Analgesic and Hemodynamic Effects of a Single 7.5-mg Intravenous Dose of Morphine in Patients with Moderate-to-Severe Postoperative Pain

Optimal pain management for radical prostatectomy surgery: what is the evidence?

BACKGROUND

Increase in the diagnosis of prostate cancer has increased the incidence of radical prostatectomy. However, the literature assessing pain therapy for this procedure has not been systematically evaluated. Thus, optimal pain therapy for patients undergoing radical prostatectomy remains controversial.

METHODS

Medline, Embase, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials were searched for studies assessing the effects of analgesic and anesthetic interventions on pain after radical prostatectomy. All searches were conducted in October 2012 and updated in June 2015.

RESULTS

Most treatments studied improved pain relief and/or reduced opioid requirements. However, there were significant differences in the study designs and the variables evaluated, precluding quantitative analysis and consensus recommendations.

CONCLUSIONS

This systematic review reveals that there is a lack of evidence to develop an optimal pain management protocol in patients undergoing radical prostatectomy. Most studies assessed unimodal analgesic approaches rather than a multimodal technique. There is a need for more procedure-specific studies comparing pain and analgesic requirements for open and minimally invasive surgical procedures. Finally, while we wait for appropriate procedure specific evidence from publication of adequate studies assessing optimal pain management after radical prostatectomy, we propose a basic analgesic guideline.

Importance of sex to pain and its amelioration; relevance of spinal estrogens and its membrane receptors

Estrogens have a multitude of effects on opioid systems and are thought to play a key role in sexually dimorphic nociception and opioid antinociception. Heretofore, classical genomic actions of estrogens are largely thought to be responsible for the effects of these steroids on nociception and opioid antinociception. The recent discovery that estrogens can also activate estrogen receptors that are located in the plasma membrane, the effects of which are manifest in seconds to minutes instead of hours to days has revolutionized our thinking concerning the ways in which estrogens are likely to modulate pain responsiveness and the dynamic nature of that modulation. This review summarizes parameters of opioid functionality and nociception that are subject to modulation by estrogens, underscoring the added dimensions of such modulation that accrues from rapid membrane estrogen receptor signaling. Implications of this mode of signaling regarding putative sources of estrogens and its degradation are also discussed.

Formation of mu-/kappa-opioid receptor heterodimer is sex-dependent and mediates female-specific opioid analgesia

Sexually dimorphic nociception and opioid antinociception is very pervasive but poorly understood. We had demonstrated that spinal morphine antinociception in females, but not males, requires the concomitant activation of spinal μ- and κ-opioid receptors (MOR and KOR, respectively). This finding suggests an interrelationship between MOR and KOR in females that is not manifest in males. Here, we show that expression of a MOR/KOR heterodimer is vastly more prevalent in the spinal cord of proestrous vs. diestrous females and vs. males. Cross-linking experiments in combination with in vivo pharmacological analyses indicate that heterodimeric MOR/KOR utilizes spinal dynorphin 1-17 as a substrate and is likely to be the molecular transducer for the female-specific KOR component of spinal morphine antinociception. The activation of KOR within the heterodimeric MOR/KOR provides a mechanism for recruiting spinal KOR-mediated antinociception without activating the concomitant pronociceptive functions that monomeric KOR also subserves. Spinal cord MOR/KOR heterodimers represent a unique pharmacological target for female-specific pain control.

Do sex differences exist in opioid analgesia? A systematic review and meta-analysis of human experimental and clinical studies

Although a contribution of sex in opioid efficacy has garnered much attention, the confirmation and direction of any such difference remain elusive. We performed a systematic review of the available literature on sex differences in μ and mixed μ/κ opioid effect on acute and experimental pain. Fifty unique studies (including three unpublished studies) were included in the analyses. Across the 25 clinical studies on μ-opioids there was no significant sex-analgesia association. Restricting the analysis to patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) studies (irrespective of the opioid) yielded greater analgesia in women (n=15, effect size 0.22, 95% c.i. 0.02-0.42, P=0.028). Further restricting the analysis to PCA morphine studies yielded an even greater effect in women (n=11, effect size=0.36, 95% c.i. 0.17-0.56, P=0.003). Meta-regression indicated that the longer the duration of PCA, the difference in effect between the sexes further increased. Across experimental pain studies on μ-opioids women had greater antinociception from opioids (n=11, effect size=0.35; 95% c.i. 0.01-0.69, P=0.047), which was predominantly due to 6 morphine studies. Female patients had greater μ/κ opioid analgesia (n=7, effect size 0.84; 95% c.i. 0.25-1.43, P=0.005), but no sex-analgesia association was present in experimental studies (n=7). Sex differences exist in morphine-induced analgesia in both experimental pain studies and clinical PCA studies, with greater morphine efficacy in women. The data on non-morphine μ and mixed μ/κ-opioids are less convincing and require further study.

[Efficacy of a continuous infusion of local anesthetic into the surgical wound for pain relief after abdominal hysterectomy]

OBJECTIVE

To assess the quality of postoperative analgesia provided by intravenous administration of paracetamol and ketorolac plus morphine in bolus doses with or without continuous infusion of local anesthetic into the surgical wound after abdominal hysterectomy. Patient satisfaction was included among the outcomes assessed.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Prospective pilot study in ASA 1-2 patients randomized to 2 groups: women in the subcutaneous catheter group received intravenous analgesics plus a continuous infusion (2 mL/h) of 0.25% bupivacaine whereas women in the control group received only the intravenous analgesics. The outcome measures were pain intensity assessed on a verbal numerical scale at rest and with movement, morphine requirements in the first 48 hours after surgery, and complications related to the drugs used or the technique.

RESULTS

Twenty-six patients were enrolled; 10 were randomized to the catheter group and 16 to the control group. Statistically significant between-group differences in pain both at rest and with movement were found while the women were in the postoperative recovery unit. Postoperative pain with movement was also significantly different at 24 hours (P<.004) and 48 hours (P<.02). Similarly, mean (SD) morphine requirements in the recovery unit were significantly greater in the control group, at 8 (2.27) mg, compared with 3.20 (1.79) mg in the catheter group (P<.002). Walking began earlier in the catheter group. No differences were found in the incidences of complications.

CONCLUSIONS

Postoperative pain is effectively relieved by continuous infusion of local anesthetic into the surgical wound after abdominal hysterectomy. This technique provides good analgesia with less morphine consumption and scarce adverse effects. Patient satisfaction and the sense of receiving quality pain management are high.

Sex-specific responses to opiates: animal and human studies

It is widely reported that analgesic drugs acting at mu, kappa, and delta opioid-receptors display quantitative and qualitative differences in effect in males and females. These sex-related differences are not restricted to the analgesic/antinociceptive properties of opioids, but are also present in opioid-induced side effects, such as changes in respiration, locomotor activity, learning/memory, addiction, and changes in the cardiovascular system. An increasing number of well-controlled animal and human studies directly examining the issue of sex in the potency of opioids show that, although sex may affect opioid analgesia, the direction and magnitude of sex differences depend on many interacting variables. These include those specific to the drug itself, such as dose, pharmacology, and route and time of administration, and those particular to the subject, such as species, type of pain, genetics, age, and gonadal/hormonal status. In the current review, we systematically present these animal and human studies and discuss the data in relation to the depending variables. Although the observed sex differences in opioid effect may be clinically relevant, lack of knowledge on other factors involved in the large variability in patient opioid analgesic sensitivity should compel practitioners to customize their dosing regimens based on individual requirements.

Endogenous opiates and behavior: 2004

This paper is the 27th consecutive installment of the annual review of research concerning the endogenous opioid system, now spanning over 30 years of research. It summarizes papers published during 2004 that studied the behavioral effects of molecular, pharmacological and genetic manipulation of opioid peptides, opioid receptors, opioid agonists and opioid antagonists. The particular topics that continue to be covered include the molecular-biochemical effects and neurochemical localization studies of endogenous opioids and their receptors related to behavior, and the roles of these opioid peptides and receptors in pain and analgesia; stress and social status; tolerance and dependence; learning and memory; eating and drinking; alcohol and drugs of abuse; sexual activity and hormones, pregnancy, development and endocrinology; mental illness and mood; seizures and neurologic disorders; electrical-related activity and neurophysiology; general activity and locomotion; gastrointestinal, renal and hepatic functions; cardiovascular responses; respiration and thermoregulation; and immunological responses.