Safety of topical calcineurin inhibitors for the treatment of atopic dermatitis

Topical Tacrolimus and Mycophenolic Acid Therapy Synergizes with Low Dose Systemic Immunosuppression to Sustain Vascularized Composite Allograft Survival

AIM

The goal of this study was to evaluate whether topical administration of tacrolimus (TAC) and mycophenolic acid (MPA) at the transplant site enables vascularized composite allograft (VCA) survival with significant minimization of the dose and adverse effects of systemic TAC (STAC) immunosuppression.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Lewis (Lew) rats received orthotopic hind limb allotransplants from fully mismatched Brown Norway (BN) donors. Group 1 (Controls) received no treatment. Other groups were treated with STAC at a dose of 1 mg/kg/day for 7 days. On post-operative day (POD) 8, the STAC dose was dropped to 0.1 mg/kg/day for Group 2 and maintained at 1 mg/kg for Group 3. Group 4 received topical application of TAC and MPA on the transplanted (Tx) limb starting POD 8 without STAC. Group 5 received topical TAC and MPA on the contralateral non-Tx limb and Group 6 received topical TAC and MPA on the Tx limb starting POD 8 along with low dose STAC (0.1 mg/kg/day). Treatment was continued until the study end point was reached, defined as either grade 3 rejection or allograft survival exceeding 100 days. .We conducted sequential LC-MS/MS measurements to assess TAC and MPA concentrations in both blood/plasma and allograft tissues. Additionally, we evaluated markers indicative of organ toxicity associated with STAC immunosuppression.

RESULTS

Compared to controls, topical therapy with TAC+MPA significantly prolonged allograft survival beyond 100 daysat very low dose STAC (0.1 mg/kg/day) (Group 6). The histopathological assessment of the grafts was consistent with the clinical outcomes. .Drug levels in blood/plasma remained low or undetectable, while allograft tissues showed higher drug concentrations compared to contralateral limb tissues (P<0.05). . Urinary creatinine clearance remained within the normal range at 2.5 mL/min.

CONCLUSION

Combination therapy with topical TAC and MPA synergizes with a very low dose, corticosteroid- free-STAC regimen and facilitates rejection-free, prolonged VCA survival without morbidity.

Prescription Patterns of Topical Medications in Patients with Atopic Dermatitis: An Investigative Review Using Big Data from the National Health Insurance Corporation

BACKGROUND

Topical medications play a crucial role in the treatment of atopic dermatitis (AD). Topical corticosteroids (TCSs) remain the main treatment of choice and topical antibiotics have also been used. However, with the new topical calcineurin inhibitors (TCIs), the prescription patterns of topical agents have changed over time.

OBJECTIVE

To characterize the prescription patterns of topical medications in Korean patients with AD.

METHODS

We investigated topical medications prescribed to Korean patients with AD using the National Health Insurance Sharing System (NHISS) database over a 14-year period (2002~2015). Additionally, the potency of prescribed TCSs was compared with AD and psoriasis patients.

RESULTS

The annual prescription of TCSs showed a slightly decreasing trend without significant change. In particular, in terms of steroid class, prescription of moderate-to-low potency TCSs were increased and the use of high potency TCSs were decreased. TCSs were the most commonly prescribed topical medications for AD. Tertiary hospitals had a higher prescription rate for TCIs than secondary or primary hospitals (16.2%, 3.1%, and 1.9%, respectively). Additionally, dermatologists prescribed TCIs more frequently than pediatricians and internists (4.3%, 1.2%, and 0.6%, respectively). Among TCSs, Class 5 was prescribed the most (40.6%) followed by Class 7, 6, 4, 3, 1, and 2. When we compared the potency of TCSs prescribed for AD with psoriasis patients, moderate-to-low-potency TCSs were more commonly prescribed in AD.

CONCLUSION

Prescription patterns of topical medications had changed from 2002 to 2015 and differed according to the type of institution and specialty of the physician.

Sex differences in the pharmacology of itch therapies-a narrative review

BACKGROUND

Chronic itch is the most common skin-related condition, associated with a high psychosocial and economic burden. In recent years, increasing evidence of sex differences in the perception, clinical presentation and treatment requirements of itch points towards potential benefits when using sex-adapted therapies. It is well-known that body composition, absorption, metabolism, elimination and adverse drug reactions (ADRs) differ between sexes, but only little is known about the impact of sex in the pharmacology of itch treatments, which could help to rationalise sex-adapted treatment strategies.

AIM

To evaluate and review sex effects in the pharmacokinetics and /-dynamics of drugs used to treat itch.

METHODS

In this narrative review we performed a PubMed and MEDLINE (Ovid) search using the terms (itch OR pruritus) AND (gender OR sex) AND (drug OR medication OR pharmacokinetics OR pharmacodynamics). Additional searches were performed for the topical and systemic drugs recommended by the European Guideline on Chronic Pruritus.

RESULTS

We found numerous reports with variable levels of evidence of sex effects with respect to the pharmacokinetics and/or pharmacodynamics of 14 drug classes used for the treatment of itch, including a total of 19 systemic and 3 topical drugs. Women seem to present higher plasma levels of several drugs used in itch treatment, including tri- and tetracyclic antidepressants (e.g. doxepin, amitriptyline, mirtazapine), serotonin reuptake inhibitors (e.g. paroxetine, sertraline, fluoxetine), immunosuppressive drugs (e.g. cyclosporine, mycophenolate mofetil), serotonin receptor antagonists (e.g. ondansetron) and betablockers (e.g. propranolol). Adverse drug reactions (ADRs) were generally more common in women. Being female was reported to be an independent risk factor for QTc-prolongation associated with antihistamines and tetracyclic antidepressants. Additionally, women seem to be more prone to sedative effects of antihistamines, and to suffer from a higher frequency as well as severity of side effects with systemic calcineurin inhibitors, opioid agonists, and opioid antagonists. Women were also sensitised more often to topically applied drugs. Of note, apart from only one experimental study with capsaicin, none of these reports were designed specifically to assess the effect of sex (and gender) in the treatment of itch.

DISCUSSION/CONCLUSION

Our review supports previous reports that sex is of importance in the pharmacokinetics and /-dynamics of several drugs used to treat itch although those drugs were mostly evaluated for non-itch indications. However, the results are limited by methodological limitations evident in most studies such as underrepresentation of women in clinical trials. This emphasises the need to study the impact of sex (and gender) in future itch trials to yield better outcomes and prevent ADRs in both sexes.

Comparison of anti-atopic dermatitis activities between DHMEQ and tacrolimus ointments in mouse model without stratum corneum

This study is aimed to further investigate the anti-atopic dermatitis (AD) activities of dehydroxymethylepoxyquinomicin (DHMEQ) ointment and compare its effect with that of tacrolimus ointment based on the previous study that DHMEQ improves AD-like lesions. AD were induced by 2,4-dinitroclilorobenzene/oxazolone (DNCB/OX) repeatedly on the ears of BABL/C mice while medical tape was additionally used to disrupt stratum corneum in order to exacerbate the lesions. The mice were randomly divided into groups, which are normal, vehicle, DHMEQ (0.1%) and tacrolimus (0.1%). Those in the last two groups were externally applied with DHMEQ ointment and tacrolimus ointment, respectively. The results showed that both of them significantly improved dermatitis symptoms of DNCB/OX-induced AD-like lesions, such as redness, itching, weeping, scaling and thickening of the skin, while reducing epidermis thickness, dermis thickness and the number of mast cells as well, which were examined histopathologically. In contrast with DHMEQ, tacrolimus led to a significant decrease in body weight after long-term application. Both DHMEQ and tacrolimus suppress DNCB-induced increase of serum total IgE and attenuate expression of inflammatory factors IL-4, IL-6, IL-13, IL-1β and interferon (IFN)-γ in the disrupted ear tissues. On the other hand, the mice applied with tacrolimus became obviously irritable, jumping up and down, and inflammatory exudation on the lesioned-skin surface of the mice was remarkably observed. Contrary to the side effects made by tacrolimus, DHMEQ didn't cause any adverse stimulus response. As a conclusion, DHMEQ is safer, milder and more suitable for long-term use than tacrolimus for the treatment of AD-like lesions.

Topical agents for the treatment of atopic dermatitis

INTRODUCTION

Atopic dermatitis (AD) is perhaps the most common inflammatory skin disorder worldwide, with an increasing incidence in developed countries. The mainstay treatment for patients with AD is topical therapies, which are used not only by the mild patients but also by the moderate-to-severe patients, in conjunction with systemic treatment. While topical steroids and calcineurin antagonists are widely used, these are associated with long-term cutaneous adverse effects (AEs) or a black box warning, preventing their chronic use. Areas covered: The aim of this review is to provide a comprehensive overview of new and upcoming topical therapies currently in development and undergoing clinical trials, as well as their safety and efficacy profiles, and discuss current topicals used in the management of AD. Expert opinion: AD is a heterogeneous disease with complex pathophysiology. Treatments available to date for AD provide disease control; however, patients struggle to find an optimized therapeutic regimen they may use long term and without severe effects. Novel therapies are currently under investigation, with the hope of shifting the paradigm of AD management from symptom control to disease eradication.

Review of Atopic Dermatitis and Topical Therapies

Atopic dermatitis is one of the most common skin disorders in the developed world, affecting up to 20% of children and 1% to 3% of adults. This review concisely explains the pathophysiology and epidemiology of atopic dermatitis, as well as potential challenges facing its successful treatment. Furthermore, mainstay topical treatment modalities are evaluated, such as emollients, topical corticosteroids, and topical calcineurin inhibitors. The use of topical corticosteroids and topical calcineurin inhibitors in combination is discussed, as studies have indicated encouraging results. The proactive use of topical corticosteroids and topical calcineurin inhibitors is also investigated, in order to bring attention to a new possibility in long-term management of atopic dermatitis. Last, new and upcoming topical medications are described, including Janus kinase inhibitors, phosphodiesterase-4 inhibitors, and benvitimod. Although topical corticosteroids and topical calcineurin inhibitors can be very effective in the treatment of atopic dermatitis, it is important that practitioners are aware of mechanistically unique and new treatments for patients for whom more traditional topical therapies have failed. Overall, this review article hopes to serve as a comprehensive overview of currently available topical treatments for atopic dermatitis, while shedding light on new treatments coming in the future.

15 year experience of tacrolimus application in medical practice

The review presents modern literature data on the use of tacrolimus in medical practice. The results of national and international research on the effectiveness and safety of the drug at various dermatoses are presented.

Systematic review of published trials: long-term safety of topical corticosteroids and topical calcineurin inhibitors in pediatric patients with atopic dermatitis

BACKGROUND

Many clinicians have concerns about the safety of atopic dermatitis (AD) treatments, particularly in children requiring long-term daily maintenance therapy. Topical corticosteroids (TCS) have been widely used for >5 decades. Long-term TCS monotherapy has been associated with adverse cutaneous effects including atrophy, rebound flares, and increased percutaneous absorption with potential for adverse systemic effects. Topical calcineurin inhibitors (TCIs), tacrolimus and pimecrolimus, available for 1-2 decades, are not associated with atrophy or increased percutaneous absorption after prolonged use and have much lower potential for systemic effects. However, since 2006 TCIs have carried a controversial Boxed Warning based on a theoretical risk of malignancy (eg, skin and lymphoma) that has limited TCI use for standard-of-care maintenance therapy.

METHODS

A comparative systematic search of PubMed was done for long-term (≥12 week) clinical trials of TCS or TCI treatment in patients <12 years with AD. Citations were reviewed for inclusion based on MeSH terms, abstracts, and relevant article text. Studies were excluded if they did not encompass subjects <12 years, or were <12 weeks' duration, retrospective, meta-analyses, or limited to anecdotal case reports.

RESULTS

Of 27 trials meeting criteria, 21 included 5825 pediatric patients treated with TCIs, and 6 included 1999 patients treated with TCS. TCS studies were limited to low- to mid-potency products, and all but one study lacked a vehicle control. Eight TCI studies were vehicle-controlled, and safety data were well reported, with ≤5 % of patients reporting discontinuation due to adverse effects (DAEs). Cutaneous and systemic adverse events (AEs) were similar in TCI and vehicle groups, with no reports of lymphoma. Safety data in TCS trials were less well reported. DAE incidence was addressed in just 2 trials, and systemic and cutaneous AEs were mostly unreported.

CONCLUSIONS

Data supporting long-term use of TCIs are robust, documenting safety and efficacy, while data supporting long-term TCS use are limited to low- to mid-potency products. Our review identifies a lack of information on the safety of commonly prescribed, long-term monotherapy with mid- to high-potency TCS in pediatric AD, and supports standard-of-care maintenance therapy with TCIs and intermittent use of low- to mid-potency TCS for flares.

Off-label prescribing for allergic diseases in pre-school children

BACKGROUND

Several studies have demonstrated that medication is commonly used off-label in children with allergic diseases. The aim of this study was to characterise off-label use of prescriptions for allergic diseases in pre-school children from an allergology outpatient unit.

METHODS

The clinical files of children aged ≤ 6 years seen in a reference allergology consultation with asthma, allergic rhinitis, and/or atopic eczema were reviewed. A total of 500 patients were consecutively observed from January to June 2012. The data collected included gender, age, diagnosis, and prescriptions with the respective daily dosage.

RESULTS

A total of 1224 prescriptions were registered. The most prescribed medications were oral antihistamines (34.6%), antileukotrienes (22.6%), topical nasal corticosteroids (20.3%), and inhaled corticosteroids (17.7%). From all prescriptions, 422 (34.5%) were considered off-label for age (62.6%), dosage (31.7%), or clinical indication (5.7%). Off-label use was more frequent in children aged <2 years, with 73.5% prescribed for children of this age.

CONCLUSIONS

Off-label use of drugs for the treatment of paediatric allergic diseases is high. However, these prescriptions are not necessarily wrong, and are recommended in many guidelines. Randomised controlled studies are limited by methodological difficulties creating the need for more observational studies in order to further evaluate the safety and efficacy of drugs used in children.

Atopic dermatitis: a review of topical treatment options

BACKGROUND

Atopic dermatitis (AD) is a chronic, pruritic, inflammatory skin disease with a wide range of severity, and is usually the first manifestation of atopic disease. It is one of the most common skin disorders in developed countries, affecting approximately 20% of children and 1-3% of adults. Symptoms such as eczematous papules, plaques, and itch, and their associated consequences, such as sleep disturbance, can significantly impact the quality of life of the patient and family.

SCOPE

This is a broad-based review focusing on clinical practice for primary care physicians treating patients with AD. The PubMed database was searched (to 1 November 2008) for English-language articles containing the keywords atopic dermatitis, atopic eczema, topical calcineurin inhibitor, tacrolimus, pimecrolimus, or corticosteroid. Articles focusing on clinical practice for patients with AD were chosen for further review. A limitation is that this is not a systematic review of the literature.

FINDINGS

Emollients have long been used to maintain the skin barrier function in patients with AD. Topical corticosteroids have been the pillar of medicated therapy for AD since their introduction nearly 50 years ago. The introduction of topical calcineurin inhibitors more than 8 years ago represented the first new class of medication approved for the treatment of AD since topical corticosteroids. Topical calcineurin inhibitors provide targeted anti-inflammatory activity without the local or systemic side-effects seen with topical corticosteroids. More recently, three new, nonsteroidal, barrier creams (Atopiclair * , Mimyx dagger , and Epiceram double dagger ) have entered the marketplace for AD treatment. A multi-therapeutic approach that incorporates short-term management of flares and longer-term strategies to prolong the time between flares is needed for the treatment of AD.

CONCLUSION

Multiple topical therapies have been successfully used to treat patients with AD. An understanding of the available treatment options will help primary care providers striving to achieve best practice in the management of AD.

Daily topical tacrolimus therapy prevents skin rejection in a rodent hind limb allograft model

BACKGROUND

Skin is the most immunogenic component of a composite tissue allograft. Topical immunotherapy is an attractive therapeutic modality with which to provide local immunosuppression, with minimal systemic toxicity. The present study was performed to investigate the potential of topical tacrolimus to prolong survival of the skin component of a composite tissue allograft.

METHODS

Wistar Furth-to-Lewis rat orthotopic hind limb transplants were performed. Group I consisted of rats treated with topical tacrolimus; group II, antilymphocyte serum plus 21 days cyclosporine; and group III, antilymphocyte serum plus 21 days of cyclosporine plus topical tacrolimus. In group IV, tacrolimus levels in blood, skin, and muscle were measured in an autograft control group.

RESULTS

All animals in group I (n = 8) developed grade III clinical rejection by postoperative day 9. In group II (n = 9), the median onset of grade III rejection was postoperative day 40 (range, postoperative days 34 to 44). In group III (n = 6), two animals developed focal grade III rejection on postoperative days 35 and 56. The remaining four animals reached the 100-day endpoint without grade III rejection. In group IV, tacrolimus levels were low or undetectable in blood, whereas skin levels were 100-fold higher than underlying muscle.

CONCLUSIONS

Topical tacrolimus therapy has the potential to prevent skin rejection in a composite tissue allograft. Preoperative depletion of T cells with antilymphocyte serum, along with a short course of systemic immunosuppression, prevents acute rejection, whereas topical tacrolimus inhibits immune cell function in the skin. Concentrations of tacrolimus are substantially higher in skin compared with underlying muscle and peripheral blood. Topical immunotherapy could reduce the morbidity associated with systemic immunosuppression in clinical composite tissue allografts.

Skin problems in chronic kidney disease

Skin disorders associated with chronic kidney disease (CKD) can markedly affect a patient's quality of life and can negatively impact their mental and physical health. Uremic pruritus, which is frequently encountered in patients with CKD, is considered to be an inflammatory systemic disease rather than a local skin disorder. Biomarkers of inflammation are increased in patients with uremic pruritus and an imbalance of the endogenous opioidergic system might be involved in the complex pathogenesis of the disease. Treatment options for uremic pruritus include emollients, topical capsaicin cream, ultraviolet B phototherapy, gabapentin, oral activated charcoal and nalfurafine, a kappa-opioid-receptor agonist. Calcific uremic arteriolopathy is triggered by an imbalance of promoters and inhibitors of vascular calcification, caused by the inflammatory changes that occur in uremia. Promising therapeutic strategies for calcific uremic arteriolopathy include bisphosphonates and intravenous sodium thiosulfate. Nephrogenic systemic fibrosis is a devastating condition associated with the use of gadolinium-based contrast agents in patients with CKD. At present, no therapies are available for this complication. Preventive measures include use of iodine-based contrast agents, particularly in patients with CKD stage 4 and 5. If gadolinium contrast is necessary, administration of low volumes of the more stable macrocyclic ionic types of gadolinium-based contrast agent is advocated. Hemodialysis following gadolinium exposure might offer benefits but evidence is lacking.

Atopic dermatitis: a review of recent advances in the field

Atopic dermatitis is increasing in prevalence and currently affects 15–30% of children in urban areas. Immune dysregulation and an impaired epidermal barrier are important factors in the pathogenesis of this disease. Pruritus and a chronic relapsing remitting course are hallmarks of the disorder, and sleep disturbance can occur in both the patient and family. Preventive interventions include exclusive breastfeeding in the first 4 months of life and withholding solid foods for 6 months. The avoidance of irritants and the use of emollients decrease flares. Topical corticosteroids remain the mainstay of therapy, and should be judiciously utilized. Excessive and inappropriate use must be avoided, as well as ‘steroid phobia’. The topical calcineurin inhibitors can be useful adjuncts. Systemic therapies are available for severe disease, but carry risks of adverse effects.