found statistically significant reductions in mortality. The two higher quality observational studies reported increased mortality with βB. The risk of COPD exacerbations was reduced in about half of the studies. Nonetheless, there were significant biases that confounded the results. The highest quality RCT found a significant increase in severe and very severe COPD exacerbations with βB use. In conclusion, data on the safety of βB in patients with COPD are conflicting. However, given higher quality evidence showed harm with their use, βB should be prescribed with caution in patients with COPD, including patients with cardiac indication for βB.

Do beta-adrenergic blocking agents increase asthma exacerbation? A network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Beta-adrenergic blocking agents (abbreviated as beta-blockers) have been used for treating various cardiovascular diseases. However, the potential for asthma exacerbation is one of the major adverse effects of beta-blockers. This study aimed to compare the level of risk for an asthma attack in patients receiving various beta-blockers. We searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of either placebo-controlled or active-controlled design. The current network meta-analysis (NMA) was conducted under a frequentist model. The primary outcome was the incidence of asthmatic attack. A total of 24 RCTs were included. Overall NMA revealed that only oral timolol [risk ratio (RR) = 3.35 (95% confidence interval (CI) 1.04–10.85)] and infusion of propranolol [RR = 10.19 (95% CI 1.29–80.41)] were associated with significantly higher incidences of asthma attack than the placebo, whereas oral celiprolol [RR = 0.39 (95% CI 0.04–4.11)], oral celiprolol and propranolol [RR = 0.46 (95% CI 0.02–11.65)], oral bisoprolol [RR = 0.46 (95% CI 0.02–11.65)], oral atenolol [RR = 0.51 (95% CI 0.20–1.28)], infusion of practolol [RR = 0.80 (95% CI 0.03–25.14)], and infusion of sotalol [RR = 0.91 (95% CI 0.08–10.65)] were associated with relatively lower incidences of asthma attack than the placebo. In participants with a baseline asthma history, in addition to oral timolol and infusion of propranolol, oral labetalol, oxprenolol, propranolol, and metoprolol exhibited significantly higher incidences of asthma attack than did the placebo. In conclusion, oral timolol and infusion of propranolol were associated with a significantly higher risk of developing an asthma attack in patients, especially in those with a baseline asthma history, and should be avoided in patients who present a risk of asthma.

Trial registration: PROSPERO CRD42020190540.

The safety of cardioselective β1-blockers in asthma: literature review and search of global pharmacovigilance safety reports

INTRODUCTION

Beta-blockers are key in the management of cardiovascular diseases but blocking airway β2-receptors can cause severe and sometimes fatal bronchoconstriction in people with asthma. Although cardioselective β1-blockers may be safer than non-selective β-blockers, they remain relatively contraindicated and under-prescribed. We review the evidence of the risk associated with cardioselective β1-blocker use in asthma.

METHODS

We searched "asthma" AND "beta-blocker" in PubMed and EmbaseOvid from start to May 2020. The World Health Organization (WHO) global database of individual case safety reports (VigiBase) was searched for reports of fatal asthma or bronchospasm and listed cardioselective β1-blocker use (accessed February 2020). Reports were examined for evidence of pre-existing asthma.

RESULTS

PubMed and EmbaseOvid searches identified 304 and 327 publications, respectively. No published reports of severe or fatal asthma associated with cardioselective β1-blockers were found. Three large observational studies reported no increase in asthma exacerbations with cardioselective β1-blocker treatment. The VigiBase search identified five reports of fatalities in patients with pre-existing asthma and reporting asthma or bronchospasm during cardioselective β1-blocker use. Four of these deaths were unrelated to cardioselective β1-blocker use. The circumstances of the fifth death were unclear.

CONCLUSIONS

There were no published reports of cardioselective β1-blockers causing asthma death. Observational data suggest that cardioselective β1-blocker use is not associated with increased asthma exacerbations. We found only one report of an asthma death potentially caused by cardioselective β1-blockers in a patient with asthma in a search of VigiBase. The reluctance to use cardioselective β1-blockers in people with asthma is not supported by this evidence.

Beta Blockers and Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD): Sum of Evidence

Approximately, half a century has passed since the discovery of beta blockers. Then, their prime therapeutic purpose was to treat angina and cardiac arrhythmias, nowadays, beta blockers' usage and effectiveness is extended to treat other cardiovascular diseases, such as hypertension, congestive heart failure, and coronary artery disease. Safety concerns were raised about beta blockers and their use for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) patients with concurrent cardiovascular disease. After a thorough research of the literature, this review summarizes the evidence proving that beta blockers not only might be well tolerated in COPD patients, but they might also have a beneficial effect in this group of patients.

The impact of regular bisoprolol on the response to salbutamol in asthma: A double-blind randomized placebo-controlled crossover trial

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Non-selective beta-blockers impair the bronchodilator response to beta₂ -agonists. Cardio-selective beta₁ -blockers are less likely to cause this effect, yet they remain relatively contraindicated in asthma. We investigated whether the response to salbutamol is impaired during cardio-selective beta₁ -blocker treatment in people with asthma.

METHODS

A random-order, double-blind, placebo-controlled, non-inferiority, crossover study was conducted comparing up to 5 mg bisoprolol daily for 2 weeks with matching placebo, with an open-label extension of up to 10 mg bisoprolol daily. After each treatment period, mannitol was inhaled to induce bronchoconstriction with a 15% fall in forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV₁ ). Immediately after mannitol challenge, salbutamol (100, 100 and 200 μg) was administered via spacer at 5-min intervals with repeated FEV₁ measures. The FEV₁ recovery with salbutamol was measured as an area under recovery curve (AUC). Based on earlier research, a clinically relevant non-inferiority limit of a 30% reduction in the AUC was set.

RESULTS

A total of 19 adults with mild asthma and positive inhaled mannitol challenge completed the study. Adjusting for the FEV₁ fall induced by mannitol and treatment sequence, the mean AUC response to salbutamol after bisoprolol was 5% lower than after placebo, with a one-sided 95% confidence interval (CI) of 26% lower. Thirteen participants completed the open-label extension up to 10 mg bisoprolol daily with mean AUC 11% higher after bisoprolol with a 95% CI of 5% lower.

CONCLUSION

The bronchodilator response to rescue salbutamol after mannitol-induced bronchoconstriction is non-inferior during regular treatment with the cardio-selective beta₁ -blocker, bisoprolol, compared to placebo.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

ACTRN12618000306213 at https://www.anzctr.org.au.

Effect of atenolol pre-treatment in heart damage in a model of intestinal ischemia-reperfusion

PURPOSE

To investigate the effects of atenolol in inflammatory mediator and oxidative stress in a myocardial injury by intestinal ischemia/reperfusion in rat model.

METHODS

Adult Wistar male rats were randomly (n=8), anesthetized and divided in: Sham: submitted to operation only; group SS+IR: intravenous saline infusion following superior mesenteric artery occlusion during 60 minutes (ischemia) and open for 120 minutes (reperfusion); group AT+IR: intravenous atenolol infusion (2 mg/kg) following superior mesenteric artery occlusion during 60 minutes (ischemia) and open for 120 minutes (reperfusion); and group AT+I+AT+R: intravenous atenolol infusion following superior mesenteric artery occlusion during 60 minutes (ischemia) and in the time 45 minutes other atenolol doses were administrated and the artery was open for 120 minutes (reperfusion), all animals were submitted to muscular relaxation for mechanical ventilation. In the end of experiment the animals were euthanized and the hearts tissue were morphology analyzed by histology and malondialdehyde by ELISA, and the plasma were analyzed for tumor necrosis factor-alpha by ELISA.

RESULTS

The group SS+IR demonstrated the higher malondialdehyde levels when compared with the atenolol treated-groups (p=0.001) in the heart tissue. The tumor necrosis factor-alpha level in plasma decrease in the treated groups when compared with SS+IR group (p=0.001). Histology analyses demonstrate pyknosis, edema, cellular vacuolization, presence of inflammatory infiltrate and band contraction in the heart tissue of the rats.

CONCLUSION

Atenolol significantly reduce the degree of cardiac damage after intestinal ischemia-reperfusion.

Cardiac Arrhythmias in Patients with Exacerbation of COPD

Supraventricular and ventricular arrhythmias are common among patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Multiple factors can contribute to the development of arrhythmias in patients with exacerbation of the disease, including: respiratory or heart failure, hypertension, coronary disease and also medications. In the present study we seek to determine the prevalence of cardiac arrhythmias and risk factors among patients with exacerbation of COPD. The study was a retrospective evaluation of 2753 24-h Holter recordings of patients hospitalized in 2004-2016. Exacerbation of COPD was diagnosed in 152 patients and the prevalence of arrhythmias in this group of patients was 97%. The commonest arrhythmia was ventricular premature beats (VPB) - 88.8%, followed by supraventricular premature beats (SPB) - 56.5%. Permanent atrial fibrillation accounted for 30.3% and paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (PAF) for 12.5%. Supraventricular tachycardia (SVT) was noted in 34.2% patients and ventricular tachycardia in 25.6%. Respiratory failure increased the risk of SPB, while heart failure increased the risk of VPB. Treatment with theophylline was associated with a higher proportion of PAF and SVT. In conclusion, COPD exacerbation is associated with a high prevalence of cardiac arrhythmias. COPD treatment and comorbidities increase the risk of arrhythmias.

[Medical therapy of heart and lung diseases. Effects on the respective other organ]

Many patients suffer from both heart and lung diseases. The choice of medical drugs should not only be driven by the clinical and prognostic effects on the target organ but should also be selected based on the effects on the respective other organ. Beta blockers and statins have both beneficial and harmful effects on the respiratory system. Angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors and amiodarone can cause severe lung damage. Low-dose thiazides and calcium antagonists are first-line medications in hypertensive asthma patients but beta blockers should be avoided. Theophyline should be used with caution in patients with known cardiac disease. Glucocorticosteroids can cause cardiovascular symptoms while the phosphodiesterase inhibitor roflumilast appears to have no relevant cardiovascular side effects. Anticholinergic drugs have both favorable and unfavorable cardiovascular (side) effects. Short-acting beta-2 sympathomimetic drugs (SABA) and macrolides in particular can trigger arrhythmia and some SABAs are associated with a higher incidence of myocardial infarction. Detailed knowledge of the effects of drugs used for the treatment of lung and heart diseases on the respective other organ and the associated complications and long-term effects are essential in providing optimal medical care to the many patients who present with both respiratory and cardiovascular diseases.

Effects of one month treatment with propranolol and metoprolol on the relaxant and contractile function of isolated trachea from rats exposed to cigarette smoke for four months

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

The effects of one-month treatment of β-adrenergic receptor (AR) blockers on the relaxant function of airway in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) are unknown. A passive cigarette smoking rat model was used to investigate the effect of β-AR blockers.

METHODS

Thirty-six rats were randomly divided into six groups: control (C); propranolol (P); metoprolol (M); smoking (S); smoking + propranolol (SP); and smoking + metoprolol (SM). Histological analysis of the lungs was done and isolated tracheal segments were studied in vitro to assess the contractile and relaxant function of the smooth muscle. The level of norepinephrine (NE) was measured.

RESULTS

Airway inflammation was more severe in group S than group C (p < 0.001), and it was alleviated in group SP (p < 0.001) while had no change in group SM. After propranolol or metoprolol administration, the level of NE was significantly lower in both SP and SM groups (p < 0.01). The maximal contractile response to acetylcholine (Ach) in groups S and SM was increased compared to group C (p < 0.01). Propranolol significantly inhibited contractile response in group SP (p < 0.05), while metoprolol did not show the same effect. The curve of maximum relaxant rate to isoprenaline (Iso) shifted to the left in group SP (p < 0.01), while group SM showed no changes.

CONCLUSION

One-month treatment with propranolol increased the relaxant effect mediated by the β₂-AR and decreased the contractile response to Ach by reducing the level of NE.

β-Blocker Use and Incidence of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Exacerbations

BACKGROUND

β-Adrenergic antagonist (β-blocker) use in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) has been avoided as a result of potential risk of pulmonary adverse effects. However, recent studies indicate that β-blocker use in patients with COPD can decrease outpatient visits and either decrease or have no effect on the number of hospitalizations. Long-term treatment with β-blockers has been shown to increase survival and decrease exacerbations in patients with COPD.

OBJECTIVE

To assess the impact of β-blocker use on the incidence of exacerbations in patients with COPD.

METHODS

In a retrospective cohort study of patients with COPD from 2 academic primary care practice sites who were seen in 2010, patients were identified using International Classification of Diseases, 9th revision, Clinical Modification codes for COPD and reviewing active medication lists for COPD-specific medications (tiotropium). Patients were classified as either a β-blocker user or a nonuser. Primary outcomes were incidence and severity of COPD exacerbations. Secondary outcomes included COPD exacerbations distinguished by β-blocker cardioselectivity and all-cause hospitalizations.

RESULTS

The study enrolled 412 patients. Of those, 166 patients were β-blocker users and 246 were β-blocker nonusers. β-Blocker users were less likely to have a COPD exacerbation (OR 0.61, 95% CI 0.40–0.93) and had fewer mild exacerbations (OR 0.56; 95% CI 0.34–0.89). There was no significant difference in COPD exacerbations based on β-blocker cardioselectivity (OR 0.84, 95% CI 0.38–1.83). When controlled for, using a backwards stepwise logistic regression, β-blocker use was a variable in the model that predicted exacerbations but alone was not statistically significant (adjusted OR 0.62, 95% CI 0.39–1.01).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with COPD prescribed a β-blocker were significantly less likely to have a COPD exacerbation and had fewer mild COPD exacerbations.

Do beta-blockers alter dyspnea and fatigue in advanced lung cancer? A retrospective analysis

INTRODUCTION

Dyspnea is common in lung cancer and may be partially attributable to increased ventilatory drive due to muscle weakness. The sympathetic component of this pathway might be mitigated by β-blockers.

METHODS

A retrospective review of new patients with stage III-IV non-small lung cancer or any small cell lung cancer was undertaken to assess the impact of β-blocker use on dyspnea and fatigue. Data were abstracted for clinical characteristics, β-blocker use, and pre-treatment Edmonton Symptom Assessment System dyspnea and fatigue scores.

RESULTS

Of 348 patients assessed, 202 met eligibility criteria. The median age was 67, 55.4% were female, 18.8% had chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), and 5.9% had active coronary artery disease. Over 60% of patients scored 4/10 or higher on their dyspnea and fatigue scores. While dyspnea and fatigue were moderately associated, no association was found between β-blocker use and either symptom. Recorded dosages of β-blockers were low. COPD was associated with dyspnea and fatigue, while anemia was associated with fatigue.

CONCLUSIONS

Dyspnea and fatigue are prevalent and increased in the presence of COPD and anemia. No association between β-blocker use and dyspnea or fatigue scores was observed. This may be attributable to inadequate dosing or to retrospective bias.

Carvedilol therapy after cocaine-induced myocardial infarction in patients with asthma

INTRODUCTION

Cocaine-induced myocardial infarction (MI) is well documented. Current literature recommends avoiding beta-blockers in the acute care setting, but after discharge from the hospital, benefits of beta-blocker use may outweigh risks in patients with recent MI resulting from cocaine use. Cardioselective beta-blocker therapy has been demonstrated to be beneficial in post-MI patients with nonsevere asthma. This review article is to compare the risks and benefits of using carvedilol in patients with asthma who have had cocaine-induced MI.

METHODS

The authors searched the English literature from 1984 to July 2010 via PubMed, EMBASE and SCOPUS using the following search terms: "cocaine-induced myocardial infarction AND treatment," "cocaine AND carvedilol," "beta blockers AND asthma," and "carvedilol AND asthma." All studies and case reports related to carvedilol use associated with bronchospasm in patients with asthma and carvedilol use after cocaine-induced MI were included.

RESULTS

Carvedilol has theoretical advantages in patients who use cocaine, but there are no controlled studies confirming the superior efficacy of this agent. Reports of carvedilol use in patients with asthma are rare, but findings include increased asthma symptoms and hospitalization in some patients. Fatal asthma has also been reported because of this noncardioselective beta-blocker.

CONCLUSIONS

Based on a lack of evidence supporting the theoretical advantages but documented risks associated with its use in patients with asthma, carvedilol should be avoided in asthma patients who have a history of cocaine-induced MI. Cardioselective beta-blockers should be used in post-MI patients with nonsevere asthma.

Use of beta-adrenoceptor antagonists in older patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and cardiovascular co-morbidity: safety issues

The incidence of and mortality from both chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and cardiovascular disease (CVD) increase with age. In addition, the average age of patients with COPD and CVD is also increasing as a result of improvements in both pharmacological and non-pharmacological treatments. Coronary artery disease is a compelling indication for beta-adrenoceptor antagonist use in a population in whom beta-adrenoceptor antagonism is often viewed as contraindicated. beta-Adrenoceptor antagonists have been proven to improve cardiovascular morbidity and mortality but have been under-utilized in patients with COPD with concomitant CVD because of a fear of bronchoconstriction and adverse effects, particularly in the elderly. The advanced age of patients with COPD and CVD, along with the sheer number of patients with these diseases, necessitates that clinicians understand the treatment of these co-morbidities using seemingly conflicting therapy in the form of beta-adrenoceptor agonists and antagonists. We review changes in the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of beta-adrenoceptor antagonists in the elderly, the role of beta-adrenoceptor antagonists in CVD and the literature regarding the safety and mortality benefits of beta-adrenoceptor antagonists in elderly patients with COPD and concomitant CVD. We conclude that cardioselective beta-adrenoceptor antagonists appear to be safe to use in elderly male patients with mild-to-moderate COPD who have a compelling indication for beta-adrenoceptor antagonist therapy. Data in female patients are very limited. Nonselective beta-adrenoceptor antagonists should be avoided in general, except in patients with heart failure who might benefit significantly from the use of carvedilol. beta-Adrenoceptor antagonists have been shown to improve mortality in older patients with coexisting CVD and COPD.

[Beta-blocker prescription and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease]

The beta-blocker (BB) prescription remains insufficient despite guidelines, especially, for chronic heart failure. Patients suffering chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) are particularly less treated by BB. The level of evidence for BB prescription is however especially high and as we will focus on, the level of evidence for the safety of BB in the COPD context is convincing enough. We, thus, propose to review the existing literature in regard to this prescription of BB in the chronic heart failure, in the coronary artery disease and for high blood pressure in COPD patients. We then propose our approach to improve the level of prescription of BB in COPD patient really justifying this prescription in cardiology.

Rates of hospitalizations and emergency department visits in patients with asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease taking beta-blockers

STUDY OBJECTIVE

To determine the rates of hospitalizations and emergency department (ED) visits during cardioselective and nonselective beta-blocker therapy in patients with asthma and/or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD).

DESIGN

Retrospective, observational cohort study.

DATA SOURCE

Electronic medical records database.

PATIENTS

A total of 11,592 adult patients with asthma and/or COPD, identified from August 1, 1997-December 31, 2005, who were taking beta-blockers for at least 30 days or had never received a beta-blocker (controls).

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

Of these patients, 3062 were taking cardioselective and 690 nonselective beta-blockers; 7840 were controls. The primary end point for the beta-blocker groups was the rate of hospitalizations and ED visits/patient-year of beta-blocker therapy relative to the control group. In patients with asthma with or without concomitant COPD, cardioselective beta-blockers were associated with a relative risk of 0.89 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.53-1.50) for hospitalizations and 1.40 (95% CI 1.20-1.62) for ED visits compared with controls. Nonselective beta-blockers were associated with a relative risk of 2.47 (95% CI 1.37-4.48) for hospitalizations and 1.21 (95% CI 0.91-1.62) for ED visits. In patients with COPD only, cardioselective beta-blockers were associated with a relative risk of 0.64 (95% CI 0.43-0.96) for hospitalizations and 1.19 (95% CI 1.02-1.39) for ED visits. Nonselective beta-blockers were associated with a relative risk of 1.02 (95% CI 0.52-2.02) for hospitalizations and 0.51 (95% CI 0.33-0.80) for ED visits.

CONCLUSION

In patients with asthma with or without COPD, both cardioselective and nonselective beta-blocker use increased hospitalizations and ED visits compared with controls. Thus, these patients should receive beta-blocker therapy only if their cardiac risk exceeds their pulmonary risk and if they have concomitant cardiac disease for which beta-blockers decrease mortality, such as previous acute myocardial infarction or chronic heart failure. In patients with COPD only, cardioselective beta-blockers slightly increased the risk of ED visits but reduced the risk of hospitalizations. Nonselective beta-blocker therapy in these patients reduced the rate of ED visits and total visits. These findings suggest a larger safety margin with beta-blocker therapy in patients with COPD only than in those with asthma with or without COPD.

Tips and tricks on outpatient initiation and uptitration of beta-blockade in heart failure

beta-blockade has a therapeutic role across the continuum of patients with heart failure (HF), with a demonstrated mortality benefit in stage II and III HF. Concerns regarding initiation and uptitration linger as patients with resting bradycardia, pulmonary, or vascular disease are often unnecessarily excluded from receiving therapy. We will review the risk data on beta-blockade and offer therapeutic strategies to help overcome residual barriers to the initiation and uptitration of this important therapy in patients with HF.

Diagnostic and therapeutic challenges in patients with coexistent chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and chronic heart failure

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and heart failure (CHF) are common conditions. The prevalence of COPD ranges from 20% to 30% in patients with CHF. The diagnosis of CHF can remain unsuspected in patients with COPD, because shortness of breath is attributed to COPD. Measurement of plasma B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP) levels helps to uncover unsuspected CHF in patients with COPD and clinical deterioration. Noninvasive assessment of cardiac function may be preferable to BNP to uncover unsuspected left ventricular (LV) systolic dysfunction in patients with stable COPD. Patients with COPD or CHF develop skeletal muscle alterations that are strikingly similar. Functional intolerance correlates with severity of skeletal muscle alterations but not with severity of pulmonary or cardiac impairment in COPD and CHF, respectively. Improvement of pulmonary or cardiac function does not translate into relief of functional intolerance in patients with COPD or CHF unless skeletal muscle alterations concomitantly regress. The mechanisms responsible for skeletal muscle alterations are incompletely understood in COPD and in CHF. Disuse and low-level systemic inflammation leading to protein synthesis/degradation imbalance are likely to contribute. The presence of COPD impacts on the treatment of CHF, as COPD is still viewed as a contraindication to beta-blockade. Therefore, COPD often deprives patients with CHF due to LV systolic dysfunction of the most beneficial pharmacologic intervention. A large body of data indicates that patients with COPD tolerate well selective beta-blockade that should not be denied to CHF patients with concomitant COPD.

The Effect of Perioperative β-blockade on the Pulmonary Function of Patients Undergoing Major Arterial Surgery

INTRODUCTION

Concern about the potential detrimental side-effects of beta-blockade on pulmonary function often dissuades against their perioperative use in patients undergoing major arterial surgery (especially in those with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD)). In this study we aimed to establish prospectively the clinical relevance of these concerns.

METHODS

After ethics committee approval and individual informed consent, the pulmonary function of twenty patients (mean age 68.7 years (range 43-82), 11 males) scheduled to undergo non-emergency major vascular surgery was studied by recording symptoms and spirometry before and after institution of effective beta-blockade. Fifteen patients (75%) had significant smoking histories (mean pack years/patient=50), while 12 (60%) had COPD.

RESULTS

All patients tolerated effective beta-blockade satisfactorily without developing either subjective deterioration in symptoms or significant change on spirometry. The mean change in FEV1 following adequate beta-blockade was 0.05+/-0.24 liters (95% CI -0.06 to +1.61), p=0.35, giving a mean percentage change of 3.18%+/-11.66 (95% CI -2.26 to 8.62).

CONCLUSIONS

Previously held concerns about worsening pulmonary function through the short-term use of beta-blockers should not dissuade their perioperative usage in patients with peripheral vascular disease. Furthermore, the accuracy of pulmonary function tests in preoperative assessment and risk stratification also appears unaffected by this therapy.