Management of acute decompensated heart failure: treatment, controversy, and future directions

Loop diuretic strategies in patients with acute decompensated heart failure: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

PURPOSE

The safety and efficacy of continuous infusion vs bolus injection of intravenous loop diuretics to treat acute decompensated heart failure were debated. Our aim is to compare the administration routes of diuretics in hospitalized patients with acute decompensated heart failure.

METHODS

A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials was performed to evaluate the effects of continuous infusion vs bolus administration of loop diuretics in patients with acute decompensated heart failure. The primary end points were urine outputs, body weight loss, all causes of mortality, and death from cardiovascular causes. Secondary end points were electrolyte imbalance, change in creatinine levels, tinnitus or hearing loss, and days of hospitalization.

RESULTS

Ten randomized controlled trials with 518 patients were identified. Continuous infusion of diuretics was associated with a significantly greater weight loss (weighted mean difference, 0.78; 95% confidence interval, 0.03-1.54) compared with bolus injection. Urine output, the incidence of electrolyte imbalance, change in creatinine level, length of hospitalization, the incidence of ototoxicity, cardiac mortality, and all-cause mortality showed no significant differences between the 2 groups.

CONCLUSION

Meta-analysis of the existing limited studies did not confirm any significant differences in the safety and efficacy with continuous administration of loop diuretic, compared with bolus injection in patients with acute decompensated heart failure.

Prolonged effects of B-type natriuretic peptide infusion on cardiac remodeling after sustained myocardial injury

B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP) is an established first-line therapy for acute decompensated heart failure (HF), but its efficacy in preventing left ventricular (LV) remodeling after myocardial injury is unknown. The goal of this study was to evaluate the effects of BNP therapy on remodeling after ischemic injury in an awake canine model. Dogs were chronically instrumented for hemodynamics. Ischemia was created by daily coronary embolization (Embo; 3.1 x 10(4) beads/day) for 3 wk; 60 min after the first embolization, BNP (100 ng x kg(-1) x min(-1); n = 6) or saline (control; n = 6) was continuously infused via a left atrial catheter for 3 wk. Hemodynamics and echocardiography were performed in an awake state at baseline, 3 wk after Embo + BNP infusion, and 4 wk after stopping Embo + BNP infusion. End-systolic elastance (E(es)) and LV change in pressure over time (dP/dt) were preserved throughout Embo + BNP therapy versus control therapy (E(es): 3.76 +/- 1.01 vs. 1.41 +/- 0.16 mmHg/ml; LV dP/dt: 2,417 +/- 96 vs. 2,068 +/- 95 mmHg/s; both P < 0.05 vs. control). LV end-diastolic dimension was significantly smaller in BNP-treated dogs compared with control dogs (4.29 +/- 0.10 vs. 4.77 +/- 0.17 cm), and ejection fraction was maintained in treated dogs vs. control dogs (53 +/- 1% vs. 46 +/- 2%) (both P < 0.05 vs. control). Cyclooxygenase (COX)-2 expression in terminal LV tissue was significantly reduced after BNP therapy. Treatment with continuous infusion of BNP preserved LV geometry, improved systolic function, and prevented the progression of systolic HF after persistent ischemic injury.

Classical inotropes and new cardiac enhancers

Acute heat failure syndromes are a heterogenous group of conditions. Chronic heart failure exacerbations represent the vast majority of cases. Pathophysiologic mechanisms, such as hypotension with peripheral tissue hypoperfusion, renal function impairment and myocardial ischemia and injury, adversely affect patients' clinical outcome. Classical inotropes, such as beta-agonists (dobutamine, dopamine) and phosphodiesterase inhibitors (milrinone), seem to improve clinical symptoms and hemodynamics of acutely decompensated chronic heat failure patients, but they have been associated with increased long-term mortality. Thus, on the basis of the available evidence, these agents can be used only as a temporary treatment of acute heart failure exacerbations with stringent criteria (ESC AHF guidelines), resistant to intravenous vasodilators and/or diuretics when systolic blood pressure (SBP) is >100 mmHg or as a first-line treatment in patients with worsening of chronic cardiac failure and low SBP (<100 mmHg). The calcium sensitizer levosimendan is a new cardiac enhancer that seems to be more effective than classical inotropes in improving cardiac mechanical efficiency and reducing congestion, without causing cardiomyocyte death or increasing myocardial oxygen uptake. Recent randomized trials showed that levosimendan is not superior to placebo or dobutamine in improving 1- and 6-month mortality, although it caused a greater reduction of neurohormonal response. More data are needed regarding patient selection and the optimum regimen and dosing of levosimendan before this treatment modality become the first line therapy of acutely decompensated chronic heart failure patients.