Craniofacial and Pharyngeal Cephalometric Morphology in Seven-Year-Old Boys with Unoperated Submucous Cleft Palate and without a Cleft

Cephalometric Pharyngeal Morphology in Adults with Unoperated Cleft Palate

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to cephalometrically evaluate the pharyngeal morphology in adults with unoperated Submucous Cleft Palate (SMCP), adults with unoperated Overt Cleft Palate (OCP), and adults without clefts.

DESIGN

This study employed a retrospective cross-sectional design. Lateral cephalometric radiography was performed on three groups of adults: 1) 29 with unrepaired SMCP; 2) 41 with unrepaired OCP; and 3) 39 without clefts, who served as controls. One-way ANOVA and rank-sum tests were used for intergroup comparisons. P value was set at .05.

RESULTS

The soft palate length and the ratio of soft palate length to pharyngeal depth were significantly lower in subjects with unoperated SMCP and OCP than in non-cleft controls. Significant differences were also observed in pharyngeal depth, nasopharyngeal depth, and posterior pharyngeal wall thickness between subjects with unoperated OCP and non-cleft controls.

CONCLUSIONS

Pharyngeal morphology differs significantly between individuals with and without clefts, particularly in soft palate length and the ratio of soft palate length to pharyngeal depth.

A retrospective cephalometric study on the craniofacial morphology of adult patients with unoperated submucous cleft palate

This retrospective cross-sectional study reviewed adult patients with unrepaired SMCP, OCP and normal control and performed comprehensive skeletal and soft tissue morphological analyses basing on lateral cephalometric radiographs. One way-ANOVA and rank-sum tests detected potential intergroup differences. 32 subjects with unrepaired SMCP, 42 with unrepaired OCP and 28 noncleft normal controls were enrolled. Both the SMCP and OCP groups were significantly different from the normal controls in sagittal maxillary length, jaw relationship, facial profile angle, nasal base and nasal tip prominence, upper lip position, and lower lip protrusion. S-N-A angle in the control group (82.25 ± 2.74°) was significantly greater than in the SMCP (77.96 ± 4.05°, p<0.001) and OCP (78.55 ± 2.93°, p<0.001) groups. Nasolabial angle in the control group (99.18 ± 8.76°) was significantly greater than in the SMCP (91.75 ± 8.93°, p = 0.002) and OCP (93.69 ± 7.24°, p = 0.020) groups. No significant difference was detected between the SMCP and the OCP group in other measurements except upper facial height. Within the limitations of the study it seems that craniofacial growth is impaired in patients with submucous clefts to the same extent as in patients with a conventional cleft palate.

Craniofacial Cephalometric Morphology in Caucasian Adult Patients with Cleft Palate Only (CPO)

Orofacial clefts are common birth defects that affect the morphology of the skull. Cleft palate only (CPO) has a different etiology than other types of clefts, and craniofacial morphology in CPO differs from that of UCLP and BCLP. The long-term effect of the cleft and its surgery is visible after growth cessation. However, few studies exist describing cephalometric craniofacial morphology in adults with CPO. The aim of the present study was to describe the cephalometric craniofacial morphology of adult patients with CPO compared to healthy patients. The study included analysis of cephalometric lateral headfilms of 28 adults with CPO and 28 healthy subjects. It was found that the angles of SNA, ANB, 1-:NB angle (°) and Wits appraisal were significantly smaller in CPO, whereas NL-NSL (°), 1+:NA angle (°) and 1+:NA (mm) had significantly higher values in CPO compared to the control group. It has been concluded that CPO in adult patients is characterized by a sagittal jaw discrepancy due to maxillary deficiency, with a tendency for compensatory inclination of the upper and lower incisors.

Three-Dimensional Computed Tomography Analysis of Pharynx in Juvenile Patients With Unrepaired Isolated Cleft Palate

Previous research showed that pharynx in adult patients with unrepaired isolated cleft palate (UICP) significantly enlarged. However, the literature lacks studies in juvenile patients. Thus, this study aimed to conduct a 3-dimensional evaluation of pharynx in juvenile patients with UICP using cone beam computed tomography. Cone beam computed tomography images of 58 nonsyndromic patients with UICP and 60 noncleft controls aged from 4 to 13 years were acquired. Both patients and controls were divided into 3 groups according to their ages. Image processing and analyses were performed using Mimics and ZWCAD. Linear, angular, planar, and volumetric measurements and comparisons were made. Statistical analyses comparing patients with controls were performed using independent-samples t test, with the threshold of significance set at P = 0.05. Results showed that, in all age groups, anterior height (P = 0.002, P = 0.004, P = 0.004) and length of the floor (P = 0.023, P = 0.000, P = 0.024) of bony nasopharynx; transverse (P = 0.028, P = 0.031, P = 0.043) and posteroanterior (P = 0.000, P = 0.000, P = 0.000) diameters of pharyngeal airway at palatal plane; cross-sectional area of pharyngeal airway at palatal plane (P = 0.006, P = 0.001, P = 0.001); total volume (P = 0.005, P = 0.003, P = 0.038), volume above palatal plane (P = 0.001, P = 0.000, P = 0.005), and volume between palatal plane and C2 plane (P = 0.047, P = 0.025, P = 0.048) were larger in UICP patients. Based on this study, the authors can conclude that pharynx in juvenile UICP patients around the palatal plane was significantly enlarged, and narrowing of velopharyngeal orifice in palatoplasty was seemed important.

Facial growth in patients with isolated cleft palate treated with minimal incision technique compared to a normal population-a cephalometric study at 10 and 16 years of age

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the result of a novel palatoplasty (minimal incision technique) for closure of an isolated cleft palate (ICP) at 10 and 16 years of age, concerning facial growth, compared to a normal population.

SUBJECTS

Treated group: 55 non-syndromic Caucasian children born with an ICP between 1987 and 2001. The children were treated surgically with a one-stage palatoplasty at a mean age of 13 months. Control group: 110 Caucasian children with normal occlusion with no history of clefts or orthodontic intervention.

METHOD

The treated children (25 boys, 30 girls) were matched (gender and age) with the children in the control group. A retrospective evaluation at 10 (mean 10.5) and 16 (mean 16.0) years of age was performed by analysis of lateral cephalograms. Fifteen variables were evaluated. Ninety-nine per cent confidence intervals were calculated. Two-way factorial ANOVA and mixed-model analysis were performed.

RESULTS

Treated patients compared to the control group showed: at 10 years of age, smaller mandible (P = 0.001) and reduced posterior upper and total face heights (P ≤ 0.001); at 10 and 16 years of age, a retrognathic (P ≤ 0.001), smaller (P ≤ 0.006) and with an increased posterior inclination of the maxilla (P < 0.001), as well as a retrognathic mandible (P ≤ 0.006).

CONCLUSION

The craniofacial morphology at 10 and 16 years of age in patients born with an ICP and treated with the minimal incision technique differs compared to the morphology of a normal control group born without a cleft. Retrognathic maxillas and a smaller and posteriorly inclined maxilla were found in the treated group.

Growth and Development of Craniofacial Structures in Patients at Different Ages With Unrepaired Submucous Cleft Palate

PURPOSE

Submucous cleft palate (SMCP) is a particular subtype of cleft palate deformity; research related to the craniofacial features of patients with SMCP is comparatively rare. The study objective was to perform a cephalometric comparison of the craniofacial features of patients with SMCP and non-cleft controls at different ages.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The sample in this cross-sectional study was composed of 2 groups: SMCP patients and non-cleft controls. The primary predictor variables were study group (cleft and non-cleft) and age. Age was divided into 3 groups. The outcome variables of interest were craniofacial measurements. The measurements used reflect cranial length, cranial angle, maxillary sagittal length and protrusion, maxillary vertical height, pharyngeal depth, facial height, mandibular length and protrusion, mandibular plane angle, and intermaxillary relation. Adjusted cephalometric craniofacial measurements between the groups were compared in 3 age groups using generalized linear models after being adjusted for age and gender.

RESULTS

The study included 60 SMCP patients and 60 non-cleft controls. SMCP patients and non-cleft controls were divided into 3 subgroups: those aged 5 to 7 years, those aged 9 to 11 years, and those aged 18 to 30 years. Patients with SMCP at age 5 to 7 years showed a shortened cranial base length, maxillary sagittal length and height, and bony pharynx depth. Patients with SMCP at age 9 to 11 years showed a smaller maxillary sagittal length and bony pharynx depth and an inharmonious jaw relationship. Patients with SMCP at age 18 to 30 years showed a smaller maxillary sagittal length and height and an inharmonious jaw relationship.

CONCLUSIONS

SMCP is associated with progressive maxillary retrognathism and reduced profile convexity from childhood to adulthood.

Analysis of the Relationship Between Micrognathia and Cleft Palate: A Systematic Review

Objective To gather data from relevant experimental and observational studies to determine the relationship between micrognathia and cleft palate. The goal is to raise awareness and motivate clinicians to consider the cause and effect relationship when confronted with patients with cleft palate, even if there is no clearly noticeable mandibular abnormality. Design Several electronic databases were systematically examined to find articles for this review, using search terms including "cleft palate," "micrognathia," "tongue," and "airway obstruction." PubMed was the source of all the articles chosen to be included. Exclusion criteria included case reports, articles focused on treatment options, and articles only tangentially related to cleft palate and/or micrognathia. Results A total of 930 articles were screened for relevance, and 82 articles were chosen for further analysis. Evidence gathered in this review includes a variety of etiological factors that are causative or associated with both micrognathia and cleft palate. Observational studies relating the two abnormalities are also included. Much of the included literature recognizes a cause-and-effect relationship between micrognathia and cleft palate. Conclusion On the basis of the published data, we suggest that micrognathia does induce cleft palate in humans and animals. With knowledge of this causative relationship, clinicians should consider the importance of gathering cephalometric data on the mandibles and tongues of patients presenting with isolated cleft palate to determine whether they have micrognathia as well. With more data, patterns may emerge that could give insight into the complex etiology of nonsyndromic cleft palate.

Bony defect of palate and vomer in submucous cleft palate patients

The aim of this study was to visualize bony defects of the palate and vomer in submucous cleft palate patients (SMCP) by three-dimensional (3D) computed tomography (CT) reconstruction and to classify the range of bony defects. Forty-eight consecutive non-operated SMCP patients were included. Diagnosis was based on the presence of at least one of three classical signs of SMCP: bifid uvula, a translucent zone in the midline of the soft palate, and a palpable 'V' notch on the posterior border of the bony palate. Patients were imaged using spiral CT. 3D reconstruction models were created of the palate and vomer. The sagittal extent of the bony cleft in SMCP was classified into four types: type I, no V-shaped hard palate cleft (8.3%); type II, cleft involving the partial palate (43.8%); type III, cleft involving the complete palate and extending to the incisive foramen (43.8%); type IV, cleft involving the complete palate and the alveolar bone (4.2%). The extent of the vomer defect was classified into three types: type A, vomer completely fused with the palate (8.3%); type B, vomer partially fused with the palate (43.8%); type C, vomer not fused with the palate up to the incisive foramen (47.9%). Significant variability in hard palate defects in SMCP is the rule rather than the exception. The association of velopharyngeal insufficiency with anatomical malformations may be complex.

Relationship between palate-vomer development and maxillary growth in submucous cleft palate patients

Objective : Experimental and clinical findings suggest that the vomer is involved in facial development and might contribute to the short and retrusive maxilla in cleft patients. The aim of this study was to investigate the relationship between vomer development and maxillary growth in unoperated submucous cleft palate (SMCP) patients. Design : Retrospective cohort study. Participants : Thirty unoperated SMCP patients were included. The criteria for clinical diagnosis were: bifid uvula, a translucent zone in the midline of the soft palate, and a touchable "V" notch on the posterior border of the bony palate. There were 19 female and 11 male patients, with an age range from 3 to 25 years. Interventions : All patients were imaged using spiral computed tomography (CT) while in centric occlusion before the surgeries. Main Outcome Measures : Three-dimensional (3D) reconstruction models were created, and dentoalveolar relationships were rated by three experienced doctors according to the GOSLON score principles. The patients then were divided into three groups: 1 - normal occlusion, 2 - edge-to-edge bite, and 3 - crossbite. The vomer-palate fusion rate was calculated on 3D CT images and represented the vomer development. Results : The sagittal extent of the palatal cleft and the malformation of vomer in SMCP were greatly varied. The vomer-palate fusion rate in the crossbite group (occlusal score = 3) was significantly lower than that in the normal occlusion group (P = .027). Conclusions : Our findings suggest that correlation exists between vomer development and sagittal maxillary growth in unoperated SMCP patients.