Effect of acetaminophen on international normalized ratio in patients receiving warfarin therapy

Plasma Concentration of Taurine Changes following Acetaminophen Overdose in Male Patients during Hospitalization

Changes in plasma concentration of taurine during hospitalization of acetaminophen poisoned patients have not been studied. Hepatotoxicity is a common consequence of acetaminophen overdose that may lead to acute liver failure. Numerous biomarkers for drug-induced liver injury have been explored. All biomarkers are usually obtainable 48 h following acetaminophen overdose. We have already introduced taurine as a non-specific early biomarker of acetaminophen overdose. This study aimed to follow up changes in plasma concentration of taurine during the first three days of acetaminophen overdose. Sixty-four male patients suffering from acetaminophen overdose were selected for the study. Four blood samples were taken from the patients every 12 h. Sixty blood samples were also taken from sixty healthy humans. The plasma concentration of taurine in both groups was analyzed an already developed HPLC method. Analysis of regression showed a significant correlation between means of plasma concentrations of taurine and acetaminophen, aspartate aminotransferase, Alanine aminotransferase, glutathione peroxidase, and prothrombin time during hospitalization. The high plasma concentration of taurine, 6 h or more after acetaminophen overdose, could be a useful early indicator of liver damage.

[Aspects of multimodal pain therapy in old age]

Chronic pain in older adults should be explained and treated on the basis of the biopsychosocial model. With its interdisciplinary and interprofessional approach, multimodal pain therapy is the method of choice. In old age freedom from pain is usually not the primary goal. It is more important to restore the quality of life of those affected and to maintain independence and autonomy with a versatile treatment offer. This article explains the basics of multimodal pain therapy and its special features in old age.

Potential drug-drug interactions in paediatric outpatient prescriptions in Nigeria and implications for the future

BACKGROUND

Information regarding the incidence of drug-drug interactions (DDIs) and adverse drug events (ADEs) among paediatric patients in Nigeria is limited.

METHODS

Prospective clinical audit among paediatric outpatients in four general hospitals in Nigeria over a 3-month period. Details of ADEs documented in case files was extracted.

RESULTS

Among 1233 eligible patients, 208 (16.9%) received prescriptions with at least one potential DDI. Seven drug classes were implicated with antimalarial combination therapies predominating. Exposure mostly to a single potential DDI, commonly involved promethazine, artemether/lumefantrine, ciprofloxacin and artemether/lumefantrine. Exposure mostly to major and serious, and moderate and clinically significant, potential DDIs. Overall exposure similar across all age groups and across genders. A significant association was seen between severity of potential DDIs and age. Only 48 (23.1%) of these patients presented at follow-up clinics with only 15 reporting ADEs.

CONCLUSION

There was exposure to potential DDIs in this population. However, potential DDIs were associated with only a few reported ADEs.

Prevalence of Drug Combinations Increasing Bleeding Risk Among Warfarin Users With and Without Alzheimer's Disease

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to analyse the prevalence and predictors of drug combinations increasing bleeding risk among warfarin users with and without Alzheimer's disease (AD).

METHODS

This retrospective observational study utilised data from the Finnish MEDALZ-2005 cohort. The MEDALZ-2005 study included all community-dwelling persons with a clinically verified diagnosis of AD at the end of 2005, and one comparison person without AD for each case. Data on drug use was collected from the Prescription Register. We included persons who were warfarin users during the study period 2006-2009. Drug combinations increasing bleeding risk with warfarin included selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs), non-steroidal anti-inflammatory agents (NSAIDs), other antithrombotic drugs and tramadol. Factors associated with combination use were investigated with logistic regression.

RESULTS

During the follow-up, 3385 persons with AD and 4830 persons without AD used warfarin. Drug combinations increasing bleeding risk were more common in warfarin users with AD than without AD [35.9 and 30.5%, respectively (p < 0.0001)]. The most common combination was SSRIs and warfarin, which was more common among persons with AD (23.8%) than among persons without AD (10.9%). NSAIDs and warfarin combination was more common among persons without AD. Combination use was associated with AD, female gender, younger age, diabetes mellitus, rheumatoid arthritis and asthma/chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD).

CONCLUSIONS

Use of drug combinations increasing bleeding risk was more common among warfarin users with AD. Special attention should be paid to minimise the duration of concomitant use and to find safer alternatives without increased bleeding risk.

Safety and efficacy of paracetamol and NSAIDs in osteoarthritis: which drug to recommend?

INTRODUCTION

Osteoarthritis (OA) is the most common form of arthritis and is a major cause of disability, especially in people ≥ 45 years old. Several international societies recommend the use of both acetaminophen and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) to alleviate OA pain. However, patients with OA often have comorbidities, notably cardiovascular risk factors, which may hamper the use of these analgesics.

AREAS COVERED

This paper reviews the safety of both acetaminophen and NSAIDs in OA. Recent data have pointed to a gastrointestinal and cardiovascular toxicity of acetaminophen, which has been neglected for a long time. In addition, several meta-analyses revealed that acetaminophen is a poor analgesic in OA. Traditional NSAIDs and cyclooxygenase 2 inhibitors (coxibs) have similar analgesic effects but vary greatly in their potential gastrointestinal and cardiovascular toxicity.

EXPERT OPINION

Given the putative gastrointestinal and cardiovascular toxicity and poor analgesic properties of acetaminophen in OA, its use in patients with risk factors is questionable. Acetaminophen should be used at the lowest effective dosage and for the shortest time in all OA patients. Given the different safety profiles, the choice of NSAIDs, traditional or coxibs, should be based on individual patient risk factors. A good knowledge of the different strategies to decrease the gastrointestinal and cardiovascular toxic effects of NSAIDs is key to the management of OA.

Describing the profile of patients on concurrent rifampin and warfarin therapy in western Kenya: a case series

Background

Rifampicin’s ability to induce hepatic enzymes is responsible for causing a clinically significant drug interaction with warfarin. Little data exists to guide clinicians on managing this interaction, especially in Sub-Saharan Africa where many patients are exposed to this combination due to a higher burden of tuberculosis.

Objective

The objective of the case series is to provide insight to practicing clinicians of the unique dynamics of this drug interaction in resource-constrained settings. The case series will provide details on commonly encountered scenarios and the dosage adjustments required to maintain a therapeutic INR.

Methods

A retrospective chart review was conducted of patients attending the Moi Teaching and Referral Hospital anticoagulation clinic in Eldoret, Kenya. Patients were included if they had a history of concurrent rifampicin and warfarin therapy and a minimum follow up of 2 months. Descriptive statistics were used to explain the demographic characteristics, time to therapeutic INR and average weekly warfarin dose. The inference on proportions test was conducted to compare the time in the therapeutic range (TTR) for patients on concurrent rifampicin to the rest of the patients not receiving rifampicin in the clinic.

Results

Of the 350 patient charts evaluated, 10 met the inclusion criteria. The median percentage increase of the weekly warfarin dose from baseline was 15.7 %. For the patients in this analysis, the median TTR was 47 %.

Discussion

Patients on concurrent therapy should be rigorously monitored with regular INR checks and warfarin dosage adjustments. Empiric dosage adjustments of warfarin should be avoided but patient characteristics can aid in understanding the alterations seen in INR.

Antithrombotic drugs: pharmacology and implications for dental practice

Appropriate preoperative assessment of the dental patient should always include an analysis of the patient's medications. This article reviews the actions and indications for the various categories of antithrombotic medications and considers actual risks for postoperative bleeding and potential interactions with drugs the dental provider might administer or prescribe.

Identification and weighting of the most critical "real-life" drug-drug interactions with acenocoumarol in a tertiary care hospital

PURPOSE

The objective of this study was to identify the most clinically relevant drug-drug interactions (DDIs) at risk of affecting acenocoumarol safety in our tertiary care university hospital, a 2,000 bed institution.

METHODS

We identified DDIs occurring with acenocoumarol by combining two different sources of information: a 1-year retrospective analysis of acenocoumarol prescriptions and comedications from our Computerized Physician Order Entry (CPOE) system (n = 2,439 hospitalizations) and a retrospective study of clinical pharmacology consultations involving acenocoumarol over the past 14 years (1994-2007) (n = 407). We classified these DDIs using an original risk-analysis method. A criticality index was calculated for each associated drug by multiplying three scores based on mechanism of interaction, involvement in a supratherapeutic international normalized ratio (INR) (≥ 6) and involvement in a severe bleeding.

RESULTS

One hundred and twenty-six DDIs were identified and weighted. Twenty-eight drugs had a criticality index ≥ 20 and were therefore considered at high risk for interacting with acenocoumarol by increasing its effect: 75% of these drugs involved a pharmacokinetic mechanism and 14 % a pharmacodynamic mechanism. An unknown mechanism of interaction was involved in 11 % of drugs.

CONCLUSION

Twenty-eight specific drugs were identified as being at high risk for interacting with acenocoumarol in our hospital using an original risk-analysis method. Most analyzed drugs interact with acenocoumarol via a pharmacokinetic mechanism. Actions such as the implementation of alerts in our CPOE system should be specifically developed for these drugs.